Israel's Supreme Court rules that decision to sack Shin Bet chief was illegal, Israeli media report
CAIRO, May 21 (Reuters) - Israel's Supreme Court ruled that a government decision to sack the head of the domestic intelligence service Shin Bet was "illegal and contrary to law", Israeli media reported on Wednesday.
In March, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to sack Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, a move that sparked protests nationwide, with critics arguing that the government was undermining key state institutions and endangering the foundations of Israeli democracy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
27 minutes ago
- The National
Gaza aid chief: 'Israel herding Palestinians into concentration camps'
Amjad Al-Shawa, the head of the Palestinian Network of NGOs, said that Israel was trying to lure Gazans in the north to the south of the territory with its 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' – then imprison them. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is an American organisation which has been at the centre of an international scandal where Palestinians trying to reach food at its sites have been shot at and killed. It is backed by both the US and Israeli governments as a way of getting around the United Nations as the main distributor of food in the territory – and has been condemned by a number of humanitarian organisations, including Christian Aid and Amnesty International. Speaking from Gaza via a video link to a press conference in London on Thursday, said that Israel planned to 'starve' Palestinians in the north in a bid to move them to the south, consistent with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's (below) plans to colonise the region. He said: 'They starve Palestinians under the famine they went to catch up some aid which was distributed in these military sites, mainly in Rafah, south of Netzarim, they were shot and killed' Al-Shawa added: 'This mechanism is to serve the Israeli plan, to force displacement for the Palestinians from Gaza's north – and this was clearly declared by Netanyahu himself. READ MORE: BBC issues statement after staff 'held at gunpoint and strip searched ' by IDF 'The first step of that is displacement and the second to have concentration camps on the south for the Palestinians under the security measures of the Israeli occupation forces.' The Gazan humanitarian worker hit out at Israel for replacing a 'humanitarian structure' with 'military companies'. The GHF announced on Thursday it would reopen two distribution centres – despite the Israeli military previously declaring that the routes leading to them were 'considered combat zones'. An open letter signed by 11 charities in May called the GHF a 'sham', while UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher described it as a 'cynical sideshow'. The letter, published before people were killed trying to access GHF centres, said: 'Despite branding itself as 'independent' and 'transparent', the GHF would be wholly dependent on Israeli coordination and operates via Israeli-controlled entry points, primarily the Port of Ashdod and the Kerem Shalom/Karem Abu Salem crossing. 'This entrenches and legitimises the very structures of control that are responsible for cutting Gaza off from food, fuel, and medicine.' Amnesty International has accused the organisation of 'inhumane and politically motivated methods of aid delivery'. The US and Israeli governments were approached for comment.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Israeli Finance Minister says banks should not obey EU sanctions on settlers
JERUSALEM, June 5 (Reuters) - Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Thursday condemned the country's banks that have refused to provide services to Israeli settlers sanctioned by the European Union and warned they may have to pay compensation to them. The EU last year imposed sanctions on five Israeli settlers for violence against Palestinians and Smotrich said there were reports of sanctions being considered against other settlers. But in a letter to the banking supervisor, he said Israeli banks should not follow a "zero risk" policy since it leads to the abandonment of Israeli clients "under the guise of compliance with foreign sanctions." In a statement quoting his letter to the regulator, Smotrich called on banks to use their legal, economic, and international strength to fight "unjust sanctions". "The banks' enormous profits enable them to take measured risks on behalf of their clients — especially when it comes to a national moral injustice," Smotrich, who leads the far-right Religious Zionism party, said. Should banks continue to comply with sanctions and harm clients, Smotrich said he intended to promote immediate legislation that would require banks to pay substantial compensation to affected customers. He also intends to require the Bank of Israel itself to offer banking services to citizens targeted by sanctions. Responding to the letter, the Bank of Israel said that while banks must comply with international sanctions to avoid an array of risks, a draft directive it published on Thursday aimed to ensure appropriate banking services were available for the affected customers. "Circumventing foreign sanctions regimes through the Israeli banking system exposes banking corporations to multiple risks, including compliance risks, anti-money laundering and counter-terror financing risks, legal risks, and reputational risks," the central bank said. But it said it has taken steps to comply with sanctions "without banks resorting to blanket refusals to serve such customers." While the sanctions in question concern Israeli settlers, the EU is reviewing its broad pact governing its political and economic ties with Israel in the face of mounting international pressure on Israel amid complaints about the lack of humanitarian aid reaching Gaza in the wake of the war triggered by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attack.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Airlines left with fewer flight routes as global conflict zones expand
Airlines are facing increased operational and financial burdens due to the rise in global conflict zones, including threats from missiles and airspace closures. Airspace closures around Russia, Ukraine, the Middle East, and parts of Africa are forcing airlines into expensive, last-minute re-routings. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict and drone activity near Russian airports have led to commercial flights sharing airspace with potential hazards, raising safety concerns. The downing of an Azerbaijan Airlines flight in Kazakhstan and a cargo plane in Sudan highlights the worst-case scenario of aircraft being hit by weaponry, prompting calls for better information sharing between governments. IATA emphasises the need for urgent global coordination to address conflict zone risks, as airlines navigate a patchwork of government notices and security advice, with flight crews retaining the right to refuse flights over unsafe airspace.
