EVs in the spotlight as China claims a leading global role at Shanghai's auto show
SHANGHAI (AP) — Leading automakers will be showcasing their latest designed-for-China models at the Shanghai auto show this week, struggling not to be edged aside in the world's largest car market while watching for U.S. President Donald Trump's next steps in his trade war.
Some industry experts view this year's show in the sprawling industrial outskirts of Shanghai as a tipping point. Three decades after Beijing set out to build a world-class auto industry, local manufacturers account for about two-thirds of sales inside China, and a growing share of global exports.
The exhibition opens to the public on Thursday and runs until May 2.
Electrics gaining ground
Encouraged by government subsidies for scrapping older cars for the latest models, Chinese drivers have embraced the switch to electrics, with sales of battery powered and hybrid vehicles jumping 40% last year.
A total of 31.4 million vehicles including buses and trucks were sold last year in the world's biggest market by sales, up 4.5% compared to a year earlier, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers reported.
Growth in sales of EVs was offset by falling sales of traditional gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles, which still accounted for just over half of new car sales.
Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD nudged past Tesla as the world's biggest maker of EVs by sales last year, reporting revenue of over $100 billion. It recently announced an ultra fast EV charging system that it says can provide a full charge for its latest EVs within five to eight minutes, about the time needed to fill up at the pump. It plans to build more than 4,000 of the new charging stations across China.
Survival of the fittest
To gain access to China's potentially huge market, foreign automakers like Volkswagen, General Motors, BMW and Ford set up joint ventures with state-owned local companies beginning in the 1980s and 90s, helping them build the capacity and technology to compete on a world scale.
They also created sprawling supply chains in Shanghai and other major manufacturing hubs, helping to nurture other big names in Chinese automaking, such as BYD, Geely and Great Wall Motors.
Facing brutal competition at home, Chinese automakers are expanding rapidly into many world markets, winning market share with relatively affordable sedans, SUVs and pickup trucks.
Shanghai's auto show is a gathering for the 'survival of the fittest,' Zhou Lijun, director and chief researcher of the industry analysis group Yiche Research Institute, said. It's also a turning point in that local automakers have switched from a supporting role to being the real protagonists on the world stage, he said.
That doesn't mean all the EV makers go it alone. BYD teamed up with Daimler, now the Mercedes-Benz Group, to launch its Denza premium brand, featured on billboards in Southeast Asian capitals like Bangkok.
Tariffs and other challenges
Opening markets wider to foreign competition has given car buyers a choice of more affordable, innovative vehicles. But that has been a mixed blessing for older automakers like GM, Ford, Toyota and VW that now face fiercer competition both at home and abroad.
Trump doubled down on tariffs on Chinese goods, raising them to up to 145%. His recent announcement of a 90-day pause temporarily spared many other countries including Japan from 24% across-the-board tariffs. But a 10% baseline tariff and a 25% tax on imported cars, auto parts, steel and aluminum exports remains in place.
Higher U.S. and European tariffs on foreign-made EVs are prompting Chinese newcomers to shift production closer to those markets as more Western consumers opt for the latest Chinese models.
Not that long ago, Japanese automakers were doing the same, as they fought trade friction with the United States over their own exports. Now, Toyota, Honda and Nissan employ hundreds of thousands of U.S. workers at their U.S. factories.
'The trade war between China and the United States has blocked direct exports from China to the United States, but it hasn't blocked local production there or the establishment of global production bases in Europe or elsewhere," Zhou said.
But as Trump's 25% tariffs on foreign-made vehicles shows, other factors may slow that expansion.
A report by the Rhodium Group shows that nearly half the world's markets are restricting imports from China, in part because of national security concerns linked to the advanced electronics in EVs and other high-tech vehicles. About 12% of the global market is relatively open, including countries like Australia and South Africa, and Russia is a major market but is nearly saturated, it says.
The road ahead
Chinese automakers lag behind global leaders like Toyota in conventional gasoline and diesel fueled vehicles, but they can sell EVs at roughly the same price, while also solving the problems of range and fast charging.
China has become part of what geopolitical analyst Yanmei Xie described, in a commentary in the Japanese financial publication Nikkei Asia, as a 'technological paradigm shift.' Automakers in China are going electric not just because of the green transition, but as a route to 'technological and industrial dominance,' she wrote.
EV makers in China have benefited from not having huge legacy operations that have to make the transition, Stefan Sielaff, vice president of global design for EV maker Zeekr Group, part of Geely's stable of brands. Founded in 2021, it's selling cars in more than 80 markets including in Europe.
'Therefore they can immediately react to market demand, to customer demand, and can deliver very, very fast,' he said. "We have done most of these cars in two years. From 0 to 100 in two years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Grim Reality of the Conflict in Iran
A damaged residential building in Tehran, Iran, on June 13, 2025. Credit - Middle East Images—AFP/Getty In the early hours of Friday morning, Israel launched a sweeping military campaign against Iran. The ongoing operation, which was reportedly planned to unfold over several days, is targeting a list of nuclear and military facilities, as well as senior regime officials, that grows longer by the hour. Iran has thus far retaliated with drones and a substantial missile barrage that could see Israel expand its targeting further still. In a region that has seen endless bloodshed since Hamas's October 2023 attacks, the grim reality is that things may get much worse before they get even worse. Under the Islamic Republic that took power in 1979, enmity toward Israel has been a core ideological tenet of Iranian foreign policy and a key driver in its regional policy. Over decades, their rivalry played out mainly through indirect actions by Iran and by covert operations from Israel. That dynamic changed last year. In April and again in October, the two sides engaged in direct hostilities, with Iran twice launching massive missile salvoes largely repelled by Israeli and allied air defenses. After the second strike, which came shortly after Israel severely degraded the upper ranks of Hizbollah in Lebanon—the most powerful of Iran's proxies—Israel targeted Iranian air defences and missile production facilities, facing little resistance or response. But while Iran's regional power projection was diminishing and its arsenal of missiles and drones twice proved largely ineffective, a third concern—a nuclear threat which Israel considered existential—was still growing. Tehran had been steadily expanding the scale and scope of its nuclear activity ever since President Donald Trump withdrew from the Iran Nuclear Deal during his first term; President Joe Biden's Administration sought and failed to revive it. In March, Trump announced that he had reached out to Iran's leadership to negotiate a new deal, and his administration conducted five rounds of talks in Muscat and Rome in attempts to reach one. For Iran, which sought sanctions relief for its embattled economy, the success of negotiations with the U.S. hinged on concessions it has long opposed: Dismantling its nuclear program altogether or even ceasing the domestic enrichment of uranium. For Israel, eliminating, rather than merely restricting, the production of fissile material that could be used to fuel a weapon has been paramount. For President Trump, the prospect of a military strike by Israel seems a means of strengthening Washington's hand in a diplomatic agreement in which he still remains interested. But at the moment, the question may be less a matter of whether diplomacy can succeed than how grievously the situation could escalate. The worst-case scenarios are dire: A cycle of Israeli and Iranian counterstrikes that draw in the U.S., Iran's non-state allies, and regional states, cause grievous harm to civilians on all sides, and inject profound uncertainty into global markets. Over time, Iran's regime could attempt to reconstitute its nuclear activity from the rubble, only with an explicit aim of fashioning a weapon in the shortest possible time as a means of deterrence in the future. Another disastrous scenario is that the regime in Tehran falls and there is a protracted war for power and chaos or an even harder line regime armed with nuclear weapons. Is there a path out of this deepening crisis? Perhaps, though not a particularly promising one. Trump's stated objective—even as the fire is exchanged in two directions—remains a deal with Iran, and Tehran could offer concessions on the stipulation that it also involve an immediate cessation of hostilities with Israel. Were Iran to concede on its red lines in an effort to stave off greater destruction, perhaps Trump would be keen enough to avert a widening conflagration to also press Israel into ending the escalation cycle as well. Iran's government has previously demonstrated that when facing particularly inauspicious circumstances, especially those that might threaten the very foundations of the regime itself, it can make concessions necessary for its survival. But facing perhaps the gravest crisis it has faced since the eight-year-long war with Iraq in the 1980s, it may end up doubling down to the detriment of its people and the region. Contact us at letters@
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
The Grim Reality of the Conflict Between Iran and Israel
In the early hours of Friday morning, Israel launched a sweeping military campaign against Iran. The ongoing operation, which was reportedly planned to unfold over several days, is targeting a list of nuclear and military facilities, as well as senior regime officials, that grows longer by the hour. Iran has thus far retaliated with drones and a substantial missile barrage that could see Israel expand its targeting further still. In a region that has seen endless bloodshed since Hamas's October 2023 attacks, the grim reality is that things may get much worse before they get even worse. Under the Islamic Republic that took power in 1979, enmity toward Israel has been a core ideological tenet of Iranian foreign policy and a key driver in its regional policy. Over decades, their rivalry played out mainly through indirect actions by Iran and by covert operations from Israel. That dynamic changed last year. In April and again in October, the two sides engaged in direct hostilities, with Iran twice launching massive missile salvoes largely repelled by Israeli and allied air defenses. After the second strike, which came shortly after Israel severely degraded the upper ranks of Hizbollah in Lebanon—the most powerful of Iran's proxies—Israel targeted Iranian air defences and missile production facilities, facing little resistance or response. But while Iran's regional power projection was diminishing and its arsenal of missiles and drones twice proved largely ineffective, a third concern—a nuclear threat which Israel considered existential—was still growing. Tehran had been steadily expanding the scale and scope of its nuclear activity ever since President Donald Trump withdrew from the Iran Nuclear Deal during his first term; President Joe Biden's Administration sought and failed to revive it. In March, Trump announced that he had reached out to Iran's leadership to negotiate a new deal, and his administration conducted five rounds of talks in Muscat and Rome in attempts to reach one. For Iran, which sought sanctions relief for its embattled economy, the success of negotiations with the U.S. hinged on concessions it has long opposed: Dismantling its nuclear program altogether or even ceasing the domestic enrichment of uranium. For Israel, eliminating, rather than merely restricting, the production of fissile material that could be used to fuel a weapon has been paramount. For President Trump, the prospect of a military strike by Israel seems a means of strengthening Washington's hand in a diplomatic agreement in which he still remains interested. But at the moment, the question may be less a matter of whether diplomacy can succeed than how grievously the situation could escalate. The worst-case scenarios are dire: A cycle of Israeli and Iranian counterstrikes that draw in the U.S., Iran's non-state allies, and regional states, cause grievous harm to civilians on all sides, and inject profound uncertainty into global markets. Over time, Iran's regime could attempt to reconstitute its nuclear activity from the rubble, only with an explicit aim of fashioning a weapon in the shortest possible time as a means of deterrence in the future. Another disastrous scenario is that the regime in Tehran falls and there is a protracted war for power and chaos or an even harder line regime armed with nuclear weapons. Is there a path out of this deepening crisis? Perhaps, though not a particularly promising one. Trump's stated objective—even as the fire is exchanged in two directions—remains a deal with Iran, and Tehran could offer concessions on the stipulation that it also involve an immediate cessation of hostilities with Israel. Were Iran to concede on its red lines in an effort to stave off greater destruction, perhaps Trump would be keen enough to avert a widening conflagration to also press Israel into ending the escalation cycle as well. Iran's government has previously demonstrated that when facing particularly inauspicious circumstances, especially those that might threaten the very foundations of the regime itself, it can make concessions necessary for its survival. But facing perhaps the gravest crisis it has faced since the eight-year-long war with Iraq in the 1980s, it may end up doubling down to the detriment of its people and the region.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Cuomo campaign aide who worked for companies tied to Chinese Communist Party quits after Post queries
A mayoral campaign aide to Andrew Cuomo resigned after The Post questioned the years he spent working for companies tied to the Chinese Communist Party and his meteoric rise through the Democratic Party, which alarmed local politicos and national security experts alike. Dr. Lining 'Larry' He stepped down from his role as Cuomo's Asian outreach director Friday, a week after The Post reached out to him and the Cuomo campaign about his extensive business ties to his native China. He had served as an executive for a powerful state-owned conglomerate that has CCP cells embedded in its corporate hierarchy, records and news reports obtained by The Post showed. These links, along with his association with a NYC political operative with known Beijing ties, worried experts who study the CCP's international influence efforts, which China calls the 'United Front.' 'His position as an Asian community liaison fits with a tactical pattern that such actors are using to gain political legitimacy and influence,' said Dr. Audrye Wong, a fellow with the American Enterprise Institute and United Front expert. He's links to Beijing include: As director of asset management of the state-owned Guangxi Beibu Gulf Investment, He pushed both California and Australia for deeper economic ties with China. He served from 2013 through 2015 as the former board chairman of Guangxi Beitou Petrochemical Company, a joint venture with state-owned Chinese oil giant Sinopec, according to a bio on the website of a commodity trading firm where He was a managing partner. The company's current corporate organization chart shows it has an official Chinese Communist Party cell embedded in its leadership. A regulatory consulting firm called Penshare-Banyu Technology, based in Chongqing, listed He as a partner. After The Post reached out to He, Penshare-Banyu deleted his picture and profile from its webpage, though it remains visible on Google. He owns import business InterStellar Enterprise, which ships plastic bottles into the U.S. from a manufacturer based in Shenzhen. His wife, Jing Lei, formed a new company weeks after the couple moved to Brooklyn that import manifests show brought in roughly 8.5 tons of plastic bottles from China in May alone. 4 He denied any ties to the Chinese Communist Party. 'I've never been an asset beholden to the Chinese government,' He told The Post. Kings County Democratic County Committee/ X The Post found He, 48, did not disclose any of these business relationships on mandatory filings he made as chief-of-staff to Assemblyman William Colton (D-Brooklyn), a job he started in late 2023 while living in upstate New York. The Cuomo campaign did not answer what sort of vetting process He underwent for the liaison job, and admitted He failed to properly disclose his business dealings to the Assembly, sending images of what it said were corrected filings in response to The Post's questions. 'Larry is a district leader and a known quantity in the community who does his job well,' said Cuomo spokeswoman Esther Jenson, who said any links to the CCP amounted to 'guilt by association.' He vehemently denied to The Post any involvement with the United Front or the CCP. 'I've never been an asset beholden to the Chinese government and oppose any and all foreign government influence in our political process,' He told The Post. 'Becoming an American citizen remains one of the highest honors of my life. The fact the CCP has been trying to assert itself is undeniable and something our community always looks out for.' He acknowledged his relationships with the various Chinese state entities, but said he left the jobs in 2015 because he disliked the 'bureaucratic' work and moved back to the U.S., where he had gotten his doctorate in the 2000s and where his wife and son lived. And He denied Australian news reports that he repeatedly visited the country to push import deals, and insisted he had only done 'startup training' at the Chongqing-based Penshare-Banyu, despite being listed on its site as a partner in the firm. 4 Andrew Cuomo's campaign praised He. POOL/AFP via Getty Images In October 2024, He was photographed attending an October celebration of the 75th anniversary of the birth of the People's Republic of China, alongside Brooklyn activist John Chan — who Wong has identified as the big wheel in the CCP's New York machine. Chan, 70, a one-time gangster who pleaded guilty to trafficking heroin and human trafficking, has participated in CCP events in the United States and China and publicly battled American policies supportive of the freedom of Hong Kong and the persecuted Uyghur ethnic minority. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs listed his activism on a webpage titled 'Activities of Overseas Chinese Affairs and Chinese-Funded Institutions,' according to the Washington Post. Critics have accused Chan and his operatives of trying to oust anti-Beijing members of the New York State Assembly, and have warned of pro-CCP agents working to infiltrate local Chinese community events. Chan has never faced formal allegations of spying but the FBI questioned him ahead of his trip to a CCP event on the mainland last year, according to the National Review, though no details of this interview have emerged. Chan did not respond to multiple requests for comment. He admitted that he knew Chan from community events, but denied having any formal relationship with him. Wong acknowledged that these connections, like He's business ties, do not prove he works for Beijing — but mark him as a figure with definite 'political connections,' and likely a strong understanding of the CCP's aims and interests. 'Someone with his background who is active in local politics or American politics, that is something politicians like Cuomo should be aware of and should be mindful of,' Wong said of He. 4 Larry He and John Chan were photographed at this rally for district leaders in the 49th Assembly District. Obtained by the New York Post After moving permanently to the U.S. from China in 2016, He bought a $317,790 five-bedroom home the Syracuse suburbs with his wife, a longtime professor at the local state university, records show. He formed his import firm there in 2018, and held the role of managing partner at OneStream Capital, which is headquartered in the town where he lived and was founded by a veteran of the Beijing-controlled China Venturetech Investment Corporation. He took his job with Colton in December 2023, and told The Post he moved to Brooklyn for the gig, even though he kept his upstate home. It wasn't until November 2024 that He registered to vote in New York City, listing a rented condo on Bay Parkway in Bensonhurst as his residence and attesting on the form that he had never cast a ballot in his life. He said the registration coincided with him becoming a citizen. Barely a month after becoming a New York City voter, the Kings County Democratic Party — led by Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn — appointed He as a district leader. Just days after the appointment, He and his wife bought their own $830,000 condo on Kings Highway. In March, He was named to Cuomo's campaign — stunning community stalwarts. 'I have experience in the Brooklyn community for 20 years, and I have no idea where he comes from,' said one Chinese-American activist, who works with immigrants in Bensonhurst and Sunset Park, and who requested anonymity out of fear of reprisals. 'When I asked for more information about this person, it's a mystery. Nobody knows where he comes from.' Cuomo and other local pols have been a target of alleged CCP influence operations in the past, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. In September, federal prosecutors accused Linda Sun, who served as a Queens community liaison to Cuomo and Gov. Kathy Hochul in Albany, of working as an unregistered foreign agent for Beijing. Cuomo's team has told The Post Sun had minimal access to the then-governor. Last summer, the feds arrested two accused Chinese agents who allegedly worked to subvert Taiwan-born pastor and freedom activist Xiong Yan's bid for a New York congressional seat. In February 2024, the FBI raided the home of Winnie Greco, a longtime ally to John Chan and an aide to Mayor Eric Adams. These are all reasons Cuomo should be more cautious vetting his staff, said Yaqiu Wang, a veteran human rights researcher who has studied the United Front and the CCP's transnational influence operations. 4 Chan has participated in CCP events in the United States and China. NYP 'At this point, it's hardly surprising that individuals with close ties to the Chinese Communist Party are working for politicians in New York,' said Wang. 'Allowing CCP-affiliated individuals and entities to influence American electoral politics isn't just a national security threat—it's a human rights issue. New York has long been a refuge for people fleeing repression in China: pro-democracy activists, Tibetans, Uyghurs, and others who came seeking a place where they could speak freely,' she added.
