Romania & Poland halt hard-right breakthroughs
BUCHAREST: Presidential elections on Sunday in Romania and Poland - the two most populous countries on Europe's formerly communist eastern fringe - halted, or at least slowed, a hard-right breakthrough that many liberals had feared.
In Romania, a centrist mayor who campaigned as an independent untainted by close ties to two long-dominant mainstream parties - widely viewed as corrupt - defeated another outsider, a hard-line nationalist who aligned himself with US President Trump and had been seen as the front-runner.
Nicusor Dan, the mayor of Romania's capital, Bucharest, won a decisive victory over George Simion in a runoff for Romania's presidency, confounding expectations of a sharp turn to the right.
He won 54% of the vote, boosted by an unusually high turnout of 64%. That turnout was nearly 10% more than in the first round, in which Simion trounced Dan and nine other candidates.
The result Sunday delighted mainstream political leaders across Europe and also the EU's executive arm in Brussels, whose president, Ursula von der Leyen, congratulated voters for having "chosen the promise of an open, prosperous Romania in a strong Europe."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here]
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
Simion, who Sunday responded to early results that showed him losing with cries of fraud and Trump-like vows to "stop the steal," curbed his fury early Monday, conceding defeat and dropping complaints of irregularities in a video address. "We may have lost a battle, but we will certainly not lose the war," he said on the social platform X. "We will continue our fight for freedom and our great values along with other patriots, sovereigntists and conservatives all over the world.
"
Poland delivered a far less emphatic rebuff to EU-skeptic nationalism, with hard-right candidates taking second, third and fourth places in the first round of presidential race.
Rafal Trzaskowski
, the liberal mayor of Warsaw, Poland, and an ally of PM Donald Tusk, still came in first. That secured him a slot in a runoff June 1 against the second-place finisher, Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist historian backed by Poland's previous governing party, Law and Justice. But the margin of his victory - 31.3% of the vote to Nawrocki's 29.5%, according to the official count - was so small and support for hard-right candidates so strong that a repeat win for Trzaskowski in the runoff is far from certain.
Like Simion in Romania, Nawrocki positioned himself during the campaign as part of an unstoppable global movement, visiting Washington in early May for a meeting in the White House with Trump, who gave him a thumbs-up.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
26 minutes ago
- The Wire
Post-Degree Jobs Won't be Available Any More in the US, But It is Still the Best Option
Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now India sends students to the US in record numbers, but this academic year, applicants are feeling anxious before they head out. The changing policies of the Trump administration is likely to cause delays and tougher immigration questioning, among other things. Moreover, it is likely that the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme, which allows F-1 visa holding students to work for a year or more, will be modified if not terminated. That was one of the great attractions for foreign students in the US. So is it still worth going to the US to study? 'Absolutely' says Viral Doshi, who has advised Indian students heading to the US for the last 20 years. 'No other country can match up to the US,' he says, in sheer number of colleges, in the kinds of courses it offers and in the experiences one can have. He acknowledges that parents have anxieties but 'I tell them, have patience,', he says in a podcast discussion with Sidharth Bhatia. 'Almost 50 percent students have already got visas and others will too, maybe a few weeks late for the first semester.' He says universities depend foreign students and are saying they will allow students to come late.' 'America is not the same as it was some years ago. Things have changed. 'No more internships and no more jobs or work experience'. And most important, he adds, 'Avoid political activism.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mossad's masterstroke? Israeli spies may have used Ukraine's SBU playbook to shatter Iran's missile shield
Israel's attack across Iran on Friday was launched to strike its nuclear and missile programs under " Operation Rising Lion ", which took years of planning, including building a drone base inside Iran and smuggling precision weapons systems and commandos into the country, as per reports. Inside Operation Rising Lion An Israeli security source revealed to Ynet News that Israel's attack on Iran was a joint effort by the IDF, Mossad and Israel's defence industries, as per Ynet News. "Operation Rising Lion" was accomplished with the help of a cooperation between Mossad and the military's Intelligence Directorate, which prepared detailed intelligence files for the precision strikes to attack crucial figures in Iran's security establishment and nuclear program, according to the report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pho Moi: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo Israel's Three-Phase Attack Strategy Along with these efforts, a parallel covert campaign was planned to target Iran's strategic missile arsenal and its air defence systems, and the operation, which had been planned for a long time, unfolded along three principal axes, reported Ynet News. The official told Ynet News that Mossad commando units had already placed high-precision guided weapons in open areas near Iran's surface-to-air missile batteries, as per the report. So, when the air campaign began, those weapons which were deployed were remotely activated and struck their targets simultaneously with exceptional accuracy, reported Ynet News. Live Events The second phase started with advanced strike systems being launched from hidden vehicles, which were smuggled into Iran, disabled the air defence sites and cleared the way for Israeli fighter jets to operate freely, as per the report. For the third phase, a drone base had been set up near Tehran by Mossad agents before the operation, and then explosive-laden drones were launched overnight toward surface-to-surface missile launchers at the Asfajaabad base, which was one of the most threatening sites to Israel, reported Ynet News. The security official told The Times of Israel that the operations depended on 'groundbreaking thinking, bold planning and surgical operation of advanced technologies, special forces and agents operating in the heart of Iran while totally evading the eyes of local intelligence,' as quoted in the report. FAQs How did Mossad operate inside Iran? Mossad agents allegedly smuggled weapons, set up a drone base near Tehran, and deployed commando units who placed guided munitions near Iranian missile defence sites. What was hit in the first phase? High-precision guided weapons, hidden in advance by Mossad, were remotely activated to strike surface-to-air missile batteries, clearing Iran's defensive shield.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Trump's America is driving away the brightest minds in the world
In a recent call, I spoke with a student from Mumbai who had just been denied a US student visa — despite an Ivy League admit, full funding, and a spotless academic record. The reason? 'Potential immigration intent.' No explanation. No second chance. Unfortunately, this isn't an isolated case — it's the new normal. As someone who has spent nearly two decades helping students around the world access top-tier education , I'm witnessing a dangerous shift: America, once the epicenter of academic opportunity, is now sending a different message - you're not welcome here. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga) Cari Sekarang Undo Columbia & Harvard : The campus crackdown (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Late 2024 saw student-led protests erupt at Columbia University , calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and institutional divestment from Israeli-linked companies. These demonstrations sparked national outrage particularly among conservative lawmakers and pro-Israel groups who accused the university of allowing 'anti-Semitic hate speech' to flourish. Live Events In early 2025, the Trump administration responded with a formal investigation, citing potential Title VI violations for failing to protect Jewish students. Education Secretary Linda McMahon even threatened to strip Columbia of its federal funding and accreditation: a move seen by many legal experts as political overreach aimed at silencing campus dissent. Harvard didn't fare any better. After student groups released a statement criticizing Israeli policy, the university found itself under federal scrutiny. Trump officials questioned not just free speech on campus, but also Harvard's DEI programs and alleged 'left-wing indoctrination.' Civil rights lawsuits are being considered. Anti-terrorism statutes are being explored. The message is clear: campuses are being punished not for lawbreaking, but for ideological divergence. Visas: A bureaucratic wall Meanwhile, outside these campuses, international students are struggling just to get in. According to the 2025 INTO Global Survey, 28% of South Asian students, including many from India, cited visa processing delays as their top challenge. In major cities like New Delhi and Mumbai, wait times stretch 180 to 300 days, causing students to miss orientations, housing deadlines, and even entire semesters. Despite advocacy from leading bodies like NAFSA and the American Council on Education, the US government has yet to reinstate the COVID-era interview waiver program. Consular staffing remains unchanged, even as Indian students now make up the second-largest international student population in the U.S. (over 270,000 in 2024). Add to this the alarming rise in F-1 visa rejection rates — 36% globally in 2023 — with disproportionately higher rejections in India, Nigeria, and the Middle East. Many denials are issued to students with admits from top-ranked universities, often under vague justifications like 'intent to immigrate.' This isn't due diligence. It's systemic gatekeeping. From your feed to your future In April 2025, the Trump administration added another layer of scrutiny: mandatory social media vetting for all F, M, and J visa applicants. Consular officers are now directed to examine five years of social media activity. Applicants have been penalized for: Sharing anti-war posts. Supporting campus protests. Liking or following pages critical of US foreign policy. There's no transparent rubric for these decisions. Legal experts warn this practice threatens free expression, especially when students are held accountable for content that would be constitutionally protected for American citizens. Revocations without recourse Perhaps most alarming is the surge in SEVIS deactivations and visa revocations. In early 2025 alone, over 1,300 international students — largely from China and the Middle East — had their valid US visas retroactively cancelled, often due to alleged links to institutions tied to the Chinese government. No appeal process. No compensation. Just abrupt exits and lost semesters. Indian students aren't yet targeted, but the anxiety is palpable. In an increasingly unstable geopolitical climate, one controversial post or political affiliation could be enough to unravel years of academic planning. What's at stake Top faculty at MIT have raised the alarm: 'We're training the best minds in the world only to lose them to other nations because they feel unwelcome or unsafe here.' They're right. Students are already choosing Canada, Australia, and Europe — countries rolling out fast-track visas, transparent policies, and public commitments to international education. America's loss is their gain. Universities are fighting back. Institutions are launching legal aid clinics, financial support for disrupted students, and workshops on rights and documentation. Advocacy groups are lobbying hard for transparency and reform. But time is running out. The US must decide whether it wants to remain the beacon of global education — or watch that light dim, student by student, dream by dream.
