Nigel Farage is voters' last choice to be PM - as he's branded 'political fraud'
In embarrassment for Nigel Farage, YouGov released a poll on his popularity ratings as he took to the stage to claim voters were behind him in a major press conference
Nigel Farage is voters' last choice to be Prime Minister - with Brits preferring Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch or Sir Ed Davey over the Reform UK leader.
In embarrassment for Mr Farage, YouGov released a poll on his popularity ratings as he took to the stage to claim voters were behind him in a major speech.
The Reform UK leader was branded a 'political fraud' by the TUC after announcing a series of headline-grabbing tax and welfare policies - funded through controversial cuts to climate change strategies and diversity programmes. And Labour accused him of making 'tens of billions of pounds of fantasy promises' like disgraced ex-Tory PM Liz Truss, who crashed the economy.
In his speech, Mr Farage claimed Mr Starmer's leadership was "dismal" and "uninspiring" yet 44% of the public backed the Labour leader to lead the country compared to 29% choosing Mr Farage when asked who would be the best PM out of the two.
The Reform UK leader also used his central London speech to fiercely attack the Tories, branding them 'completely irrelevant'. He said Kemi Badenoch was not having a 'particularly great time' - yet 29% of the public think she'd make the best PM versus 25% who backed Mr Farage.
Elsewhere, 41% of people said Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed would make the better PM compared to 27% who picked Mr Farage.
Asked about the poll results, Mr Farage said the UK did not have a 'presidential election' and he needed a 'team of people that look competent and capable of going into government'.
He said Reform UK's weakness was that it has never been in government and that newly-elected council leaders now needed to show the party is capable of governing. 'These boys and girls need to do a good job, and we'll be judged very much on that,' he added.
During a more than an hour-long press conference, Mr Farage set out a series of eye-catching plans including for Brits to avoid paying tax on any earnings up to £20,000 if he was elected. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the tax plan would cost between £50billion and £80billion. Currently workers pay the 20% basic rate of income tax on everything between £12,570 and £50,270, with higher rates applying after that.
The Reform UK leader also said he would introduce tax breaks for married couples to 'encourage people to have children' amid dwindling birth rates. It would reportedly exempt one spouse from paying tax on the first £25,000 of their income. The other would get the tax-free income of £20,000.
The former UKIP leader also attempted to outflank Labour by committing to scrapping the two-child benefit limit and fully reinstating the winter fuel payments. Mr Farage said he would fund the policies through 'big savings', including ditching the plan to reach net zero carbon emissions, end the use of asylum hotels and scrapping diversity, equality and inclusion schemes in the public sector.
He said Reform had set up its own 'DOGE unit' - inspired by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency in Donald Trump 's administration.
Elsewhere Mr Farage declined to commit to keeping the triple lock pensions guarantee.
TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said: ' Nigel Farage is a political fraud who'll jump on any bandwagon to chase headlines. He is full of empty promises, writing cheques he knows will never be cashed.
'Because when it really counts, Farage always sides with the rich and powerful against working people. And who bankrolls Farage? Hedge fund managers and speculators – the same people profiting from economic chaos. He pretends to be anti-establishment, but in reality he's as establishment as they come.'
Unison general secretary Christina McAnea warned the deep-rooted change the country needs 'won't happen overnight'. "It's easy to announce policies to appeal to voters, but far harder to work out how to fund them,' she said.
"The future for many families continues to look bleak. But voters should be wary of politicians promising the earth and trying to be all things to all people.'
She also pointed out that Mr Farage had voted against Labour's workers' rights reforms, adding: 'Reform has shown by its words and actions that the party's no friend of working people.'
Labour chair Ellie Reeves said: "There's nothing new about what Nigel Farage said today: the tens of billions of pounds of fantasy promises he made this morning are exactly how Liz Truss crashed the economy, devastating the finances of families across the country.
'Those families don't need to be told what the consequences would be of this nonsense. They live through it every month through the higher mortgages, higher rents, higher prices, and higher bills inflicted upon them by the last government.
'Labour is delivering security and renewal through our Plan for Change. NHS waiting lists are falling, the economy is growing, wages are rising faster than prices and we've had four interest rate cuts, along with three major trade deals that will put more money in working people's pockets. All Reform offer is a return to the chaos of Liz Truss."
::: YouGov surveyed 2,212 adults in Great Britain on May 18 and 19.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reform's non-stop psychodrama threatens to drive voters away
Nigel Farage was given just 10 minutes' warning before Zia Yusuf unleashed an earthquake that could shatter Reform UK's electoral fortunes. The party leader said that after a telephone conversation on Wednesday morning, he thought Mr Yusuf had 'had enough' of politics. But it was on Thursday evening that Reform's chairman resigned in the latest in a series of internal disputes that has begun to distract from the party's electoral success. As voters were trickling out of polling booths in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election in Scotland, where Reform's position looks strong, Mr Yusuf announced he no longer thought working for the party was a 'good use of his time'. The barely veiled implication was that he does not believe Mr Farage should be prime minister – a stunning admission from a man who has made putting Reform in Downing Street his single goal since the days after last year's general election. Mr Yusuf, a successful entrepreneur and millionaire, was hired to professionalise the party's candidate selection, fundraising and day-to-day operations. Under his leadership, Reform has moved into a plush new Westminster headquarters, won a parliamentary by-election and majorities on 10 English councils, and placed itself in the crosshairs of Sir Keir Starmer. There was also an almighty row with Rupert Lowe, one of the five MPs Reform voted in at the 2024 election, who fell out with Mr Yusuf and was reported to the parliamentary authorities and police for bullying, which he denies. Mr Farage backed his chairman and suspended the whip from Mr Lowe in March, and both sides have since sued each other. It proved a bitter row, but one that Mr Yusuf survived. As recently as Monday, Mr Farage told The Telegraph that while the 38-year-old businessman was 'new to the game', he would 'be around for many, many years to come', and would play a 'significant role in shaping the future of the country'. The fact that he resigned four days later is a testament to the work Reform still needs to do to become a general election-winning machine. Reform sources say there has been a dispute in the party for some time over what exactly Mr Yusuf should do in his role as chairman. As a recent graduate of Britain's business world, he was the obvious choice to lead 'UK Doge', Reform's Elon Musk-inspired efficiency drive in the councils it now runs. But that shift, from running Reform to the 'Doge' role, has led to the rise of another figure, 24-year-old Aaron Lobo, who served as Mr Farage's producer at GB News and has recently become Reform's operations manager. The divide between the party's political team and Mr Yusuf's more managerial role was laid bare on Wednesday at Prime Minister's Questions, when Sarah Pochin, the newest Reform MP, asked Sir Keir whether he would ban the burka. Mr Yusuf, who is a Muslim, said he only learnt about the question when he saw it online. He later added he thought it was 'dumb' for a party to ask the Government to endorse policies it did not support. But it later emerged that other party figures were more open to banning the burka than he expected. Lee Anderson, the chief whip, said he agreed they should be outlawed, adding: 'No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public.' Mr Farage said the public 'do deserve a debate' about banning religious face coverings. He added, in an interview with GB News, that he had known about the question in advance. The row was remarkable not just for its contents – which led to accusations of racism from Labour – but because it played out in public. If Mr Yusuf was in charge of his party, why did he not know what was going on? And why would he respond to his colleagues online, rather than in the office? Sources close to the party say that Mr Yusuf has become increasingly uncomfortable with the level of scrutiny his dispute with Mr Lowe brought, and had complained that every time he went on a national broadcast channel, he received a deluge of racist abuse online. On Thursday night, Mr Farage blamed 'alt-Right' abuse of Mr Yusuf online and claimed criticism of him on X had begun to upset him in recent weeks. The Telegraph understands he also found it difficult to bridge the gap between the party's more aggressive wing, once led by Mr Lowe, and attempts to become more moderate to attract disaffected Conservative voters. Unfortunately for Mr Farage, the incident is only the latest in a series of high-profile rows between the party leader and his senior colleagues. In his remarkable and lengthy political career, the veteran Brexiteer has fallen out with Ukip colleagues Mark Reckless, Douglas Carswell, Godfrey Bloom and Suzanne Evans, and the Reform deputy leader Ben Habib. Reform already has an uphill battle in convincing voters that it is a credible political force before the next general election. Mr Farage has done an impressive job in building a party with five MPs into a project with a seven-point poll lead over Labour that has all but killed off the Conservatives. The fact there are now Reform-run councils across the country is a boon. However, turning Reform's momentum in opposition into the sense it is a party of government will be much harder, and endless rows and resignations will not give voters any confidence on that front. Plus, if the row over the burka ban is genuinely the reason for Mr Yusuf's resignation, there are also policy questions to be asked. Chiefly, how much does Mr Farage want to rely on migration and race issues for votes? Will he tolerate his party's MPs criticising core beliefs of Muslims in the Commons chamber? Mr Farage, aided by Mr Yusuf, has come to think about his party as more of a political business than a party in the traditional Westminster mould. In the early-stage startup world, rows between executives over the direction of their projects are not uncommon – as Mr Yusuf has no doubt experienced. But stopping the in-fighting and resignations is now a business-critical issue. Reform's psychodrama risks driving voters back to Labour and the Conservatives, at a time when it must maintain its position in the polls or fizzle out.
ITV News
38 minutes ago
- ITV News
Why has Zia Yusuf quit Reform UK?
Zia Yusuf was brought in as Reform UK chair less than a year ago, with Nigel Farage hoping the millionaire entrepreneur would help to 'professionalise' his party. Only this week, he was leading 'UK DOGE' - Reform's attempt to copy Elon Musk's cost-cutting drive in the US federal government. But on Wednesday, long-bubbling tensions within Reform boiled over. When newbie MP Sarah Pochin asked Keir Starmer whether he wanted to ban the burqa at PMQs this week, it was a deliberate attempt to provoke controversy and attract attention. But it has backfired spectacularly. On Thursday morning, Zia Yusuf - who is a practising Muslim - said he had no idea the question was going to be asked and labelled it 'dumb' because banning the burqa was not even Reform UK policy. Hours later, he told Farage he'd had enough and would be quitting the party. 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time,' Yusuf posted in a statement. 'Nigel was very disappointed and shocked,' said a Reform source. All of this matters because Farage wants to become prime minister of a Reform UK government after the next election. And another round of infighting at the top of the party (Rupert Lowe was kicked out as an MP in March) risks leaving the party looking amateur, unprofessional and not ready to govern. From early on, Yusuf's appointment created a rift. Staff who'd been with Farage throughout his Ukip and Brexit party years clashed with Yusuf's start-up style of management. Some long-term officials were pushed out of Reform in favour of younger faces. Farage put Yusuf in charge of overhauling Reform's vetting, campaigning and training operation. He is credited with expanding Reform's membership to more than 200,000 people and overseeing a local election campaign which saw almost 700 councillors elected. But the tensions bubbling away within the party burst out in early March when Yusuf reported one of Reform's MPs, Rupert Lowe, to the police over alleged threats of physical violence. Lowe had the party whip suspended and never returned. Police later said he would not face any charges. Some of Reform's supporters were deeply uncomfortable with the party being managed by a practising muslim, and the row with Lowe caused a torrent of online abuse to be directed at Yusuf. Online streams of Reform events would often see comments filled with hateful, often racist rhetoric when Yusuf appeared on screen. In March, Farage called out the 'online abuse and frankly outright overt racism' directed at his party chair, and criticised the lack of media coverage. Farage was a genuine believer that Yusuf had the intellect to help Reform UK achieve the seemingly improbable task of winning the next general election. He also thought having a young man from an ethnic minority at the top of the party softened Reform's image and blunted accusations from the left that his party was racist. 'Zia leaving will cause him a problem,' said one Reform insider. While some will celebrate Yusuf's departure, he leaves a big hole at the top of the party. 'I think politics was too much for him. He genuinely has a great mind, but he hated having to play the game,' said one Reform source. Farage's biggest challenge now is proving that he can keep his party together. If he can't, he has little chance of convincing voters he is capable of running the country.
Rhyl Journal
44 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Peers debate change to 105-year-old law so children can work on steam trains
Labour's Lord Faulkner of Worcester proposed an amendment to the Employment of Women, Young Persons, and Children Act 1920, which barred children from work in any 'any industrial undertaking', including in mines, construction or transport. If agreed, his change would have exempted voluntary work on heritage railways and tramways from the ban. Government whip Lord Katz cautioned there 'may be unintended consequences' by amending the 'old legislation', but Lord Faulkner indicated he could push for a vote on his proposal before the Employment Rights Bill becomes law. Supporting the proposals, independent crossbench peer the Earl of Clancarty said: 'Steam railways are an important part of this country's heritage, and as every year passes that importance surely grows. 'We are getting closer to a time when there will be no-one with a personal memory of such trains in their working life, so as well as being an enjoyable activity for interested, enthusiastic children and young people, this is also an educational opportunity for the next generation.' Lord Faulkner said the ban was from a 'very different era' and told the Lords it 'languished unknown on the statute book for many years'. He said: 'Heritage railways managers, not surprisingly, do not wish to break the law, even if it is moribund and other safeguards exist.' Training on heritage railways 'has led to many seeking careers on the national rail network and in some cases have provided training and apprenticeships appropriate to their future career choices', Lord Faulkner added. He warned that even where regulators have said they would not prosecute a child who volunteers on a heritage railway, a legal challenge 'could be brought by a local authority or by a relative of a young people, regardless of the assurances given'. Historic England chairman and Conservative peer Lord Mendoza said: 'One of the most difficult things in the heritage sector is to encourage young people to come into it, to learn the skills, to learn the trades that we need in order to keep our heritage environment going for as long as we can.' In his response, Lord Katz said 'regulators should and do take a proportionate approach to enforcement action'. He offered a meeting with peers who wanted to change the law, adding: 'The 1920 Act is old legislation and amendment of it should only be considered after a thorough review upon other areas of law, as there may be unintended consequences.' Withdrawing his amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, Lord Faulkner said he would 'take up the minister's kind offer' but added that without solution, he believed 'the House as a whole would like the opportunity to express its view on the report' as the draft new law progresses.
