
Adnan Syed will not serve more prison time for Hae Min Lee's 1999 murder, judge rules
Adnan Syed will not spend any additional time in prison after being resentenced for the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee, a case that gained national attention when it was featured in the "Serial" podcast in 2014, according to The Baltimore Banner.
Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Jennifer B. Schiffer made the ruling more than a week following Syed's Feb. 26 hearing under the Juvenile Restoration Act, a Maryland law that permits individuals who have served at least 20 years in prison for crimes committed as minors to seek a modified sentence.
Syed was 17 at the time of Lee's murder and served more than 20 years in prison after he was convicted in 2000. He will be on probation for five years.
Syed, now 43, has been out of prison since 2022 after his original conviction was vacated. It was later reinstated amid a series of legal challenges.
The years-long legal battle involved a murder conviction, 20 years behind bars for Syed, his eventual release and several court appeals.
The murder of Hae Min Lee
Syed was convicted in 2000 for the murder of his ex-girlfriend and high school classmate Hae Min Lee. Both Syed and Lee attended Woodlawn High School in Baltimore.
Lee went missing during her senior year in January 1999, and her body was found weeks later in Baltimore's Leakin Park.
Syed was 17 at the time.
During a six-week trial, prosecutors argued that Syed planned Lee's murder after she broke up with him. According to attorneys and witnesses, Syed strangled Lee to death, then he and a friend disposed of her body in a shallow grave.
Syed was convicted of murder, kidnapping and false imprisonment and was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years.
"Serial" podcast changes public perception
In 2014, the true-crime podcast "Serial" explored Syed's case in its first season. The podcast, which had millions of listeners at the time, raised questions about the evidence and witnesses in the trial.
The podcast raised doubts about one of the prosecution's key witnesses, a drug dealer named Jay Wilds, who claimed he was the one who helped Syed bury Lee's body.
It also explored the effectiveness of Syed's attorney, who was later disbarred. The podcast further questioned why another student, who could have provided an alibi for Syed, was never interviewed by his lawyer or asked to testify.
"Serial" fans donated more than $80,000 to Syed's legal fund.
Fight for retrial
In 2015, a Maryland appeals court said they would review Syed's murder conviction.
His new attorney argued that Syed's former attorney Christina Gutierrez failed to interview Syed's classmate Asia McClain who said she was with him in a library around the time of Lee's death.
In a letter to Syed after his arrest, McClain offered to speak with investigators and mentioned two other witnesses who she said saw Syed in the library.
"It is hard to imagine that Gutierrez could have done anything worse than failing to pick up the phone and call Syed's witness," Syed's appeals attorney wrote in a filing.
By the end of 2015, a judge agreed to reopen Syed's case and in 2016, his conviction was vacated and he was granted a new trial.
The state continued to fight the decision for about two years, reinstating Syed's conviction in 2019, and leading his lawyers to file an Amicus Brief at the U.S. Supreme Court.
In the brief, Syed's defense team argued that the Maryland Court of Appeals' decision to reinstate his murder conviction "will impact criminal defendants and, in particular, habeas petitioners, far beyond Maryland's borders."
The Supreme Court declined to hear Syed's case.
Motion to vacate conviction
After the Juvenile Restoration Act passed in 2021, Syed's defense team approached former Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby and requested that his sentence be reviewed.
The Juvenile Restoration Act allowed individuals who were convicted of crimes committed while they were minors to request a modified sentence after they served at least 20 years in prison.
Mosby ordered additional DNA tests with forensic technology that was not available at the time of the initial investigation and trial.
In 2022, Mosby filed a motion to vacate Syed's murder conviction after tests found trace levels of male DNA under Lee's fingernails and on her shirt.
"The swabs from the right fingernail and shirt were then analyzed with a genotyping kit that targets male Y-chromosome STR DNA," Mosby's office said in a motion. "However, no useful typing results were obtained from this analysis."
The new investigation revealed evidence against two unnamed suspects and revealed that Lee's car was parked behind the home of one of the suspects, according to the motion.
Syed was released from prison in September 2022 after a judge vacated his murder conviction; he spent more than 20 years incarcerated.
Shortly after, prosecutors dropped the charges against him when DNA tests excluded him as a suspect in the murder.
Conviction reinstated, appeal moves forward
Hae Min Lee's family filed an appeal to reverse the decision. After several attempts, a court ruled the appeal could move forward.
Five months after Syed was freed from prison and cleared of charges, his murder conviction was reinstated.
His defense team brought the case to the Maryland Supreme Court and his conviction was put on hold as they decided whether to hear his appeal.
As the case dragged on through 2023, exonerees expressed support for Syed and Lee's family and called on the court to hear the case.
In 2024, the Maryland Supreme Court upheld a decision to reinstate Syed's conviction, sending the case back to a lower court.
By the end of 2024, Syed's attorneys requested a reduced sentence. Syed remained out of prison since being released in 2022.
As the court considered resentencing in 2025, Baltimore State's Attorney Ivan Bates withdrew a motion to vacate Syed's conviction, leaving his murder conviction in place.
Bates said his predecessor, Mosby's motion to vacate was based on "false and misleading statements that undermine the integrity of the judicial process."
"While I did not ask for this task, it was remanded to my office by the Supreme Court of Maryland; thus, we have a duty as Maryland-barred attorneys, prosecutors tasked with pursuing justice, and officers of the Court to address false and misleading statements in the State's legal filings - a duty that we take extremely seriously," Bates added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
12 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland business looted, vehicle set on fire hours after peaceful anti-ICE protest ended
Two businesses in Oakland's Fruitvale district were reeling Wednesday morning after a group of people allegedly looted a shoe store following a peaceful anti-ICE protest Tuesday night. One person was arrested on suspicion of stealing merchandise, police said. A crowd ransacked a Shiekh shoe store near International Boulevard and 34th Avenue on Tuesday night, according to videos reported by KTVU and police. A car parked on 34th Avenue was set on fire, and trash cans on the sidewalk were knocked over, spilling garbage onto the sidewalk. The looting and vehicle fire occurred after a peaceful protest denouncing arrests of immigrants by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers had ended, according to businesses owners and Fruitvale residents. Oakland police said officers responded to a car crash at 34th Avenue and International Boulevard at 8:40 p.m., where 'several people threw objects at the officers' and damaged a police vehicle. No officers were injured, police said. People then set the crashed vehicle on fire. An hour later, around 9:30 p.m., officers were called to the 3400 block of International Boulevard for a report of a business that was burglarized. Approximately 30 people ransacked the Shiekh store, police said. An unidentified person was arrested on suspicion of possessing stolen merchandise and a burglary tool. 'Looting and violence in any form or the destruction of property will not be tolerated in the city of Oakland,' Mayor Barbara Lee said in a statement. 'To the business owners, we are committed to accountability, safety and protecting the well-being of our communities. Our commitment to peaceful protest does not extend to rioting, or the destruction of property,' Lee said. On Wednesday morning, workers inside the Shiekh store were cleaning up the mess left behind. Clothing racks were empty and merchandise and shards of glass from the shattered front door were sprawled on the floor. The store's manager declined to be interviewed. Next door, Deep Singh, owner of Oakland Discount Liquor and Market, arrived to find his garbage cans knocked over and trash spread on the sidewalk in front of his business. 'It's a mess,' he said. 'Who wants to walk into a store (like that) now?' Some businesses on East 12th Street, in front of Fruitvale Village where the protest was held, remained boarded up Wednesday morning. None appeared to be burglarized. Norma Orozco, the communications manager at the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, said she returned to the nonprofit's headquarters at International Boulevard and 34th Avenue at about 8 p.m. after the protest ended and saw an abandoned vehicle that had crashed into a parked car on 34th Avenue. Neighbors moved the car from the crosswalk to the side of the road. She said nearby police officers did not immediately respond to the scene of the crash and fire. About an hour later, groups of people tried breaking into the car and later set the car on fire, she said. Firefighters responded and put the fire out, but the vehicle was later set on fire again, Orozco said. 'Everything that happened last night was completely preventable,' she said. 'There were multiple points of intervention, and there were multiple people who saw this happening and not a single step was taken to prevent this.' Victor Moreno, a Fruitvale resident, was walking his two dogs along International Boulevard on Wednesday morning when he stopped to observe the workers cleaning inside the Shiekh store. Moreno said he saw black smoke from his apartment window at about 8 p.m. after arriving home from the protest. He said the demonstration was peaceful. 'What I'm afraid of is that people will start to blame the protesters for what happened,' Moreno said in Spanish, referring to the alleged looting. Singh, the liquor store owner, said he supported the ICE protests and did not believe demonstrators took any part in the destruction. . 'I don't think you should hurt the business owners that are supplying you in the community,' he said.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
NYC Chinatown residents unveil alternative plan to relocate 'mega jail'
[Source] Community advocates in Manhattan's Chinatown unveiled a new proposal last week calling for the relocation of a controversial, borough-based jail project as opposition intensifies against what would become one of the world's tallest detention centers. Catch up The Manhattan jail at 124-125 White Street stems from former Mayor Bill de Blasio's 2017 announcement to create a borough-based jail system replacing Rikers Island, which the City Council voted to shut down in 2019. Major construction of the borough-based jails began in June 2021, but the Manhattan project now faces significant delays, with costs rising from an original $1.7 billion estimate to $3.8 billion and completion pushed to 2032 — though city officials now consider the original 2027 Rikers closure deadline unattainable. Community group Neighbors United Below Canal (NUBC) filed a lawsuit in 2020 citing the city 'underestimates the impacts of the Manhattan jail' on traffic, noise pollution and socioeconomic impacts, initially winning before the city's successful 2021 appeal. Demolition work that began last spring has disrupted the adjacent Chung Pak senior housing center, with residents reporting structural damage and dust, and one tenant describing constant shaking that feels 'like an earthquake is coming.' Trending on NextShark: The latest efforts NUBC and a new community group, Welcome to Chinatown, held a rally on June 2 to present their 'Alternative Plan,' which proposes relocating the Manhattan jail to the currently vacant Metropolitan Correctional Center that closed in 2021. Under their proposal, the 125 White Street site would be converted into 1,040 units of affordable housing, a 25,000-square-foot public plaza and community retail space, while reducing the maximum building height from 335 feet to 235 feet. NUBC co-founder Jan Lee said the plan 'reflects what the community has been asking for all along: more affordable housing and a real voice in what happens to our neighborhood.' The proposal has won support from Councilmember Chris Marte, Assemblymember Grace Lee, State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and other elected officials, with Community Board 1 passing a resolution endorsing the plan last month. Trending on NextShark: What's next The alternative proposal faces significant obstacles, requiring both city and federal approval since the Metropolitan Correctional Center is a federal facility. Community advocates have contacted Sen. Chuck Schumer's office, and according to Lee, Schumer has been in touch with the Bureau of Prisons regarding the facility's status. Time is running short, with Lee warning that the window for changes could be just 'a matter of weeks' as 'once those boring tests are over, the bulldozers come in.' Meanwhile, Mayor Eric Adams' office maintains that any decision to relocate the jail must go through the City Council. He noted that the original Chinatown site selection occurred under the previous administration, with a spokesperson stating, 'the contract to build the Manhattan-based borough jail at this site has already been signed and the work has already begun.' Trending on NextShark: This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices. Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community. Trending on NextShark: Subscribe here now! Download the NextShark App: Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Old photo of abandoned workplace misrepresented as S. Korea's presidential office pre-transition
"The presidential office left in complete chaos," reads part of a Korean-language X post shared on June 4, 2025. It features a screenshot of what appears to be another post sharing a panorama image of an empty office space. The post was shared shortly after South Korea's newly elected President Lee Jae-myung said the presidential office in Seoul's Yongsan district "feels like a tomb" during his first press conference (archived here and here). "There's no one here. Not even staff to provide writing tools. No computers. No printers. It's absolutely ridiculous," he said. The next day, Lee's Democratic Party accused the administration of his impeached predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol of sabotaging the transition of power, describing the compound as a "crime scene" that had been "cleared out to destroy evidence" (archived link). Yoon is on trial on charges of insurrection over his botched declaration of martial law, which saw him impeached, and faces the death penalty or life imprisonment if convicted. The same image was also shared in similar posts on South Korean online forums Ppomppu, Mimint, Wassada and "They aren't even humans," read a comment on one of the posts, while another said: "Truly, truly despicable. They should all be prosecuted." But neither Lee's office nor the Democratic Party have released any official photos of the presidential office in Yongsan before his administration moved in. Moreover, the circulating photo has been online since at least 2009. A reverse image search on Google traced the picture to a post from February 27, 2009 on a South Korean forum (archived link). The post says the photo shows the office of Seoul-based Jaty Electronics, and claims the firm abruptly relocated to Incheon during a labour dispute with employees. "The owner fled overnight," claimed the poster, who said they were an employee. The reported labour dispute was also covered by local outlet News Cham, which published a photo of the same office from a slightly different angle, credited to the Korea Metal Workers Union (archived link). Filings with South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service, a securities regulator, show the company did move from its office in Seoul's Gwanak-gu district to Incheon's Namdong-gu district in the first quarter of 2009 (archived here and here).