logo
Nebraska Environmental Trust backers bemoan ‘raid' on funds financing recycling, conservation

Nebraska Environmental Trust backers bemoan ‘raid' on funds financing recycling, conservation

Yahoo17-02-2025

Gov. Jim Pillen, center, greets State Sen. Dave "Woody" Wordekemper of Fremont after his annual State of the State Address. Jan. 15, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — As part of Gov. Jim Pillen's proposed budget, millions of dollars now devoted to restoring wildlife habitat and local recycling efforts would be diverted for new purposes: aiding campgrounds, marinas and cabins at state parks.
Pillen also would increase money transfers to a water resources fund that finances the management of water use by farmers.
All told, three pending legislative bills — two of which were introduced on behalf of the governor — would earmark nearly all of the state lottery funds now distributed via competitive grants by the Nebraska Environmental Trust.
This year, the Trust had about $26 million to distribute in matching grants. Pillen's two budget bills would earmark $20.5 million of that money for other uses, while another bill seeking funds to combat nitrate contamination of groundwater would take another $5 million.
'It's essentially a raid on the Environmental Trust,' said Kristal Stoner, the executive director of Audubon Great Plains and a leader of a coalition of conservation groups that rely on Trust grants.
The Nebraska Environmental Trust, established when Nebraskans approved a state lottery, receives 44.5% of the lottery proceeds. Its stated mission is 'to conserve, enhance and restore the natural environments of Nebraska.'
Grant proposals are reviewed and scored by a committee of Trust Board members and then voted on by the entire 14-member board. The governor appoints nine board members. Five are state agency heads, four of which are appointed by the governor.
Recent grant recipients include the Statewide Arboretum, various cities and towns from Omaha to Mullen, the Crane Trust and the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission.
Former State Sen. Sandy Scofield, who was working under then-Gov. Ben Nelson when the Environmental Trust was set up in 1992, said funding 'outdoor recreation' and 'healthy public infrastructure' — as the current governor proposes — was never considered when the Trust was established.
While cleaning up nitrates in groundwater, providing nicer cabins and marinas at state parks and preventing overuse of water resources are worthy projects, that's not what the Trust was set up to fund, said both Scofield and Stoner.
'The idea was that the natural world needed some help, and local communities didn't have the resources to do it — help the little guy on things that state government couldn't,' said Scofield, president of a group called 'Friends of the Environmental Trust.'
The current governor, she said, is 'just madly looking at places to find money so he can fill the (budget) holes he dug last session.'
Public hearings on Pillen's budget bills, Legislative Bills 261 and 264, are scheduled for Tuesday afternoon before the Legislature's Appropriations Committee.
Reportedly, the committee has decided that the bill taking half of the Trust's money should be debated separately and not be part of the mainline budget, because of the expected controversy. A hearing on a third bill seeking $5 million a year from the Trust, LB 638, the nitrate reduction act, is set for Feb. 25 before the Agriculture Committee.
The proposals come as the state is wrestling with an estimated budget shortfall of $432 million over the next two years. Such shortfalls usually mean cuts in spending and programs, and a search for unspent funds in state cash accounts that can be 'swept' back to close the budget gap. The gap has largely been blamed on the softening of the state's economy and lower tax revenues due to recent cuts in state income taxes.
Pillen has proposed sweeping millions in excess money from cash funds held by various state agencies, and rescinding some past spending authorized by the Legislature. Among those clawback targets: funding for a now-dead sandpit lake between Omaha and Lincoln and millions to build new marinas at state parks and a new lodge at Niobrara State Park.
Meanwhile, the governor is sticking with his pledge to reduce local property taxes, proposing to utilize $400 million in additional state funds to offset more of the taxes.
In response to a reporter's question, the governor's budget office said that because the Environmental Trust has not granted out all its lottery funds, its excess cash has increased from $36 million to $74 million over the past five years.
'The intent is to put these funds to work for their intended purpose,' the governor's spokeswoman wrote in an email.
The Trust, in recent years, has seen fewer applications for its grants and has granted out less money. In 2023, the Trust granted out only $11 million of its available $20 million. Earlier this month, the Trust approved $15 million worth of grants for 2025 out of $26 million available.
Whether or not the millions held by the Trust can be shifted to general state purposes is unclear.
Karl Elmshaeuser, the trust's executive director, said in an email that $62 million of the $75 million held by the Trust is 'encumbered,' which means it's already been granted to environmental groups or earmarked for spending but not yet spent or sent out.
'All (encumbrances) are subject to change by the Legislature,' he added.
The 14-member Environmental Trust Board voted recently to take a neutral stance on the bills that redirect Trust funds, though Elmshaeuser was instructed to testify about 'technical and mechanical issues' raised by the proposals.
Pillen, in his State of the State speech last month, said he was shaking the 'pillowcases' of state agencies to find extra funds to close the budget gap.
'To shrink government, we must eliminate its obsolete parts and clean out its closets,' Pillen said.
One governor proposal, LB 264, would redefine the allowed use of lottery funds to include 'outdoor recreation' and 'healthy public infrastructure.' It would earmark 25% of the Trust's state lottery proceeds for a park improvement fund held by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission.
Another 25% of the Trust's annual funds, under LB 264, would be devoted for the state water resources cash fund that finances projects that maintain the state's surface and groundwater.
Those two proposals would divert half of the $20 million to $26 million a year the Environmental Trust gets from the state lottery, taking that decision away from the Trust Board, which now decides, after reviewing grant applications, which environmental projects will get matching funds. Its supported projects include planting trees, restoring silted-in reservoirs, recycling programs, and restoring habitat.
LB 261 would earmark $5 million a year in Trust funds for the state Water Sustainability Fund and $2.5 million a year for the state Soil and Water Conservation Fund, two funds now financed by general tax dollars through the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, which manages the state's water resources and regulates dam safety.
State Sen. Teresa Ibach, via LB 638, seeks to obtain $5 million a year from the Trust for a law she got passed last year, the Nitrogen Reduction Incentive Act. The Act had received state general funding for two years. Ibach seeks money to keep the program going using lottery funds instead of taxpayer funds.
It pays farmers to use less nitrogen fertilizer, thus preventing leaching into groundwater.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can You Trust Anybody?
Can You Trust Anybody?

Wall Street Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Can You Trust Anybody?

Who can you trust anymore? Just before leaving office, President Biden railed against a 'tech-industrial complex' claiming, 'The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit.' Hmmm, was he referring to the coverup of his own health decline and the sharp-as-a-tack charade? Can we trust presidents? The press? Anyone? We're told to trust the process. Trust the system. Even trust the science. Trust always starts with a belief in truth and adds in a little integrity, reliability and character. Often, it's more faith than belief. Being trustworthy is the first attribute of Boy Scout Law. How quaint. We're told to trust 'experts.' I like to say, 'I trust them about as far as I can throw them.'

A look back: Mayor Patrick Cannon's path from scandal to second chances
A look back: Mayor Patrick Cannon's path from scandal to second chances

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

A look back: Mayor Patrick Cannon's path from scandal to second chances

Stories by Charlotte Observer journalists, with AI summarization Patrick Cannon's journey from disgrace to redemption stands out in Charlotte's political history. After his 2014 conviction for taking bribes from undercover FBI agents and serving time in federal prison, Cannon acknowledged his wrongdoing on his radio show, "At the Table with Cannon." He used this platform to publicly apologize and reconnect with the community. Cannon's return to public life included advising aspiring politicians at forums and voicing support for colleagues' campaigns. Ultimately, he filed to run for City Council, telling voters he takes responsibility for his actions and wants a second chance to serve Charlotte. His campaign raises questions about trust, forgiveness, and the challenges of earning redemption in public service. On Wednesday, Patrick Cannon is scheduled to become a free man. | Published January 24, 2017 | Read Full Story Former Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon has a new talk-show job. | Published April 12, 2017 | Read Full Story Former Charlotte mayor Patrick Cannon apologized profusely on his new radio show for taking the bribes that sent him to federal 50, was arrested in March 2014, four months into his term, and later pleaded guilty to taking about $50,000 in bribes from federal undercover officers. | Published April 17, 2017 | Read Full Story Former Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon, in his first public appearance since being released from federal prison on corruption charges, said Saturday he is focused on being the 'best father, husband and son he can be' – but didn't rule out running for office again.'Anything else is God's will,' Cannon a Democrat, was part of a forum held by the Black Political Caucus for people considering running for public office. | Published May 13, 2017 | Read Full Story Needing a voice over for a campaign radio ad, at-large City Council member Claire Fallon turned to an old colleague: | Published September 14, 2017 | Read Full Story by Steve Harrison When he was convicted, a judge foretold Patrick Cannon's name ought to 'fade into our distant memories' — but this election season may change that. | Published March 4, 2022 | Read Full Story by Will Wright The former mayor is returning to Charlotte politics with a bid for City Council. | Published March 4, 2022 | Read Full Story by Anna Douglas The disgraced former mayor is hoping to make a political comeback. | Editorial | Published March 14, 2022 | Read Full Story by the Editorial Board Patrick Cannon's comments came during a forum with other candidates running for City Council. | Published April 2, 2022 | Read Full Story by Will Wright Find out who's on the ballot and what they stand for. This Q&A is one in a series for The Charlotte Observer's voter guide to 2022 local, county and state elections. | Published April 22, 2022 | Read Full Story The summary above was drafted with the help of AI tools and edited by journalists in our News division. All stories listed were reported, written and edited by McClatchy journalists.

‘We made a mistake': Pillen accepts responsibility for failed vetoes to Nebraska budget
‘We made a mistake': Pillen accepts responsibility for failed vetoes to Nebraska budget

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

‘We made a mistake': Pillen accepts responsibility for failed vetoes to Nebraska budget

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen. Dec. 10, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen has accepted responsibility for mishandled line-item vetoes to the state's next two-year budget while reiterating that many of the suggested cuts will be reconsidered in 2026. Pillen, speaking with the Nebraska Examiner after the Legislature adjourned for the year, said the veto process includes 'human beings' in his office, the Clerk of the Legislature's Office and the Secretary of State's Office. On May 21, his office delivered Legislative Bill 261 and LB 264 with line-item vetoes to the Secretary of State's Office, which is the right place for the bills to go when the Legislature is out of session, but not to the Clerk of the Legislature's Office on the other side of the Capitol, which is where bills must be returned when senators are in session. The Governor's Office says LB 261 was line-item vetoed at 1:08 p.m. on May 21 and LB 264 at 1:10 p.m. A spokesperson for the Secretary of State's Office said the bills were delivered to that office around 5 p.m. the same day. The Legislature did receive a separate letter from Pillen the night of May 21 detailing the line-item vetoes, as well as a copy of the bills with the inscribed vetoes, but lawmakers contended the next day that a line-item veto is constitutional only with the inscribed vetoes on the actual bills. Those bills remained at the Secretary of State's Office until morning. The Nebraska Constitution requires vetoes to be returned within five days of being presented to the governor, excluding Sundays. The bills passed May 15 and went to Pillen's office at 1:12 p.m., so the deadline was by the end-of-day May 21. Pillen said the mistake on the night of May 21 was 'a miscommunication on where it was supposed to go.' Pillen was in Washington, D.C., the following day, for a 'Make America Healthy Again' event at the White House. 'Bottom line: We made a mistake. I'd have thought, because we all work together, that a flag would have been thrown and said, 'Hey, let's do X,' but there wasn't, and then the glass of milk was spilled the next morning,' Pillen told the Examiner. The intended vetoes targeted $14.5 million to the state's general fund and $18 million in repurposed cash funds for improvements at Lake McConaughy. He sought to save $14.5 million that the Legislature's budget aimed to use from the state's 'rainy day' cash reserve by trimming spending — $152 million from the rainy day fund went to help balance the budget. The Nebraska Supreme Court, which faced about $12 million of Pillen's proposed general fund reductions (83%), has said the loss of those funds could close vital court services. This was Pillen's second two-year budget — he vetoed $38.5 million in general fund spending in 2023 for the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. Lawmakers restored about $850,000 of the trims. Pillen, Secretary of State Bob Evnen and Speaker of the Legislature John Arch have pledged to clarify the line-item veto process for the budget ahead of 2026, and they've agreed that the suggested reductions should be considered when the budget is adjusted next year. Arch has said that to his knowledge, nothing like this had happened before. Pillen, whose office now insists the matter is resolved, said, 'As I told our team, we look in the mirror, we accept responsibilities. I've not met a human that doesn't make a mistake yet.' Pillen and his staff have declined to detail exactly what happened the night of May 21. Rani Taborek-Potter, a spokesperson for Evnen, said no one from the Secretary of State's Office delivered the actual LB 261 and LB 264 with the line-item vetoes to the Clerk of the Legislature's Office, 'nor is it our office's responsibility to do so.' 'When bills are vetoed by the Governor, the vetoed bills are delivered directly to the Clerk of the Legislature's Office by the Governor's office, as was the case for LB 319 and LB 287 to the best of our knowledge,' Taborek-Potter told the Examiner, referring to the two other bills vetoed this session related to expanding SNAP benefit eligibility and fighting bedbugs in Omaha. Taborek-Potter confirmed the Governor's Office delivered the budget bills to the administrative assistant in the Secretary of State's Office just before 5 p.m. on May 21. The Examiner on May 23 requested all records and communications regarding the line-item vetoes from when the budget bills passed May 15 to the date of the records request. The request sought texts, emails and digital messages. It also asked for communications within the executive branch and between Pillen's office and the legislative branch, including staff and state senators. Documents provided in response indicated that Pillen's veto letter detailing his objections was ready by 6:05 p.m., when the state budget administrator, Neil Sullivan, sent it to Pillen's staff. Around 6:27 p.m., Kenny Zoeller, director of the governor's Policy Research Office, the main research and lobbying arm for Pillen, confirmed the letter among gubernatorial staff. 'We are handing this off back to the Legislature POST adjournment,' Zoeller wrote of next steps. 'I will text when it's handed off.' Laura Strimple, the governor's primary spokesperson, sent a draft news release regarding the vetoes at 8:21 p.m. to Sullivan. It was sent to reporters around 11:23 p.m. The Legislature adjourned at 9:20 p.m., and a reporter could see legislative staff discussing the veto letter. Through much of the day on May 22, legislative leadership met off the floor, including Arch. Several emerged just before adjournment at 2:37 p.m. when Arch announced the vetoes could not be accepted and that the Legislature had concluded they were constitutionally improper. Some members of the Appropriations Committee hugged, threw fists in the air and smiled after. Pillen's spokesperson, Strimple, sent a statement to reporters at 4:48 p.m. stating it was the governor's position that Pillen 'clearly took the legally required steps to exercise his veto authority by surrendering physical possession and the power to approve or reject the bills.' She said the Governor's Office would consult with the Attorney General's Office and other counsel. The Policy Research Office, executive branch budget staff and other members of the governor's staff met around 5 p.m. on May 22. Strimple sent her statement on the governor's position to all members of the governor's staff at 5:23 p.m., then to lawmakers at 5:53 p.m. On May 27, the next legislative day, Pillen, Arch and Evnen released their joint statement around 2:54 p.m., ending the possible constitutional dispute and returning to their respective corners, with no one taking blame for the situation until Pillen spoke with reporters this week. Pillen's office asserts that it searched texts and digital messages as part of the public records request but found no responsive records, including from Zoeller, who had pledged to text after delivering the veto letter in one of the emails. The Governor's Office provided no records reflecting communications with the legislative branch. None of the records indicate what happened to the bills after being delivered to Evnen's office. Evnen, speaking with the Examiner on Friday, reiterated that the Secretary of State's Office's role with legislation is to file it, and 'when it's brought to our office and we're asked to file it, that's what we do.' 'There's a certain amount of confusion, really between the legislative branch and the Governor's Office, about those line-item vetoes, and I think that what we will do is sit down and talk through together how that will be handled. That's a really good thing to do,' he said. Multiple lawmakers beyond Arch have quietly teased the suggestion with the Examiner, asking how much clearer the process can be. Asked if there was a reason the original bills in the Secretary of State's Office by about 5 p.m. could not be delivered by midnight on May 21, Evnen said: 'You would have to ask the Governor's Office.' Strimple, asked about the remaining timeline on May 21 and May 22, said that with the Arch-Evnen-Pillen joint statement, 'The matter is concluded.' One of the top targets of Gov. Jim Pillen's intended line-item vetoes to the state's budget bills was about $12 million in spending earmarked for the Nebraska Supreme Court. Corey Steel, state court administrator for Nebraska, told lawmakers that the line-item vetoes to the courts could eliminate various services, including three problem-solving courts in Lancaster and Sarpy Counties, a drug court in Gov. Jim Pillen's home of Platte County, transition living reimbursements for certain adults and non-statutory services for juveniles on probation. Pillen told the Examiner that while he has the 'utmost respect' for the separation of powers between Nebraska's branches of government, he believes each one must look at government differently. He said the courts have significantly increased spending and have money sitting around. Steel, as well as Chief Justice Jeffrey Funke, have said that position isn't accurate and that increased spending has been in part due to legislation that came without new funds. The judicial branch leaders have said that the 'money' held in various funds is now exhausted. However, Pillen said he's not backing down and that the reductions will be considered in 2026. 'We have to be fiscally responsible,' Pillen said, 'and that's all we're asking.' — Zach Wendling SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store