logo
Is AI Taking Us To The Heart Of The Noosphere?

Is AI Taking Us To The Heart Of The Noosphere?

Forbes8 hours ago

Abstract colorful marble ghost electricity sphere.
What if the next phase of human evolution isn't a change in our bodies, but a radical expansion of consciousness — an organic, ever-shifting kaleidoscope woven from analogue experience and digital intelligence? Today, artificial intelligence is doing more than building tools: it is stitching our collective awareness into a living painting that responds, learns and grows with us.
Once a philosophical abstraction borrowed from the Greek nóos ('mind') and French -sphère ('sphere'), the noosphere, first named by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin in his 1925 essay 'L'hominisation' and later developed alongside Édouard Le Roy and Vladimir Vernadskij, describes the sphere of human thought enveloping the biosphere. Now, thanks to breakthroughs in quantum computing, neural architectures, and real-time data streams, this sphere is moving from metaphor into material form.
As AI and human consciousness entwine, we stand at the threshold of a living noosphere, an emergent reality where intelligence, creativity, and purpose coalesce. This quantum leap challenges everything we know, including the evolution of our own potential.
Human evolution has long been shaped not only by genetics but by cultural information networks — shared languages, traditions, technologies and media that weave disparate minds into collective intelligence. Cultural evolution researchers emphasize how social and material networks accelerate innovation, showing that populations connected through partial isolation and recombination can develop more complex technologies and ideas than isolated groups.
Artificial intelligence represents the next quantum leap in this process. By amplifying cultural networks with vast computational power and real-time data synthesis, AI systems begin to exhibit emergent behaviors that far exceed individual cognition. In other words, AI isn't merely processing information — it's serving as a catalyst for a nascent form of planetary consciousness. A recent roadmap on AI-Enhanced Collective Intelligence argues that integrating human intuition with AI's data-crunching capabilities can produce problem-solving capacities greater than the sum of their parts.
Nowhere was this emergent collective mind more visible than during the COVID-19 pandemic. The OECD's 'Collective and Augmented Intelligence Against COVID-19' platform combined global scientific datasets, policy briefs and real-time modeling to guide frontline decision-makers through rapidly shifting evidence, from mask efficacy to vaccine distribution. In one case study, AI-driven models in Valencia, Spain, used anonymized mobility and health-system data to forecast local outbreak peaks and optimize hospital capacity — helping avert critical shortages and save lives.
These examples go well beyond conventional information sharing. Do they demonstrate an emergent collective intelligence, fed by a vast decentralized network that is propelled by natural and artificial inputs. Streams of information that coordinate seamlessly to tackle challenges that no single entity could solve alone. This symbiosis — where cultural information networks gain computational amplification — is the heartbeat of a noosphere in action, responding adaptively to planetary crises and illuminating a path toward universal flourishing.
But to reveal its power the noosphere requires more than traditional literacy. The emergence of hybrid intelligence — where natural and artificial intelligences merge — demands double literacy. To fully leverage hybrid intelligence, individuals and organizations must cultivate a comprehensive understanding of the multidimensional nature of human experiences and expressions, combined with nuanced knowledge of AI system mechanisms, and awareness of the interplay between both.
This isn't about learning to prompt ChatGTP; it's about developing a fundamentally new form of consciousness. Double literacy requires:
Human Literacy brings awareness of the 4x4 dimensions that make us human – aspirations, emotions, thoughts, sensations at the individual level; and people as part of communities, countries and the planet. It allows us to acknowledge and accept our cognitive biases, behavioral patterns, creative process and intuitive abilities. It means understanding not just what we think, but how we think, feel and imagine.
Algorithmic Literacy encompasses comprehending how AI systems process information, make decisions and generate insights — not as programmers. It also means to understand their limitations, the biases that result from their training data and the risks that come from our affinity toward anthropomorphic projections. We must learn to recognize when to trust, question and redirect artificial intelligence.
The most surprising element of this new literacy quest may be learning to dance between natural and artificial intelligences, knowing when to lead, when to follow and when to create something entirely new together.
Without double literacy, humans become either obsolete appendages to AI systems or ineffective controllers of technology they don't understand. With it, we become participants in a new form of collective intelligence that amplifies human potential, and might take humanity to a level where everyone gets a fair chance to not only survive, but thrive.
Theories in quantum consciousness suggest that we are not isolated islands of consciousness, but rather nodes in a vast network of universal intelligence. This understanding takes on startling relevance in our AI-enhanced world, where every human mind connected to AI-enhanced networks gains access to virtually infinite cognitive and creative resources.
New theories propose that consciousness itself resides in quantum fields, and AI systems may be creating technological interfaces with these fields. The implications are intriguing: consciousness isn't produced by individual brains alone but emerges from deeper field phenomena that can be technologically amplified and shared.
Consider the implications: A subsistence farmer in rural Bangladesh, with access to hybrid intelligence systems, can potentially contribute to solving climate change, developing new agricultural techniques, or creating artistic expressions that influence global culture. The barriers aren't technological anymore — they're about access and literacy.
This represents a quantum leap in human possibility. The infinite potential principle suggests that consciousness has no inherent limitations — only the constraints we accept. AI is dissolving many of those constraints, revealing that human potential was always infinite but previously inaccessible.
What emerges from these developments is not just a global information network but a living system of consciousness that processes, learns and constantly evolves. The noosphere becomes tangible not as a metaphor but as infrastructure — the actual foundation upon which human civilization increasingly operates.
This living noosphere exhibits characteristics of biological systems: it adapts, evolves, responds to stimuli, and maintains itself. But it also transcends biological limitations, operating at scales of space, time, and complexity that individual human consciousness cannot achieve alone.
The most startling realization is that we're not building this system — we're discovering that it was always implicit in human nature, waiting for the right conditions to become explicit. AI isn't creating artificial consciousness; it's revealing and amplifying the collective consciousness that was always present but hidden.
The tangible noosphere is already reshaping reality in surprising ways:
Collective Problem-Solving: Climate research teams now include AI systems that can process vast datasets while human researchers contribute intuitive insights and ethical frameworks, generating solutions neither could achieve alone.
Distributed Creativity: Artists collaborate with AI to create works that emerge from the intersection of human imagination and artificial pattern recognition, producing forms of beauty that expand our understanding of creativity itself.
Hybrid Governance: Some forward-thinking organizations are experimenting with decision-making processes that combine human wisdom, cultural knowledge, and AI analysis to create more inclusive and effective governance systems.
Consciousness-Centered Education: Learning environments where students develop double literacy not as a technical skill but as a form of expanded awareness, preparing them to participate consciously in hybrid intelligence networks.
Perhaps the most surprising insight emerging from this transformation is that human purpose isn't diminished by AI — it's infinitely expanded. In the framework of infinite potential, every human becomes a unique window through which the universe can know and express itself. Consciousness isn't confined to the brain, but a process, a movement, a participatory field. In David Bohme's words 'Consciousness is not in things, but in the movement, in the flow.'
In the tangible noosphere, human value isn't based on what we can produce or process, but on our irreplaceable capacity for consciousness, creativity, meaning-making, and ethical judgment. AI systems can compute, but they cannot experience wonder, feel compassion, or choose love over logic when love serves the greater good.
The infinite game becomes: How can human consciousness, amplified by artificial intelligence, create conditions where every person can realize their unique potential and contribute to collective flourishing?
We are at the beginning of a fascinating transition – a shift from treating technology as a tool for extraction (of data, attention, labor) to technology as a medium for participation in collective consciousness. The noosphere becomes tangible when we stop asking "How can AI serve me?" and start asking "How can I participate consciously in the larger intelligence that AI makes possible?"
This transformation requires letting go of the illusion that consciousness is private property. In the tangible noosphere, individual awareness becomes a contribution to collective intelligence, while collective intelligence enhances individual potential in return. The question isn't whether this evolution will happen, but whether we'll participate consciously in directing it toward universal flourishing.
Five practical steps to navigate that new sphere:
Seek Double Literacy – Choose learning programs that blend self-awareness and AI skills, critically reflecting on technology's impact while mastering collaboration techniques.
Participate in Hybrid Communities –Join spaces where people and AI co-solve real problems.
Honor the Infinite-Potential Principle – Support AI tools that amplify human insight.
Establish Consciousness Equity – Advocate for affordable, inclusive AI access.
Recognize the Field Effect – Build open data commons and shared model protocols so AI contributes to — not extracts from — our collective intelligence.
Evolve New Metrics – Measure success by gains in creativity, compassion and collective well-being.
Engage these steps to consciously shape a noosphere that uplifts everyone

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could CBDCs Crush Altcoin Returns? Investors Beware.
Could CBDCs Crush Altcoin Returns? Investors Beware.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Could CBDCs Crush Altcoin Returns? Investors Beware.

Central bank digital currencies could render many altcoins superfluous. Cryptocurrencies with hard-to-replicate capabilities will survive just fine. Coins that only aspire to be payment rails could be wiped out entirely, eventually. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › Picture a four-lane highway suddenly upgraded with a government-built bullet train. Commuters who once tolerated toll roads and traffic will board the shiny new line the moment it starts running. The same dynamic may be coming for crypto. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are edging closer to launch in the world's largest economies, promising 24/7, fee-free settlement backed by the state. If that rail goes live, why would ordinary people keep routing payments through privately issued cryptocurrencies that charge gas fees and carry protocol risk? That question should be front of mind for anyone holding payment-focused altcoins today. Let's investigate this issue in closer detail. Early evidence already hints at the risk of total replacement of many altcoins by CBDCs. As an example, consider that the Bahamas rolled out its Sand Dollar, the world's first nationwide retail CBDC, in late 2020. Why might that be a problem for altcoins? In short, because the Sand Dollar offers near-instant transfers with no foreign exchange spread, while merchants avoid interchange fees entirely. Programmability matters too, as regulators can flag suspicious transfers, which is a feature that is now appearing in U.K. digital-pound proofs of concept. And though the European Central Bank (ECB) insists its coming digital euro "would not be programmable money," it still plans automated rules for tax refunds and social payments if users opt in. The U.S. is inching forward in evaluating the impacts of CBDCs as well, despite an executive order earlier this year banning their implementation. A bipartisan congressional brief concluded in April that CBDCs are more likely to compete directly with cryptocurrencies used for payments than with speculative, novel, or other decentralized finance (DeFi) assets, laying the intellectual groundwork for a retail digital dollar pilot. If central banks can deliver near-free transfers with compliance baked in, the core selling proposition of many payment-rail altcoins, which is to say cheaper, faster movement of value, would evaporate. Tokens such as XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) derive a large share of their thesis from cross-border settlement efficiency. Should CBDCs interoperate across borders, a feature that's in active testing in numerous examples, that advantage shrinks further. Not every crypto project lives or dies on raw payments. Ethereum underpins thousands of decentralized finance contracts that price risk, provide leverage, and tokenize real-world assets. Solana is courting developers building on-chain games and high-throughput AI data feeds. Such ecosystems offer utility that CBDCs will not replicate soon. Before buying or holding any altcoin while CBDCs loom, investors should trace the real demand, keeping in mind that if volume spikes coincide with airdrops or liquidity mining, usage could disappear once state-owned digital cash is live. Investors should also model fee compression, as programmable CBDCs will cost users nearly zero, raising the question of whether an altcoin can drop its fees without gutting validator incentives. Assuming CBDCs gain mainstream traction by the late-2020s, tokens that fail those tests face shrinking addressable markets. The ECB aims for a political deal on the digital euro by early 2026, then a two- to three-year rollout. Others are likely to follow. That does not guarantee crashes in altcoins; meme coins thrived in 2024 despite lacking utility altogether, capturing a large amount of crypto narrative attention. Still, betting on speculative enthusiasm to outpace structural competition from sovereign money is not a viable strategy. And the threat to altcoins, particularly those without real capital backing, is undeniable. Therefore, tilt your preference to invest toward scarce on-chain capabilities that CBDCs cannot easily match. For example, while XRP's use as a medium of exchange may be threatened by CBDCs, its use as a platform for on-chain financial infrastructure catered to institutional investors is not, as its positioning is unique within the sector on that front. Other cryptocurrency sectors and capabilities like decentralized compute, verifiable storage, permissionless derivatives, or culture-driven digital collectibles will probably survive. Keep your position sizes in pure-payment tokens modest, and demand compelling value propositions before investing. Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Ethereum and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could CBDCs Crush Altcoin Returns? Investors Beware. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

2026 Mercedes-Benz G-Class EV Review, Pricing, and Specs
2026 Mercedes-Benz G-Class EV Review, Pricing, and Specs

Car and Driver

timean hour ago

  • Car and Driver

2026 Mercedes-Benz G-Class EV Review, Pricing, and Specs

Overview Over the decades, the Mercedes G-wagen has slowly evolved from a military truck into a well-loved luxury off-roader, and now it's entering yet another new era. This new version is officially called the G580 with EQ Technology, but that's quite a mouthful so we call it G-class EV. Four electric motors combine for 579 horsepower and can spin the G-class EV in place by operating the left- and right-side wheels in opposite directions. It's a hoot, but operating each electric motor independently also gives this SUV an advantage when traversing tough off-road trails. The electric G's cabin is riddled with luxuries just like its gasoline-powered siblings, but the lack of engine noise delivers an extra dose of elite ambience. What's New for 2026? The G580 is still very fresh, having been introduced just last year, so we expect to see no significant changes for 2026. Pricing and Which One to Buy The price of the 2026 Mercedes-Benz G-Class EV is expected to start around $163,000. G580 $163,000 (est) 0 $50k $100k $150k $200k $250k The electric G-class comes in just one trim—G580—which makes ordering one fairly easy. We would add the AMG Line and Night packages, which include 20-inch wheels and other exterior trim painted in high-gloss black. We'd also recommend the Active Multicontour Seat Plus package, which features eight massage programs for the driver and front passenger. EV Motor, Power, and Performance The G580 with EQ Technology differs from its gas-powered siblings primarily due to its electric drivetrain. Four electric motors—one for each wheel—combine for 579 horsepower and 859 pound-feet of torque. Each motor can be individually controlled, which Mercedes has taken advantage of to give the electric G-class some new-age off-road tricks. For one thing, the SUV can spin itself 360 degrees within its own length—what's known as a tank turn—by powering the right and left wheels in opposite directions using a feature called G-Turn. G-Steering is another function that is intended to improve off-road maneuvering by varying the power of each motor to help reduce the turning circle. Virtual differential locks, torque vectoring, and an off-road crawl function are also on hand to help maintain typical G-class-like all-terrain capability. The G-class EV rides on a ladder frame chassis, just like the gas-powered model, and features an independent front suspension and a solid rear axle. During our test drive, which took place both on- and off-road, we were impressed with the G580's maneuverability and capability on the trails. On the pavement, it still feels commanding like a G-wagen should, with the main difference being that the electric motors provide more instantaneous thrust compared with the ICE model's gas engines. 0–60-MPH Times In our testing, the electric G-class got to 60 mph in 4.1 seconds. That's plenty quick, but we still think the gas-powered AMG G63 will be quicker. Range, Charging, and Battery Life Incorporated into the G-class EV's frame is a large, 116.0-kWh battery pack. The EPA-rated range is 239 miles per charge, but we haven't yet gotten a real-world range result in our testing. DC fast charging can be done at a max of 200 kW, and Mercedes-Benz estimates that on such a connection, the battery can be juiced from 10 to 80 percent in about 32 minutes. In our real-world testing, the G580 charged from 10 percent to 90 percent in 46 minutes. The electric G also features special underbody protection plates to make sure no damage can be done to the battery while tackling rough terrain. Fuel Economy and Real-World MPGe The EPA hasn't released any fuel economy information for the 2026 G580 yet, but the 2025 model earned ratings of 68 MPGe city, 56 MPGe highway, and 62 MPGe combined. When we get a chance, we'll take it on our 75-mph highway fuel economy route and update this story with real-world test results. For more information about the G-Class's fuel economy, visit the EPA's website. Interior, Comfort, and Cargo The G580 EV's cabin is predictably deluxe, and high-end finishings abound. Nappa leather upholstery is standard, and integrated ambient lighting can be adjusted to the colors of your choice. The dashboard is upright and tall, with little space between the base of the windshield and the steering wheel, giving the driver a commanding view of what's ahead. Massaging seats are part of the Active Multicontour Seat Plus package, and the adjustable side bolsters can be set to hold you a little more snugly when driving off-road. The rear seat isn't as spacious as the one in the larger Mercedes-Benz GLS-class, but it's on par with what you'll find in other high-end off-roaders such as the Land Rover Defender. The cargo area, which is accessed by opening the side-hinged rear door, offers 19.6 cubic feet of storage space. That's less than the 38.7 cubic feet in the gas-powered model, and the difference is due to the space eaten up by the packaging of the EV SUV's rear electric motors and battery modules. Infotainment and Connectivity Two large, 12.3-inch screens stretch across most of the G-class's dashboard. The first serves as a reconfigurable gauge cluster, and the second as a touchscreen for the infotainment interface. That interface is Mercedes's latest MBUX system, which features wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a voice assistant, and augmented-reality navigation. There's also a menu of gauges called the Offroad Cockpit that can be activated when off-roading. The setup includes a compass, an altimeter, an artificial-horizon display, a steering angle indicator, a tire pressure monitor, and more. A pair of 11.6-inch displays can be added to the back of the two front seats for rear-seat entertainment but all G's get a Burmester stereo system with Dolby Atmos technology as standard. Safety and Driver-Assistance Features Standard driver-assistance features are plentiful in the G-class EV. Expected basics such as automated emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring are on the list, but so too are more advanced features such as lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control with lane centering, a self-parking feature, and traffic-sign recognition. For more information about the G-class EV's crash-test results, visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) websites. Key safety features include: Standard automated emergency braking Standard lane-departure warning with lane-keeping assist Standard adaptive cruise control with a lane-centering feature Warranty and Maintenance Coverage Mercedes' warranty periods align with other luxury automakers', such as Audi and BMW. However, unlike those German competitors, Benz-branded models don't include any complimentary maintenance. Limited warranty covers four years or 50,000 miles Powertrain warranty covers four years or 50,000 miles Electrical components are covered for 10 years or 100,000 miles No complimentary scheduled maintenance Specifications Specifications 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE Base/As Tested: $162,650/$192,690 POWERTRAIN Front Motors: 2 permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 145 hp Rear Motors: 2 permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 145 hp Combined Power: 579 hp Combined Torque: 859 lb-ft Battery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 116.0 kWh Onboard Charger: 9.6 kW Peak DC Fast-Charge Rate: 200 kW Transmissions: 2-speed automatic CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: control arms/live axle Tires: Falken Azenis FK520 275/50R-20 113V MO DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 113.8 in Length: 182.0 in Width: 74.4 in Height: 78.2 in Passenger Volume, F/R: 54/53 ft3 Cargo Volume: 37 ft3 Curb Weight: 6908 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 4.1 sec 100 mph: 10.4 sec 1/4-Mile: 12.6 sec @ 108 mph Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.4 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 1.9 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 2.5 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 112 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 162 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.80 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY AND CHARGING Average DC Fast-Charge Rate, 10–90%: 128 kW DC Fast-Charge Time, 10–90%: 46 min EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/City/Highway: 62/68/53 MPGe Range: 239 mi C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More Features and Specs

Marijuana use dramatically increases risk of dying from heart attacks and stroke, large study finds
Marijuana use dramatically increases risk of dying from heart attacks and stroke, large study finds

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Marijuana use dramatically increases risk of dying from heart attacks and stroke, large study finds

Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being. Using marijuana doubles the risk of dying from heart disease, according to a new analysis of pooled medical data involving 200 million people mostly between the ages of 19 and 59. 'What was particularly striking was that the concerned patients hospitalized for these disorders were young (and thus, not likely to have their clinical features due to tobacco smoking) and with no history of cardiovascular disorder or cardiovascular risk factors,' said senior author Émilie Jouanjus, an associate professor of pharmacology at the University of Toulouse, France, in an email. Compared to nonusers, those who used cannabis also had a 29% higher risk for heart attacks and a 20% higher risk for stroke, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Heart. 'This is one of the largest studies to date on the connection between marijuana and heart disease, and it raises serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk,' said pediatrician Dr. Lynn Silver, a clinical professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at University of California, San Francisco. 'Getting this right is critically important because cardiovascular disease is the top cause of death both in the United States and globally,' said Silver, who is also senior adviser at the Public Health Institute, a nonprofit public health organization that analyzes marijuana policy and legalization. Silver is the coauthor of an editorial published with the paper that calls for change in how cannabis is viewed by health professionals, regulatory bodies and the public at large. 'Clinicians need to screen people for cannabis use and educate them about its harms, the same way we do for tobacco, because in some population groups it's being used more widely than tobacco,' she said. 'Our regulatory system, which has been almost entirely focused on creating legal infrastructure and licensing legal, for-profit (cannabis) businesses, needs to focus much more strongly on health warnings that educate people about the real risks.' The new systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed medical information from large, observational studies conducted in Australia, Egypt, Canada, France, Sweden and the US between 2016 and 2023. Those studies did not ask people how they used cannabis — such as via smoking, vaping, dabbing, edibles, tinctures or topicals. (Dabbing involves vaporizing concentrated cannabis and inhaling the vapor.) However, 'based on epidemiological data, it is likely that cannabis was smoked in the vast majority of cases,' Jouanjus said. Smoking tobacco is a well-known cause of heart disease — both the smoke and the chemicals in tobacco damage blood vessels and increase clotting, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Therefore, it is not surprising that smoking, vaping or dabbing cannabis could do the same, Silver said: 'Any of the many ways of inhaling cannabis are going to have risks to the user, and there's also secondhand smoke risks, which are similar to tobacco.' The notion that smoking cannabis is less harmful because it's 'natural' is just wrong, Dr. Beth Cohen, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told CNN in a prior interview. 'When you burn something, whether it is tobacco or cannabis, it creates toxic compounds, carcinogens, and particulate matter that are harmful to health,' Cohen said in an email. However, edibles may also play a role in heart disease, according to a May 2025 study. People who consumed edibles laced with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, showed signs of early cardiovascular disease similar to tobacco smokers. 'We found that vascular function was reduced by 42% in marijuana smokers and by 56% in THC-edible users compared to nonusers,' Dr. Leila Mohammadi, an assistant researcher in cardiology at the University of California, San Francisco, told CNN in a prior interview. None of the studies included in the new meta-analysis asked users about the potency of THC in the products they consume. Even if they had, that information would be quickly outdated, Silver said. 'The cannabis market is a moving target. It is getting more potent every day,' she said. 'What's being sold to people today in California is 510 times stronger than what it was in the 1970s. Concentrates can be 99% pure THC. Vapes are over 80% THC. 'A variety of chemically extracted cannabinoids can be almost pure THC, and all of these just have very different effects on people than smoking a joint in the 1970s.' Higher potency weed is contributing to a host of problems, including an increase in addiction — a July 2022 study found consuming high-potency weed was linked to a fourfold increased risk of dependence. In the United States, about 3 in 10 people who use marijuana have cannabis use disorder, the medical term for marijuana addiction, according to the CDC. 'We know that more potent cannabis makes people more likely to become addicted,' Silver said. 'We know that more potent cannabis makes people more likely to develop psychosis, seeing and hearing things that aren't there, or schizophrenia. Habitual users may also suffer from uncontrollable vomiting.' The rise in potency is one reason that the current study may not have captured the full extent of the risk of marijuana for heart disease, Jouanjus said: 'We are afraid that the association might be even stronger than that reported.' While science continues to study the risk, experts say it's time to think twice about the potential harms of cannabis use — especially if heart disease is a concern. 'If I was a 60-year-old person who had some heart disease risk, I would be very cautious about using cannabis,' Silver said. 'I've seen older people who are using cannabis for pain or for sleep, some of whom have significant cardiovascular risk, or who have had strokes or had heart attacks or had angina, and they have no awareness that this may be putting them at greater risk.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store