Auckland Airport Customs staff seize $34 million of methamphetamine within 12 hours
The second seizure occurred early on Sunday morning.
Border staff identified two backpacks and referred them to Customs. Officers searched the bags and found 40.5 kilograms of methamphetamine.
NZ Customs estimated these two seizures of methamphetamine would have had a street value of up to $34 million and caused up to $95 million in potential harm and cost to New Zealand.
Auckland Airport customs manager Paul Williams said this mass seizure was thanks to the 'sharp actions' of Customs officers and border partners and reaffirmed their unrelenting focus on border security.
'This was rapid, skilled work by officers who know exactly what to look for,' he said.
'They acted immediately, intercepted the suspicious bags, and shut down what would have been a significant shipment of methamphetamine reaching into our communities.'
'Preventing organised crime from profiting by harming New Zealanders is an absolute priority for Customs,' Williams said.
'Not only are our officers highly trained and always on the lookout for suspicious activity, but they do not work in isolation.
'Our job is clear: stop illicit drugs before they reach our streets.'
Since the beginning of 2025, the Customs team at Auckland International Airport has seized an estimated 405.69kg of drugs across couriers and baggage.
Auckland Airport staff seized more than 23kg of methamphetamine and cocaine in unaccompanied bags off a flight from Honolulu
Last month, officers seized more than 36kg of methamphetamine in unaccompanied bags from a US flight.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
15 minutes ago
- Scoop
National Party Bill To Crackdown On Anti-social Behaviour
Press Release – New Zealand National Party Our Government has made significant progress in restoring law and order. Violent crime, victimisations, assaults and serious assaults are all down, and weve put more cops on the beat to make Kiwis feel safe, Hamilton East MP Ryan Hamilton says. A Member's Bill entered into the biscuit tin will provide Police with new powers to crack down on anti-social behaviour and those who intimidate their fellow New Zealanders, Hamilton East MP Ryan Hamilton says. 'Since the election, our Government has made significant progress in restoring law and order. Violent crime, victimisations, assaults and serious assaults are all down, and we've put more cops on the beat to make Kiwis feel safe. 'However, communities across New Zealand are sick of having to put up with those who continue to engage in persistent anti-social behaviour, intimidation, and public disturbances in key community spaces. Kiwis shouldn't have to face this nonsense in their town centres, transport hubs, parks and schools. 'Current enforcement tools available to Police can either be too limited or overly formal for early intervention. There is a need for a more proportionate, flexible tool that empowers Police to take swift, preventative action before more serious offences occur and harm escalates. 'That's why my Bill would allow Police to direct a person or group to move on from a specified area and not return for up to 24 hours where their presence or behaviour is causing, or likely to cause: Harassment, alarm, or distress to members of the public A public nuisance Disorder or anti-social behaviour. 'A direction may be issued verbally or in writing, and failure to comply would be an offence, unless the person had a reasonable excuse for non-compliance. 'Comporable legislation is used successfully throughout Australia, and local Police that I have talked to in Hamilton are hugely supportive of these changes. 'I'm hoping that my Bill is pulled from the biscuit tin, so I can continue this important conversation with New Zealanders.'
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
National Party Bill To Crackdown On Anti-social Behaviour
A Member's Bill entered into the biscuit tin will provide Police with new powers to crack down on anti-social behaviour and those who intimidate their fellow New Zealanders, Hamilton East MP Ryan Hamilton says. 'Since the election, our Government has made significant progress in restoring law and order. Violent crime, victimisations, assaults and serious assaults are all down, and we've put more cops on the beat to make Kiwis feel safe. 'However, communities across New Zealand are sick of having to put up with those who continue to engage in persistent anti-social behaviour, intimidation, and public disturbances in key community spaces. Kiwis shouldn't have to face this nonsense in their town centres, transport hubs, parks and schools. 'Current enforcement tools available to Police can either be too limited or overly formal for early intervention. There is a need for a more proportionate, flexible tool that empowers Police to take swift, preventative action before more serious offences occur and harm escalates. 'That's why my Bill would allow Police to direct a person or group to move on from a specified area and not return for up to 24 hours where their presence or behaviour is causing, or likely to cause: Harassment, alarm, or distress to members of the public A public nuisance Disorder or anti-social behaviour. 'A direction may be issued verbally or in writing, and failure to comply would be an offence, unless the person had a reasonable excuse for non-compliance. 'Comporable legislation is used successfully throughout Australia, and local Police that I have talked to in Hamilton are hugely supportive of these changes. 'I'm hoping that my Bill is pulled from the biscuit tin, so I can continue this important conversation with New Zealanders.'
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
High Court Judge Urged To Consider Public Trust In McSkimming Case ‘Superinjunction' Decision
Press Release – Free Speech Union Even if a powerful individual is not charged or is found not guilty, the public should still have access to the facts in order to make their own informed judgments about his character. The High Court judge has reserved her decision on whether to maintain the 'superinjunction' in Jevon McSkimming's case, which currently disables the media and public from discussing the details. The Free Speech Union urges the Court to consider the damage to public trust caused by excessive secrecy, says Stephen Franks, Free Speech Union Council Member. 'The Court should uphold the speech rights of all New Zealanders by allowing the media, and therefore the public, to scrutinise matters of genuine public interest. The public should be free to discuss the conduct of their officials and form their own opinions on matters. 'The media play a crucial role in enabling Kiwis to seek and receive information. The High Court set a dangerous precedent by limiting this freedom. The public's ability to discuss cases should be prioritised in court decisions. 'Even if a powerful individual is not charged or is found not guilty, the public should still have access to the facts in order to make their own informed judgments about his character. 'We urge the judge to consider the full weight of the damage done to public trust in courts, lawyers, and judges when they act as if only they can be trusted, while the 'little people' are kept in the dark. 'Suppression is bad, whatever the outcome.'
