With CRMP on hold, monsoons could bring back potholes for city commuters
Monsoons are around the corner, when the city's best roads could give in under the stress of incessant rains and water stagnation. The threat of potholes and bad patches looms large for the city's commuters, with the State government sitting on the proposals for comprehensive road maintenance programme (CRMP).
Three months have passed since the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) has submitted the proposals for extension of CRMP for five more years, after approval by the standing committee. The government is yet to take a decision on the same.
The CRMP involves participation of private agencies in the road maintenance, which has yielded good results since introduced in 2019-2020. The fresh proposals included more road length than before, and proportionate cost escalation by 50%.
During Phase-I of CRMP, over 800 kilometres of major city roads were given out for private maintenance, at an initial estimated cost of ₹1,827 crore for a five-year period, starting from 2020. Though de-silting of stormwater drains, sanitation and greenery too were included in the proposals, the de-silting component was later removed, and mechanical sweeping was included which brought down the expenditure.
Officials from the GHMC inform that the final spending on the CRMP Phase-I turned out to be only ₹1,300 crore. However, the fresh proposals cleared by the standing committee place two options before the government.
The first option is to bring 744.22 kilometres of road length under CRMP with a total outlay of ₹2,491 crore for the coming five years. Alternatively, the road length may be enhanced to 1142.54 kilometres with a cost estimate of ₹3,825 crore for five years.
'We have included important approach roads apart from the major thoroughfares in the enhanced road length,' an official informed. Besides, the proposals also include de-silting of the stormwater drains and maintenance of greenery, which add up to the cost, he said.
The earlier plan involved re-carpeting of 50% of the roads in the first year, 30% in the second year, and 20% in the third. The last two years involved only maintenance of the roads. A few of the contracts came to a close by 2024 year-end, while a couple of others expired in the last week of January.
This time, the first two years will include maintenance of the old roads plus re-carpeting of the roads newly taken up, the official informed. Milling and re-carpeting of the old roads would begin from third year, he said.
With both the given options portending gaping hole in the treasury pockets, the government is still to take any decision on the proposals. While the Phase-I of CRMP was carried out with the help of borrowings which the GHMC is still paying off, this time, funding has been sought from the government.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
10 hours ago
- Hans India
GHMC streamlines property tax services by offering complete online access for citizens
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) has provided all GHMC property tax related services accessible online as part of its move to be more friendly for citizens to improve the digitalization of governance. Residents are now able to gain access to these services through the official website of the GHMC ( which eliminates the requirement to visit MeeSeva centers. Based on GHMC officials the initiative aims to streamline the process of applying and increasing service quality by allowing applicants to submit applications from the comfort of their home. To use the service applicants will need to input your PTIN (Property Tax Identification Number (PTIN) as well as submit the sale deed, and other documents relevant to the type of request. The system will then send applications to concerned tax officials for verification and approval. GHMC has also announced that online tax payment GHMC service for property modification is under development and will be available shortly. Citizens are encouraged to make use of the Hyderabad property tax online platform to avail quick and easy services in GHMC's overall efforts to foster digital transformation of civic administration the officials of the civic body stated in a press announcement. Stamp duties for Hyderabad for 2025-26 include taxes that are imposed by the government for property purchases which are determined as a percentage of the property's value at transaction. In the Indian Stamps Act, 1899 is the law that requires these fees to be paid to facilitate legal ownership transfers. In Hyderabad there is an additional stamp duty of 4% and registration charges are 0.5 percent and transfer charges of 1.5 percent for properties that are located within corporations and Hyderabad municipal services areas. To calculate these costs simply multiply the property's current price by its applicable percentage rates of tax and registration fees.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Telangana HC tells GHMC to decide regularisation plea before demolition of Begumpet building
HYDERABAD : Justice T Vinod Kumar of the Telangana high court has directed the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation ( GHMC ) to consider an application filed by a woman and her son seeking regularisation of their Begumpet property —constructed in violation of approved building norms—before initiating any demolition. The dispute pertains to property bearing Nos. 6-3-1177/A/120 and 6-3-1177/A/104 in BS Maktha, Begumpet, where the petitioners, Cheguri Lakshmi and her son Cheguri Eswar Sai Kishore, constructed a building. The GHMC had granted permission in 2022 for a stilt and two upper floors. However, the petitioners allegedly constructed a ground+4 upper floors along with an additional fifth floor, citing structural stability and Vastu considerations. The matter surfaced after a local resident, P Narender, filed a writ petition alleging illegal construction. In response, the high court, in an order (dated April 18, 2024), directed the GHMC to act against the unauthorised structure. Lakshmi later filed a separate writ petition, arguing that she was not made a party in the earlier case and that she had submitted a regularisation application under section 455A of the GHMC Act, 1955, on June 1, 2024. The GHMC countered that the structure violated the sanctioned plan, setback norms, and other building regulations, and therefore was ineligible for regularisation. While dismissing Lakshmi's plea to set aside the earlier court order, Justice Vinod Kumar held that the petitioners had no legal basis to challenge a previous judicial direction through a fresh writ without first seeking review. He ruled that the earlier high court order remains valid. However, the judge directed GHMC to process the petitioner's section 455A application in accordance with the law and in the spirit of the high court's judgment in A Praveen Kumar vs State of Telangana (2023), which held that only constructions adhering to building rules are eligible for regularisation. The court declined to stay demolition but made it clear that no coercive action should be taken until the GHMC decides the pending application. Justice Vinod Kumar also observed that the petitioners had clubbed two plots totalling 400 square yards and constructed well beyond permissible limits, in clear violation of the Telangana Building Rules. The GHMC had earlier issued a speaking order on Oct 3, 2023, declaring the construction illegal—an order the petitioners failed to challenge. The judge concluded by stating that equity does not favour those who openly flout the law.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Telangana HC tells GHMC to decide regularisation plea before demolition of Begumpet building
Hyderabad: Justice T Vinod Kumar of the Telangana high court has directed the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation ( ) to consider an application filed by a woman and her son seeking regularisation of their Begumpet property—constructed in violation of approved building norms—before initiating any demolition. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The dispute pertains to property bearing Nos. 6-3-1177/A/120 and 6-3-1177/A/104 in BS Maktha, Begumpet, where the petitioners, Cheguri Lakshmi and her son Cheguri Eswar Sai Kishore, constructed a building. The GHMC had granted permission in 2022 for a stilt and two upper floors. However, the petitioners allegedly constructed a ground+4 upper floors along with an additional fifth floor, citing structural stability and Vastu considerations. The matter surfaced after a local resident, P Narender, filed a writ petition alleging illegal construction. In response, the high court, in an order (dated April 18, 2024), directed the GHMC to act against the unauthorised structure. Lakshmi later filed a separate writ petition, arguing that she was not made a party in the earlier case and that she had submitted a regularisation application under section 455A of the GHMC Act, 1955, on June 1, 2024. The GHMC countered that the structure violated the sanctioned plan, setback norms, and other building regulations, and therefore was ineligible for regularisation. While dismissing Lakshmi's plea to set aside the earlier court order, Justice Vinod Kumar held that the petitioners had no legal basis to challenge a previous judicial direction through a fresh writ without first seeking review. He ruled that the earlier high court order remains valid. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now However, the judge directed GHMC to process the petitioner's section 455A application in accordance with the law and in the spirit of the high court's judgment in A Praveen Kumar vs State of Telangana (2023), which held that only constructions adhering to building rules are eligible for regularisation. The court declined to stay demolition but made it clear that no coercive action should be taken until the GHMC decides the pending application. Justice Vinod Kumar also observed that the petitioners had clubbed two plots totalling 400 square yards and constructed well beyond permissible limits, in clear violation of the Telangana Building Rules. The GHMC had earlier issued a speaking order on Oct 3, 2023, declaring the construction illegal—an order the petitioners failed to challenge. The judge concluded by stating that equity does not favour those who openly flout the law.