Court upholds police bribery conviction
Raja alias Andrews
anti-corruption bureau
The high court has sustained the conviction and punishment of MK Manjanna, a head constable at Bagalagunte police station, who was apprehended in 2017 for accepting Rs 10,000 as bribe from a complainant to close a criminal case.The trial court's sentence of four years' imprisonment and Rs 50,000 fine was upheld. Despite minor inconsistencies, the high court noted that crucial elements of demand and acceptance of a bribe were adequately proven, supporting the trial court's decision.On July 15, 2017, Manjanna was caught allegedly receiving money from complainantto close a pending criminal case. The(ACB) subsequently investigated and filed the chargesheet.On September 29, 2021, the special court found Manjanna guilty, imposing three years' rigorous imprisonment with Rs 50,000 fine under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act, and four years with Rs 50,000 fine under Sections 13(1)(d) read with 13(2).Manjanna contested the verdict, stating no official work was pending with the complainant and claimed the recovery of phenolphthalein-soaked money alone did not constitute an offence. He argued that Sections 7 and 13 were not met as demand and acceptance were absent. Justice HP Sandesh confirmed the presence of demand and acceptance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
44 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Delhi Court frames charges against 3 cops for demanding bribe for not to arrest in a drug case
New Delhi [India], June 10 (ANI): The Rouse Avenue Court has framed charges of corruption against three cops, including a sub-inspector of the Delhi police crime branch. All three were posted at the Police Station Anti-Narcotics Task Force (ANTF). It is alleged that two demanded a bribe for saving two persons from arrest. The third accused accepted Rs 2 Lakh on behalf of the two other accused. Special Judge Shailender Malik directed to frame charges against Sub Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) Kirori Mal and Head Constable (HC) Sanjay Kumar. While framing the charges the court said that there is sufficient material and evidence prima facie on record to show that there was criminal conspiracy amongst all the accused persons in demanding bribe money from complainant which was accepted by HC Sanjay Kumar. 'As such there is prima facie material for framing the charge against accused Sanjay Kumar under section 7 of P.C. Act, 1988 (being a substantive offence) as well as against all the accused persons under Section 7 of P.C. Act, 1988 read with 61(2) of BNS. Let the charges be framed,' the Special Judge ordered on June 9. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a charge-sheet in this case has been filed against accused SI Sanjeev Kumar, ASI Kirori Mal and HC Sanjay Kumar. As per the charge-sheet, complainant Rohit Kumar gave the complaint to CBI on 23.11.2024 alleging therein that an FIR is registered in PS ANTF/Crime Branch, Old Kotwali, Daryaganj, Delhi. In that FIR, a notice was sent to two friends of complainant, namely Satpal and Mujahid Malik to join the investigation on 09.09.2024. It was mentioned in the complaint that complainant and his both friends came Delhi for the purpose of joining the investigation at PS ANTF, they met SI Sanjeev Kumar, ASI Kirori Mal who allegedly demanded bribe amount of Rs. 2 lakhs from complainant for not arresting his friends Satpal, and Mujahid Malik. It is alleged that the named police officials threatened the complainant that if he would not pay the bribe amount of Rs. 2 lakhs then they would implicate the complainant also in said FIR. A complaint was filed and thereafter a trap was laid to arrest accused persons on November 25, 2024. Sanjay Kumar was arrested after he received the bribe amount. It is mentioned in the charge-sheet, that CBI Inspector Abhishek Saini and Inspector Dharamveer confronted Sanjay Kumar HC for demanding bribe from complainant. Sanjay Kumar admitted to have received the bribe amount at the instance of Kirori Mal ASI. SI Sanjeev Kumar and ASI Kirori Mal joined the investigation after the order of Delhi High court in December 2024 and January 2025. They both had also moved application for discharge from offence under section 7 of P.C. Act, 1988, solely on the ground that sanction is not proper or invalid, as was accorded by DCP and ought to have been accorded by or under instruction of Commissioner of Police in view of Section 19 read conjointly with Article 311 of Constitution. While dismissing their applications the court said, 'Such challenge to validity of sanction in the opinion of this court involve both legal as well as factual aspects because Investigation Officer (IO) of this case sought sanction for prosecution of accused from office of Commissioner of Police.' (ANI)
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Chandigarh Rapido Driver Falls Prey To QR Code Scam, Loses Rs 4,000
Last Updated: Rapido driver accepted a ride near Command Hospital in Chandigarh and was asked to make an extra stop to drop the passenger's wife at the railway station. A Rapido driver from Chandigarh recently fell victim to a digital scam and lost Rs 4000. He accepted a ride near the Army Hospital and was asked to make an extra stop to drop the passenger's wife at the railway station. The passenger claimed that he had paid Rs 4,200 but couldn't use his UPI, so he asked the driver to send the money to another account. The driver saw the amount credited to his account and forwarded the money to a QR code shared on WhatsApp. Later, he found out that the Rs 4000 in his account was actually sent by a friend the day before, not the passenger. By the time the driver noticed, it was too late. Taking to Reddit, the driver recalled, 'I got a ride in the morning near CH(Army hospital). As I was close, I accepted it. The passenger called me and said that his wife was inside the hospital and needed to be dropped off at the railway station. And he is paying Rs 4,200. I can take my amount and repay it at her ID as it was not getting done from his account. Then he said he sent Rs 4000 and I checked my account, there was Rs 4000 received, but I didn't check the date of receipt. He said his wife was inside and I should send money on QR, which he sent on WhatsApp and I did." 'As I saw Rs 4009 received, I wasn't worried, but he said he was sending more money to transfer, where I got doubt and disconnected. I was happy that I escaped until I saw the date of receipt of Rs 4000. It was my Friend who sent me Rs 4000 yesterday. I was scammed, being understanding, everything and being smart and educated. My earnings of 4-5 days vanished in a minute because of lil ignorance," the Rapido driver added. Reacting to the post, a user wrote, 'The same happened with a Rapido driver, I know. The exact hospital and the exact story. He did go to the police station and the number was found to be from Rajasthan. But nothing much happened." An individual trying to help the driver shared a few simple steps he could follow. First, they suggested reporting the scam on the government's cybercrime website and writing all the details clearly, including each money transfer. Then, the driver should speak to his bank and ask them to start a chargeback process. He also needs to give the bank a copy of the complaint he filed online. Once the online complaint is forwarded to the local police, he should go to the police station and ask them to register an FIR. After getting the FIR, he must give a copy to the bank. This can help the bank fight the case better and try to recover the money from the scammer's bank.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MUDA case: ED attaches 92 properties worth Rs 100cr; probe reveals 'large-scale' site allotment scam
File photo NEW DELHI: The Enforcement Directorate has attached 92 Mysore Urban Development Authority (Muda) sites worth Rs 100 crore in a money laundering case linked to Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah and others. This latest action brings the total value of attached properties to Rs 400 crore in the ongoing investigation. The probe has uncovered a sophisticated scheme involving illegal site allotments through fraudulent documentation and bribe routing via cooperative societies. According to the ED, "The attached properties are registered in the name of entity such as housing cooperative society and individuals who are front/dummy for influential persons including MUDA officials." "ED investigation revealed a large scale scam in allotment of MUDA sites by flouting various statutes and government orders/ guidelines and by other fraudulent means. The role of ex-MUDA commissioners including GT Dinesh Kumar has emerged as instrumental in illegal allotment of compensation sites to ineligible entities/individuals. The evidences with respect to obtaining bribe for making illegal allotments in the form of cash, bank transfer, movable/immovable properties have been gathered during the course of the investigation," the statement added. According to the probe agency, The scam's modus operandi involved identifying ineligible beneficiaries and making allocations using fake or incomplete documentation, directly violating government orders. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Classic Solitaire , Built for Desktop Play Solitaire Install Now Undo In some instances, allotment letters were backdated. The ED stated, "The gratification received for making these illegal allotments was routed through a co-operative society and bank accounts of the relatives/associates of the officers playing key role in the allotment process." The ED added that "The gratification thus received was further used to purchase some of these illegally allotted MUDA sites in the name of relatives of MUDA officers." The investigation gained momentum after the governor, Thaawar Chand Gehlot, authorized an investigation into Siddaramaiah's involvement. A special court subsequently ordered an FIR against the chief minister and three others on September 27, following a petition by social activist Snehamayi Krishna. The Karnataka High Court has upheld the governor's decision. The case encompasses violations under multiple laws, including the IPC, Prevention of Corruption Act, Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, and Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act.
