Housing developer appointed for beauty spot
The government has appointed a developer for a controversial project to build 260 homes on a beauty spot.
Homes England announced on Monday that Keepmoat Homes is expected to begin work on Brislington Meadows, in Bristol, next year.
The government's land and property agency won an appeal over the planning application in 2023 after Bristol City Council missed a deadline to make a decision.
Campaigners have argued the site should not be built on for ecological reasons and local Labour MP Kerry McCarthy has vowed to try and halt the development.
More news stories for Bristol
Watch the latest Points West
Listen to the latest news for Bristol
The council designated the 22.5-acre site for housing in 2014.
Homes England paid a total of about £15m to the council and private owners to buy the site in 2020.
The current council has tried to protect the site, citing its ecological significance, including the habitat its trees, grassland and hedgerows provide for protected species.
A spokesperson for Homes England said: "At Brislington Meadows, we are committed to delivering an exemplary scheme that will provide much-needed, high-standard homes, 30 per cent of which will be affordable, while delivering a 10 per cent biodiversity net gain, in an area that is close to local shops, community facilities, employment areas and public transport infrastructure."
In a statement on the Brislington Meadows website on Monday, the agency added: "(Keepmoat) will now prepare a Reserved Matters planning application, which will include public consultation later in the year. It is currently anticipated that work will start on-site in 2026."
Danica Priest, from campaign group Save Brislington Meadows, said: "It's not a large site - it's not going to make a difference to the housing stock in Bristol. It kind of feels like spite that Homes England is going forward with it.
"There is so much brownfield land in that area that could be developed instead."
She pointed out that the site only has outline permission and plans may be blocked when the developer submits more detailed ones. It is also being taken out of the council's Local Plan.
"It has opposition from every single political party in Bristol which is quite rare," she said.
"It's just really unethical to be building on a site of Nature Conservation Interest."
Kerry McCarthy, Labour MP for Bristol East, said: "I remain of the view that the meadows development should not go ahead.
"As well as being a site of Nature Conservation Interest, the meadows is a key green lung for Brislington and developing it would have a detrimental impact on local residents."
She added: "I will continue to look for realistic ways to prevent the development - if this isn't possible then I will be pushing as strongly as I can to reduce the development's footprint, to ensure access to local people to the wider meadows, and a promise that any biodiversity net gain remains in the local area."
Follow BBC Bristol on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Developer wins right to build on meadowland
Planning reforms will end development chaos, says Rayner
Inquiry starts into green space development
Homes England - GOV.UK
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
PFBC Exec Tim Schaeffer explains the catch and release of federal funding
ERIE – Tim Schaeffer, Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, has proven to be a hands-on leader who relates well, isn't afraid to dig in on difficult subjects, and always strives to be a clear and open communicator. That trend continued recently as Schaeffer traveled to Erie to brief members of the Pennsylvania Outdoor Writers Association on agency updates, including a breakdown of how federal funds are obtained and redistributed. 'Federal revenue – which represents roughly one-fourth of PFBC's total funding – comes from a national excise tax on fishing and boating gear,' Schaeffer explained. 'This money is allocated via a formula that is based on geographic location and fishing license sales.' The Sport Fish Restoration Act, also known as the Dingell-Johnson Act, was enacted in 1950 to provide federal funding to state fish and wildlife agencies for restoration, conservation, management and enhancement of sport fishing opportunities. In 1984, that program was expanded by the Wallop-Breaux Amendment to include excise taxes on a wider variety of fishing equipment, including motorboat fuel, imported boat duties and fishing tackle. This amendment provided additional funding for boating access development and aquatic resource education programs, essentially creating a system through which the consumer directly benefits from the dollars they spend. Anglers and boaters purchase equipment to enjoy their favorite pastimes, and a portion of their investment comes right back to improve fishing access while ensuring abundant, sustainable fish populations in well- managed fisheries. According to PFBC reports, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, which manages the Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration budget, apportioned $381,827,198 in grants to state sport fish programs during the 2024 federal fiscal year. The program's North Atlantic- Appalachian Region received $62,573,512 for distribution among 14 states, with Pennsylvania receiving $9,320,492 – the largest apportionment to any state in the region. Of this total, $7,922,419 was allocated for freshwater fish and $1,398,074 was earmarked for boating access. 'This funding represents a significant portion of the PFBC's annual budget, and we've been able to steward that apportionment through a variety of programs that share these federal funds,' Schaeffer said. Fisheries Management receives the largest slice of the pie for studies that assess the impact of management techniques, including stocking, wild fish, habitat modifications and regulations on respective fisheries to meet program objectives. Aquatic Resource Education provides educational opportunities and outreach activities to target audiences, including the development and delivery of materials and training to aid in angler recruitment, reactivation and retention. Another portion goes to Maintenance of Public Access Facilities, including approximately 250 PFBC-owned and managed facilities that were acquired or developed with both federal and non-federal funds, to provide fishing and boating opportunities. Fifteen percent of Dingell-Johnson funds must be used on Recreational Boating Access, so the PFBC's Boating Facility Grant Program provides grants to eligible entities for the construction and improvement of public boat access facilities. Another program, the Boating Infrastructure Grant provides funding for tie-up and docking facilities for transient, non-trailered vessels such as scenic river cruise boats in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia that bring economic value to the area. The Clean Vessel Act supports the construction, renovation, operation and maintenanceof pump-out stations and waste reception facilities to meet the needs of recreationalboaters at public marinas and locally operated boat access areas. Lastly, Recreational Boating Safety has been prioritized, as the program helps fund the development and delivery of effective public boating education programs, implementation of strategies to reduce boating fatalities and incidents, and the enforcement of boating laws and regulations. Even with budget changes at the national level, Schaeffer is optimistic that this critical funding will remain intact, which should help prevent an increase in fishing license costs. 'We think these excise taxes are safe, because they are applied directly by the manufacturers into the consumer pricing, and it is extracted as 10-percent of the totalsale,' Schaeffer said. 'I've walked through the halls of outdoor shows, explaining to vendors how we use these excise tax dollars. 'Most businesses didn't know what their money was going towards, but they were pleased to hear it's being used to directly benefit their customers.' Just like catch-and-release fishing, these funds are redistributed for others to enjoy. (Frantz is a past president of the Pennsylvania Outdoor Writers Association. Contact the writer: outdoors@
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minister Peter Kyle Boldly Compares Labour's Arrival In Government To Steve Jobs' Apple Takeover
Labour's return to government is comparable to Steve Jobs' restoration of Apple, according to the science secretary Peter Kyle. The government's finances are under intense scrutiny right now ahead of next week's spending review where the chancellor will set out how much money each department will receive in the coming years. Labour has promised to fix the foundations of the country after 14 years of the Conservatives, and the economy did grow by more than expected in the first quarter of 2025 and increasing by 0.7% of gross domestic product. Interest rates have also dropped – but the government has faced public backlash over the way it has managed to claw back this cash. Labour chose to cut winter fuel payments from pensioners – a policy it is now looking at partially reversing – and to keep the Conservatives' two-child benefit cap. In comparison, Steve Jobs was ousted from his famous tech company in 1985 but returned to Apple in 1997 when it was on the cusp of going under, and helped to reinvent the world-famous firm. Pressed on how the government would try to revive the economy with its spending plans, Kyle told Sky News: 'The key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. 'Just bear in mind how Apple turned itself around. 'When Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. 'Now, Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, inventing a series of products like the iPod, now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions, there's going to be high growth, investing in our space sector – all these really highly innovative sectors.' 'When Steve Jobs came back to Apple they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office.'Science Sec. @peterkyle compares the government's record to Steve Jobs.#TrevorPhillipshttps:// Sky 501 & YouTube — Sky News (@SkyNews) June 8, 2025 Diane Abbott Slams Keir Starmer's Immigration Speech For Being 'Fundamentally Racist' Why Keir Starmer Believes It's Far Too Early To Write Reform UK's Political Obituary 'This Is Panic': Defence Secretary Forced To Deny Keir Starmer Is Rattled By Nigel Farage
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Abbott calls Starmer's immigration comments ‘fundamentally racist' at rally
Backbench Labour MP Diane Abbott has criticised Sir Keir Starmer's comments on immigration as 'fundamentally racist' at a protest rally, suggesting the Government was copying the rhetoric of Reform UK. Thousands of trade unionists, campaigners and activists gathered to 'send a message' to the Government at a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform in central London on Saturday. Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and Ms Abbott were among those who gave speeches at the rally outside Downing Street following a march. Organisers The People's Assembly accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. The Prime Minister said the UK risked becoming 'an island of strangers' when he unveiled plans for tighter controls on immigration in a major speech last month, leading to a mixed reaction from different parties. Addressing the protest crowd in Whitehall, Ms Abbott – who was previously suspended by Labour in 2023 before being allowed to run in last year's general election – said there was an international struggle to 'fight the rich and the powerful (and) to fight the racists', including in her own party. The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said: 'I was very disturbed to hear Keir Starmer on the subject of immigration. 'He talked about closing the book on a squalid chapter for our politics – immigrants represent a squalid chapter. 'He talked about how he thought immigration has done incalculable damage to this green and pleasant land, which, of course, is nonsense – immigrants built this land. 'And, finally, he said we risk becoming an island of strangers. 'I thought that was a fundamentally racist thing to say. It is contrary to Britain's history. 'My parents came to this country in the 50s. They were not strangers. They helped to build this country. 'I think Keir Starmer is quite wrong to say that the way that you beat Reform is to copy Reform.' Reform's leader Nigel Farage previously said his party 'very much enjoyed' Sir Keir's speech, as it showed he was 'learning a great deal' from them. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could be seen at the demonstration's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. Mr Corbyn, who also criticised Sir Keir's 'island of strangers' comments, told protesters at the rally: 'As the wars rage around the world – the killing fields in Ukraine and Russia, the abominable, deliberate starvation of children in Gaza and the genocide that's inflicted against the Palestinian people continues – surely to goodness we need a world of peace. 'We need a world of peace that will come through the vision of peace, the vision of disarmament and the vision of actually challenging the causes of war, which leads to the desperation and the refugee flows of today.' The Independent MP for Islington North urged protesters to 'go forward as a movement of hope, of what we can achieve together (and) the society we can build together'. The People's Assembly said trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations came together for the protest under the slogan 'No to Austerity2.0'. A spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.'
