PVH USA Champions Domestic Manufacturing to Advance U.S. Energy Independence
Strengthening the supply chain will accelerate clean energy investment and growth
'Domestic manufacturing isn't just about securing materials. It is about securing the future of clean energy in America.' — Rodolfo Bitar, Vice President of Business Development at PV Hardware
HOUSTON, TX, UNITED STATES, April 2, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- As the U.S. solar industry continues to expand, key challenges threaten to slow its progress. Regulatory uncertainties, grid integration barriers and land use debates have long complicated the industry's advancement. More recently, supply chain disruptions and shifting tariff policies have underscored the urgent need for stronger domestic manufacturing.
PV Hardware USA (PVH) at the forefront of this shift, driving investment in U.S.-made solar materials, components, and technologies to ensure a resilient, reliable and scalable solar sector. In the past year, PVH supported utility-scale solar projects nationwide with expansion planned at its Houston facility headquarters. By reducing dependence on foreign supply chains, domestic manufacturing will play a pivotal role in securing energy independence and accelerating the transition to a clean energy economy.
'Domestic manufacturing isn't just about securing materials. It is about securing the future of clean energy in America,' Rodolfo Bitar, Vice President of Business Development at PV Hardware. 'By investing in U.S.-based production, we are reducing vulnerabilities, accelerating deployment, and helping the nation achieve energy independence.'
A Stronger Supply Chain for a Growing Industry
The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act has catalyzed investment in new solar facilities and technologies, setting the stage for significant industry expansion. As solar installations rise, so does the demand for domestically manufactured components. PVH Terra exemplifies how 100% U.S.-made solar solutions are fueling industry progress by ensuring a stable and adaptable supply chain.
A robust domestic manufacturing sector strengthens the solar industry by providing:
Supply Chain Resilience: Reducing reliance on imports insulates the industry from international trade fluctuations, ensuring continuous production and deployment. PVH USA now utilizes a nearly 100% Made-in-the-USA supply chain to manufacture its products, including DeepTrack, PVH Terra and AxoneDuo Infinity, ensuring stability and adaptability for the growing demand.
Job Growth & Economic Development: Expanding U.S. manufacturing creates high-quality, stable jobs, driving local economies and increasing public support for renewable energy. PVH celebrated the grand opening of its Houston facility in May 2024 with 120 employees and has grown to more than 180 in the past year, with further expansion plans, providing significant employment opportunities that benefit local communities.
Investor Confidence: A secure, predictable supply chain encourages investment in solar energy projects, fostering long-term industry growth. PVH is committed to further investments to support the energy transition and strengthen energy security in the U.S.
Powering Jobs, Strengthening Communities
The clean energy transition is already transforming the U.S. labor market. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, clean energy jobs grew at more than twice the rate of the overall job market in 2023. As more Americans find employment in renewable energy, public support continues to rise.
A majority of Americans now prioritize clean energy expansion, with a growing consensus around the importance of reducing climate impacts, according to Pew Research Center. Domestic manufacturing ensures that these jobs remain local, further solidifying public and governmental backing for the solar industry.
Keeping the Industry Moving Forward
A strong domestic supply chain safeguards the industry from tariff fluctuations, geopolitical tensions, and logistical disruptions. With the ability to rapidly scale production and adapt to evolving market demands, U.S. manufacturers provide the flexibility needed to sustain long-term growth. PVH is committed to leading this charge, ensuring that solar projects across the country remain unconstrained by external factors and focused on advancing clean energy solutions.
For more information, please contact Shawna Seldon McGregor at 917-971-7852 or [email protected].
About PV Hardware: PV Hardware (PVH) is a solar tracker manufacturer and provider of innovative solar tracking solutions for the global solar energy market, including solar trackers, fixed structures and SCADA systems. Each product designed by PVH can be easily installed on any type of terrain, withstands different weather conditions, and is prepared to withstand high winds, supporting any type of module, including thin-film and bifacial. Founded in 2011, PVH has supplied more than 29GW to photovoltaic plants operating in various countries around the world. It is currently the world's third-largest supplier of solar trackers and structures and has the expertise to properly manage solar tracking installations of any capacity, anywhere.
Shawna Seldon McGregor
PV Hardware
+1 917-971-7852
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will Senate Republicans block the climate law rollback?
This analysis and news roundup comes from the Canary Media Weekly newsletter. Sign up to get it every Friday. The Inflation Reduction Act has jump-started hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy and manufacturing development — and most of its benefits have gone to regions represented in Congress by Republicans. But House Republicans still chose to pass a budget bill two weeks ago that would crush the bustling clean energy sector by rapidly phasing out incentives for making energy-efficient home improvements, buying EVs, and building solar, wind, and battery projects. Now, it's the Republican-controlled Senate's turn to consider the bill. Early signs suggest that at least two GOP senators — John Curtis of Utah and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — are not on board with the aggressive cuts in the current version of the bill. Tillis represents a purple state where clean manufacturing and solar project development has boomed in recent years, Canary Media's Elizabeth Ouzts reported this week. He's since said that he wants to revise the House's cut to IRA production and investment tax credits, as well as a provision that bars companies with ties to China from accessing incentives. Tillis and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) also said that the Senate is unlikely to stand by the House's provision that would require clean energy projects to start construction within 60 days of bill enactment or miss out on tax credits. Curtis meanwhile authored a Deseret News op-ed on Wednesday diving into the consequences of a total IRA repeal. While he agrees that some IRA provisions included 'frivolous spending,' he warned against treating 'good policy ideas as guilty by political association.' 'The simple truth is this: many of these credits are Republican policies that we fought to protect,' Curtis wrote. 'We must build a thoughtful, principled bill that doesn't pull the rug out from under American innovators.' Other Republican senators have expressed reservations too. Chuck Grassley, who represents wind turbine-dotted Iowa, suggested he'll try to find compromise on extending support for wind power. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana said he may look to change the House's proposed 60-day deadline for accessing tax credits. North Dakota's John Hoeven wants to preserve some incentives for geothermal; Shelley Moore Capito, from West Virginia, would like to keep hydrogen incentives alive. We still have yet to hear from Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, who in April penned a letter alongside Sens. Curtis, Murkowski, and Tillis defending IRA tax credits. These public statements in support of some aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act could be read as a signal that the House's 'backdoor repeal' of the landmark climate law will fail at the hands of the Senate. On the other hand, plenty of House Republicans spoke out before the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passed, too. In fact, nearly two dozen signed a letter opposing IRA cuts in late March. But come time to vote in May, not a single one of those signatories voted against the bill. It passed the House 215-214. Trump's coal-boosting efforts don't make sense The Trump administration keeps trying to prop up fossil-fuel power plants. Experts and regulators say it's an uneconomical and unwise mission. President Donald Trump's coal-boosting endeavors kicked off last month with a slate of executive orders that would let the U.S. Energy Department order power plants to stay open and would exempt some coal plants from air-pollution regulations. Among those facilities targeted for reinstatement is the Cholla coal plant in Arizona, which shut down in March, and which a state energy regulator warned would cost utility customers nearly $2 billion to reopen. In recent weeks, the DOE has ordered a Michigan coal power plant and a Pennsylvania oil and gas facility to stay open just days before their planned retirements. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis examined the challenges of keeping the Michigan plant open, noting that its power prices were becoming increasingly uncompetitive and that its owner has already been working for years to replace its generation capacity with renewables and gas. And with coal companies laying off miners across Appalachia, keeping coal alive is only going to become more impractical. Bad news/good news for greener steel A potential deal between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel, backed by President Trump, would likely be bad news for efforts to clean up steelmaking. A week ago, Trump announced that Japan's Nippon Steel was set to acquire U.S. Steel in a deal whose details are yet to be disclosed. Nippon has previously pledged to extend the life of U.S. Steel's coal-burning furnaces, Alexander C. Kaufman reported for Canary Media this week, and to build a new electric arc furnace in the U.S. should the deal go through. Meanwhile, Massachusetts-based Boston Metal is honing a greener steelmaking process of its own. The start-up is developing a technique that uses electricity to remove contaminants from iron ore, the company told Canary Media's Sarah Shemkus. Refining iron ore is responsible for most of steelmaking's emissions, but in Boston Metal's process, the only greenhouse gas emissions created come from the electricity used to power it. Breakup of the year: President Trump and Elon Musk start a public fight over the congressional budget bill, leading Tesla shares to drop Friday morning and leaving the EV company with few political allies. (E&E News, Associated Press) Fading love for renewables: A Pew Research Center survey finds support for solar and wind power has dropped among both Democrats and Republicans over the past five years. (Floodlight) Can start-ups survive? Cleantech start-ups are 'stress testing' operations to see if they can still move forward after the Trump administration cuts funding for industrial decarbonization and other clean energy projects. (Wall Street Journal) Routing climate research: The White House's campaign to slash National Science Foundation grants has eliminated funding for more than 100 climate-related research projects, with Harvard University hit particularly hard, a new analysis finds. (MIT Technology Review) Data centers skip the line: Texas residents grow frustrated as data center developers begin planning and building their own gas-fired power plants instead of waiting to connect to the grid, affecting nearby neighborhoods and locking in reliance on fossil fuels for decades to come. (Texas Tribune/Inside Climate News) Gas' growing consequences: Gas leaks, which are common in states with aging infrastructure, release hazardous pollutants that can extend far beyond the homes or neighborhoods where they happen and reach neighboring states. (Inside Climate News) Regulatory switcheroo: President Trump nominates attorney Laura Swett to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, who analysts say will likely champion gas infrastructure and fossil fuel projects, in line with the White House's priorities. (E&E News)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sunrun (RUN) Gained Over 22% This Week. Here is Why.
The share price of Sunrun Inc. (NASDAQ:RUN) surged by 22.34% between May 29 and June 5, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Gained the Most This Week. Let's shed some light on the development. A field of solar panels glistening in the afternoon sun, symbolizing the company's renewable energy ambitions. Sunrun Inc. (NASDAQ:RUN) is America's leading provider of clean energy as a subscription service, offering residential solar and energy storage with no upfront costs. Sunrun Inc. (NASDAQ:RUN) nosedived by over 46% in May after the House of Representatives narrowly passed President Trump's 'one big beautiful bill', which ends the investment and electricity production credits for clean energy facilities. The bill is especially damaging for the rooftop solar industry as the credits for rooftop solar and battery storage would end this year, proving disastrous for companies like Sunrun Inc. (NASDAQ:RUN) that lease equipment to customers. The attention now turns to the Senate, where the renewables industry is hoping that cooler heads will prevail and the House bill won't fly. Even some Republican senators have made it clear that they want to change the deep cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act, restoring some degree of investor confidence in players like Sunrun Inc. (NASDAQ:RUN). The rebound could also be the result of investors perceiving the stock as undervalued and picking it up at a lower, more attractive price. While we acknowledge the potential of RUN as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Cheap Energy Stocks to Buy Now and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
How One Climate Tech Company Is Hanging On in the Trump Era
TRACY, California — The bloodbath that Republicans are making of federal incentives for climate projects has stopped — for now — at the border of House Speaker Mike Johnson's district. That's where Heirloom Carbon is planning to build its first commercial-scale plant capable of extracting carbon dioxide from the air, by way of shallow trays of crushed limestone that absorb the planet-warming gas. The project was on the Trump administration's draft "kill list" of federally funded climate tech projects, as my colleagues reported in March. But it wasn't on the final list that came out last week. Another win in progress: While last week's House-passed megabill would gut the Inflation Reduction Act's tax credits for renewables and nuclear power by tightening their construction deadlines to near-impossibilities, it leaves the IRA's credits for carbon capture largely intact, other than cutting the credits' transferability to third parties. Carbon capture has plenty of enemies on the left, where it's often viewed as a nascent, expensive distraction from reducing emissions in the near term. But it's the right that wields influence over the huge pots of money that are the Biden administration's biggest climate legacy — and as Republicans prepare to decimate incentives for renewable resources like solar, wind and geothermal energy, carbon capture has managed to weather the storm better than many other climate technologies. Heirloom is as savvy an operator as any, having announced its Louisiana facility in 2023 in conjunction with Climeworks and Battelle on the back of an initial $50 million award from the bipartisan infrastructure law. The company is pursuing a two-pronged policy strategy: It's trying to win over the right with the promise of jobs and heavy industry in their districts, and the left with the additional promise of a way to tackle climate change — with caveats about it not being a substitute for other emissions reductions. To that end, it takes pains to make a key distinction between "carbon capture" — which includes technologies that filter CO2 from industrial sources — and "carbon removal" like Heirloom's, which draws existing carbon out of the atmosphere. "By building in California, you get the door knocks from the Microsofts of the world," Vikrum Aiyer, the company's head of global public policy, told me on a tour last month of its first plant, on the agricultural eastern outskirts of the Bay Area, over the hum of a kiln that heats up the limestone to extract the captured CO2. "By building in Louisiana, we get more companies interested in 'How do I use this CO2 for other things?'" Choosing Louisiana was a prescient bet. Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's administration pleaded the project's case after it ended up on the Energy Department's preliminary hit list. "I urge you to contact DOE Secretary Chris Wright and ask him to take every necessary step to advance this critically needed federal grant,' Louisiana Economic Development Secretary Susan Bonnett Bourgeois wrote to the state's congressional delegation. Local port commissioners and business groups chimed in, too; an April letter touted the project's ability to "generate demand for American-made steel, concrete, and advanced equipment, revitalizing our industrial heartland." It probably also helped that Heirloom was a relative old-timer, getting its funding award in August 2023; two-thirds of the projects on the kill list received final approval after the November election. But either way, avoiding being on the list was a significant victory, given how much work remains to get the technologies to economic viability. "For those earlier-stage startups who are not backed by a large corporation or multinational, I think you could see this as absolutely devastating," said Jessie Stolark, executive director of the Carbon Capture Coalition, a trade group. The Senate is currently working through the megabill, but the House version's 2033 deadline to start construction works for Heirloom, which is banking on the preservation of the existing $180-per-ton tax credit to remove CO2 as well as permanently store it (in concrete, at its plant in California, and in an underground well, in Louisiana). Another $130-per-ton credit, for using the carbon, would help it capitalize on its recently announced deal with United Airlines to incorporate it into jet fuel. That would all go a decent way to helping the company get beyond the initial corporate buyers — Microsoft, Meta, McKinsey and JP Morgan among them — willing to shell out the roughly $600 per ton that direct-air capture currently costs. (It needs to get down to about $100 per ton to make it attractive to companies that have to reduce their emissions under government climate programs in California and the European Union, for example.) Heirloom's strategy on the left, meanwhile, involves trying to cobble together more funding for research and development to get the cost down further while allaying environmental groups' concerns that the technology will enable industrial emitters to keep polluting. Heirloom is hoping to leverage California's carbon-trading program, which generates billions in proceeds from the sale of emissions permits to industry. It's backing an "advanced climate technology" fund for industrial decarbonization technologies, pegged to the state's 2022 climate roadmap that envisions carbon removal contributing to 15 percent of the state's goal to get to net-zero emissions by 2045. To that end, the company is trying to win over wary opponents who argue that any climate dollars should go toward nearer-term reductions. "Could that someday be a realistic part of the solution?" former Vice President Al Gore, one of the most powerful climate voices on the left, said of carbon capture in a speech in April in San Francisco. "Perhaps. But not now. Not even close." Carbon capture is 'probably the most expensive and the least reliable thing that we could possibly be doing right now," Katie Valenzuela, a consultant for environmental justice groups, said on a panel at a Sacramento climate conference in April. "I recognize I'm not coming into this room as a very popular dude," Aiyer responded. "We have to earn your trust. I get that." But they're having some success there, too. California lawmakers this week advanced a bill to require the state to purchase $50 million in carbon removal credits between 2026 and 2035. Another bill would lift California's moratorium on carbon dioxide pipelines, which Heirloom would need if it scales up enough to move large volumes to storage wells or other sites. "There's a huge opportunity here," said Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris, its author, who joined last month's tour of the Tracy facility. For now, much of Heirloom's fate is in the hands of the Senate, where their industry-friendly pitch to the right might allow them to slip through the Trump administration's net once again. And as other emissions-cutting efforts fall to Republicans' machete, time is on their side. "By 2050, we need to start taking down six to 10 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year for the rest of the century,' Aiyer said, 'if we stand any chance of realizing either the temperature goals or the Paris Accords." Carbon capture might not be a favorite among progressives yet, but with the Trump administration's gutting of other climate projects, companies like Heirloom may be some of the only ones left.
