logo
RFK-backed ostrich farm fighting H5N1 cull boasted of turning birds into pet food

RFK-backed ostrich farm fighting H5N1 cull boasted of turning birds into pet food

Telegraph2 days ago

An H5N1-infected ostrich farm which has become a cause célèbre among animal rights campaigners and the US health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, once boasted of 'rendering' the birds down in vats so that their oil could be used in cosmetics and pet food.
Universal Ostrich Farms, located in British Columbia, made headlines earlier this month after its owners claimed they were being unfairly ordered to cull their flock of around 400 birds by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).
The cull order came after the CFIA said that several of the animals had contracted H5N1, the deadly avian flu virus that has decimated bird populations worldwide and which experts fear could one day jump to humans.
Thousands of similar cull orders have been issued to infected farms around the world as the virus has spread, but the Canadian ostriches appear to have won a brief stay of execution after being swept up in the US-Canadian culture wars.
A 'Save our Ostriches' campaign launched by the farm's owners has been jumped on by both animal rights activists and MAGA supporters in the US.
Some 69 ostriches have died on the farm since an outbreak began in December last year, when PCR testing came back positive for H5N1.
The farm's owners demanded the CFIA carry out further testing but their request was denied, and they are now claiming that the remaining birds have developed 'herd immunity,' catching the eye of RFK Jr, who has petitioned to have the birds relocated to Florida for further testing.
Scientists have called the proposal both dangerous and irresponsible, given the serious risks any infected birds pose to public health.
The farm's new 'Save Our Ostriches' website certainly pulls at the heartstrings but the contrast with the original website, still available through the internet archive, could not be sharper.
While the new site urges readers to donate up to $1,000 or more to save the 398 remaining birds, the original site talked of 'processing and rendering' and selling the 'meat, skin and oil' of ostriches all over the world.
'Full vertical integration improves quality, increases efficiency, and boosts profitability,' the original website reads.
'Help save Anna. She's feisty, confident, and always full of attitude,' says the new, MAGA-friendly site today, beneath a cutesy picture of a fluffy and determined looking bird.
Ostrich meat is imported and sold in Britain, including at major supermarkets but it is not clear if burgers and steaks from Universal Ostrich Farms were ever sold here.
In British Columbia, Katie Pasitney, the daughter of one of the farm's owners, Karen Espersen, and now acting spokesperson for both her mother and business partner Dave Bilinski, has appeared in several emotional videos in recent weeks appealing for public help and support.
The farm says the birds have not been used for meat since 2020, and are now mainly involved in medical research – specifically, the extraction of antibodies from ostrich eggs.
However, official court documents from the recent dispute with CFIA contradict this claim. They state that 'some level of ostrich sales, along with sales or planned sales of products derived from ostrich fat and eggshells, continued through to at least December 2024'.
The H5N1 avian flu virus was first detected in the late 1990s, but has spread rapidly through animal populations since 2020, killing millions of wild and farmed birds as well as a huge range of mammals – including polar bears, rhinos, whales, foxes, as well as domestic pets including cats and dogs.
Thousands of poultry farms around the world – including in Britain – have been forced to cull their flocks, causing the price of eggs to skyrocket to unprecedented levels.
Last year, the virus 'jumped' into the US cattle chain and since has become endemic. More than 1,000 dairy herds have been infected with the virus, and a fifth of the country's milk supply now contains detectable traces of H5N1.
At least 70 people in the US, mostly poultry and dairy farm workers, have also caught the virus, one of whom has died.
The virus's exponential spread comes at a time when the Trump administration has dramatically cut back on the government's response to H5N1.
Just last week, the administration announced it had cancelled a $766 million contract with pharmaceutical giant Moderna for the mass-production of mRNA bird flu vaccines. The agreement was intended to strengthen the country's pandemic preparedness by diversifying its emergency H5N1 vaccine stocks.
RFK Jr, a long-time vaccine sceptic, has repeatedly expressed concerns over the safety of mRNA vaccines despite them having saved millions of lives during the Covid-19 pandemic.
President Trump has also cut funding to several departments at the US Department of Agriculture and Centre for Disease Control responsible for monitoring and containing the spread of H5N1.
It makes RFK Jr's intervention into the Canadian ostriches' fate even more baffling. 'We believe significant scientific knowledge may be garnered from following the ostriches in a controlled environment,' Mr Kennedy wrote in a letter to the head of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
Experts say the scientific value of the ostriches is minimal, as similar studies have already been conducted in other parts of the world, and transporting any sickened birds would put people and other farms at risk.
In a statement published over the weekend, the CFAI said: '[Our] response to highly pathogenic avian influenza in domestic poultry is based on an approach known as 'stamping-out', as defined by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH).
'Stamping-out is the internationally recognised standard and is a primary tool to manage the spread of [H5N1] and mitigate risks to animal and human health as well as enable international trade.'
'Given that the flock has had multiple laboratory-confirmed cases of H5N1 and the ongoing serious risks for animal and human health, and trade, the CFIA continues planning for depopulation at the infected premises'.
The Telegraph contacted Universal Ostrich Farms for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

George Clooney tries to hide dodgy hair dye as he makes most dramatic political claims yet
George Clooney tries to hide dodgy hair dye as he makes most dramatic political claims yet

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

George Clooney tries to hide dodgy hair dye as he makes most dramatic political claims yet

A cap-wearing George Clooney dramatically claimed that the current political climate in the US is worse than anti-communist witch-hunts of the 1950s during an interview with CNN 's Anderson Cooper. The left-leaning Hollywood A-lister gave the interview on the set of his Broadway play 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' based on Clooney's 2005 film about journalist Edward R. Murrow's battles with Senator Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy infamously alleged that communist spies had infiltrated America, targeting everyone from journalists to the movie industry, and earned a forceful rebuke from Murrow. 'What's fun about the play is although McCarthyism was bad, it wasn't anywhere near as pervasive as it is right now,' Clooney told Cooper, citing the President Donald Trump 's wave of executive orders and pushback against legacy media. Clooney, who dyed his famous salt and pepper locks dark brown to portray Murrow in the production, remarked on 'the kind of fear that you see kind of stretching through law firms and universities.' 'You think it's worse now than McCarthyism?' a stunned Cooper responded, pointing to McCarthy's persecution of left-leaning Americans during the 'Second Red Scare.' 'I do think it is worse now,' Clooney replied, while offering 'one caveat.' Scroll down for video: 'When I was a kid, we did duck and cover drills. So, overriding all of this was the threat of nuclear annihilation,' the 64-year-old actor said. 'Very big deal. I mean, we were pretty sure we were going to all die of a nuclear bomb somewhere along the way. 'So, that always kind of rode on top of the McCarthyism of it all,' Clooney continued. 'What's fun about doing the play, is it reminds people that, you know, that we have been through difficult times, challenging times. And that we survive it as a country. 'And we do find our better angels along the way. It takes a minute... We always do.' In a separate portion of the segment, Clooney offered an anecdote about his father - 91-year-old former Cincinnati anchorman and ex-ABC gameshow host Nick Clooney - before revealing he too fears being targeted by the Trump administration. 'When I was a kid, my dad would stand up on a chair like this, and he would do the speech that I start and close the show with. 'The "box of lights and wires" speech,' Clooney said, referencing to the seminal speech Murrow gave to the Radio Television Digital News Association in 1958. The play begins and ends with the black-tie media event where Murrow warned commercial radio and television were becoming anti-intellectual and propagandized at the behest of the government. 'He would do the Edward R. Murrow speech?' Cooper laughed. 'He would do the Edward R. Murrow speech,' Clooney said. 'And my father was an anchorman for like 40 years. [My performance] is a big salute to my dad, and the things that he stands for and believes in and fights for. When asked whether he personally fears being targeted by the Trump administration, Clooney coolly said, 'Sure.' 'I mean, everybody worries about it,' he explained. 'But, you know, if you spend your life worrying about things, then you won't do things.' 'I want to be able to look at my kids in the eye and say where we stood and what we did at certain times in history,' Clooney continued to Cooper, referring to his continued criticisms of the conservative, as well as the legal work of his wife, Amal Clooney. In April, It was widely reported that Clooney's wife, Amal, a Lebanese-born international human rights lawyer with UK citizenship could be barred from re-entering the US after recommending an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu in a war crimes case brought against him earlier this year. The two mainly live in Paris but have homes in London and Lake Como, Italy, and have briefly relocated to New York for the debut of 'Good Night, and Good Luck.' 'I have no problem with that,' Clooney said of ending up in the administration's crosshairs. 'And my wife certainly doesn't. And my wife's the bravest person you've ever met. 'My wife spent two years in a bunker in Beirut trying Hezbollah for killing Hariri. She's the only person to put ISIS on trial. She's the bravest person I've ever met in my life. 'And so, you know, we have other issues, besides just worrying about an American administration that might want to be unkind and say bad things about us. It's a frustrating and scary time.'

Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial
Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

BreakingNews.ie

time28 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

Jurors started deliberating on Thursday in Harvey Weinstein's New York sex crimes retrial, tasked with deciding — again — a case that encapsulated the #MeToo movement. The seven-woman, five-man jury is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape, each relating to a different accuser and a different date. In this case, the criminal sex act charge is the higher-degree felony. Advertisement Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty. Harvey Weinstein (Olga Fedorova/Pool Photo via AP) Nearly eight years ago, a series of sexual misconduct allegations against the Oscar-winning movie producer propelled the #MeToo movement. Some of those accusations later generated criminal charges and convictions in New York and California. The New York conviction from 2020 was subsequently overturned, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Advertisement Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy and sometimes fiery questioning of Weinstein's three accusers in the case. Jessica Mann said he raped her in 2013, when she was trying to build an acting career. Miriam Haley accused him of forcibly performing oral sex on her in 2006, when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Kaja Sokola, who was not involved in Weinstein's first trial, told jurors that he forced oral sex on her, too, during 2006. At the time, she was a teenage fashion model trying to break into acting. 'They all had dreams of pursuing careers in the defendant's world, the entertainment industry,' prosecutor Nicole Blumberg told jurors in her closing argument on Tuesday. Advertisement She contended that Weinstein let the women think he was interested in their careers when what actually interested him were their bodies, and 'he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they wanted him to or not'. Weinstein chose not to testify. His defence called other witnesses, including some former friends of Ms Sokola's and Ms Mann's. Weinstein's attorneys argued that all three accusers consented to Weinstein's advances because they wanted help with their Hollywood aims. All three stayed on friendly terms with him afterwards, a point the defence emphasised. Advertisement 'It's transactional, folks. Yes, he wants to fool around with them, and yes, they want something from him,' defence lawyer Arthur Aidala said in his summation on Tuesday.

EXCLUSIVE How Justin Bieber could end up with HALF of Hailey's $1B Rhode cosmetics sale if they divorce
EXCLUSIVE How Justin Bieber could end up with HALF of Hailey's $1B Rhode cosmetics sale if they divorce

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE How Justin Bieber could end up with HALF of Hailey's $1B Rhode cosmetics sale if they divorce

Justin Bieber could be entitled to a major payday from his wife Hailey Bieber 's massively successful cosmetics company if they should ever divorce. The 28-year-old model's Rhode cosmetics company was sold late last month to E.L.F. Beauty for a reported $1 billion, and a source close to the couple recently told that her friends and family are worried that the 31-year-old pop star could try to take advantage of her windfall to help cover his reported millions in debt. That's because the couple reportedly never signed a prenuptial agreement to determine how to split their assets up in the event of a divorce. Divorce Attorney and Certified Family Law Specialist Stephanie Blum - who does not represent either spouse - tells that, should the couple divorce amid concern for their marriage, Justin could walk away with half of Hailey's earnings from selling Rhode because of the lack of a prenup. A spokesperson for Hailey declined to comment when contacted by and a rep for Justin has not yet responded. 'Since Hailey founded Rhode cosmetics during the marriage, the money she receives for the sale would be considered community property and thus a court would order the monies divided equally between them,' Blum explains. However, it could be complicated by 'the extent the money she receives for the sale is tied to her future work efforts,' in which case 'that money should go to her,' which Blum says could lead to a fight in court over how the money should be allocated. Bieber had his own massive sale in December 2022, when he sold off nearly 300 songs from his catalog dating up to late 2021, which earned him a reported $200 million from the buyer, Hipgnosis Songs Capital. However, in the event of a divorce, Hailey might not have the same rights to that sum that he would have to her newly acquired fortune. According to Blum, 'If Justin's song catalog consists of songs written and recorded prior to marriage, the money he receives from selling off that song catalog would be considered his separate property.' However, that assumes that he kept those earnings separate. If he 'mixed it up with monies earned by the parties during marriage, there could definitely be some fights about how the money should be divided,' she says. Blum also notes that it is 'not common for people of Justin and Hailey's wealth and prominence to not have a prenuptial agreement.' People in similar situations can usually count on 'business managers and lawyers' to council them to get a prenup. Technically, Hailey's deal to sell Rhode is only for $800 million, but an extra payment of $200 million is on the table depending on how well the brand performs in the next three years after being acquired by E.L.F. Beauty But she might not receive anything from his $200M sale of his songs. 'If Justin's song catalog consists of songs written and recorded prior to marriage, the money he receives from selling off that song catalog would be considered his separate property,' Blum says That could upend the dynamic in the couple's wealth, as Justin may now be worth less than his wife. According to Celebrity Net Worth, the hitmaker is worth around $200 million, and Forbes reported that he was worth around $83.5 million in 2017, before the sale of rights to some songs. 'Without a prenuptial agreement, the lesser earning spouse is potentially advantaged if they get divorced, but of course no one has a crystal ball when they get married so it can be hard to tell which one of the spouses that will be!' Blum warns. 'Probably when they got married, Justin had greater wealth. Would anyone have anticipated that Hailey would end up being the richer spouse?' she adds. 'Probably not, but good for her.' The LA-based divorce attorney also notes that there could be a dispute between Hailey and Justin in a potential divorce if 'there ends up being a huge disparity in the amount of money' they each end up with, and if 'one of them continues to work while the other doesn't. A source close to the couple has revealed to the that Hailey's family and friends are worried that Justin might ' take advantage of her kindness.' They also feared that she might end up using her hundreds of millions from the sale of Rhode to wipe out her husband's alleged debts. 'Friends of Hailey are concerned that she has been so ride or die with Justin that she might get enveloped into bailing him out of financial struggles,' the insider told the Daily Mail. 'Without a prenuptial agreement, the lesser earning spouse is potentially advantaged if they get divorced, but of course no one has a crystal ball when they get married so it can be hard to tell which one of the spouses that will be!' Blum warns 'She is happy to help Justin in any way she can, but friends want her to look out for herself and Jack,' they added. 'They don't want to see Justin take advantage of her kindness.' The source added that Hailey hoped Justin would get back to making music and touring, rather than spending most of his time at home, as he has been doing lately. However, they said her friends feared that he might opt to rest on his reputation, in which case Hailey might not be able to 'take it anymore and [it will] end up being the catalyst of a future breakup.' Justin hasn't one out on tour since he canceled his Justice tour midway through in September 2022 after he fell victim to Ramsay Hunt syndrome, which temporarily caused him to suffer facial paralysis Although Hailey's deal for Rhode could be worth up to $1 billion, a finance expert recently claimed on TikTok that Hailey could end up making far less when accounting for payouts to investors and other company employees. Earlier this week, an insider revealed to the real reason the model had decided to sell her cosmetics company. Last month, Justin was widely criticized by fans after he admitted telling Hailey that she would never be on the cover of Vogue in order to hurt her during an argument. He made the bizarre revelation in a post intended to celebrate his wife for finally achieving a cover story on the magazine, and fans blasted him in the comments for sharing something he should have instead kept to himself. An insider subsequently revealed to that Justin and Hailey are regularly 'at each other's throats,' and the bruising argument the pop star described isn't out of the ordinary for them. Because of that earlier argument, fans were unmoved when Justin again tried to celebrate his wife's accomplishments by reposting a photo on Sunday that Hailey's Rhode Beauty products will soon be sold at Sephora locations. Instead of another take on complimenting his wife, Justin just left the caption blank this time, which only fueled further criticism in the comments section. Even his apparent attempt at a sweet conclusion to the bizarre post couldn't help but bring up the painful insult again. 'So baby u already know but forgive me for saying u wouldn't get a vogue cover cuz clearly i was sadly mistaken,' he wrote. Commenters on the post were shocked that he would admit to such behavior. Once user wrote that it was 'Giving Kanye,' and another added, 'A simple congrats would've been fine I fear.' Several fans suggested Justin should have just kept the argument a 'secret.' One person savaged him by commenting, 'brother you'll never beat the hates his wife allegations like this.' Another fan urged him to just 'put that phone down please.' In the wake of Justin's confession, fans of his wife highlighted past incidents in which he had allegedly displayed 'unsupportive behavior' toward his wife to contextualize the Vogue controversy. Some fans claimed that the disheveled way he often dresses for public events with Hailey betrays a lack of respect.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store