logo
U.S. rocket-testing plans at Pacific atoll stir controversy

U.S. rocket-testing plans at Pacific atoll stir controversy

Yahoo19-05-2025

Hawaii conservation groups are voicing their opposition to plans by the U.S. Space Force to conduct cargo rocket testing at Johnston Atoll, a national wildlife refuge in the Pacific.
The atoll, known as Kalama to Hawaiians, lies within the. It was used in earlier decades as a nuclear testing site but is now a refuge to seabirds, including one of the largest known nesting populations of red-tailed tropicbirds, more than 300 species of fish and a shallow coral reef.
They say Kalama, about 800 miles southwest of Honolulu, shares an ecological and spiritual connection to Hawaii and must be protected.
The Pacific Islands Heritage oalition—a diverse network of scientists, cultural practitioners and community leaders—already has launched a strongly objecting to the plan announced in March by the Department of the Air Force.
Rocket testing poses serious risks, the coalition said, including contamination, debris, noise pollution and the potential for failed landings within protected waters.
This is not unprecedented, according to the coalition, which noted that Elon Musk's Space X Starship, which is being considered for the project, already has had several explosive failures—including on and.
These explosions disrupted commercial flights and rained space debris down into the ocean.
The coalition is calling for an immediate halt to any construction plans, and a full environmental impact statement with a thorough evaluation of its effects on the atoll's fragile ecosystem.
'In a time when our Earth is rapidly changing, we must commit to its restoration and healing, ' said Solomon Kaho 'ohalahala, coalition chair, in a statement. 'The proposal by the Air Force to construct landing pads and test massive rocket cargo operations at Kalama only continues decades of harm and abuse to a place that is culturally and biologically tied to us as Pacific people. We say enough is enough. Aole (No )!'
Kaho 'ohalahala, a Native Hawaiian elder, said these testing plans, to him, 'have untold kinds of impacts that we have not even had to consider.'
Rocket testing plans The U.S. Space Force under the Department of the Air Force in March issued a to build two landing pads at Johnston Atoll, to be designed for up to 10 reentry vehicle landings per year over four consecutive years.
The purpose is to 'safely test and demonstrate the |expeditious delivery of tons of materiel (military equipment ) through space ' to support ongoing research for the department's rocket cargo program.
Testing is expected to begin sometime this year to help determine whether commercial rockets can transport military equipment more speedily around the globe, in hours rather than days to weeks that current modes of transportation require.
The Air Force said the testing must be done in a remote, securable, U.S. government-­controlled location—and that of all potential sites identified, Johnston met all operational requirements.
Other sites considered were Kwajalein Atoll, Midway Island and Wake Island.
A draft environment assessment, which would analyze potential effects to the fish, migratory birds and other protected species in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and finding of no significant impact was originally due out in early April but has been delayed.
The Air Force said in an email it was taking longer than expected and is anticipated to be available for public review in the summer. Once published, a 30-day public-comment period begins.
A jewel in the sea Opposition to the proposal, however, is mounting.
Among the more than 3, 500 people who have signed the petition are biologists, conservationists and others who say the atoll is one of the last wild, healthy ocean ecosystems remaining on Earth.
Others call it a sacred Hawaiian atoll—a jewel in the sea—with deep cultural and spiritual significance.
Kalama has made incredible progress in recovery 20 years after enduring military use, which included coral dredging, atmospheric nuclear testing and the stockpiling and burning of toxic chemical munitions—including more than 2 million gallons of Agent Orange.
The island is now healing, they said, and it would be a shame for this progress to be undone with potentially irreparable harm.
Marine biologist Alan Friedlander, former chief scientist for National Geographic's Pristine Seas program, says Johnston is one of the 'few rare places ' left in the world with a rich diversity of species.
He has traveled from the Arctic to the Antarctic during his 15-year tenure at Pristine Seas, and said, 'There are not many places left like this.'
In fact, all isles within the monument are 'like jewels in the crown, ' he said, not just for the U.S., but for the world.
The atoll is significant as a 'steppingstone ' for species on their way to the Hawaiian Islands, whether it be invertebrates, corals, fishes or birds. Both Johnston and Hawaii share many of the same endemic species.
It is now thriving, he said, with the ocean full of a beautiful and diverse array of of sharks, fish and corals. He described it as a 'kind of a living laboratory of sorts.'
Brad Keitt of the American Bird Conservancy is just as concerned about the direct as well as indirect impacts of rocket testing, which include disturbing the balance of nature and bringing invasive species back to the atoll.
The USFWS—after more than a decade of efforts—finally eradicated the invasive, yellow crazy ants brought by humans that were destroying nests.
Seabird nesting refuge Johnston Atoll is also home to nearly 1.5 million seabirds of 15 species, according to Keitt.
While seabird populations are declining around the world due to habitat loss and introduced predators, the island is one of the few 'bright spots, ' he said, where the population is increasing.
The American Bird Conservancy is requesting the military look for an alternative site because the rocket landing pads cannot be built without significant harm to bird colonies there.
The atoll is home to nearly half of the global population of red-tailed tropicbirds, or koaeula, as well as sooty terns and brown-and red-footed boobies.
He is concerned about the impact of extremely loud sounds associated with rockets, he said, which possibly could cause irreparable, permanent damage to the birds.
Seabirds play an important role in the ecology of islands, with emerging research showing their guano fertilizes the isles and nearshore environments, which helps fish and corals grow faster.
The remoteness of Johnston also makes it difficult to get to, requiring several days over the ocean. The airstrip at Johnston has long been decommissioned, he said, and has since been overtaken by nesting terns.
Friedlander said rocket launches are likely less expensive on the mainland or elsewhere.
'On a small atoll, everything is magnified because you have such limited space and all the animals are concentrated into a very narrow area, both on land and in the sea, ' he said, 'so the impacts are much more direct.'
Several environmental groups, including the Conservation Council of Hawaii, have taken a stand with the council, while others are closely watching developments.
The groups were dismayed at President Donald Trump's executive order in April a ban on commercial fishing at the monument.
Earthjustice, a national environmental law firm, has vowed to fight the order, saying it threatens critical species' habitat within and around the monument.
David Henkin, Earthjustice attorney, said in a statement that the group is closely monitoring the 'reckless proposal.'
'The rockets that the military has in mind have a lousy track record, with several blowing up shortly after launch, ' Henkin said. 'Even one such mishap would devastate wildlife at Johnston. That the military is trying to get away with preparing only an environmental assessment—a cursory review appropriate for only projects with absolutely no potential to cause significant environmental harm—is outrageous.'
The military, the Pacific Islands Heritage Coalition said, must pursue alternatives that will not damage environmental and cultural treasures in its wake.
For Kaho 'ohalahala, who launched the petition, the ocean is one, without division, despite the various jurisdictions that humans have established.
'These waters are sacred ; they tell the stories of our ancestors and connect us to our cultural heritage and cousins across the Pacific, ' he said.
What happens in one part of the ocean affects other parts of it, including the Hawaiian Islands, and he is most concerned about the consequences of the destruction for future generations.
'As an indigenous Hawaiian, those lines do not exist in our ocean, ' he said. 'Our whales, our sharks, our turtles, they move across those lines. For us to think that by drawing a line we're somehow about to act independently without any impact to the whole is a false kind of perspective.'
Johnston Atoll National Wildlife Refuge—Managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Johnston Atoll is an unincorporated U.S. territory made up of four islands (Johnston, Sand, North and East islands ).—Located 716 nautical miles (824 miles ) southwest of Honolulu.—In 1926, Johnston was designated a refuge for native birds. This status as a refuge was retained after the U.S. took control in 1934.—From late 1950s to 1962, Johnston was the site of high-altitude nuclear testing. Chemical munitions were stockpiled there, and incinerated in a disposal system built in 1990, then disassembled in 2004.—By November 2003 the U.S. Air Force demolished the incinerator buildings. By May 2005 almost all of the infrastructure had been removed, and all personnel left the atoll.—On Jan. 6, 2009, the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument was established by President George W. Bush, with Johnston Atoll within its boundaries. In 2014, President Barack Obama expanded the boundaries of the monument.—In 2010, USFWS identifies an invasion of yellow crazy ants at Johnston that are blinding and maiming nesting red-tailed tropicbirds. Efforts to eradicate them begin.—In 2021, USFWS declares eradication of yellow crazy ants from Johnston.
Source : U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'City-Killer' Asteroid Even More Likely to Hit The Moon in 2032
'City-Killer' Asteroid Even More Likely to Hit The Moon in 2032

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'City-Killer' Asteroid Even More Likely to Hit The Moon in 2032

An asteroid that burst onto the scene with an unusually high risk of striking Earth has just had its collision risk upgraded. In February 2025, asteroid 2024 YR4's maximum collision risk with our homeworld when it swoops back around in 2032 was projected to be 3.1 percent. Now its collision risk has risen to 4.3 percent – not with Earth, but the Moon. That's not particularly high, sure. But it's high enough to be pretty exciting. This impact wouldn't destroy the Moon or even affect its orbit; but it would be scientifically interesting to see the formation process of a large crater (and also really cool). 2024 YR4 announced itself with a bang. Initial calculations of its trajectory found that it could collide with Earth in December 2032. The risk wasn't huge, but 3.1 percent is still alarmingly high for an event that could wipe out a city – the chunk of rock measures between 53 and 67 meters (174 and 220 feet), comparable to the size of the asteroid that devastated Tunguska in 1908. Thankfully, it didn't take long for that risk to be downgraded to less than a fraction of a fraction of a percent, effectively ruling out the possibility of an Earth-2024 YR4 collision entirely. The Moon, however, remained in the firing line, with a collision risk of 3.8 percent. Now, using new JWST observations obtained in May 2025, astronomers led by Andy Rivkin of Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory have refined that calculation, bumping the risk to 4.3 percent. That's probably still not the final word on the matter; tracing an asteroid's trajectory takes repeated observations, and 2024 YR4 is now too far away for us to see. It comes around close to Earth every four years, so astronomers are going to have another opportunity to observe it closely in December 2028. We'll know with more precision then how likely the chunk of space rock is to smack into our satellite and give us a wild show (and a bunch of science). The Center of Our Universe Does Not Exist. A Physicist Explains Why. Stunning Direct Images of Alien Worlds Are Detailed Enough to Reveal Clouds Stunning 'Solar Curtains' Phenomenon Revealed on The Sun in New Images

Amazon Kuiper second satellite launch delayed by ULA due to weather
Amazon Kuiper second satellite launch delayed by ULA due to weather

CNBC

time13 hours ago

  • CNBC

Amazon Kuiper second satellite launch delayed by ULA due to weather

United Launch Alliance said Tuesday it was pushing back the second flight carrying Amazon's Project Kuiper internet satellites due to "multiple weather delays during launch processing." The launch from Florida's Space Coast was originally slated for Friday afternoon, but it's now scheduled to take place on June 16, at 1:25 p.m. ET, ULA said in a post to its site. Cape Canaveral and other parts of Florida's Space Coast last week experienced several days of rain and high winds. Representatives from Amazon didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. It will be the second voyage ferrying a batch of Kuiper satellites after a successful launch in April. The first mission dispatched 27 Kuiper satellites into low Earth orbit, a region of space that's within 1,200 miles above the planet's surface. Amazon is working to speed up its satellite deployments so that it can begin delivering service to customers later this year. The company will have to contend with steep competition from Elon Musk's Space X, which operates Starlink. Amazon aims to build a constellation of more than 3,000 satellites. The company has to meet a Federal Communications Commission deadline to launch half of its total constellation, or 1,618 satellites, by July 2026.

SpaceX plans up to 76 Starship launches annually from old Delta IV launch site
SpaceX plans up to 76 Starship launches annually from old Delta IV launch site

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

SpaceX plans up to 76 Starship launches annually from old Delta IV launch site

The first of two Environmental Impact Statements around SpaceX plans for Starship launch sites on Florida's Space Coast was released last week, and it lays out the company's plans to fly as many as 76 times a year from Cape Canaveral Space Station. The Department of the Air Force owns the property at Space Launch Complex 37 that was most recently used by United Launch Alliance, but was shut down after the final launch of ULA's last Delta IV Heavy rocket in 2024. The Air Force has been taking the lead for the EIS on the site while the Federal Aviation Administration has its own EIS in the works for a Starship launch site at neighboring Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 39-A, where SpaceX plans to perform as many as 44 Starship launches a year. The 120 combined potential launches would swell SpaceX's already prodigious pace. With its existing Falcon rockets added to the total, the company could easily make more than 200 launches from the Space Coast in a single year. While the former ULA site was always an option, SpaceX had also eyed a brand new launch complex at Canaveral known as SLC-50, but the just-released draft EIS took that off the board citing it as potentially more harmful environmentally and archeologically, since the proposed site is currently undeveloped green space. 'The development of SLC-50 is less ideal than the redevelopment of an existing SLC,' the report reads. 'Additionally, leveraging existing infrastructure would increase efficiency and reduce environmental impacts.' The final version of the EIS is expected to be released in fall. But first, a series of in-person meetings, as well as one virtual presentation, are slated during a comment period for the draft EIS that's open from June 13-July 28. The three public meetings will be on Tuesday, July 8, from 4-7 p.m. at the American Police Hall of Fame and Museum in Titusville, on Wednesday, July 9 from 4-7 p.m. at the Radisson Resort at the Port in Cape Canaveral, and on Thursday, July 10 from 4-7 p.m. at the Dr. Joe Lee Smith Recreation Center in Cocoa. The virtual hearing will be from July 15-28 at a link that will be posted at the dedicated website for the Cape Canaveral EIS at The draft EIS outlines the potential effect of launches and landings of Starship, which is the most powerful rocket to have ever made it to space. For now, SpaceX has launched it only on suborbital test missions from its Texas site Starbase. The first two test launches of 2025 ended with the Starship's upper stage disintegrating in a spectacle that could be seen from South Florida, Bahamas and the Caribbean. The most recent fared better, but still saw the Starship spin out of control on its path halfway across the world. But already SpaceX is in the midst of a $1.8 billion infrastructure project on the Space Coast to build out a Starship factory and support what it hopes will be both the launch site at Cape Canaveral and one at KSC. SpaceX most recently declared it is aiming for its first Starship launch from the Space Coat before the end of the year, but that would be subject to the acceptance of the EIS and then approval to launch from the FAA. For now, Starship is grounded until SpaceX submits the results of its investigation into the latest Starship mishap. Within the Air Force EIS for the Canaveral site, it outlined SpaceX's intentions not only to launch as many as 76 times, but potentially to have twice as many landings: 76 for the powerful Super Heavy booster that would return minutes after launch, and 76 for the returning upper stage, which depending on its mission could return within hours, or even potentially years after launch. SpaceX would build out two launch pads and two landing pads among the new infrastructure. Half of the launches would be at night, and some of the return landings could still take place offshore as happens with most of the booster landings for Falcon 9 launches using droneships stationed in the Atlantic. While the Air Force is taking the lead, the EIS also includes input from the FAA, NASA, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service. The EIS looks at not only environmental, but social, economic, historic and cultural impacts. For each of 68 potential impacts, the draft EIS concluded that there would at worst be no impact or no significant impact. 'The only known potential significant cumulative effect is associated with noise,' the EIS reads. 'Given the increased launch activity on CCSFS and KSC, community annoyance may increase in the surrounding areas.' Sonic booms from returning boosters and upper stages would become more common, and potentially louder than those currently heard along the Space Coast from the smaller Falcon 9 boosters. Some other impacts could be mitigated, especially involving endangered and threatened species that could be found at the site during construction. 'Southeastern beach mouse habitat permanently lost during construction would be mitigated by providing funding to offset the loss of habitat at an offsite location in accordance with an agreement with the USFWS,' the statement reads as an example. There's a special note saying if tricolored bats are found roosting at the site, they would be allowed to leave before demolition begins. There are also mitigation plans for Florida scrub jays, eastern indigo snakes, gopher tortoises and bald eagles. The report also noted the construction and operation of Starship launches from Canaveral would benefit the area economically. And it stated the Space Force's Space Launch Delta 45 unit, which oversees launch operations at both KSC and Canaveral, would be relied on to ensure that SpaceX competitors would not be shoved to the side. 'SLD 45 would aim to reduce scheduling conflicts between launch providers and will develop mitigation strategies to reduce impacts from conflicts,' the report stated. The goal of the EIS from the Air Force and Space Force point of view was to ensure SpaceX could launch its new rocket as part of the Department of Defense's Assured Access to Space program. 'The (proposed launch site) would increase the space launch mission capability of the U.S. DOD, NASA, and other federal and commercial customers and enhance the resilience and capacity of the nation's space launch infrastructure, while promoting a robust and competitive national space industry,' the report stated. -----------

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store