Shortsighted DOGE USAID cuts hurt Wisconsin farmers, weaken national security
Growing up in rural Western Wisconsin, farms and farmers were central to my community. From afterschool meetings of Future Farmers of America to my best friend's complaints about having to milk cows every Sunday morning before church, agriculture was woven into daily life. After college, I worked for (now retired) Congressman Ron Kind and was honored to do my part supporting his efforts in Washington to protect Wisconsin farmers' livelihoods.
I then went on to work in the U.S. intelligence community, where I was exposed to a global understanding of food and farming. I saw firsthand how food insecurity in Africa and the Middle East helped terrorists and extremists recruit hungry young men – and how U.S. food aid, which in large part comes from American farmers, could reverse this trend.
It is because of these life experiences that I am so concerned by the Trump Administration's shortsighted effort to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and cut U.S. foreign aid, both of which harm Wisconsin agriculture and food security globally.
More: As fights rage over DOGE and USAID, farmers battle decades of government failure | Opinion
This action is a reversal of decades of bipartisan support for programs that provide global food aid and prevent starvation, precisely because such programs help American farmers, help those most in need, and prevent conflict and instability that threatens our national security.
American farmers, including Wisconsin farmers, have played a critical role in saving lives globally since the Food for Peace program was established by President John F. Kennedy. In 2024, USAID purchased $2 billion in U.S.-grown crops for humanitarian aid, such as corn, soybeans, wheat, sorghum, vegetable oil and peas.
The University of Wisconsin-Madison is a key partner for USAID's Feed the Future Innovation Lab, helping train agricultural researchers around the world and research new seeds. In the past decade, Feed the Future has reduced hunger and poverty by 20 to 25 percent in targeted areas, with over 6 million producers newly using better agricultural practices in 2023 alone.
Of course, these innovations not only support communities abroad, but can also be put to use right in UW-Madison's backyard to make farmers more resilient to increasing hazards such as heatwaves and extreme precipitation.
Right now, however, Feed the Future is suspended. A report from the USAID Inspector General released on Feb. 10 found that $489 million of food assistance at ports, in transit, and in warehouses, including food from Midwestern farmers is at risk of spoiling and diversion before it can be used to help hungry communities. Programs that leverage U.S. agricultural innovation to help small-scale farmers in East Africa and the Sahel have stopped, much to the delight of extremist groups and U.S. adversaries Russia and China.
More: I'm relieved our new president will not be responsible for the price of eggs | Letters
Should parts of USAID be reformed or revisited? Certainly. But shutting down the entire agency in less than two weeks is not the way to do it. I know Wisconsinites are proud of the role our farm industry plays in supporting food security and preventing starvation worldwide. The Wisconsin Congressional delegation has consistently stood up for Wisconsin farmers, and they must do the same today by opposing this reckless destruction of these life-saving and economically important food aid programs.
Erin Sikorsky grew up in Holmen, WI and her family spends summers in Spring Green, WI. She previously worked for Congressman Ron Kind and the US intelligence community for more than a decade, and now directs the Center for Climate and Security in Washington, DC.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Cuts to USAID hurt Wisconsin. Congress must support farmers. | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court Grants Musk-Less DOGE Access to Social Security Data
Elon Musk may be persona non grata at the White House, but DOGE lives on. The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Government Efficiency should be allowed access to Social Security Administration data, lifting a previously issued injunction that blocked the department from doing so. While the court's majority did not provide a detailed explanation of their ruling, they did write, 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.' The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioning the urgency of the application and expressing concerns about the potential privacy risks that would result from the ruling. She wrote, 'In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes.' The Trump administration had previously argued that DOGE employees needed access to SSA data in order to halt fraudulent payments, but a federal judge in Maryland ruled that DOGE being granted such access violated federal law and put millions of people's data at risk. Two unions—the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers—brought the lawsuit alongside the Alliance for Retired Americans. The groups argued that allowing DOGE broader access to individuals' personal data would violate the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. 'The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure—and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," their lawyers wrote. The data DOGE employees now have access to includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. In her dissent, Jackson argued that the Supreme Court had 'truly lost its moorings,' by allowing the move and bending its usual standards to accommodate the Trump administration, adding, 'The Court is… unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration.'
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director
Podcaster Joe Rogan was shocked as he read billionaire Elon Musk's wild allegations against President Donald Trump on Thursday. Musk dropped a bomb on social media when he alleged Trump was in the Jeffrey Epstein files after a series of escalating back-and-forth social media messages between him and the president. This accusation occurred as part of a larger tirade against Trump and Republican leaders over the "Big Beautiful Bill." In the episode, which was recorded Thursday but released Friday, a "Joe Rogan Experience" producer interrupted the host's live interview with FBI director Kash Patel to inform him of Musk's Epstein tweet. Watch: Republicans Rally Behind Trump, Continue To Support Musk Amid 'Big, Beautiful' Brawl Rogan read the tweet out loud, "'Time to drop the really big bomb Donald Trump is in the Epstein files, that's the real reason they have not been made public, have a nice day.' "Jesus Christ," he said in shock. Read On The Fox News App "I'm not participating in any of that conversation," Patel said. "Someone should take his phone away," Rogan said as he marveled at Musk's tweet. "Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?" "I don't know how he would," the FBI director said, again insisting he would stay out of the feud. "What the f--- are they doing?" Rogan asked. "I understand he owns Twitter, I think it's bad for your mental health," Rogan said. "I think posting things public all day and arguing with people all day is bad for you." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful BIll because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The White House said a source familiar with the Epstein matter said it is widely known that Trump kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club. The source also pointed out that the administration released the Epstein files, which included Trump's name, and nothing was new about Musk's revelation. "If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hang out with him for 6 months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'" the source said. Shortly after Musk posted about Trump being in the Epstein file, Trump posted his response to Truth Social. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress," Trump said, turning his attention to the "big, beautiful bill" that is before the Senate. "It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that." "I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" the president article source: Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations
Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations originally appeared on TheStreet. The Trump–Musk feud has officially gone nuclear. Speaking aboard Air Force One on Friday, President Donald Trump said he has 'no plans' to speak with Elon Musk, after a week of fiery online exchanges that began over Trump's proposed 'big beautiful bill' and quickly spiraled into personal jabs and political threats. Trump didn't mince words when asked if he was still in contact with Musk. 'No, I don't,' he said. 'I hope he does well with Tesla, but we're going to take a look at everything. It's a lot of money.' The president's comments come just days after Musk blasted Trump's sweeping tax and spending proposal, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and warning it would add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt. He also replied 'Exactly' to a post suggesting Trump had retaliated against him personally. Musk later floated the idea of launching a new political party, posting, 'It's time for a new party – one that actually represents the people. Not the far left or far right, but the 80% in the middle!' The falling-out marks a sharp turn from their once-friendly dynamic. Trump had recently appointed Musk to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, a symbolic role that ended with modest results. Bitcoin fell sharply after Trump threatened to cut off Elon Musk's government contracts, intensifying their public feud. The uncertainty rattled markets, leading Tesla shares to drop 14% and dragging crypto sentiment down with them. Investors feared a political crackdown on Musk-linked ventures could spill into broader risk assets like Bitcoin. Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.