Pitt State faculty and students win top honors internationally
PITTSBURG, Kan. — Pittsburg State University faculty and students have received high international honors at a conference in St. Louis.
Officials with Pitt State say Associate Professor Byron McKay and Assistant Instructional Professor Trevor Maiseroulle from the university's School of Technology and Workforce Learning both received the Distinguished Technology & Engineering Professional Award at the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA) conference in St. Louis.
Pitt State officials claim the Distinguished Technology & Engineering Professional Award is only given to the top 5% of those working in the profession and is indicative of technology and engineering educators who have demonstrated an exceptionally high level of career competence.
'They must demonstrate professional ability, exceptional character, and have developed a reputation of excellence within the profession through service, scholarly activity, and teaching,' noted Professor Andrew Klenke, director of the university's School of Technology and Workforce. 'Byron and Trevor have excelled in each of these categories and have definitely earned this prestigious honor.'
Klenke also said he was surprised to be the recipient of two awards himself, winning the ITEEA Teacher Educator of the Year Award as well as the ITEEA Special Recognition Award. The Educator of the Year is the highest honor given by the Council for Technology and Engineering, with only 68 people receiving the award since its inception in the 1950s.
Officials say other awards given to Pitt State students include:
Nine Pitt State students were inducted into the newly resurrected Alpha Alpha Chapter for Epsilon Pi Tau, the leading international honor society for technology that recognizes academic excellence. It is led by McKay and Maiseroulle.
Will Niffen (Technology & Engineering Education)
Hannah Reilly (Technology & Engineering Education and Wood Product Manufacturing)
Gage Davenport (Technology & Engineering Education)
Jack Banman (Technology & Engineering Education)
Melania Wright (Technology & Engineering Education)
Kendryc Walker (Technology & Engineering Education)
Jozzalynn Duke (Graphic Communications)
Hayden Miller (MSCTE Graduate Student)
Jessica Kohley (MSCTE Graduate Student)
Pitt State says starting in Fall 2025, EPT will be open to all undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in the university's Crossland College of Technology.
In competitions that drew eight other universities including Purdue and Brigham Young, students from Pitt State scored well:
2nd in Manufacturing (Hannah Reilly, Jack Banman, Gage Davenport, Will Niffen, Jozzalynn Duke, and Kendryc Walker)
4th in Problem Solving (Hayden Miller, Jack Banman, Kendryc Walker, Melania Wright, and Will Niffen)
5th in Teaching Lesson (Hayden Miller and Jessica Kohley)
4th in Technology Challenge
For more information about the School of Technology and Workforce at Pitt State, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Calls on Nvidia's Huang to Train Up Britons on AI
Keir Starmer will make an appearance alongside Nvidia Corp co-founder Jensen Huang on Monday, as the British prime minister puts technology and artificial intelligence at the heart of his government's plan to boost economic growth. The Labour leader will hold an in-conversation event in London with tech billionaire Huang to mark an agreement in which Nvidia helps the UK train more people in AI and expands research at universities and at the company's own AI lab in Bristol, west England.
Bloomberg
8 hours ago
- Bloomberg
America Has Plenty of Rare Earths. But Not for Long
Hypocrisy, it's said, is the tribute that vice pays to virtue. The US government's meltdown about rare earths similarly shows how an administration determined to halt the energy transition knows it's already lost the argument. Rare earth magnets are the super-strong pellets that help stick a charging cable to your laptop, smartwatch or headphones. They're also an essential component in a swath of high-tech applications. About 90% are produced in China.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review to include £86bn science and tech package
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review. The package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost security. But research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by 2029. DSIT said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their areas. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers. "This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he said. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." The shadow technology secretary, Alan Mak, said the investment for the sector seemed to be a "copy and paste" of Conservative plans set out in its manifesto last year. "As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back," he added. Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality". Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the economy. The Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to invest. Big chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three years. Whitehall insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
