
France gives air base $1.7 billion nuclear facelift
In a sign of the growing security nerves in Europe, France has embarked on a $1.7 billion renovation of an air base in remote hills in the east of the country so it can handle nuclear-armed bombers.
The work will take a decade but from 2035 the Luxeuil-Saint Sauveur base will be twice the size it is now and it will house new generation hypersonic missiles carried by 50 of France's Rafale fighter jets.
President Emmanuel Macron announced at the base in March -- on the day that US President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin discussed the Ukraine war -- that it was to become the first to welcome the latest Rafale jets and France's ASN4G nuclear-capable air-to-ground missiles.
Luxeuil will become the fourth, but most modern, base in France capable of storing nuclear weapons.
The base currently has about 20 Mirage-2000 jets, which are no longer in production.
Its triangle shaped hangars date from 1952, according to base commander, Colonel Emmanuel Roux. They have been 'well used', according to Roux who said he had seen pictures of President Charles de Gaulle there in 1962. 'It was the same,' he joked.
The hangars will go as the Rafales will not fit in them. 'We will have to redo everything for the infrastructure,' the colonel said.
The Rafale is also heavier than the Mirage so Luxeuil's runway will also have to be made longer and tougher.
Nuclear deterrent
As nuclear bases are given extra protection, 'we will have to increase security measures and the entire infrastructure to get up to speed,' the colonel said, likening his work to 'building a cathedral.'
'We have 10 years to build the best base in France with planes that do not exist (yet), a nuclear weapon that does not exist and technicians who are not yet in school,' said Roux.
Luxeuil will be closed between 2029 and 2032 for the key works and the arrival of the first Rafales.
There will be four times as many pilots as now as the Rafale has two crew. The 300 technicians currently at the base will expand to 1,000 by the time the new base is fully operational.
'Logistics wins the war,' said Roux who highlighted the importance of speed in preparing jets for faster rotations between flights. A Rafale engine can be changed in one hour and an ejector seat in 15 minutes, he said.
Pilots at the base, who cannot be named, also said they were ready to carry nuclear weapons. 'It's the weapon of last resort, but I think we're all ready to use it to protect our loved ones and our nation,' said one.
Luxeuil is close to France's border with Germany, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Belgium and the position could also prove strategic.
Macron has also said that with the Russian invasion of Ukraine raging and heightening worries in the rest of Europe, France is ready to start discussing with other European countries the possible deployment of French nuclear-armed jets.
'I will define the framework in a very specific way in the weeks and months to come,' Macron said in a television interview this month.
Russia has already condemned his comments. 'The proliferation of nuclear weapons on the European continent is something that will not add security, predictability or stability to the European continent,' said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
25 minutes ago
- Arab News
What We Are Reading Today: Desert Edens
Author: Philipp Lehmann From the 1870s to the mid-20th century, European explorers, climatologists, colonial officials, and planners were avidly interested in large-scale projects that might actively alter the climate. Uncovering this history, 'Desert Edens' looks at how arid environments and an increasing anxiety about climate in the colonial world shaped this upsurge in ideas about climate engineering. From notions about the transformation of deserts into forests to Nazi plans to influence the climates of war-torn areas, Philipp Lehmann puts the early climate change debate in its environmental, intellectual, and political context, and considers the ways this legacy reverberates in the present climate crisis. Lehmann examines some of the most ambitious climate-engineering projects to emerge in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Confronted with the Sahara in the 1870s, the French developed concepts for a flooding project that would lead to the creation of a man-made Sahara Sea.

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump says he believes a Gaza ceasefire deal is close
US President Donald Trump said on Friday he believes an agreement is close on a Gaza ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas and that it could be announced soon. US officials have been waiting on a formal response from Hamas about what a source said is a proposed 60-day Gaza ceasefire deal. Trump, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, also said he believes the United States is close to a deal with Iran on its nuclear program.


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
In the wake of the WEF's challenges, neutrality and good governance are paramount
Geneva, Switzerland, is a hub for international cooperation. The city has provided a venue for dialogue among governments and nongovernmental organizations alike since the early 20th century, bolstered by critical aspects of the Swiss DNA: neutrality, good governance and a tradition of dialogue for impact and peace. Since its founding in 1971, the World Economic Forum, under the leadership of its founder Klaus Schwab, started as a private foundation and eventually became an official Swiss international organization guided by the mission statement: 'Committed to improving the state of the world.' The WEF and its annual gathering in Davos evolved from a European industrial conclave into the world's most influential event for brand building, networking and addressing the topics of the day among political figures, business leaders, NGOs and the social sector. The WEF today, however, is facing an impasse. As a perceived neutral platform for dialogue, for decades the WEF offered a unique value proposition geopolitically, from the Cold War period through the Middle East peace process and the end of apartheid in South Africa. This neutrality came into question in 2022 following the war in Ukraine. At that point, the WEF followed political pressure from the US, the EU and Switzerland, turning away all stakeholders, political and civilian, from Russia, thereby taking sides in the conflict and stifling dialogue. When asked directly why the Russians were excluded, one WEF representative at the time cited the excuse that 'Russia invaded a sovereign country' as a justification for the WEF's unprecedented political stand. This situation has played itself out historically with the US-UK invasion of Iraq in 2003, when moral justifications regarding human rights violations were used on a selective basis to underscore what was later revealed to be the false pretense of weapons of mass destruction. Moreover, without skipping a beat, the following January, the WEF invited the US and UK governments, their allies and other stakeholders to Davos, despite their invasion of a 'sovereign country.' As a perceived neutral platform for dialogue, for decades the WEF offered a unique value proposition geopolitically. This fault line is one, which, compared to Western countries, counterparts from the Arab Gulf to the BRICS and the Global South have addressed in a more pragmatic way. Instead of focusing solely on the Western, pro-NATO enlargement narrative, they have considered, rightly, their own business and economic interests and interlinked global geopolitics over the principles of so-called sovereignty and invasion. In terms of its own internal governance, the WEF has come under scrutiny in the past few years following a series of journalistic reports, notably from The Wall Street Journal, which started with looking into gender and inclusion policies and which ultimately led to the resignation of the founder. In the last month in particular, several alleged governance questions have emerged about Schwab, his family, the board and select members of the management team. While independent investigations are underway under the eyes of the Swiss authorities, and innocence is presumed until proven otherwise, it is important that these events not neglect a critical aspect: these issues — if true — would not have occurred had proper measures been installed to ensure good governance, checks and balances, and the proper oversight of what is today an official Swiss international organization. According to the bylaws of the WEF, Schwab has the right to appoint his own successor and either he or a member of his immediate family sits on the board of trustees. Schwab will therefore likely continue to pursue his own case and deny the allegations of wrongdoing that have been lodged to protect his own personal reputation and, even more so, his legacy. The authorities and the current board of the WEF may need to find a compromise, including naming him honorary chairman and/or meeting other demands. Serious questions must be addressed about how so many alleged internal issues were allowed to precipitate over an extended period without board members supposedly being aware. Beyond the organizational culture that was variably criticized in the media, it appears as though board members failed to ask the right questions or address issues, as did the regulators, in compliance with Swiss law, which mandates regular audit. The current circumstances should therefore give the WEF pause to pose some of the difficult values-based questions for an organization that is charged with convening the world's elite around the most pressing global challenges. Moreover, the WEF's partners, notably business and wealthy governments, finance its $500 million annual budget. If the WEF is going to continue to accept these financial contributions, it must also be held accountable. Against this backdrop, and at a moment when global leadership is under great scrutiny and redefinition, multistakeholder leaders have options to choose between myriad different events and initiatives for building their influence and collaboration, ranging from the Milken Institute to the Future Investment Initiative. Now is the time, however, for the WEF to revisit its purpose and decide if it will become one of the many hubs for corporate networking and deal-making or if it will stay true to its DNA: serving as a neutral platform, with good governance and focused on real impact. • Khalid Abdulla-Janahi, chairman of Vision3, has over 30 years of experience in banking and financial services.