logo
Mississippi politics: Former Congressman Steven Palazzo fined for misuse of campaign funds

Mississippi politics: Former Congressman Steven Palazzo fined for misuse of campaign funds

Yahoo17-02-2025

Although he's been out of office since 2023, Former Congressman Steven Palazzo is still on the forefront of politics after he was cited for misusing campaign funds.
"The Commission found reason to believe that Steven Palazzo and Palazzo for Congress and Paul Kilgore in his official capacity as treasurer … violated (part) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, by converting campaign funds to personal use," the Federal Election Commission wrote in its conciliation agreement, which is similar to a settlement agreement.
Palazzo, who represented Mississippi's 4th Congressional District from 2011 to 2023, received notice of the fine last week, although the agreement was reached in January. He has approximately 30 days to pay the fine.
to read the conciliation agreement.
Find out what was in the initial complaint.
'I am glad this is finally over for my family, friends, and loyal supporters," Palazzo said in an email. "After five years of dealing with the lies and half-truths, we can finally move on.
"Serving as South Mississippi's Congressman will always be among my greatest honors. From my heart, thank you for the opportunity, and God bless you all.'
Carl Boyanton, who has sought the Republican nomination in the congressional primaries since 2020, filed a complaint with the FEC, questioning Palazzo's campaign spending.
Boyanton said he filed the complaint before he decided to run for Congress.
Among the spending he challenged was the congressman's expenses of $3,000 a month on rent for a campaign office that did not exist. In addition, that rent was paid to Greene Acres, a company owned by Palazzo. He also reported by Palazzo's own campaign finance reports that the congressman paid for utilities and cleaning of the nonexistent facility.
Palazzo, in his responses to Boyanton's complaint and the FEC investigation, denied he and his campaign leadership used the funds for anything other than for what they were intended.
Read the FEC general counsel's second report.
to read the FEC general counsel's first report.
The complaint was filed in January 2020, and after five years the FEC determined Palazzo was in the wrong. He was fined $13,500 in a civil penalty and as part of the settlement agreement, and agreed to reimburse his campaign committee an additional $16,500 to cover outstanding debts.
On Monday, Boyanton said in a phone interview that he was happy to see the FEC agreed with him, but he believes the punishment should have been for Palazzo to pay back every dollar that was put toward personal use.
"The fine isn't going to be enough, because it isn't going to deter people from doing it," Boyanton said. "If you're going to do the crime, do the time. You know, we put people in jail for less than what he did. It's horrible to say these people aren't held accountable."
Boyanton said he also filed a complaint with the House ethics committee, chaired by Mississippi Congressman Michael Guest, but felt the complaint was ignored since nothing apparently came of it.
But Boyanton also said he was told in a follow-up to the complaint, that the ethics committee doesn't disclose personal information, so he doesn't know for sure what happened after the complaint was filed.
"But where is the transparency," he asked. "To have the fox watching the hen house, that is what we've got with the ethics committee."
Despite his frustration with how long it took for the FEC to act and the small amount of the fine, Boyanton said he is satisfied that action was taken.
"I'm happy something happened," Boyanton said. "I don't want him to go to jail. To tell you the truth, he's actually a nice guy. I think he would have gotten reelected had he just come out and said, 'Hey, I made a mistake. I'll fix everything.' He was well-liked. It's a shame."
Former Mississippi Congressman Gregg Harper defended Palazzo in the FEC complaint and proceedings.
'This was a long and difficult process for Congressman Palazzo to have to endure," Harper said. "If you read the Conciliation Agreement, you can see that the Congressman strongly states that he did not convert campaign funds to personal use, and at the end of the day, paid a modest amount for a fine for not having mileage logs for a vehicle and other technical violations.
"In addition, this allows him to pay for some campaign expenses that he wanted to see resolved. Had he fought this, it would have taken years longer and probably cost in excess of $150,000 in legal fees to hire an attorney in D.C. that specialized in FEC matters.
"After almost five long years, I recommended that he settle and bring this to an end. This doesn't diminish the fact that Congressman Palazzo worked hard and successfully to represent the 4th Congressional District for 12 years.'
Lici Beveridge is a reporter for the Hattiesburg American and Clarion Ledger. Contact her at lbeveridge@gannett.com. Follow her on X @licibev or Facebook at facebook.com/licibeveridge.
This article originally appeared on Hattiesburg American: Ex-Mississippi Rep. Palazzo fined $30,000 for campaign fund misuse

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Trump restores fort names, it's time to end the silly renaming wars
After Trump restores fort names, it's time to end the silly renaming wars

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

After Trump restores fort names, it's time to end the silly renaming wars

After President Donald Trump restores the names of military bases that once honored Confederates, the left and the right need to call a name-change truce. During Tuesday's speech at Fort Bragg (formerly Liberty, and before that, Bragg again), Trump announced that his administration would be reviving the names of Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Lee. Those forts were renamed during the left's crazed push, in the aftermath of the George Floyd protests in 2020, to purge public-property references to any figure it deemed controversial. Advertisement Much of the frenzy was a ridiculous exercise in woke revisionism: The hysteria got so bad that not even Teddy Roosevelt, a once-hero of progressivism, was safe. Trump has made his disdain for the whole gambit clear: One of his first acts as president was giving Mount McKinley its name back. But both the left and the right made the argument for nixing the names of traitorous Confederates from public property, especially in cases where the names were picked during the 1950s and '60s, purely out of hostility toward the Civil Rights movement. Advertisement So both sides should be happy to learn that the restored fort names technically won't honor Confederates. During Trump's first term, Congress passed the bipartisan National Defense Authorization Act, which required the Pentagon's newly established Naming Commission to remove Confederate-linked names from Defense Department-owned property. So in order to give the forts their names back, the DOD is nodding to service members with identical surnames. That silly trick doesn't might go a bit too far: For instance, Fort Bragg is now named after a relatively unknown World War II private, Roland Bragg, instead of Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg. Advertisement Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But many of the new honorees do merit the recognition: Fort Rucker will now be named after heroic World War I Capt. Edward W. Rucker, instead of Confederate brigade commander Col. Edmund Rucker; Fort Robert E. Lee will now be simply 'Fort Lee,' paying tribute to Army Private Fitz Lee, a black Medal of Honor recipient who served in the Spanish-American War. This seems a fair compromise: The bases no longer reference men who fought against the Union, but locals will be able to call the forts by their long-held names. And Trump's move makes a point — the ever-escalating, Orwellian push to scrub flawed men from the history books needs to stop. Advertisement Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars were shelled out to change the fort names once, and a similar amount will presumably be spent changing them back. 'Round and 'round we go. In fact, every time any publicly owned building, street or base goes through this process, it's a costly, divisive mess. Without a cease-fire, it'll never stop; any man or woman deemed worthy of honoring today could be vilified tomorrow, as the standards and values of the time change. Enough is enough: By finding a solution that should satisfy both sides, Trump is offering an opportunity to end the expensive, renaming war the left started. An opportunity neither side should miss.

2 women marry in Mexico's embassy in Guatemala fueling a debate over same-sex marriage
2 women marry in Mexico's embassy in Guatemala fueling a debate over same-sex marriage

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

2 women marry in Mexico's embassy in Guatemala fueling a debate over same-sex marriage

GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — Two Mexican women were married inside the grounds of Mexico's embassy in Guatemala on Friday, sparking anger in a nation that doesn't recognize same-sex marriage and debate over diplomatic sovereignty. The ceremony held in the embassy gardens was intended to celebrate Pride Month , which is celebrated every June, and the consulate said the marriage marked a step toward inclusion, respect and equality for all. 'We celebrate love without borders,' wrote the embassy in a post on the social media platform X. 'This is the first civil wedding of a same-sex couple at the Embassy of Mexico in Guatemala. It's a right granted to all individuals when both are Mexican citizens.' Shortly after, the ceremony sparked an outcry among conservative politicians in Guatemala, a largely Catholic country and one of a handful in Latin America that still doesn't recognize same-sex marriages. While such marriages aren't explicitly prohibited, Guatemalan law only refers to unions between a man and a woman. Allan Rodríguez, the head of the VAMOS party bloc and ally of former president Alejandro Giammattei, was among those to reject the wedding, writing in a statement that 'although the act may be protected under external jurisdictions, it clearly contradicts Guatemala's current legal framework.' According to the congressman, the properties where embassies are located 'are not foreign territory; they merely enjoy diplomatic privileges' and therefore are not a part of the Mexican state. He claimed considering them as such would 'violate constitutional principles of sovereignty, territorial unity, and the rule of law.' Rodríguez, a former president of Congress, is sanctioned by the United States for obstructing anti-corruption efforts and undermining democracy in Guatemala. The office of progressive President Bernardo Arévalo said that under international law embassies like Mexico's 'have territorial immunity and operate under the jurisdiction of the state they represent.' 'In this case, it is an activity carried out by the Mexican Consulate in Guatemala and aimed at Mexican citizens. Therefore, it is exclusively the responsibility of the Government of Mexico, through its diplomatic representation, to comment or speak on the matter,' the embassy statement said. Still, debate only continued on, with Elmer Palencia, a congressman for the VALOR party, created by the daughter of a former dictator, called the marriage, 'not an act of inclusion, but a provocation.' 'Out of respect for the host country, Mexico should refrain from that narrative. Guatemalan sovereignty and social institutions deserve that respect,' he said. Constitutional lawyer Edgar Ortíz contradicted the conservative politicians, saying the marriage doesn't violate Guatemala's sovereignty and complies with the Vienna Convention, which establishes that what happens on diplomatic premises 'are not subject to the host state's jurisdiction.' He noted that Guatemala's constitution establishes that the country will govern following international principles. 'In no way are Guatemala's laws being altered; the effects of this marriage will occur in Mexico, which does recognize same-sex marriage,' he said. 'Rather,' he added, 'it is the Guatemalan lawmakers who are violating sovereignty, by interfering in Mexico's affairs and trying to tell them what they can or cannot do. That seems far more discourteous.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Congressman curses fellow lawmaker on House floor
Congressman curses fellow lawmaker on House floor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Congressman curses fellow lawmaker on House floor

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – New York Democratic Congressman John Mannion cursed out Republican Congressman Mike Lawler on the House floor, Thursday. Video caught the congressman shouting as the rest of the House floor fell silent 'I said it loud enough for him to hear. I did, and he turned to me and then you see the exchange that occurred,' said Mannion. The congressman's outburst came shortly after California Senator Alex Padilla was forced out of a news conference in Los Angeles and handcuffed. Mannion defended his actions saying Republicans, like Lawler, are letting the president and the administration walk over the Constitution. 'He's not standing up to the president. He is ceding his authority, along with the other Republicans, to the president, as is the speaker of the House,' said Mannion. Todd Belt with George Washington University says the country is reaching a boiling point as these aren't the usual things lawmakers would say to each other. 'Tempers are really flaring up over what's going on with these Ice raids, and how members of Congress are being arrested and thrown to the ground and handcuffed,' said Belt. Belt says this could be the start of more to come on the House or Senate floor. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store