Police bust ring smuggling Nvidia GPUs to China-based DeepSeek: Report
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Singapore Police Force have charged three men with fraud in a case involving allegedly illegal re-export of Nvidia GPUs to Chinese AI company DeepSeek, bypassing U.S. trade restrictions, reports ChannelNewsAsia. The police and customs authorities raided 22 locations, arrested nine individuals, and seized documents and electronic records, reports Reuters.
When Singapore suddenly became Nvidia's second largest geographical source of revenue in 2024, many suspected that this happened because Nvidia's GPUs were illegally re-exported from Singapore to China. Nvidia denied all accusations saying that billing locations do not represent actual destination of GPUs. Still, the U.S. Commerce Department started investigation whether DeepSeek has acquired restricted American GPUs to train its AI models.
"Customers use Singapore to centralize invoicing while our products are almost always shipped elsewhere," a statement by Nvidia reads. "Shipments to Singapore were less than 2% of fiscal year 2025 total revenue."
However, it looks like the problem with smuggling high-performance Nvidia GPUs from Singapore to China exists and intermediaries in Singapore helped smuggle Nvidia GPUs for AI and HPC to China in violation of U.S. export laws.
The accused include Singaporeans Aaron Woon Guo Jie, 41, and Alan Wei Zhaolun, 49. Prosecutors allege that in 2024, they conspired to deceive a server supplier by falsely claiming the equipment would not be resold to unauthorized parties. A third suspect, Li Ming, 51, a Chinese national, faces separate charges related to a similar scheme in 2023. Authorities claim he misrepresented the intended recipient of hardware, stating it was meant for a Singapore-based company, Luxuriate Your Life.
If convicted, the suspects could face up to 20 years in prison, fines, or both. Authorities have not disclosed details about other arrested individuals or whether additional charges will be filed.
While the arrests clearly indicate the involvement of Singapore-based groups in smuggling restricted high-performance Nvidia GPUs to China, the extent of their operations are yet to be determined. Companies like DeepSeek need tens of thousands of Nvidia Hopper GPUs (H100, H20, H800) to train its large-language models. However, smaller research institutions run smaller clusters containing tens or hundreds of such processors.
Last week Singapore's government emphasized that while it is not legally bound to enforce unilateral export restrictions imposed by other nations, it expects businesses operating within its borders to comply with such regulations where applicable. Authorities have reiterated that the country does not tolerate attempts to exploit its trade networks to circumvent international controls.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lakers rumors: How new owner will be ‘valuable resource' for LeBron James
The post Lakers rumors: How new owner will be 'valuable resource' for LeBron James appeared first on ClutchPoints. The Los Angeles Lakers officially changed hands on Wednesday, with the Buss family selling its majority stake in the franchise to billionaire investor Mark Walter in a record-breaking $10 billion deal. The transition not only marks a new era for the historic franchise but may also have long-term implications for LeBron James as he looks toward his post-playing career. Advertisement According to a report from ESPN's Tim Bontemps and Dave McMenamin, Walter could serve as a 'valuable resource' for James, who has publicly expressed his ambition to own an NBA team once his playing days are over. 'While James' decision is still pending, a source close to James suggested that Walter could be a valuable resource for James as he pursues his post-playing career goal of one day owning an NBA franchise, too,' the ESPN report noted. Walter, who also owns Major League Baseball's Los Angeles Dodgers, is no stranger to success in professional sports. Since acquiring the Dodgers in 2012, Walter has helped turn the franchise into one of baseball's most consistently dominant clubs, culminating in a World Series title last October. His business acumen and leadership within high-profile sports franchises make him a notable figure in league circles—one whose mentorship could prove instrumental to James' off-court aspirations. Walter's arrival aligns with Lakers' key offseason and LeBron's future James, 40, completed his 22nd NBA season this spring and holds a $52.6 million player option for the 2025–26 season. While he has yet to announce whether he will return for a 23rd year, his interest in franchise ownership has been clear for some time. In past interviews, he has stated his desire to own a future NBA team — most notably in Las Vegas should the league pursue expansion. Advertisement Walter's takeover of the Lakers arrives at a key moment for the organization. The team was eliminated in the first round of the 2025 NBA Playoffs and is entering an offseason of uncertainty and potential retooling. The midseason acquisition of Luka Doncic in a blockbuster trade with the Mavericks reshaped the franchise's core, and the Lakers are expected to be aggressive in the summer market to build a championship-caliber roster around Doncic and, potentially, James. The ownership change also signals a shift in leadership philosophy, with Walter bringing a track record of modernized operations and financial investment that could align with James' own ambitions. As James eyes life beyond the court, forming a relationship with one of the most influential owners in American sports could be a strategic step toward his long-term goals. With the sale finalized and the offseason underway, all eyes now turn to James' pending decision and how Walter's presence could influence both the short-term direction of the Lakers and the next chapter of James' legacy. Related: Colin Cowherd hits Luka Doncic with warning after Lakers sale Related: Lakers rumors: Nick Wright predicts Austin Reaves' trade value after Desmond Bane deal
E&E News
21 minutes ago
- E&E News
The oil and gas industry has a water problem. EPA wants to help.
Oil and gas companies are running out of options for disposing of polluted water they generate every day, a problem for the Trump administration's 'energy dominance' agenda. EPA is offering the industry a hand by promoting reuse of that wastewater. The effort worries environmentalists, but it could draw crucial political allies in oil-producing states. The agency plans to update rules for what can be done with water that emerges from the ground during oil and gas extraction. The goal is to allow the chemical-laden, super-salty brine to be substantially cleaned and reused for power generation, water-guzzling data centers and irrigating rangeland. Advertisement Reusing the water could address a major industry challenge and help ease crippling drought in parts of Texas and New Mexico, two of the nation's most prolific oil-producing states. A growing body of research suggests that the water — which is three or more times saltier than seawater — can now be safely treated for certain applications, from industrial cooling to growing alfalfa and other non-food crops, proponents say. 'The short answer is New Mexico is supportive,' said James Kenney, secretary of the state's Environment Department. 'We want to be EPA's partner and thought leader on this.' But while treatment technologies for produced water have progressed, critics say they remain expensive and energy intensive. Environmentalists and some local officials also worry that EPA will not require testing for all potential pollutants lurking in the water, creating contamination risks. 'EPA [has been] very upfront by saying that there's a lack of data on the technology and its ability to effectively and reliably treat this fluid,' said Dan Mueller, a Texas-based water resources engineer who has worked with the Environmental Defense Fund. 'That is a struggle, and I continue to make that advocacy point.' Drilling in the Permian Basin, the oil field that straddles Texas and New Mexico, can generate three or more times as much wastewater as oil. During hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, water deep underground mixes with naturally occurring salt, radioactive materials, heavy metals and, potentially, chemicals used to fracture shale. For years, companies have reinjected the dirty brine underground in designated locations. But that can provoke earthquakes and risks polluting water supplies. With state regulators now tightening rules around deep well injection, companies are increasingly trying to recycle, treat and reuse the water. The push comes as reservoirs in the Rio Grande Basin are around a quarter percent full, and New Mexico's governor declared a drought emergency last month. If water supplies continue to dwindle, it could stifle clean energy and new industries such as data centers, experts say. 'I'm honestly really excited about the opportunity that this represents, because it's a significant volume of water, and the economics are now competitive with the cost of disposal by deep well injection,' said Shane Walker, director of the Texas Produced Water Consortium at Texas Tech University. Still, Mueller and other skeptics want to see the oil industry do more to reduce its own water footprint before companies can treat and sell their wastewater for other uses. Others worry that the oil-friendly Trump administration and states won't enact proper guardrails to ensure treated water is safe to reuse. 'While I do think there are some beneficial reuses of these waters, our concern is they will be loosely regulated and appropriate oversight will not occur,' said Dana Ames, an environmental crimes investigator in Johnson County, Texas. Treatment options The oil sector's wastewater problem has spawned an industry of its own specializing in disposing of and trying to treat the brine. An oil-and-water mixture is pooled at a wastewater disposal site serving the oil and gas industry outside Eunice, New Mexico, on March 8, 2016. | New Mexico State Land Office via AP One such company is Aquafortus, which has a produced water treatment project in Colorado City, Texas, said Earl Jones, chair of the board for the company. EPA officials toured the site last month, Jones said. The biggest challenge with produced water is its extremely high salt content, but other materials are largely 'not a big deal' to remove, he said. 'This is a pilot facility that's intended to demonstrate the technology, which it does, both in terms of the effectiveness of desalination — the clean water that comes out the backend — and the economics,' Jones said. Although it's not currently done on a large scale, treating 'produced water' at drilling sites is becoming cost competitive with other disposal options, said Mike Hightower, the former program director of the New Mexico Produced Water Consortium. That's because state regulators have cracked down on where the brine can be injected underground to quell the risk of earthquakes. 'They have to truck it out of the basins and into other areas,' Hightower said. 'Once you start trucking water, it gets to be very expensive.' As EPA moves to 'standardize' treatment and reuse of produced water, the practice could soon become common, he predicted. Texas and New Mexico have each invested millions of dollars into research on the topic. 'It's a big opportunity, and I think people need to acknowledge that EPA is trying to do the right thing,' Hightower said. But proponents of reusing produced water in New Mexico encountered a major setback last month. The state's Water Quality Control Commission adopted a rule prohibiting discharge of produced water to groundwater and surface waters, effectively shutting the door on widespread reuse for the next five years. The decision was a win for environmental groups, who say it's still unclear if regulators can ensure that treated produced water is safe to apply on land or in surface waters. One problem is the lack of comprehensive data on specific chemicals that oil and gas companies inject underground, said Colin Cox, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. While Colorado enacted a law in 2022 requiring companies to disclose fracking chemicals, that isn't mandated nationwide, Cox said. 'We don't know how to test for all the contaminants we are aware of, we don't know how to treat for all the contaminants potentially in there, and there haven't been demonstrations of how this would work,' he said. 'I'm proud of the Water Quality Control Commission in New Mexico doing the right thing and protecting us.' PFAS concerns In Texas, meanwhile, the Commission on Environmental Quality is evaluating four permit proposals to discharge treated produced water into creeks and reservoirs. A scarecrow floats on the surface of a tailings pond to keep birds from landing in the toxic wastewater from oil production near Fort McMurray, Canada, on Sep. 2, 2023. | Victor R. Caivano/AP The Legislature also enacted a law last month that could thrust reuse of produced water into the mainstream — while prompting fresh concerns about the safety of the material. The law shields oil and gas companies from lawsuits should contamination or other issues occur after produced water is sold, treated and reused. Supporters of the policy say it provides companies with the legal certainty they need to invest in treatment technologies. 'It's about offering regulatory certainty to the industry that's the backbone of this state,' Drew Darby, a Republican who chairs the Energy Resources Committee in the Texas House of Representatives, said during a hearing earlier this year. But the legal shield set off alarm bells for Ames, the Johnson County official. Located 20 miles south of Fort Worth, the county declared a state of emergency in February due to severe contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. The toxic, human-made forever chemicals were allegedly spread via sewage sludge fertilizer, spurring a cattle die-off and possibly sickening farmers, Ames said. Although it's not clear how much PFAS is used in fracking, the chemicals have been found in some produced water. With state and federal regulators taking a hands-off approach to PFAS in sewage sludge, Ames worries that testing for the chemicals — which include thousands of unique compounds — will not be mandated for produced water discharges. 'We are extremely concerned the EPA will not require PFAS testing be conducted before the waters are released for their reuse purpose,' Ames said. 'If they refuse to regulate PFAS in biosolids, what do you think the likelihood is they're going to do that in fracking water or produced water?' EPA declined requests for an interview on how it plans to advance treatment of produced water and regulate it. The agency's expert engineer on produced water, Jesse Pritts, also retired June 13, according to an automatic reply from his EPA email address. He's one of many career staffers heading for the exit amid agency restructuring and the looming threat of firings under President Donald Trump. By updating federal wastewater standards for produced water, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin plans to advance his top two priorities, protecting the environment and 'promoting energy dominance,' an agency spokesperson said. 'Current effluent regulations limit where and how wastewater from this industry, also known as produced water, can be discharged,' the spokesperson said. 'These regulations do not reflect advancement in treatment technology that have occurred.' In an April presentation to nonprofits, EPA officials indicated they were gathering feedback on what types of pollutants should be monitored and regulated in an upcoming rule. 'Are there concerns you have about pollutants in produced water generally, or in arid West, specifically? Are there specific pollutants that you would like to see limits for in an effluent guidelines revision?' one slide stated, according to a copy of the presentation obtained by POLITICO's E&E News. The presentation said the timing of a potential ruling was still uncertain. Walker, of the Texas Produced Water Consortium, said the agency seems to be trying to move quickly. As for safety concerns, he stressed that there are technologies to treat for and remove all potential contaminants in produced water, including heavy metals, ammonia and chemical compounds. Nonetheless, he noted that treatment itself — especially to remove all the salt — is energy-intensive, a potential barrier to widespread deployment. '[The energy] is not trivial, and in West Texas, the grid is not really set up to handle that level of energy demand,' Walker said. 'So we've actually received some funding to support research on that energy-water nexus.' For Mueller, the water resources engineer and consultant, there's another option for better managing produced water that must be pursued: recycling. The term refers to reusing produced water to frack for more oil and gas, which does not require expensive or energy-intensive treatment and reduces demands on freshwater. The practice is increasingly being employed by the oil industry. Still, non-industry data is limited on exactly how widely it is being done, Mueller said. 'The No. 1 step is to maximize recycled water first, and then see what's left for these other uses that could be used for this produced water,' he said. This story originally appeared in Greenwire.
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, GLOBAL INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Vestis Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 27, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Vestis Corporation (NYSE: VSTS) between May 2, 2024 and May 6, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important August 8, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Vestis securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Vestis class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 8, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Vestis' ability to grow its business; notably that Vestis would be unable to execute on planned strategic initiatives to drive purported improvements to the customer experience and its onboarding efforts in order to drive new customer growth, increased customer retention, and increased revenue from existing customers. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Vestis class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit
