Judith Collins Tells Security Summit NZ Setting Up Space Squadron
Judith Collin told those at the inter-governmental conference the Air Force's 62 Squadron would be reactivated. Phil Pennington, Reporter
The Defence Minister has told a security summit New Zealand is setting up a space squadron against a backdrop of rising threats.
Judith Collins told the high level Shangri-La inter-governmental conference in Singapore the Air Force's 62 Squadron would be reactivated.
She also told the summit that as New Zealand doubled its defence spending, 'We need to ensure that we are building capabilities that are effective into the future and this is particularly true for the domains of space, cyber and undersea warfare.'
In World War Two 62 Squadron ran radar operations in the Pacific in Bougainville and the Solomon Islands, including in the Guadacanal campaign.
'The 21st century 62 Squadron will again turn to the skies, it's just going to be a little bit higher this time,' Collins said, appearing on a panel talking about cyber, undersea and space challenges.
Reuters previously reported the squadron would be reactivated in July with 15 personnel in what was a symbolic step to formalise the significance of the space work the Air Force was already doing.
Collins told the summit New Zealand was also working with its partners to 'leverage out launch capabilities and our other unique advantages such as a lack of immediate neighbours, to support our shared security interests'.
The United States recently confirmed it was in talks with several partner countries, including New Zealand, about the potential for more military satellite launches in future – though Collins had said she was not 'directly' engaged with that, and the NZ Defence Force said launch contracts were a matter for the US and private company Rocket Lab that has spaceports at Mahia and in the US.
'No nation can work on space alone,' Collins told the summit, while pointing out 'we beat Russia' for the number of rocket launches last year.
Transparency around space, cyber and undersea developments was key to avoid misunderstandings, she said.
China's senior colonel Shen Zhixiong said the militarisation of space and other emerging technology domains had accelerated, undermining collective security, asking the panel how the international community should resolve that.
Collins herself had noted New Zealand's reliance as a small state on a rules-based order.
Also, she noted satellites were increasingly crucial and 'increasingly attractive targets for hostile action' despite the big downsides of using weapons in space.
She singled out Russia, and claims from US lawmakers that Moscow was developing a nuclear weapon for use in space, for special mention.
The $12 billion defence capability plan that covered till 2029, and aimed by 2032 to double New Zealand defence spending, would make the NZDF 'increasingly lethal', she told the summit.
The plan featured investment in space systems (up to $600m by 2029), cyber (up to $300m) and 'for the very first time' in maritime surface and subsea drones (up to $100m) to surveil what was happening in New Zealand's vast ocean surrounds, she said.
However, Budget 2025 provided only $30m for space shared with a range of other 'small-scale' projects; it had no funding for maritime drones, only for aerial counter-drone systems.
There was an undisclosed amount for 'an initial uplift to the defensive cyber capabilities' from 2025-29, Budget 2025 said.
A lot of money is still having to be poured into conventional kit – replacing both the Navy's maritime helicopters, and the old, breakdown-prone two 757 planes operated by the Air Force.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Space Scholarships For Seven University Students
Press Release – New Zealand Government Minister for Space Seven university students have been awarded New Zealand Space Scholarships to intern at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. 'This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for these incredibly capable students. They will gain invaluable experience working on projects alongside scientists and engineers who are part of world-leading NASA missions,' Ms Collins says. 'These three-month internships will equip them with real-world skills to kick-startexciting careers in New Zealand's fast-growing space industry.' The students, Asif Rasha (Auckland University of Technology), Shivam Desai (University of Auckland), Felix Goddard, Jack Patterson (University of Canterbury), Mark Bishop, Sofie Claridge and Taran John (Victoria University of Wellington), received their scholarships at a ceremony today. The students will work on projects across the space spectrum, from deep space communication, the Big Bang and the early universe, to mission analysis. 'These scholarships, along with the Prime Minister's Space Prizes, help us encourage the next generation of talent to ensure we have an aerospace-capable workforce. This is a key part of our plan to double the size of our space and advanced aviation sectors by 2030,' Ms Collins says. 'Last month I released an economic report that shows New Zealand's space and advanced aviation sectors are thriving – growing by 53 percent in the five years to 2024. The space sector contributed $2.47b to the economy in the 2023-24 financial year, while the advanced aviation sector, which overlaps with the space sector, contributed $480 million.' More information about the 2025 NZ Space Scholarship recipients and the projects they'll work on is available on the MBIE website. Applications are open now for the 2025 Prime Minister's Space Prizes, which recognise and encourage innovative expertise through the Professional Excellence category and the Student Endeavour category.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Space Scholarships For Seven University Students
Minister for Space Seven university students have been awarded New Zealand Space Scholarships to intern at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. 'This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for these incredibly capable students. They will gain invaluable experience working on projects alongside scientists and engineers who are part of world-leading NASA missions,' Ms Collins says. 'These three-month internships will equip them with real-world skills to kick-startexciting careers in New Zealand's fast-growing space industry." The students, Asif Rasha (Auckland University of Technology), Shivam Desai (University of Auckland), Felix Goddard, Jack Patterson (University of Canterbury), Mark Bishop, Sofie Claridge and Taran John (Victoria University of Wellington), received their scholarships at a ceremony today. The students will work on projects across the space spectrum, from deep space communication, the Big Bang and the early universe, to mission analysis. 'These scholarships, along with the Prime Minister's Space Prizes, help us encourage the next generation of talent to ensure we have an aerospace-capable workforce. This is a key part of our plan to double the size of our space and advanced aviation sectors by 2030,' Ms Collins says. 'Last month I released an economic report that shows New Zealand's space and advanced aviation sectors are thriving – growing by 53 percent in the five years to 2024. The space sector contributed $2.47b to the economy in the 2023-24 financial year, while the advanced aviation sector, which overlaps with the space sector, contributed $480 million.' MBIE website. Applications are open now for the 2025 Prime Minister's Space Prizes, which recognise and encourage innovative expertise through the Professional Excellence category and the Student Endeavour category.
Otago Daily Times
17 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Our last hope — geoengineering?
Peruvian farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya, who sued a German energy firm arguing that the company's emissions contributed to the melting of Andean glaciers, standing by Lake Palcacocha. PHOTO: REUTERS This is the second anniversary of the arrival of the emergency but practically nobody is mentioning it. Instead people are choosing to worry about more familiar problems like global trade wars, the rise of fascism and genocidal wars. It's kind of a global displacement activity: if we don't mention it, maybe it will go away. Two years ago this month (June 2023) the average global temperature jumped by a third of a degree Celsius in a single month. That shook the climate science world to its foundations, because the orthodox predictions assumed about one-tenth of a degree of warming every five years. The June 2023 event was "non-linear". Like most major shifts in natural systems, the pressure built up and up, and then suddenly the system flipped into a different stable state. It took more than another year — until last December — to figure out what actually happened. Ninety percent of the extra heat in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels goes straight into the ocean. That heat was bound to affect the ocean currents, and sooner or later one of those currents would start returning very warm water to the surface. The water gave up its heat to the air — and suddenly, two years ago, the low-level clouds over the eastern North Atlantic started to thin out, letting in much more sunshine to warm the ocean's surface. This chain of events, where the warming we cause triggers further changes in the climate, is called a "feedback" — and since we didn't cause it directly, we can't turn it off. So two years ago we got three-tenths of a degree of warming in one huge lurch — from +1.2°C to +1.5°C in June 2023 — and since then about one-tenth of a degree more in slow but steady warming. The average global temperature has been about +1.6°C for the past year. Many scientists had hoped that we could hold the warming down to +1.5°C at least until the mid-2030s, but that's already passed. This means more and bigger forest fires, floods, droughts, cyclones and killer heatwaves, which is bad enough — but it also turns the future into a minefield. The "never-exceed" limit on warming, set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 10 years ago, was +2.0°C. They chose that limit because they knew we would activate many feedbacks if the warming went past there. Some they knew about (eg melting permafrost), but they also feared that there might be some hidden feedbacks north of +2.0°C. It's turning out that big hidden feedbacks start kicking in at a much lower temperature. We already hit one at +1.2°C two years ago, and for all we know there could be another feedback just ahead. In fact, feedbacks might even come in clusters that cascade and carry us quickly up into much higher temperatures. Unlikely, but not unimaginable. So suddenly the absolute priority is to hold the heat down. Greenhouse gas emissions must be stopped far sooner than the "Net Zero by 2050" target the IPCC originally set, but there is no way that can be done in less than 10 or 15 years — and the World Meteorological Organisation says that we could reach +1.9°C average global temperature as soon as 2029. The only way to hold the heat down in the short term is geoengineering: direct intervention in the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space and thereby cool the planet. Many people are nervous about it, but we find ourselves in a position where geoengineering is the least bad option. I am not a climate scientist, but I have been paying close attention to the subject for a long time (two books), and I spent three days in Cape Town last month interviewing many of the leading scientists in the field at the largest ever conference on geoengineering. None of the men and women I spoke to were ready to deploy geoengineering techniques now, but they could probably begin to deploy within five years if a crash programme was launched right away. Which governments could finance and direct such a programme? The United States is no longer a serious contender (although possibly a major obstacle). The Russians have shown no interest in the subject. But the United Kingdom, the only country committed to open-air research on geoengineering, could lead a European group. China also has the scientists and is keenly aware of the threat, and India would almost certainly join in such an enterprise. Developing countries are desperately exposed to climate damage and would also collaborate. It's a long shot, but that would be the best available outcome. • Gwynne Dyer is an independent London journalist.
