No CCTV footage, no forensic report: Hospital staffer acquitted in sexual harassment case after 5 years due to lack of evidence
A 36-YEAR-OLD staffer at a public hospital was acquitted of charges of sexual harassment of a doctor as police failed to collect CCTV footage from the spot of the incident, among other grounds.
On January 1, 2020, a senior resident at the hospital had alleged that the accused, assigned with cleaning and sweeping duties, had taken a video of her while she was changing clothes after an operation. The woman had noticed a mobile phone. She saw the accused taking a video and confronted him and found a video of the ceiling of the changing room. An FIR was filed with the Mumbai police under section 354(C) (voyeurism: any man who watches, or captures the image of a woman engaging in a private act) of the Indian Penal Code against the staffer. While the phone was seized and sent to the forensic science laboratory, even after five years, a report on it was not submitted to the court.
'Non-filing of a forensic report on a mobile phone in a case of section 354C IPC can be a fatal flaw in the prosecution's case, especially if the phone is relevant to the incident. It creates doubt about the prosecution case. Thus, the absence of a forensic report on the accused's mobile phone, significantly impacts the prosecution's case,' the metropolitan magistrate D M Mata said in the order passed on May 29.
During the trial, the woman deposed about the incident, along with two other colleagues but the defence said that there was no other corroborative evidence to prove the case. 'It is to be noted that in a city like Mumbai, generally, CCTVs are installed at every place. Notably, the spot of the incident is situated in a hospital. Thus, a question arose as to why the investigating officer has not collected the CCTV footage outside of the changing room where the accused is alleged to have been apprehended by the informant (victim). The CCTV footage being a crucial piece of evidence, it is for the prosecution to have produced the best evidence, which is missing in this case,' the court said.
It said that under these circumstances, the prosecution failed miserably to prove the involvement of the accused in the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays trial against former Haryana IAS officer in Manesar land case
The Supreme Court has stayed trial proceedings against former Haryana IAS officer Rajeev Arora in the Manesar land deal, investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The former IAS officer had petitioned the apex court after his revision petition challenging his summoning by a special CBI court was dismissed by the Punjab and Haryana high court on May 15. A special CBI court had on December 1, 2020 ordered that the former IAS officer be summoned to face trial for committing offence under section 120-B read with 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in the Manesar land matter. However, on a revision petition filed by Arora, the Punjab and Haryana high court on December 14, 2020 had stayed the operation and implementation of the order of the special CBI court. Rejecting the challenge to the special CBI court's December 1, 2020 order, the HC on May15 said it found no illegality or infirmity in the order passed by learned special CBI court in summoning the petitioners. An apex court bench headed by chief justice BR Gavai, however, on May 29 ordered that notice be issued to the respondents and 'proceedings qua the petitioner (Rajeev Arora) shall stand stayed till the next date of hearing.' During the trial court proceedings on Friday, Special CBI judge, Rajeev Goyal while referring to the apex court's order of May 29 ordered that proceedings against all the accused persons except Rajeev Arora shall commence. The special court in its June 6 order noted that it is, therefore, seen that all the accused except accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba, DR Dhingra and Rajeev Arora, have been ordered to be charge-sheeted qua the offences as detailed in the order December 1, 2020. The court said that now arguments need to be advanced on charges in respect of accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba and DR Dhingra. Learned defence counsels seek time to prepare the arguments. Learned senior public prosecutor Harsh Mohan Singh submits that charge-sheet may kindly be framed against the accused persons who have already been ordered to be charge-sheeted vide order dated December 1,2020. 'I am not able to accept the submission made by the senior public prosecutor as it will not be appropriate to frame charge-sheet before considering the case concerning framing of charges in respect of accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba and DR Dhingra. In case, the court after hearing contentions of the said accused persons and senior public prosecutor for CBI, concludes that charges are required to be framed against said accused persons as well, then a consolidated charge-sheet qua all the accused persons shall be framed and in my opinion, it will be more appropriate if such a course is adopted, for framing charge-sheet in a piecemeal manner is not desirable. As such, to come up on July 10, 2025 for arguments on charge qua accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba and DR Dhingra,'' ordered the special court.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
UP man gets life term for killing wife over 'affair'
AGRA: A court in Agra sentenced a 32-year-old man to life imprisonment for murdering his 25-year-old wife with the help of his minor friend in 2023, after suspecting her of having an affair. Additional district govt counsel Vijay Verma said Akash Kumar's marriage to Rekha deteriorated after he began suspecting her of an affair with a neighbour. On Aug 15, Akash and his friend lured Rekha to Agra's Malpura area, where Akash slit her throat with a sharp weapon. The body was found on Aug 17, and a case was registered the next day based on a complaint by Rekha's sister, Indravati Devi. Akash and the minor were arrested on Aug 19 under IPC sections 302 (murder). A chargesheet was filed on Nov 7. The verdict was delivered on Friday by additional district judge Shiv Kumar who also imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on him. The minor's case is ongoing before Juvenile Justice Board. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
State legislature employee gets 7-year jail term for misappropriation of funds
MUMBAI: A cashier at the state legislature was sentenced to seven years in jail on May 5 by a special court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, for misappropriation of government funds and for amassing a disproportionate amount of assets from March 1991 to December 2004. An FIR had been registered against the accused, Manoj Gaonkar, in 2005 at the Marine Drive police station, and the anti-corruption bureau had taken over the case and revealed that he had acquired ₹19.24 lakh, which was 109.62% more than his known sources of income. Gaonkar's advocate contradicted the charges and claimed that there was no significant amount in his account. However, the prosecution examined 12 witnesses, including investigating officers and bank officials, and key evidence included salary records, loan statements, demat account transactions, and property purchase documents. The court said, 'The investigation was thorough, the computation was corroborated by official records, and testimonies were consistent.' Additional sessions judge Shahikant E Bangar held the accused guilty under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and said that despite being given multiple opportunities, he was unable to explain the extra assets in his possession. The court said, 'He committed forgery, cheating, and criminal breach of trust under IPC,' and added that the state was not to show him any leniency. In 2018, Gaonkar was sentenced to five years in prison for siphoning off ₹63,000 from a member of the legislative council's medical claim and misappropriating over ₹52.3 lakh from the state government funds in 2005. He had misappropriated money from the travel allowance of member of the legislative assembly, Anil Gote, by forging challans and making wrong entries in the cash book.
