As Congress considers cuts to Medicaid, North Carolina health panel warn of grave impacts
A panel of health experts, officials, and affected North Carolinians convened by Rep. Deborah Ross discuss the impact of proposed cuts to Medicaid on Friday, Feb. 28, 2025. (Photo: Brandon Kingdollar)
A panel of health care experts, elected officials, and affected North Carolinians warned of dire consequences should Congress cut Medicaid funding, a near certainty under a budget resolution passed by House Republicans that calls for roughly $2 trillion in spending cuts.
Convened on Friday morning by Rep. Deborah Ross (NC-02) at Raleigh's NeighborHealth Center, the round table discussion featured stories of lives saved by Medicaid, the federal-state health coverage partnership that supports low-income individuals and people with disabilities. The talk came days after a plan to slash government spending narrowly cleared the U.S. House of Representatives, which observers have said would likely require significant reductions in Medicaid funding.
Ross, a Democrat representing Wake County, called proposals to slash Medicaid spending 'penny wise and pound foolish,' arguing that Republicans' proposal would 'put families in medical debt' while extending substantial tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans. Those cuts, she said, would result in more strain on the health care system by discouraging people from seeking treatment until their conditions grow much worse.
'The money will then go to people who are not investing in the health care system, will take health care away from people who need health care, and create a health care crisis that will cost our communities even more money,' Ross said. 'It is the worst way to deal with public policy.'
'We're operating on razor thin margins. In fact, we had to do a 20% staff reduction about three weeks ago,' said Daniel Lipparelli, NeighborHealth's CEO. 'Something like this would certainly jeopardize our health center — I can say that with confidence — along with other health centers in the state who are a month or less away from closing.'
North Carolina is one of nine states with 'trigger laws' reversing Medicaid expansion if federal matching funds for the program drop below 90% of costs for those covered under the expansion. Nearly 630,000 North Carolinians signed up under the expanded program after a bipartisan bill expanded the program in 2023 to cover adults making up to 138% of the federal poverty line.
Brendan Riley of the North Carolina Community Health Care Association said health care costs will rise for everyone should Medicaid expansion be reversed, not just those who are covered by the program. Nonprofit health centers like NeighborHealth aimed at low-income residents and underserved communities would not be able to keep up their current services, Riley said, ultimately landing more patients in intensive and emergency care.
'Without Medicaid — and without Medicaid expansion in particular — we could not do what we do today. We could not save money for the health care system, for the taxpayers, keeping people out of hospitals and emergency rooms by keeping them healthy,' Riley said.
Cuts to Medicaid could hurt rural North Carolinians the most. Nearly 40% of the program's beneficiaries in the state live in rural counties, according to NC Health News, and hospitals in those areas depend heavily on Medicaid funding — likely leading to closures should the program face significant cuts.
Patrick Woodie, president and CEO of the NC Rural Center, said about more than 1.2 million rural North Carolinians are covered by Medicaid
'We lost 12 rural hospitals in North Carolina since 2005, we have seven more that are considered extremely vulnerable. We have seen a great deal of stabilization of those hospitals since Medicaid expansion took effect,' Woodie said. 'Cuts sound easy — it may be an easy decision for some — but what comes after that?'
Also included in the panel were North Carolinians supported by Medicaid as well as family members of those who rely on the program. Jessica Connelly said without Medicaid, her three-year-old son would not be able to live at home with her family after being born with multiple complex health conditions.
'He went home on a ventilator with a [tracheostomy] and it was 24/7 life support. When we left the ICU after a combined stay of over half a year, it was, 'what sort of skilled nursing facility should we go to?'' Connelly said. 'That is not a conversation you have for your child. Your child lives in your house. You bring your child home.'
Because of Medicaid, her son was able to receive in-home health care and now, is about to start preschool after no longer requiring a ventilator or tracheal tube — improvements she said would not have occurred had he been placed in a nursing facility without the presence of his family. 'Don't take away things from children,' she asked lawmakers.
Teresa Johnson said she had to stop working for months to take care of her adult son after he experienced a brain injury. Being able to get care for him at home was an enormous relief. 'My son knows he's at home,' she said. 'I don't know what would happen if we didn't have home health through Medicaid.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Senate rejects effort to block arms sales over Trump's dealings with Qatar and UAE
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have blocked an effort by Democrats to temporarily block arms sales to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in response to President Donald Trump's dealings in the region. Democrats forced two procedural votes Wednesday to protest Qatar's donation of a $400 million plane to be used as Air Force One and a $2 billion investment by a UAE-backed company using a Trump family-linked stablecoin, a form of cryptocurrency. Sen. Chris Murphy, who led the Democratic effort, said the U.S. Senate should not 'grease the wheels' for Trump. 'We can do that by voting to block these two arms sales to Qatar and to the UAE — not permanently, but until both countries commit to deny Trump's requests for personal enrichment as part of the bilateral relationship,' Murphy said. Trump's administration is still sorting out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family and how the plane would be modified so it is safe for the president, who has called the arrangement a 'no brainer' as a new Air Force One has faced delays at U.S.-based Boeing. Trump said he wouldn't fly around in the gifted Boeing 747 when his term ends, but Democrats, and even some Republicans, have strongly questioned the ethics of the arrangement. At a hearing on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth refused to provide details on plans for his department to accept the jet. He said budgeting and schedules for security upgrades to turn the plane into the president's aircraft are classified. 'A memorandum of understanding remains to be signed,' Hegseth said. Democrats have also raised ethical questions about the Trump family's stake in World Liberty Financial , a cryptocurrency project that has launched its own stablecoin, USD1. Earlier this year, World Liberty announced an investment fund in the United Arab Emirates would be using $2 billion worth of USD1 to purchase a stake in Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. Murphy forced the votes under a mechanism known as a joint resolution of disapproval that allows the Senate to reject arms sales. The procedural vote Wednesday blocked a Democratic motion to discharge the resolution from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and move to an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor. The effort was mostly symbolic, as the measures would have had to pass both chambers of Congress and withstand any presidential veto to become law. But Murphy said the Senate should exercise its powers to oversee arms sales around the world. 'We place immense trust in the president not to abuse these incredible authorities that are given to him,' he said. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump's mass deportations leave Democrats more ready to fight back
WASHINGTON (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom looked straight into the camera and staked out a clear choice for his Democratic Party. The governor positioned himself as not only a leader of the opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda, but a de facto champion of the immigrants now being rounded up in California and across the country. Many of them, he said in the video address, were not hardened criminals but hard working people scooped up at a Home Depot lot or a garment factory, and detained by masked agents assisted by National Guard troops. It's a politically charged position for the party to take, after watching voter discontent with illegal immigration fuel Trump's return to the White House. It leaves Democrats deciding how strongly to align with that message in the face of blistering criticism from Republicans who are pouring billions of dollars into supporting Trump's strict immigration campaign. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Wednesday he's proud of Newsom, 'he's refusing to be intimidated by Donald Trump.' From the streets of Los Angeles to the halls of Congress, the debate over Trump's mass deportation agenda is forcing the U.S. to reckon with core values as a nation of immigrants , but also its longstanding practice of allowing migrants to live and work in the U.S. in a gray zone while not granting them full legal status. More than 11 million immigrants are in the U.S. without proper approval, with millions more having arrived with temporary protections. As Trump's administration promises to round up some 3,000 immigrants a day and deport 1 million a year , the political stakes are shifting in real time. The president rode to the White House with his promise of mass deportations — rally crowds echoed his campaign promise to 'build the wall.' But Americans are watching as Trump deploys the National Guard and active U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, while pockets of demonstrations erupt in other cities nationwide, including after agents raided a meat packing plant in Omaha, Neb. Joel Payne, a Democratic strategist, said the country's mood appears to be somewhere between then-President Barack Obama's assertion that America a 'nation of laws and a nation of immigrants' and Trump's 'more aggressive' deportation approach. 'Democrats still have some work to do to be consistently trustworthy messengers on the issue,' he said. At the same time, he said, Trump's actions as a 'chaos agent' on immigration, at a time when there's already unrest in the U.S. over his trade wars and economic uncertainty, risk overreaching if the upheaval begins to sow havoc in the lives of Americans. Republicans have been relentless in their attacks on Democrats, portraying the situation in Los Angeles, which has been largely confined to a small area downtown, in highly charged terms as 'riots,' in a preview of campaign ads to come. Police said more than 200 people were detained for failing to disperse Tuesday, and 17 others for violating the 8 p.m. curfew over part of Los Angeles. Police arrested several more people for possessing a firearm, assaulting a police officer and other violations. Two people have been charged for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails toward police during LA protests. House Speaker Mike Johnson said Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for his leadership in the state, which he called 'a safe haven to violent criminal illegal aliens.' At a private meeting of House Republicans this week with White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Rep. Richard Hudson, the chairman of the GOP's campaign arm, framed the situation as Democrats supporting rioting and chaos while Republicans stand for law and order. 'Violent insurrectionists turned areas of Los Angeles into lawless hellscapes over the weekend,' wrote Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal, suggesting it may be time to send in military troops. 'The American people elected Donald Trump and a Republican Congress to secure our border and deport violent illegal aliens. That's exactly what the president is doing.' But not all rank-and-file Republicans are onboard with such a heavy-handed approach. GOP Rep, David Valadao, who represents California's agriculture regions in the Central Valley, said on social media he remains 'concerned about ongoing ICE operations throughout CA' and was urging the administration 'to prioritize the removal of known criminals over the hardworking people who have lived peacefully in the Valley for years.' Heading into the 2026 midterm election season, with control of the House and Senate at stake, it's a repeat of past political battles as Congress has failed repeatedly to pass major immigration law changes. The politics have shifted dramatically from the Obama era, when his administration took executive action to protect young immigrants known as Dreamers under the landmark Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Those days, lawmakers were considering proposals to beef up border security as part of a broader package that would also create legal pathways, including for citizenship, for immigrants who have lived in the country for years and paid taxes, often filling roles in jobs Americans won't always take. With Trump's return to the Oval Office, the debate has turned toward aggressively removing immigrants, including millions who were allowed to legally enter the U.S. during the Biden administration as they await their immigration hearings and proceedings. 'This anniversary should be a reminder,' said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., at an event at the U.S. Capitol championing DACA's 13th year, even as protections are at risk under Trump's administration. 'Immigration has many faces.' Despite their challenges in last year's election, Democrats feel more emboldened to resist Trump's actions than even just a few months ago, but the political conversation has nonetheless shifted in Trump's direction. While Democrats are unified against Trump's big tax breaks bill, with its $150 billion for new detention facilities, deportation flights and 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, they talk more openly about beefing up border security and detaining the most dangerous criminal elements. Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, points to the example of Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi who won a special election in New York last year when he addressed potential changes to the immigration system head on. At one point he crashed a GOP opponent's press conference with his own. 'Trump said he was going to go after the worst of the worst, but he has ignored the laws, ignored due process, ignored the courts — and the American people reject that,' she told the Associated Press. 'People want a president and a government that is going to fight for the issues that matter most to them, fight to move our country forward,' she said. 'They want a Congress that is going be a coequal branch of government and a check on this president.' __ Associated Press writer Matt Brown contributed to this story. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Schumer says 16 Republicans have ‘discomfort' with green tax credit rollbacks
Democrats are working to convince some 16 of their Republican colleagues to oppose the GOP's policy bill because of its rollbacks to climate-friendly tax credits, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday. 'We have a group…of seven or eight Democrats who are talking to their Republican colleagues…and we're getting some vibes that people realize this bill went too far and we're hoping they can all go together to [Majority Leader] John Thune and to [Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike] Crapo and say 'change it. We can't be for it the way it is,' Schumer told reporters Wednesday. 'We have a list of 16 Republican senators who have shown some discomfort with this and that's the main group we're focused on,' he added. The version of the 'big, beautiful bill' passed by Republicans makes major cuts to tax credits for climate-friendly energy sources, making it so that any project that is not already under construction within 60 days of the law's enactment is ineligible for the tax credits. This provision, among others, is expected to bar many projects from eligibility and could ultimately lead to less low-carbon energy development. At least some Republicans have publicly expressed skepticism of a rapid end to the credits with Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Curtis (R-Utah) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) warning against a 'full scale' repeal. However, House Republicans who have championed the cuts are pushing for them to stay in their current form, with members of the Freedom Caucus board recently saying it will 'not accept' changes that water down the cuts.