Trump's Medicaid Cuts Will Gut a ‘Medical Lifeline' for Millions
Sabrina Bishop, a California home care worker, and her disabled patient, Ronald Penn, traveled to Washington, D.C., last week to warn lawmakers about the impact that Donald Trump and Republicans' tax bill, which would massively cut Medicaid, will have on Americans who rely on home health care services.
'We're really trying to get them to understand that this is about saving human lives, but they want to focus on giving these billionaires and corporations tax breaks who don't even need it,' Bishop tells Rolling Stone. 'I can't believe that there's people out there who would actually entertain taking away care for people who need care,' says Penn, a veteran and retired hospice care worker, calling the idea 'absolutely criminal.'
Last week, Republicans in the House of Representatives passed legislation to extend and expand Trump's 2017 tax law, which disproportionately benefited the wealthy and big corporations. Their latest tax legislation would similarly benefit the wealthy — and it would pay for those tax cuts, in part, with huge cuts to Medicaid, the government health insurance program for low-income and disabled Americans.
At least 10 million Americans are expected to lose Medicaid as a result of measures in the tax bill. The legislation will also limit 'provider taxes,' which states use to provide supplemental payments to hospitals, doctors, and other health care providers. The bill would additionally impose a financial penalty on states that offer health coverage to undocumented immigrants. For California, this would mean a $30 billion reduction in federal funding by 2034. Taken together, these changes could greatly impact available funding for home health care workers like Bishop.
The idea of cutting Medicaid is wildly unpopular, according to numerous polls. One recent survey, commissioned by the Committee to Protect Healthcare, an advocacy group for doctors and health care advocates, found that 62 percent of respondents oppose cutting Medicaid, compared to only 22 percent who support doing so. The group found that messages attacking GOP House candidates on Medicaid cuts shifted voter opinions by as much as 3.4 percent against Republicans.
Penn and Bishop, a member of AFSCME Local 3930/United Domestic Workers, met with several California lawmakers and congressional offices in Washington last week to warn about the impact that the Medicaid cuts will have on home health care workers and their patients.
Noting that Republicans are calling this legislation 'a big, beautiful deal,' Bishop says, in reality, the legislation is 'going to cut the medical lifeline off for millions of human beings, millions of people.' She adds, 'Millions of lives will be lost.'
Bishop, 59, assists disabled patients, seniors, and others who cannot care for themselves — helping them with 'cooking, cleaning, running errands, medication management' — so they can 'stay in their own home, versus being put in an institution where their quality of life could be diminished.'
Penn, 61, lost his eyesight and his legs due to illness. 'I'm financially OK, but I can't care for myself the way I'm used to,' he says. 'I can't drive. I can't cook.'
'That's where Sabrina comes in,' he says. 'Without my personal caregiver — and not just her, but others that work alongside her — it would grossly impact my life. I would end up in a state, county-run facility. … My livelihood would be greatly diminished, and it would cost the state and cost the federal government more money to put me in these types of places, where I wouldn't be able to come and go as I please, I wouldn't be able to thrive. I wouldn't be able to have the life that I so honestly and richly deserve — that I earned.'
Bishop and Penn met with Democratic Rep. Juan Vargas, their representative, and staffers for California freshman Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff. They also met with an aide for Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley.
They say the meeting with the Kiley staffer did not go well.
'I tried to reach out to him and try to appeal to his heart,' says Penn, adding that he tried to explain that it would 'cost less money to get the systems working properly and effectively' than it will if Republicans slash Medicaid.
He says Kiley's aide started reciting talking points about undocumented immigrants taking advantage of the Medicaid system. This has become a key plank in Republicans' messaging efforts to defend their tax bill, despite it being false. Undocumented immigrants are ineligible for Medicaid. Democrats have pointed out that, of the millions of Americans who are expected to lose their health insurance coverage as a result of Republicans' Medicaid cuts, precisely none of them are undocumented.
'That's not the real problem,' says Bishop, adding that Republicans are merely looking for a way to give more tax breaks to the wealthy. 'If we could get them to pay their taxes, we could have a better program.'
More from Rolling Stone
Tom Morello Joins Bruce Springsteen and Harvard in Trump Standoff: 'F-ck That Guy'
Trump Capped Memorial Day by Pardoning a Crooked Sheriff
NPR Sues Trump for Trying to Strip Its Funding
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Begins Putting Its Stamp on Giant Trump Tax, Debt Limit Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Significant changes are in store for President Donald Trump's signature $3.9 trillion tax-cut bill as the Senate begins closed-door talks this week on legislation that squeaked through the House by a single vote. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access Senate Republican leaders are aiming to make permanent many of the temporary tax cuts in the House bill, a move that would increase the bill's more than $2.5 trillion deficit impact. But doing so risks alienating fiscal hawks already at war with party moderates over the bill's safety-net cuts. It amounts to a game of chess further complicated by the top Senate rules-keeper, who will decide whether some key provisions violate the chamber's strict rules. Jettisoning those provisions — which include gun silencer regulations and artificial intelligence policy — could sink the bill in the House. House Republicans' top tax writer, Representative Jason Smith, on Friday said that senators need to leave most of the bill untouched in order to ensure it can pass the House in the end. 'I would encourage my counterparts, don't be too drastic, be very balanced,' he said. Trump worked the phone as Republican senators returned to work in Washington Monday after a one-week holiday break. Josh Hawley of Missouri said in a mid-afternoon social media post that he 'just had a great talk' with the president on the legislation and they agreed no Medicaid benefits would be cut. Hawley, who has been a vocal supporter of preserving Medicaid benefits, didn't specify if he believes the House bill — projected to cut health care coverage coverage for about 7.7 million people by changing eligibility requirements — reduces benefits. GOP wrangling imperils Republicans' goal of sending the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' to Trump's desk by July 4. But the real deadline is sometime in August or September, when the Treasury Department estimates the US will run out of borrowing authority. The House bill would raise the government's legal debt ceiling by $4 trillion, which the Senate wants to increase to $5 trillion in order to push off the next fiscal cliff until after the 2026 congressional elections. That's just one of the major changes the Senate will weigh in the coming weeks. Here are others: Permanent Business Breaks Senate Finance Chairman Mike Crapo's top priority is making permanent the temporary business tax cuts that the House bill sunsets after 2029. These are the research and development tax deduction, the ability to use depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) as the basis for interest expensing, and 100% bonus depreciation of certain property, including most machinery and factories. Senate Republicans plan to use a budget gimmick that counts the extension of the individual provisions in the 2017 Trump tax bill as having no cost. That gives them room to make the additional business tax cuts and possibly extend some of the new four-year individual cuts in the House bill like those on tips and overtime. Deficit hawks could demand new offsets, however, either in the form of spending cuts or ending tax breaks like one on carried interest used by private equity. SALT The House expanded the state and local tax deduction limit from $10,000 to $40,000 to get blue-state Republicans behind the bill. But SALT isn't an issue in the Senate, where high-tax states like California, New York and New Jersey are represented by Democrats. 'I can't think of any Senate Republicans who think more than $10,000 is needed and I can think of several who think the number should be zero,' said Rohit Kumar, a former top Senate staffer now with PWC. That includes deficit hawks like Louisiana's John Kennedy, who has balked at the House's SALT boost. Senators could propose keeping the current $10,000 SALT cap as a low-ball counter, forcing the House to settle from something in the ballpark of a $30,000 cap, Kumar said. The Senate could also change new limits on the abilities of passthrough service businesses to claim SALT deductions. Green Energy Moderate Republicans in the Senate are pushing back on provisions in the House bill that gut tax credits for solar, wind, battery makers and several other clean energy sectors. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she's seeking to soften aggressive phaseouts of tax credits for clean electricity production and nuclear power. She has the backing of at least three other Republicans, giving her enough leverage to make demands in a chamber where opposition from four GOP senators would kill the bill. Their demands will run headlong into ultraconservatives, who already think the House bill doesn't get rid of tax benefits for clean energy fast enough. Medicaid, Food Stamps Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin say they're willing to sink the bill if it doesn't cut more spending. 'I think we have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about reductions,' Johnson said recently on CNN. They haven't made specific demands yet, but they could start off where the House Freedom Caucus fell short — cutting the federal matching payment for Medicaid for those enrolled under Obamacare and further limiting federal reimbursement for Medicaid provider taxes charged by states. Conservatives' demands are in stark contrast to Republican senators already uncomfortable with the new Medicaid co-pays and state cost-sharing for Medicaid and food stamps in the House bill. Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Jim Justice and Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Hawley join Murkowski in this camp. Boosting their case is Trump, who told the Freedom Caucus to stop 'grandstanding' on more Medicaid cuts. Regulatory Matters There's an extensive list of regulatory matters in the House bill that could be struck if they are found to break Senate rules for averting a filibuster and passing the legislation by a simple majority. Provisions likely to be challenged for not being primarily budgetary in nature include a repeal of gun silencer regulations, preemption of state artificial intelligence regulations, staffing regulations for nursing homes and abolishing the Direct File program at the Internal Revenue Service. The House bill's provisions limiting the ability of federal judges to hold administration officials in contempt, ending funding for Planned Parenthood, requiring congressional review of new regulations and easing permitting of fossil fuel projects are also vulnerable. The biggest Senate rules fight will be over using the 'current policy' budget gimmick to lower the cost of the bill. Senate Republican leaders could explore bypassing rules keeper Elizabeth MacDonough if she finds the accounting move breaks the rules. Battles over these provisions could take weeks. 'I think it would be very difficult to get it out of the Senate quickly,' said Bill Hoagland, a former top Republican Senate budget staffer now with the Bipartisan Policy Center. Spectrum Sales A major auction of government radio spectrum that would generate an estimated $88 billion in revenue is another unresolved fight. Ted Cruz of Texas, the Senate Commerce chair, backs the spectrum sale but Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota has vowed to protect the Defense Department, which has warned auctioning off its spectrum would degrade its capabilities and cost hundreds of billions for retrofits. The proposal would free up key spectrum for wireless broadband giants like Verizon and Elon Musk's Starlink. Estate Tax Majority Leader John Thune and 46 other Republican senators back a total repeal of the estate tax, which would likely cost several hundred billion dollars over a decade, benefiting the heirs of the richest 0.1%. That could make it too pricey for the Senate to include. The House bill permanently increases the estate tax exemption to $15 million for individuals and $30 million for married couples, with future increases tied to inflation. --With assistance from Emily Birnbaum. (Updates with Trump phone call to Hawle in sixth paragraph.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joni Ernst posts sarcastic apology video after downplaying concerns over Medicaid cuts
Sen. Joni Ernst (D-IA) posted a sarcastic apology video after she downplayed the concerns of her constituents about Medicaid cuts at a townhall. Writer-at-large at The Bulwark Tim Miller, National Affairs Correspondent at The Nation John Nichols and U.S. National Editor at Financial Times Ed Luce join Katy Tur to react to the video and discuss Medicaid funding.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Savings calculator: How to grow your emergency fund
(NewsNation) — With the economy on shaky ground, more Americans may focus on saving, but many aren't making the most of their money. A recent Vanguard survey found that nearly 60% of Americans earn less than 3% interest on their savings, and about a quarter earn under 1% — well below the 4%+ rates offered by top high-yield savings accounts. Regular vs. high-yield savings account: What's the difference? A few percentage points may not seem like much, but over time, the higher returns from a HYSA can add up to thousands of extra dollars, without any added risk. Experts typically recommend setting aside three to six months' worth of essential living expenses in an emergency fund. A high-yield savings account lets that money grow essentially Earned: Total Contributions: Initial Deposit: Total Savings: The calculators on this website are provided for educational purposes only and are not a substitute for, nor should be construed as financial, legal, tax or other advice. All calculator results are estimates based on information you provide and may not reflect actual results based on all relevant information and factors. NewsNation is not responsible for the results or accuracy of information available via the calculators, and users should consult their own financial, tax, legal or other advisers regarding their individual needs. From Your Money on NewsNation Traditional savings accounts currently offer an average interest rate of just 0.42%, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In contrast, some HYSAs offer rates about ten times higher, above 4%, per Bankrate. That extra interest comes with no added risk as long as you're using an FDIC-insured bank, which protects your deposits up to $250,000. Here's how much more money you could save: Traditional savings account Savings: $10,000 Annual interest rate: 0.42% Balance after 1 year: $10,042 Opening a savings account? Here's what to know High-yield savings account Savings: $10,000 Annual interest rate: 4.0% Balance after 1 year: $10,400 There are a few things to keep in mind before opening a HYSA: Interest rates can change: While a 4% rate can help grow your savings, it's not guaranteed. Rates may go up or down depending on decisions by the Federal Reserve. Don't think of it like investing: Emergency funds are meant to be safe and easy to access. If you're looking to grow your money over the long run, there are better options for investing. Watch out for fees and minimum deposits: Some HYSA accounts require a minimum deposit to earn the advertised interest rate. Others may charge monthly maintenance or withdrawal fees. No brick-and-mortar locations: Many HYSA accounts are online-only, so if you prefer visiting a physical bank, that might not be an option. Remember: The Internal Revenue Service treats the interest earned on a savings account as ordinary income, so it's taxed at the same rate as your regular earnings. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.