logo
Almost every European country experienced a hotter winter than usual, study finds

Almost every European country experienced a hotter winter than usual, study finds

Euronews21-03-2025

ADVERTISEMENT
When disaster strikes, it becomes painfully obvious how much human-caused climate change is making our world a more dangerous place.
In recent months, attribution studies have found that it doubled the likelihood of Central Europe's
deadly floods
in September, and made the hot, dry weather that drove January's
LA wildfires
35 per cent more likely. The heatwave that left students fainting in
South Sudan
last month was ten times more likely to occur in our era of fossil fuel burning.
However, less notice is paid to the way climate change is shifting our local climates on a daily basis. A new analysis shows that at least one in five people globally felt a strong climate change influence every day over the last three months, from December 2024 to February 2025.
Related
World Glacier Day: UN warns of 'avalanche of cascading impacts' as ice melt increases
Moldova, Ukraine, Switzerland: The top 10 fastest-warming countries are all in Europe
Extreme heat was the most pervasive climate change effect around the world this winter, according to scientists at Climate Central, the independent group behind the
study
.
According to the group's Climate Change Index, a 'strong' influence is felt when climate change makes conditions at least two times more likely.
Heat-related health risks rose for billions of people
Nearly 394 million people experienced 30 or more days of risky heat added by climate change during the last three months, the scientists say.
Most of these 394 million people (74 per cent) live in Africa.
Risky heat days are defined as those with temperatures hotter than 90 per cent of the temperatures recorded in the local area from 1991-2020.
Heat-related health risks
rise when temperatures climb above this local threshold, partly because people are unprepared.
In half of the analysed countries (110 out of 220), the average person experienced temperatures strongly influenced by climate change for at least one-third of the season (30 days or more).
Related
EVs set to save Europe 20 million tonnes of CO2 this year but transport remains biggest polluter
In Finland, more than half of consumers are shopping less for climate reasons
Where in Europe felt the biggest rise in temperatures?
The last three months were warmer than normal for 42 out of 43 countries in Europe, according to Climate Central.
Russia
, home to more than 145 million people, experienced the highest average temperature anomaly of 3.1°C above the 1991-2020 normal. Baltic countries were close behind, with Lithuania and Latvia recording temperatures of 2.8°C higher than normal, followed by Estonia at 2.7°C.
During this time, more than 9.4 million people across four countries experienced daily average temperatures that were strongly influenced by climate change for at least one-third of the season.
Malta
experienced the most abnormally hot days (34), just ahead of Norway and Estonia (both 32) and Latvia (31).
At a city level, Longyearbyen in
Svalbard
is well ahead of the pack. The Norwegian territory's 1,753-strong population experienced 45 days of unusual heat made twice as likely by climate change.
The other top 10 cities with the highest average temperature anomalies were all in Eastern Europe. They were, in order: Vilnius (Lithuania), Minsk (Belarus), Tallinn (Estonia), Riga (Latvia), Helsinki (Finland), Kharkiv (
Ukraine
), Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Kyiv (Ukraine) and Chisinau (Moldova).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Guterres urges countries to join ocean pact before point of no return
Guterres urges countries to join ocean pact before point of no return

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Guterres urges countries to join ocean pact before point of no return

After receiving historic support for the High Seas Treaty at the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said on Tuesday that its entry into force is "within sight". The treaty, which provides a legal framework for establishing marine protected areas and regulating activities on the high seas, gained momentum on Monday. However, its implementation is not yet guaranteed. Guterres urged all remaining nations to ratify the pact quickly to make it legally binding. During his address, he highlighted significant opposition to the treaty's goals. "There is a tipping point approaching, beyond which recovery may become impossible. And let us be clear. Powerful interests are pushing us towards the brink," Guterres stated. "We are facing a hard battle against a clear enemy. Its name is greed. Greed that sows doubt, denies science, distorts truths, rewards corruption, and destroys life for profit." If it comes into force, the treaty would be the first legally binding international agreement to protect biodiversity on the high seas, which cover nearly two-thirds of the world's oceans. It is considered vital to counter overfishing, end plastic pollution, regulate seabed mining, and meet the global '30 by 30' conservation goal, which aims to protect 30 per cent of the planet's oceans by 2030. Stressing the urgency, Guterres also reminded delegates that climate change goals cannot be ignored. "Last year, for the first time, the annual global temperature was 1.5 degrees Celsius hotter than pre-industrial times. Scientists are clear that that does not mean that the long-term global temperature rise limit of 1.5 degrees is out of reach," he said. "It means we need to fight harder. And the ocean depends on it, and so do we." Eighteen countries ratified the treaty on Monday, bringing the total to 49, just 11 short of the 60 needed for the ocean agreement to enter into force. The surge in support adds momentum to what could become a historic shift in how the world governs the open ocean. The French Senate overwhelmingly backed a new bill designed to regulate low-cost clothing giants on Tuesday, mainly targeting Chinese e-commerce platforms Shein and Temu. The text aims to tackle the environmental and economic consequences of fast fashion, a model that thrives on mass production and low prices. The legislation introduces an eco-score system that will evaluate the environmental impact of products sold by fast fashion companies, including emissions, resource use, and recyclability. Brands with the lowest scores could be taxed up to €5 per item starting in 2025, increasing to €10 by 2030. However, the tax cannot exceed 50% of the item's retail price. It also includes a ban on advertising for ultra-fast fashion brands and sanctions for influencers who promote them online. While the bill takes aim at ultra-fast fashion platforms like Shein and Temu, it notably spares major European players such as Zara, H&M, and Kiabi from the harshest penalties. Environmental groups have criticised the revised bill for what they see as a weakened ambition. 'It's a missed opportunity,' said Pierre Condamine, campaign manager at Friends of the Earth France. 'We've got a text that's going to target two brands and therefore leave out what represents at least 90% of production and clothing sold in France. So it's a missed opportunity. We could have a real environmental ambition. We are very disappointed because, in the end, we can see that it's economic protection that has become the major driving force behind this bill. In contrast, at its beginning, there was an ambition to move the sector towards more sustainable practices," he told Euronews. But some French lawmakers argue the bill needs to protect European industries first. 'Unfortunately, we have no choice,' said conservative Senator Sylvie Valente Le Hir. 'Today, we still have to defend what's left of our European industries. We have to make a distinction between the production that's done in China by these giants. We're talking about scales that are 100 times larger than us. So we're preserving European and French industries for the time being, because if we don't, there will be nothing left," she told Euronews. Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat responded to the bill earlier this week, warning that the text could "impact the purchasing power" of French consumers. Between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised fast fashion products in France rose from €2.3 billion to €3.2 billion. In France, 35 clothing items are discarded every second, according to the country's environment agency Ademe. The Senate passed the bill with 337 votes in favour and only one against. The text will now move to a joint committee of senators and deputies in September. The European Commission will also need to be notified to ensure the bill complies with EU regulations. If passed, it would mark one of the most aggressive legislative efforts in Europe to address the toll of fast fashion, though its ultimate impact remains to be seen.

Race to the bottom? The dangers of deep sea mining
Race to the bottom? The dangers of deep sea mining

France 24

time2 days ago

  • France 24

Race to the bottom? The dangers of deep sea mining

Environment 44:44 Overheated and overfished, an sos for oceans under duress sent from a summit in Nice… but try telling that to those who advocate deep sea drilling for precious a world hungry for the minerals that power our batteries and connect our computers, the United States but also China, India, Japan, Norway and more are seriously studying whether science fiction can become reality. We'lll ask about the actual feasibility of deep sea the competing narratives at play, what with the US boycotting the United Nations Oceans Conference in Nice… and a paltry 32 nations so far ratifying the UN's High Seas Treaty. How to protect the two-thirds of our planet's surface that belong to both everyone and no one? On that score, no need to drill when you hit rock bottom. Even areas protected on paper remain vulnerable to large fishing trawlers that literally rake the seabed, killing both fish and plant life essential for our planet. What to do before it's too late? Produced by François Picard, Andrew Hilliar, Juliette Laffont, Ilayda Habip.

Farmed production of some fish - and seaweed
Farmed production of some fish - and seaweed

France 24

time2 days ago

  • France 24

Farmed production of some fish - and seaweed

According to the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization, nearly 99 million tonnes of aquatic animals (fish, molluscs like oysters and mussels and crustaceans like prawns) were farmed around the world in 2023, five times more than three decades ago. Since 2022, the farming of aquatic animals has been steadily overtaking fishing around the world -- but with large disparities from species to species. Fast-growing species The two biggest sellers on the market in 2023, carp and tilapia, mainly came from freshwater farming, while other widely-consumed fish, like herring, came just from deep sea fishing Thierry Laugier, a researcher at Ifremer, France's national institute for ocean science and technology, told AFP that fish farmers choose species that grow quickly and with simple requirements, to be able to control the life cycle. Sales of the most widely farmed fish in Europe, Atlantic salmon, came to 1.9 million tonnes in 2023, 99 percent of which were farmed. "We know how to control the ageing or how to launch a reproduction cycle, through injecting hormones," Laugier said. Asia main producer Asia is by far the biggest producer of farmed fish, accounting for 92 percent of the 136 million tonnes -- of both animal and plant species -- produced under manmade conditions in 2023. "For carp, it comes down to tradition, it has been farmed for thousands of years on the Asian continent," the Ifremer researcher said. At the other end of the spectrum, sardines and herring are just fished in the oceans, mainly for profitability reasons as some fish grow very slowly. "It takes around two years to get an adult-sized sardine," Laugier said. He said farming of some fish has not yet been started as, "for a long time, we thought the ocean was an inexhaustible resource". Seaweed Little known in the West, seaweed nevertheless accounts for almost a third of world aquaculture production. Almost exclusively from Asia, seaweed production increased by nearly 200 percent in two decades, to 38 million tonnes. It is mainly used in industry, in jellies, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, the expert said. He said seaweed also has the major advantage of absorbing not just CO2 in the oceans, but also nitrogen and certain pollutants. "And from an ecological point of view it is better to farm macroalgae than salmon," Laugier said. © 2025 AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store