logo
‘Finglas deserves better', Dublin TD sets up petition to oppose proposed gaming arcade

‘Finglas deserves better', Dublin TD sets up petition to oppose proposed gaming arcade

The planning application for the ground floor of 44 Main Street, Finglas, was lodged with Dublin City Council on February 13.
The proposed development reads: 'Change of use of the ground floor from commercial unit to gaming/amusement arcade with ancillary site works.'
Paul McAuliffe, Fianna Fáil TD for Dublin North West, has been working with Finglas Tidy Towns, other local organisations, local businesses and residents who are leading the opposition to a proposed gaming arcade.
According to Mr McAuliffe, formal objections have already been lodged to Dublin City Council, but were unsuccessful, with an appeal now being submitted to An Bord Pleanála.
'This development is not in line with the community's vision for Finglas,' Mr McAuliffe said.
'We want a main street that supports families, local businesses, and a safer, more vibrant village – not one shaped by gambling and anti-social behaviour.
'The arcade does not align with the Dublin City Development Plan's focus on sustainable, community-led regeneration
'It risks damaging the character of the village and setting a harmful precedent. It's too close to schools and youth services and could increase late-night disturbances.
'Finglas deserves better. An Bord Pleanála can help protect our village by rejecting this proposal.
'Formal appeals can only be lodged by those who originally objected, and it is expensive. But this petition will be cited in the appeal being lodged – your voice can help show how strongly felt our objections are,' he added.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rory Hearne, Social Democrats TD for Dublin North West, also spoke out on the proposal.
'Unfortunately, Dublin City Council has granted planning permission for a gaming/amusement arcade in Finglas village, despite objections from myself and others on behalf of Finglas residents.
'A lot of local people, including Finglas Tidy Towns, have been on to me today very concerned about this.
'As has been pointed out by the Finglas Cabra Drug and Alcohol Task Force – an organisation that does great work in providing support for families of people with gambling-related issues – a gaming/amusement arcade will normalise gambling, particularly for younger people.
'A development like this is in direct conflict with the Dublin City Development Plan which prohibits amusement centres in residential areas. Finglas Village already has five bookmaking shops, is this really a development that residents need?
'There are serious concerns among residents that the development of a gambling-related business such as the one proposed could result in increased anti-social behaviour.
'There are many services near the proposed development which cater to the needs for vulnerable people.
'Finglas Village would be much better served by developments such as youth and community spaces, cultural spaces, restaurants and shops, which serve and enrich the community. We will continue to work on stopping this.'
Dublin City Council and An Bord Pleanála have been contacted for further comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wright Group gets go-ahead to turn former Rustic Stone restaurant into gastropub
Wright Group gets go-ahead to turn former Rustic Stone restaurant into gastropub

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Wright Group gets go-ahead to turn former Rustic Stone restaurant into gastropub

The Wright Group has secured planning permission to turn chef Dylan McGrath's former Rustic Stone restaurant in Dublin into a gastropub. The permission, granted by Dublin City Council to Mink Fusion Ltd, comes 10 months after celebrity chef, Dylan McGrath shut down Rustic Stone and Brasserie Sixty Six, both located on South Great Georges Street, on the same day on August 15th last. At the time an email to customers said: 'Both have been very successful restaurants in Dublin city for a long time, but the time has come where we have decided it's simply not sustainable any more.' Plans were lodged by Mink Fusion Ltd, a subsidiary of the Wright Group, in February for the change of use application and the council delayed the project in April when it asked what the firm's conservation proposals were for the property which is part of a Victorian commercial development dating from 1881. READ MORE However, in a response, Anthony Brabazon of ABA Architects said that while a 'conservation gain' was desirable in principle it may not be financially feasible and that this could be carried out at a later time. He noted that the proposed works involved no removal of original features. Mr Brabazon pointed out that Mink Fusion 'as tenants under a lease, are paying substantial rent and would like to get the business open'. Mr Brabazon said that Mink Fusion 'would therefore find the onus of a full restoration, which would involve significant procurement of replacement elements as well as the entire shop front screens on two streets, a big obstacle in their goal to bring the unit back to use'. In response to Mr Brabazon's comment, the council's conservation division said it had no objection to the scheme on condition w that a conservation expert was to be employed to design, manage, monitor and implement the works and to ensure adequate protection of the retained and historic fabric during the works. A planning report lodged with the application by Manahan Planners has stated said that a gastropub operation 'offers a more sustainable business model than the previous restaurant, given current market conditions'. The most recent accounts for the Wright Group – led by chief executive, Michael JF Wright – show that its pretax profits increased almost three fold to €10.67 million in the 12 months to the end of September 2023 as revenues surged by 38 per cent to €49 million. The group now employs over 700 people through a collection of over 24 restaurants, bars, food halls, cafes, event spaces and convenience retail.

Energy regulator ‘ignored' High Court ruling that could boost powers to restrict data centres
Energy regulator ‘ignored' High Court ruling that could boost powers to restrict data centres

Irish Independent

time16 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Energy regulator ‘ignored' High Court ruling that could boost powers to restrict data centres

Sinn Féin MEP Lynn Boylan has now called on the regulator to publish its legal advice, as concerns mount over the expansion of the data centre sector. Ms Boylan sought documents under Freedom of Information (FOI) after the regulator, the Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU), issued a proposal last February on the regulations that should apply to new data centres. Data centres currently use 22pc of all the country's electricity and multiple agencies and experts have warned that the electricity system cannot cope with their growing demand. The CRU proposed that new data centres could be permitted if they generated all the power they needed themselves. In theory, that could mean developing windfarms or solar parks, but because the proposal stated the generation plants must be on site, in reality they would be installing gas-fired generators. Such a move would drive up gas use and emissions, contrary to the Climate Action Plan and legally-binding emission-reduction targets. The CRU in its proposal said it had taken legal advice on potential measures such as requiring data centres to meet 'net zero' emissions standards. 'Following legal review, the CRU considers that the current provisions under the Climate Action Act do not provide a mandate to CRU to deliver a connections policy which requires explicit emissions reduction,' it said. However, just days before this was published, the High Court delivered a landmark ruling on the climate action responsibilities of state agencies and public bodies. It was made in relation to Coolglass Windfarm proposed for Co Laois, which An Bord Pleanála refused to grant planning permission for on the basis that it would contravene the Laois County Development Plan by being a visual intrusion on the landscape. ADVERTISEMENT Mr Justice Richard Humphreys said the grounds on which An Bord Pleanála based its decision were outweighed by the requirements of the Climate Act, specifically section 15 which deals with the responsibilities of public bodies to behave in accordance with the act. It was the first time the strength of section 15 was tested and has potentially massive implications for all public bodies. Yet the FOI documents show that a draft of the CRU proposal, drawn up before the highly publicised judgment, was the same as the decision made public after it. "The Coolglass ruling gave the CRU a clear legal footing to act decisively on data centres, yet the CRU's policy reads like business as usual, as if ruling never happened,' Ms Boylan said. "The claim that they lack the legal authority to act decisively on data centre emissions now rings hollow. The CRU must publish their legal advice.'

An Bord Pleanála refuses permission for grain facility in Cork
An Bord Pleanála refuses permission for grain facility in Cork

Agriland

time3 days ago

  • Agriland

An Bord Pleanála refuses permission for grain facility in Cork

An Bord Pleanála has refused planning permission for a proposed grain storage and distribution facility in Co. Cork. Comex McKinnon Limited, which specialises in the supply of Irish-grown and imported cereals and non-grain feed ingredients, had proposed to construct the development on a 3ha site at the Belvelly Port Facility at Marino Point, Cobh. The original proposed development included a building for maize storage with a capacity of 18,000t and a general grain store building, with 20,000t capacity. The development also included two weighbridges and an ancillary weighbridge office building, ESB substation, rooftop PV panels, perimeter fencing and the use of the existing jetty to facilitate cargo vessels. According to the application, the maize and grain would be imported every two weeks on average through the jetty for cleaning and screening at the facility before being distributed by truck. Grain facility On December 19, 2024, Cork County Council refused planning permission for the development. The local authority said that in the absence of 'satisfactory proposals' to upgrade the R624 regional road, the proposed development would generate traffic which would adversely impact on the road network and contribute to traffic congestion in the area. The council also said that without a final detailed operational environmental management plan, it was not possible to determine that there would not be adverse effects on Natura 2000 European sites associated with the proposed development. In its appeal to An Bord Pleanála, Comex McKinnon said the proposal represented an opportunity to significantly reduce the carbon impact of its existing road freight and logistics operations. As the development would serve a single end user not on the rail network, the company said road transport was necessary. Comex McKinnon said the relocation of port facilities from existing port facility in Kilkenny to Marino Point would remove 180kms of vehicle trips for each trip undertaken. The application outlined that all vehicle trips associated with the proposal will be at off-peak times to reduce traffic impacts. An electric HGV fleet would also be powered through the proposed PV panels. Comex McKinnon put forward an alternative option to the board which removed the general grain store with a capacity of 20,000t. The revised proposal was for storage, processing and distribution of maize only, within an 18,000t facility. An observation from a third party made to An Bord Pleanála said the application was premature pending road infrastructure upgrades in the area and would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard or obstruction to road users. An Bord Pleanála Matthew McRedmond, An Bord Pleanála senior inspector, considered the revised design to be a reasonable proposal to reduce the traffic and transport associated impacts, and the potential dust related impacts associated with grain processing and transfer. The inspector noted the more recent refusals of permission for an agricultural fertiliser facility and a battery energy storage facility at Marino Point. He said this proposed development is entirely reliant on a road network for its distribution, but the site currently has poor road connectivity. The inspector said the heavy vehicles required for distribution would 'adversely impact on the carrying capacity of the road network serving Cobh and its hinterland'. 'It is accordingly considered that the proposed development of such a road dependant facility would be premature pending significant road improvements,' he said. The board agreed with the inspector's recommendation and refused permission for the proposed development.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store