logo
US is leaving open the possibility of a troop drawdown in South Korea

US is leaving open the possibility of a troop drawdown in South Korea

SINGAPORE (AP) — The United States is not ruling out a reduction in forces deployed to South Korea as the Trump administration determines what presence it needs in the region to best counter China, two senior American defense officials told reporters traveling with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to Singapore.
There are 28,500 U.S. troops deployed to South Korea as part of the U.S. long-term commitment to help defend Seoul from any attack from North Korea.
But the U.S. is also trying to array its forces and ships optimally across the Indo-Pacific as a credible deterrent against China for any potential attack on Taiwan and other acts of aggression against allies in the region.
No decision has been made on the number of troops deployed to South Korea, but any future footprint would be optimized not only to defend against Pyongyang but also to deter China, one of the officials said. The two officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss deliberations that have not been made public.
Hegseth is in Singapore to attend his first Shangri-La dialogue as President Donald Trump's defense secretary. His South Korean counterpart is not expected to attend due to elections in Seoul.
A possible reduction in forces was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese magnets are the next automotive supply chain crisis
Chinese magnets are the next automotive supply chain crisis

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Chinese magnets are the next automotive supply chain crisis

A shortage of rare earth magnets from China could become the next version of the auto industry's semiconductor crisis. Why it matters: The magnets are used in everything from electric motors to windshield wipers, power seats and headlights. Without them, auto production could shut down within weeks, according to a letter to the Trump administration from industry groups representing major automakers and parts suppliers. Driving the news: Rare earth magnets, also crucial for weapons, semiconductors and telecom equipment, are at the heart of the escalating trade war between the U.S. and China. The Trump administration is accusing China of withholding precious rare earth minerals and magnets as a tariff negotiating tool. That's the real reason Secretary of State Marco Rubio abruptly announced plans to cancel the visas of all Chinese students in the U.S., Axios' Marc Caputo reported. The intrigue: Automakers are racing to find workarounds, including producing electric motors in Chinese factories or shipping made-in-America motors to China to have the tiny magnets installed, the Wall Street Journal reported. Or, they could look to buy magnets through sources in Europe or Asia, rather than purchasing them directly from Chinese factories. Any such moves could mean a tradeoff between higher tariffs or shutting down production. Ford Motor already had to temporarily stop building Explorer SUVs last month because it ran short of rare earth components. Zoom in: Carmakers could also resort to stripping out premium features like adjustable seats or high-end speaker systems that use rare earth magnets. It's a strategy they used during the pandemic, when supply chain disruptions led to a shortage of semiconductors. What to watch: The U.S. is trying to reduce its dependence on China for rare earths, but that could take a decade or more.

Federal judge delivers one-two punch to Trump in Abrego Garcia case
Federal judge delivers one-two punch to Trump in Abrego Garcia case

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Federal judge delivers one-two punch to Trump in Abrego Garcia case

A federal judge granted a request Wednesday from more than a dozen major news outlets and publishers to unseal certain records in the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Salvadorian migrant and alleged MS-13 member who was deported from Maryland to El Salvador in March in what administration officials have acknowledged was an administrative error. Separately on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis granted a request from Abrego Garcia's legal team to file a motion for sanctions against the Trump administration. That filing is due June 11, she said in an order. The one-two punch from Xinis could give plaintiffs new ammo to pursue more formal punishments against the Trump administration if officials are found to have been acting in bad faith or knowingly defying court orders. It will also give new access to media outlets covering the case. Xinis agreed to grant in part a request from a group of 14 major media outlets and publishers – including Fox News, NBC News, CBS News, New York Times, the Washington Post and NPR – who filed a motion to unseal records in the Abrego Garcia case, citing concerns over the lack of public access, as well as over government efforts, or lack thereof, to facilitate his return to the U.S. In her order, Xinis agreed with the contention of the news outlets – referred to jointly as the "Press Movants" – that the public "enjoys a presumptive right to access court records, overcome only when outweighed by competing interests." As such, Xinis ordered the Trump administration to unseal a handful of documents that have so far been filed under seal, as part of a protracted legal battle over the status of Abrego Garcia. Xinis also ordered them to unseal a transcript from an April 30 hearing in his case. "The right to public access of court records remains critical to promoting 'trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of fairness,'" she said Wednesday. The order comes amid a months-long court fight over the status of Abrego Garcia, who remains in El Salvador. Xinis in April ordered the Trump administration to comply with an expedited discovery schedule to determine whether they were complying with the directive to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S., which was upheld by the Supreme Court earlier this year. Since then, she has struggled to ascertain the status of Abrego Garcia, or efforts made to return him to the U.S. Trump officials, for their part, have repeatedly alleged that Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, though any formal ties remain unproven. Lawyers for the government and Abrego Garcia's attorneys have sparred with Xinis in court over what exactly it means to "facilitate" his return – a months-long fight that Xinis most recently described as beating a "frustrated and dead horse." Xinis previously took aim at what she deemed to be the lack of information submitted to the court as part of an expedited discovery process she ordered last month, describing the government submissions as "vague, evasive and incomplete" responses, and which she said demonstrated "willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations." The order is the latest development in the ongoing feud between Trump officials and the courts over the use of the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime immigration law used earlier this year to quickly deport migrants from the U.S. To date, the Trump administration has not knowingly complied with any court orders to return migrants who were removed and sent to El Salvador in the early wave of deportation flights, despite earlier court orders from Xinis, Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and others. It is unclear whether Xinis plans to begin contempt proceedings against the administration, though the federal judge in D.C. said earlier this year that he had found probable cause to do so.

US Is Reworking Subsidy Awards to Chipmakers, Lutnick Says
US Is Reworking Subsidy Awards to Chipmakers, Lutnick Says

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

US Is Reworking Subsidy Awards to Chipmakers, Lutnick Says

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the Trump administration has been reworking agreements forged with semiconductor makers under the 2022 Chips Act to secure what he called better terms aimed at generating additional domestic investment. 'Are we renegotiating? Absolutely, for the benefit of the American taxpayer, for sure,' Lutnick said Wednesday at a Senate Appropriations Committee. 'We're getting more value for the same dollars.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store