logo
Australian girl, 11, sexually abused by stranger after adding him to get Snapchat points

Australian girl, 11, sexually abused by stranger after adding him to get Snapchat points

The Guardian15-05-2025

An 11-year-old Australian girl added random people on Snapchat as part of an informal competition with her best friend to get a high score in the app. One of the people she added went on to sexually abuse her.
Then 23-year-old Jai Clapp was added on Snapchat using the Quick Add feature by an 11-year-old girl given the pseudonym of 'April', as part of a competition she and her friend were having to reach a 'Snap score' of 100,000 points in 2023.
The Snap score is determined by how much a user is engaging on the app, and points can be gained by sending and receiving snaps, maintaining streaks (how many days users consecutively message each other), and by adding friends.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The Quick Add feature in Snapchat lists users the app suggests you could add, based on shared interests as determined by the Snapchat algorithm.
After being added, Clapp told the girl he was only 17, not 23, and a court found he went on to groom her over a 12-day period on Snapchat.
He then sexually abused the victim in three meetings at a local park in the town where the girl lived.
The offences Clapp was convicted for included digital and penile penetration, in what the judge, Marcus Dempsey, described as 'abhorrent' behaviour.
Clapp pleaded guilty and was sentenced for the abuse of April and another girl to eight years and 10 months in prison, with a non-parole period of four years and eight months.
The details of the case emerged in a county court of Victoria sentencing from late April that was published this week.
A spokesperson for Snap, the parent company of the app, said 'sexual exploitation of any young person is horrific, illegal and against our policies'.
'Snapchat was designed to help people communicate with friends they know in real life, and our goal is to make it as hard as possible for young people to be contacted by strangers,' the spokesperson said.
'Teens will only be suggested in Find Friends or search in limited circumstances, such as if they have numerous mutual friends. Over the last year we have launched new friending safeguards, which includes limiting who teens can see in Find Friends suggestions.'
Independent guides to Snapchat suggest parents turn off the Quick Add feature so only people known to them can add their child in the app.
Snapchat is expected to be one of the platforms that the Australian government will ban users under 16 years of age from accessing in December this year, but currently the minimum age for accounts on the platform is 13.
Before the ban comes into effect in December, the platforms likely to face the ban have pleaded with the government not to implement the policy, including Snapchat. The company has frequently highlighted the tools they have in their apps to keep children safe, in a push to keep the status quo.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
In its submission to a parliamentary inquiry last year, Snap said the app doesn't allow teens to surface as a suggested friend or in search results for other users unless they have mutual friends in common, and there is a warning in the app for teens if someone who has few friends in common tries to contact them.
The platform told the Australian online safety regulator, the eSafety commissioner, last year it undertakes language analysis, and also uses an internal tool to estimate ages for users on the platform to prevent people under 13 from accessing the platform. The commissioner found in a report in February 19% of children aged between eight and 12 had used Snapchat in 2024.
Snap had not undertaken any research to estimate the number users under 13 years of age on the platform in the first half of last year, according to the report.
A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner said companies had a responsibility to ensure their platforms are safe for all users.
'While features like Find Friends [Quick Add] might have a number of beneficial uses, companies like Snap also need to think about how new features might be misused,' the spokesperson said.
'We have been concerned for some time about features on social media, messaging and other services which provide a ready means for predators to gain access to children for the purposes of grooming and contact offending.
'[The] feature can allow predators to find their way into the friend groups of multiple children, aided by the platform's own algorithms, particularly where age assurance measures are not effective.'
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children reported in November last year that of the 7,000 sexual communication with child offences recorded by UK police in 2023-2024, 48% of the offences were on Snapchat.
Information and support for anyone affected by rape or sexual abuse issues is available from the following organisations. In Australia, support is available at 1800Respect (1800 737 732). In the UK, Rape Crisis offers support on 0808 500 2222. In the US, Rainn offers support on 800-656-4673. Other international helplines can be found at ibiblio.org/rcip/internl.html

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'
Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'

A Sydney Islamic cleric being sued in the federal court for alleged racial discrimination of Jewish people has described his case as an existential battle 'between Islam and unbelievers'. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by Australia's peak Jewish body over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people as 'vile', 'treacherous' and cowardly. The lectures quoted ayat and hadith from the Qur'an about Jews in Medina in the 7th century and, the federal court claim alleges, made derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, including that they are 'wicked and scheming' and 'love wealth'. The claim, brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, alleges Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – prohibiting offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin – during the sermons delivered at the Al Madina Dawah Centre (AMDC) in Bankstown in November 2023, speeches subsequently broadcast online. But, Haddad's defence case argues, his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' as religious and historical instruction. If his sermons are found to breach 18C, then, he argues, the law is unconstitutional because it restricts the free exercise of religion. On Tuesday morning, the long-running dispute, which failed to find resolution at conciliation, comes before Justice Angus Stewart in the federal court, in a case set to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech under Australian law. The court is likely to be asked to adjudicate whether Haddad's sermons, in which he quotes the Qur'an and offers interpretation of it, amount to incitement or are protected religious expression. Ahead of the trial, Haddad, argued on Instagram that the case was existential for the practice of Islam in Australia. 'What I am currently facing in the federal court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it's a battle between Islam and kuffar,' he said, using an Arabic word, usually translated as 'unbelievers'. He said the claim against him sought to criminalise Islamic scripture. 'They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith and historic accounts that speak about the Jews: to what they see as insulting, they seek to make it criminal.' Ayat are verses in the Qur'an, the Islamic holy book, while hadith are reports attributed to the Prophet Muhammad. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Two prominent members of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Peter Wertheim and Robert Goot, have sought an injunction from the court ordering the speeches still online be removed, and banning Haddad and his centre from publishing similar content online in the future. The ECAJ claim has also asked the court to order Haddad's centre to publish a 'corrective notice' on its social media pages. It has applied for the cost of its legal action to be covered, but it has not sought damages or compensation. In a statement, Wertheim said the ECAJ had attempted 'in good faith' to resolve the matter by conciliation through the Australian Human Rights Commission, but that attempts to broker a resolution failed. He said the ECAJ took the matter to court 'to defend the honour of our community, and as a warning to deter others seeking to mobilise racism in order to promote their political views'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We are all free to observe our faith and traditions within the bounds of Australian law, and that should mean we do not bring the hatreds, prejudices and bigotry of overseas conflicts and societies into Australia.' In his defence documents, Haddad argues his lectures 'were not reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people in Australia' given their context and audience. He said his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' and 'for the genuine purpose of … delivering religious historical and educational lectures … to congregants of the AMDC'. He said he had given some of the addresses in response to requests from the Islamic community 'to provide sermons which address the Gaza War, and engaging in political commentary on the Gaza War from a religious perspective'. However, his defence states, if the court finds his sermons have breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, he argues the law is unconstitutional under section 116 of the constitution, which protects the 'free exercise of any religion'. Both Haddad and the ECAJ will rely on lay witnesses and expert testimony in the week-long court case. The ECAJ has enlisted professor of theology at Notre Dame University, Gabriel Reynolds; Haddad will call Sheikh Adel Ibrahim from the Greenacre Prayers Hall in Sydney to give evidence. Haddad has never been charged with any terrorism-related offences, but has previously boasted of his friendship with Australian Islamic State fighters Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, and Briton Anjem Choudary, an extremist preacher jailed for life in the UK last year. A former Asio spy who infiltrated Haddad's organisation between 2016 and 2023 told the ABC's Four Corners program that young people in Haddad's prayer centre were being indoctrinated into supporting Islamic State. Section 18C is the most contested and controversial section of the Racial Discrimination Act. Several high-profile cases have seen it argued the section restricts freedom of speech and political communication in Australia.

Wander Franco faces additional charge in Dominican Republic
Wander Franco faces additional charge in Dominican Republic

Reuters

time32 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Wander Franco faces additional charge in Dominican Republic

June 9 - Tampa Bay Rays shortstop Wander Franco is facing a gun charge in his native Dominican Republic. The illegal possession of a firearm charge stems from a November incident in which police responded to the site of an altercation involving Franco and found a gun in the car he was driving. According to a USA Today report, the charge was filed Sunday, but an attorney representing Franco has said no crime was committed because the weapon was properly registered to the player's uncle. On Monday, the 24-year-old Franco is expected back in court in Santo Domingo, where he is standing trial on sexual abuse, sexual exploitation against a minor, and human trafficking charges. If convicted, he could be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison. Franco was a rising MLB star in August 2023 when he was placed on administrative leave amid allegations he had engaged in a relationship with a then-14-year-old girl -- the month following his first All-Star selection. He was moved to the MLB's restricted list last July and remains the subject of an MLB investigation. Franco remains under contract to the Rays, who signed him to an 11-year, $182 million contract extension in 2021. He is not paid while on the MLB restricted list. --Field Level Media

Prison authorities know there are hanging points in cells. Prisoners keep using them
Prison authorities know there are hanging points in cells. Prisoners keep using them

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Prison authorities know there are hanging points in cells. Prisoners keep using them

Karen and Gary's son, Luke Rich, died in an ACT prison one day after he was remanded in custody when he hung himself from a hanging point on a door in his cell. He was 27 years old. Prison authorities had been warned that point could be used for that exact purpose seven years earlier. Guardian Australia investigative reporters Chris Knaus and Ariel Bogle looked into 248 hanging deaths in every prison system in the country over more than two decades, finding at least 57 Australians were able to kill themselves using hanging points that prison authorities knew about but failed to remove

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store