Lakers vs Timberwolves Game 5: Live updates and highlights
Lakers vs Timberwolves Game 5: Live updates and highlights
The Los Angeles Lakers need to win or go home on Wednesday in Game 5 of their first-round playoff series against the Minnesota Timberwolves. The scene shifts to Crypto.com Arena, but the momentum remains with the young and ravenous Timberwolves.
The Timberwolves were able to outlast Los Angeles in both of the last two games to take a three-games-to-one series lead. Meanwhile, L.A. faltered down the stretch, both offensively and in terms of decision-making. It made some key miscues in crunch time of both games, and while there was some questionable officiating, it only has itself to blame for losing both contests.
If the Lakers manage to win on Wednesday, Game 6 will be back at Target Center on Friday.
Check back here for the latest updates and highlights from Wednesday's game.
What channel is Lakers vs Timberwolves game on today? Time, TV schedule
TV Channel: TNT, Spectrum SportsNet
Start time: 7 p.m. Pacific time
Where to watch Lakers vs Timberwolves on livestream
Watch Lakers vs Timberwolves live on SlingTV
Lakers vs Timberwolves injury updates:
Timberwolves: Rob Dillingham (right ankle sprain) is out.
Lakers: Maxi Kleber (right foot surgery recovery) is questionable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Beat writer on what the Lakers may have to give up in order to trade for Daniel Gafford
Beat writer on what the Lakers may have to give up in order to trade for Daniel Gafford There are plenty of mock trades and trades rumors floating around these days that involve the Los Angeles Lakers. Many of them have something to do with the team's dire need for a starting-level center, and one such player they have been linked to is Daniel Gafford of the Dallas Mavericks. In some ways, Gafford seems like an ideal fit for the Lakers. He has plenty of athleticism, he's young (26 years of age), he can protect the rim, he's a good rebounder and he's a lob threat. He also played for a little while with Luka Doncic, which means that if he were to come to the Lakers, he would already have some built-in chemistry with the Slovenian. However, after Mavericks general manager Nico Harrison sent Doncic to the Lakers for a low price, the optics of him trading Gafford to the Lakers could be terrible. Jovan Buha, a Lakers beat writer for The Athletic, said on a recent episode of "Buha's Block" that he feels L.A. may have to overpay for Gafford, and he took a guess on what it may take to land the University of Arkansas product (at 9:20). "They probably have to overpay," Buha said. "It would probably have to be something like … Gabe [Vincent], Dalton [Knecht] and a first (round pick) for Gafford. And that's a lot." Vincent, Knecht and a future first-round pick is a very similar package compared to the one the Purple and Gold offered for the Charlotte Hornets' Mark Williams before that trade was rescinded. The different was that they offered forward Cam Reddish, a no-impact player who fell out of their rotation, instead of Vincent, and they also offered a 2030 first-round pick swap. However, the package Buha suggested may be worth it for Gafford. He averaged 12.3 points, 6.8 rebounds and 1.8 blocks in 21.5 minutes a game while shooting 70.2% from the field this season, and if he could play a little more, say 25-28 minutes a game, he could be the answer to the Lakers' center woes. While Knecht, who had flashes of solid play this year, has potential, it is hard to get a read on what his ceiling is, although his floor may be that of a borderline rotation player. Giving him up may not be too much of a gamble if Los Angeles gets the center it needs in return.
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Trendlines: The smallest markets are winning the NBA finals
Welcome to Trendlines, your weekly installment of what's trending up and what's trending down in sports. This week we're talking about the NBA Finals, and the emergence of the small market team. Think about the iconic NBA franchises: The Los Angeles Lakers, the Boston Celtics, Chicago Bulls and, if you indulge me, the New York Knickerbockers. This NBA Finals features two nicknames to never win an NBA title: the Thunder and Pacers. These two teams are from not-so-iconic American cities: Oklahoma City and Indianapolis. So let's start there with a big downswing. I'm being a bit charitable here with being down 3 million. I've rounded down. Indianapolis has a little over 1 million homes in its media market. Oklahoma City has well under a million. Combined they have a little less than 2 million homes. What a change from 2024 when the Finals teams (Boston and Dallas) each have over 2 million homes in their media markets. But it's not just from last year from which we've seen a tremendous shift. Indeed, I plugged in the current media market size for every Finals team since the early 1980s. Based on the current rankings, this is the Finals with the smallest teams' media markets in at least the last 40 years. It's not just the media markets where we can see how the Pacers and Thunder are small markets. Take a look at the valuation for each franchise. Both teams are worth under $4 billion. Now, that is still a billion with a 'b', but last year the two teams were worth about $5 billion on average. The fact that we have one small market team in the Finals isn't that unusual. Both of these teams have been in the finals before. What makes this year truly unique is that we have two teams worth so little at the same time. In fact, there hasn't been an NBA Finals' with two teams in the bottom 10 in the league in terms of worth since at least the early 1990s. Small market doesn't mean unexciting. Tyrese Haliburton ridiculously clutch shooting in Game 1 proves that. What makes Haliburton's production so amazing is he was still 24 on February 1 of this year. He's one of 18 players who have suited up for these squads who were under 25 on that date. That's a record since at least the early 1980s These are young and fresh players beyond just Haliburton. Thunder's star Jalen Williams clocks in at a mere 24 years old. His teammate Chet Holmgren is 23. We're looking at squads that could be good for years to come. Dare I say that, by the time it's all done, it may be Bulls, Celtics, Knicks, Lakers… and Pacers or Thunder on the pantheon of iconic NBA teams.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Draymond Green disagrees with LeBron James' idea for NBA schedule change
Draymond Green disagrees with LeBron James' idea for NBA schedule change Each NBA season is long and arduous, and it tests every single player in the league from day one until the moment each team is done for the year. Many people have suggested that the league shorten its schedule from 82 games for each team to roughly 60 in order to reduce fatigue and injuries, as well as possibly increase the quality of play. Such proposals will likely never see the light of day, mostly because it would mean reduced revenue and pay for everyone involved, from superstar players down to those who live paycheck to paycheck. Los Angeles Lakers superstar LeBron James recently made an interesting suggestion on his "Mind the Game" podcast. He said that perhaps the NBA should give its players several weeks off between the end of the regular season and the start of the playoffs. "If they're going to allow it to be as physical as it is, you've got to give us a little time to prepare for it," James said. "Maybe 12 to 15 games left in the regular season. Like a month. Give us a month to prepare for it. Because it goes from zero to 100." Draymond Green of the Golden State Warriors, a friend and rival of his, pushed back on that suggestion. Green feels such a break would do more harm than good. 'I know Bron talked about there being a month off before the playoffs; I don't know that that's possible,' Green said. 'A, guys will get a bit out of shape and can have an adverse effect, guys getting back in, and all of a sudden, you pull something because it's been a month." The NBA has already made some adjustments in recent years in order to make its schedule a little easier. It has cut down on the number of back-to-back games, and it has given teams several days off surrounding the All-Star game in order to make it, in effect, a mini-vacation, especially for those who don't participate in it. But what James suggested is extremely unlikely to ever take place. The league would either need to compress its regular season schedule, shorten the offseason or reduce the number of regular-season games, and the downsides would probably greatly outweigh the benefits.
