Former Israeli PM urges 'civic revolt' against Israeli government
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak has called for "civic revolt" against the Israeli government.
The Times of Israel reported that Barak, who was prime minister from 199 to 2001, made the remarks at an anti-government protest in Tel Aviv.
He said: "A black flag of illegitimacy flies over every one of [the government's] actions, and it's our civic duty to act in every way possible toward its downfall, before it marches us into the abyss."
Barak also accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of "acting impulsively like a caged animal".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US says it will veto UN ceasefire resolution: Report
The US will veto a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the opening of crossings for aid, Axios reported on Wednesday, citing two Israeli officials. The vote is scheduled for the coming hours.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli opposition threatens to topple Netanyahu's government
Israel's opposition party Yesh Atid, led by former prime minister Yair Lapid, is moving to vote to topple the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu next week. On Wednesday, a member of Israel's right-wing coalition threatened to quit the cabinet and support that vote unless an exemption was passed by lawmakers for ultra-Orthodox men not to enlist in the military. United Torah Judaism, which is one of two ultra-Orthodox parties in the coalition, said it would withdraw from the government unless there were concessions on the matter of men from religious seminaries.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Washington Post update on Gaza aid group killings article sparks online backlash
A recent correction by the Washington Post regarding its reporting on a deadly incident at a Gaza aid distribution site has ignited a firestorm of criticism and accusations of pro-Israel bias on social media. On 1 June, at least 32 Palestinians were killed and over 200 wounded after Israeli troops opened fire on civilians gathered at two US-Israeli food distribution points in Rafah and central Gaza, according to local officials and eyewitnesses. The original headline of the Post article on the deaths read: "Israeli troops kill over 30 near U.S. aid site in Gaza, health officials say". The Post shared the article on X in a post that said: "At least 31 people were killed Sunday morning in southern Gaza, according to the Strip's Health Ministry, when Israeli troops opened fire on crowds making their way to collect aid". On 3 June, the Post issued a notice on X, saying it had deleted the earlier X post and edited the article because it "didn't meet Post fairness standards". "The article failed to make clear if attributing the deaths to Israel was the position of the Gaza health ministry or a fact verified by The Post," the newspaper said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "The Post didn't give proper weight to Israel's denial and gave improper certitude about what was known about any Israeli role in the shootings," it added. An archived version of the article indicates that an Israeli military statement about being "currently unaware of injuries caused by" the army was included in the second paragraph. — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 3, 2025 Among other changes, the newest version includes a categorical rejection of gunfire claims by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which called them "completely false". 'Obsequious apology' While some social media users welcomed the note from the Post, others accused the newspaper of reinforcing biases in western media coverage of Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza. "So we in Gaza get to be killed and then the media cannot be sure who killed us simply because Israel denied responsibility? So we are killed but no one killed us? That simple?" asked Palestinian writer and Pulizer Prize winner Mosab Abu Toha. "Why do you not ask Israel to provide videos from that site showing the world how their soldiers fired 'warning shots' in the heads and chests of starved people?" Investigative journalist Laila al-Arian said: "This correction only came because Palestinians are dehumanized and deemed untrustworthy, while the Israeli government—engaged in mass slaughter and repeatedly caught lying to the media—is taken at its word." Absolutely reprehensible journalism. There were thousands of Palestinian civilian witnesses to the massacre who could easily corroborate the report. Of course the criminal denies their crime, it should not be given 'more weight.' — eli n. (@elinachos) June 4, 2025 Several people accused the Post of "cowardice" and of "backing down" from what they said was a more accurate version of the story. "We apologize for initially telling the truth," said one user sarcastically in reponse to the newspaper's post. "The Washington Post is now reporting, about Sunday's massacre: 'While three witnesses said the gunfire came from Israeli military positions, the Israel Defense Forces denied the allegations...' And that led to the obsequious apology below," said another. So you made the rare mistake of accurately reporting, got yelled at and retracted it. Cause clearly you guys never cared about fairness and that's why you've been doing Israel's propaganda for years. — B L A K E L E Y™℠©® LLC (@_iamblakeley) June 4, 2025 Others accused the paper of capitulating to pressure from political and other figures. Some pointed to an X post from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt quoting the Washington Post's update: "We told you we'd hold the Fake News accountable." "The White House all but confirms that it pressured the 'correction' from the Washington Post," wrote one journalist. The White House all but confirms that it pressured the "correction" from the Washington Post. If you are at the Post and know what happened, I'm on Signal at harb.12 — Ali Harb (@Harbpeace) June 3, 2025 Others pointed to a recent post from pro-Israel billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman calling on Jeff Bezos, the owner of the Washington Post, to investigate what he said was the publication of a "false story", prompting further accusations of bowing to pressure. I had to read this 3 times to make sure it wasn't a parody account. Nope. Just a formerly reputable publication bowing to institutional pressure, in an embarrassingly ineloquent manner I would add. Stumbling over words left, right( and centre. — Carmen Alvarez (@maybeitscarma) June 4, 2025 The X post comes amid a string of Israeli attacks on Palestinians seeking aid at distribution points run by the newly established GHF, which the UN and aid organisations have accused of militarising humanitarian aid. Israeli gunfire has resulted in over 100 deaths and hundreds wounded since the initiative's launch, according to the Gaza-based Government Media Office. On Wednesday, Tom Fletcher, the UN's aid chief, said that recent "horrifying scenes" of Palestinians being killed by Israeli forces while trying to access food aid were the result of "deliberate choices". "The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat," Fletcher said in a post on X. "This is the outcome of a series of deliberate choices that have systematically deprived two million people of the essentials they need to survive."
