A journalist was killed while writing a book on the Amazon. Here's how friends completed his work
BRASILIA, Brazil: After British journalist Dom Phillips was shot and killed while researching an ambitious book on how to protect the world's largest rainforest, friends vowed to finish the project. Three years later, their task is complete.
'How to Save the Amazon,' published Tuesday in Brazil and the United Kingdom ahead of its US release, was pieced together by fellow journalists who immersed themselves in Phillips' notes, outlines and the handful of chapters he'd already written. The resulting book, scheduled to be published in the US on June 10, pairs Phillips' own writing with others' contributions in a powerful examination of the cause for which he gave his life.
In addition to the core group who led the work on finishing the book, other colleagues and friends helped to edit chapters, including The Associated Press journalists Fabiano Maisonnave and David Biller.
Phillips, who had been a regular contributor to The Guardian newspaper, was taking one of the final reporting trips planned for his book when he was gunned down by fishermen on June 5, 2022, in western Amazon's Javari Valley. Also killed was Bruno Pereira, a Brazilian expert on Indigenous tribes who had made enemies in the region for defending the local communities from intruding fishermen, poachers and illegal gold miners. Their deaths made headlines around the world. Nine people have been indicted in the killings.
'It was just a horrifying, really sad moment. Everybody was trying to think: How can you deal with something like this? And the book was there,' said Jonathan Watts, an Amazon-based environmental writer for The Guardian who coauthored the foreword and one of the chapters.
With the blessing of Phillips' widow, Alessandra Sampaio, a group of five friends agreed to carry the project forward. The group led by Watts also included Andrew Fishman, the Rio-based president of The Intercept Brasil; Phillips' agent, Rebecca Carter; David Davies, a colleague from his days in London as a music journalist; and Tom Hennigan, Latin America correspondent for The Irish Times.
'It was a way to not just feel awful about what had happened, but to get on with something. Especially because so many of Dom's friends are journalists,' Watts said. 'And what you fall back on is what you know best, which is journalism.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Attack on London: Hunting The 7/7 Bombers OTT Release Date - When and where to watch this chilling documentary
Attack on London: Hunting The 7/7 Bombers OTT Release Date - Netflix is dropping this powerful documentary on 1st July 2025, and it's not your average true-crime story. This digs deep into one of the most horrifying days in modern British history. It's chilling, emotional, and straight to the point. Here's what it's all about, the real incident that inspired it and why it matters. The real-life tragedy: What happened on 7/7? On the morning of July 7, 2005, London woke up like any other day. People boarded buses and packed onto the Underground trains, heading to work, school, or home. But by 8:50 AM, everything changed. Four young British men, radicalised and armed with homemade bombs, carried out coordinated suicide attacks on three tube trains and a double-decker bus. Three blasts hit trains near Aldgate, Edgware Road, and Russell Square. An hour later, the fourth bomb exploded on a bus at Tavistock Square. The result? 52 innocent lives lost and over 700 people injured. It was the UK's first-ever suicide bombing. The attack shocked the world, not just because of the death toll, but because the attackers were British citizens. The city came to a halt. Emergency services raced to the scenes. Families searched desperately for loved ones. And the country was left asking: Who were these men, and how did this happen on our soil? What does the documentary cover? Titled 7/7: Hunting The London Bombers, this four-part docuseries follows the urgent investigation that took place in the days and weeks after the attack. Each episode takes you deeper: Episode 1 covers the chaos of the morning and how people first reacted to what they thought were 'power surges.' Episode 2 reveals how investigators identified the bombers using CCTV and forensic evidence. Episode 3 digs into the failed follow-up attack on July 21 and how close the UK came to another disaster. Episode 4 ties it all together with survivor stories, political responses, and how the investigation changed counterterrorism forever. Who's behind it? The documentary is made by the same folks who brought us '9/11: Inside the President's War Room.' Directors Adam Wishart and Jim Nally, along with producer Neil Grant, are leading the charge. It's built on real voices, from survivors, forensic experts, counterterrorism detectives, law enforcement, and intelligence officers. Some of the key people featured include: Martine Wright, who lost both legs in the Aldgate blast and rebuilt her life after. Tony Blair, UK Prime Minister at the time, on what it was like leading the country through a nightmare. Eliza Manningham-Buller, former MI5 chief, who reveals how the intelligence services responded. Bill Mann, an everyday commuter who found himself caught in the chaos. Excited to watch 7/7: Hunting The London Bombers? Drop your thoughts @indiatimes.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Victoria's Secret delays earnings release after cybersecurity breach disrupts operations
Victoria's Secret is postponing the release of its quarterly earnings after a security breach disrupted corporate operations and forced the popular lingerie brand to take its US shopping website offline for several days last week. In an update on Tuesday, the Ohio-based retailer said it first detected a 'security incident involving its information technology systems' on May 24 and immediately activated its response protocols 'to contain and eradicate unauthorized network access,' including engaging third-party experts, AP reported. As a precaution, the company temporarily shut down corporate systems and its US retail website on May 26. The website remained inaccessible for several days and was only restored late Thursday, causing ongoing frustration among customers. While Victoria's Secret did not explicitly confirm a ransomware attack, analysts noted that the characteristics of the incident align with such threats, which have become increasingly common across the retail sector. The breach also impacted some in-store services at both Victoria's Secret and Pink-branded outlets, though the company said most of those operations had since resumed. The cyberattack is also affecting the company's ability to release its first-quarter financial results. Victoria's Secret said that it is still working to restore full access to its corporate systems, which has 'prevented employees from accessing certain systems and information' required to complete its financial reporting. Despite the disruption, the company released preliminary first-quarter results for the period ending May 3, which predated the breach. It expects to report $1.35 billion in net sales and an adjusted operating income of $32 million—figures that exceed its previous guidance. Analysts polled by FactSet had forecast sales of approximately $1.33 billion. Victoria's Secret has not announced a new date for the release of its complete first-quarter earnings report. The company maintained that the breach had no impact on its first-quarter results but added it would continue to 'assess the full scope' of the incident, including any future financial implications. The Victoria's Secret breach comes amid a broader surge in cybersecurity incidents targeting consumer-facing brands. In recent weeks, British retailers including Marks & Spencer, Harrods, and Co-op have reported cyberattacks, with M&S estimating a potential financial hit of 300 million pounds ($400 million) due to the disruption of online orders and supply chain issues. In a separate case last month, Adidas disclosed that consumer contact information had been accessed through a third-party customer service provider. Following such incidents, cybersecurity experts urge consumers to stay vigilant. They warn that fraudsters may exploit the situation by sending phishing emails, offering fake promotions, or attempting to misuse compromised data. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Congress leader suggests ‘ceasefire with Maoists', BJP alleges ‘vote bank' politics
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accused the Congress of endorsing a call for a ceasefire with the banned CPI (Maoist) and said it has "exposed" the opposition party's 'double standards' on the issue of taking on the Naxal menace. The controversy erupted after a recent remark by Telangana Congress president B Mahesh Kumar Goud, who said that he would bring an appeal of a peace talk committee for a ceasefire with the CPI (Maoists) to the notice of chief minister A Revanth Reddy and also discuss the issue in the party's high-level committee. Also Read | 'Thunder vs blunder': BJP's dig at Rahul Gandhi's 'surrender' remark on PM Modi According to media reports, the Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee chief, while addressing a conference organised by the peace talks committee in Hyderabad on Sunday, also accused the Centre of aiming to eliminate Maoists to hand over mineral wealth in Chhattisgarh and other states to corporates. The BJP seized on the statement, with national spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla accusing the Congress of supporting Maoist insurgents for 'vote bank politics.' Poonawalla also asked why the grand old party "always stands with enemies of India – from Naxals to Pakistan-based terrorists'. Also Read | BJP on Congress leader's 'Rahul Gandhi would've taken PoK back' remarks: 'Hilarious' 'When the Congress was in power (at the Centre) it used to call Naxalism the biggest internal security threat and today it has become the biggest issue of human rights for the party," Poonawalla said. "After Naxal commanders like Basavarju were killed, the Congress is now shedding tears. Telangana Congress president says there should be a ceasefire with the Naxalites,' he added. Terming the reported remarks of Goud as 'shameful', another BJP national spokesperson, Pradeep Bhandari, asked in a post on X, 'Why does Congress always stand with enemies of India – Naxals to Pak-based terrorists?' Also Read | BJP hails Salman Khurshid's Article 370 remarks, asks 'will Congress turn on him like Tharoor' He said the number of Maoist-hit districts coming down to just 18 in early 2025 from 126 in 2014 is a testament to the resolve of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government to make India 'Naxal-free by 2026'. "Instead of standing with India, he questions the government's anti-Maoist operations and echoes the narrative of urban Naxals,' Bhandari alleged. The Congress has yet to respond officially to the BJP's charges. (with PTI inputs)
