
Whistleblower sacked after accusing HS2 bosses of fraud for ignoring warnings about the true cost of the project wins over £300,000
A 'brave' whistleblower who lost his job after accusing HS2 executives of fraud over the true cost of the controversial project has won more than £300,000 in compensation.
Risk management expert Stephen Cresswell repeatedly raised concerns that the cost of the high speed rail line - which could end up landing the taxpayer with a bill of more than £80billion - was being 'actively misrepresented'.
The consultant was told by one HS2 executive to 'disregard' scenarios he had prepared which forecast a 'significant' increase in the price to the public, an employment tribunal heard.
As a result, Mr Cresswell warned that he found himself in a 'very uncomfortable position' of having a 'very different' view to the high speed rail line company's 'documented position'.
The tribunal heard that in a meeting with bosses he said 'fraud had been committed because he understood fraud to be making false statement so as to secure a benefit'.
After losing his job, Mr Cresswell took HS2 to an employment tribunal, claiming he had his contract terminated and been denied other work as a result of blowing the whistle.
After the rail firm admitted that he had not given adequate levels of protection following his disclosures he has now been awarded £319,070 in damages.
In response, campaigners said it was not to late for Labour to consider scrapping high speed rail over years of 'catastrophic mishandling'.
But HS2 bosses said the firm is 'now under new leadership', adding that it had not accepted Mr Cresswell's allegations.
The project to build a high speed line between London, the Midlands and the North was announced in 2010 by then Conservative Transport Secretary Philip Hammond.
But ever since it has been beset by controversy amid ballooning costs - including spending £100million on a tunnel for bats.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Mr Cresswell later accused HS2 of having deployed a 'classic playbook' used on major taxpayer-funded construction projects, by holding back accurate cost predictions to ensure government kept money flowing in.
Following his tribunal win he said: 'In my opinion HS2 is not an organisation that should be trusted with public money.
'HS2 is destroying taxpayer value, a properly functioning administration would mothball the programme and undertake a full independent investigation.'
Today John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'HS2 has rightly become a byword for incompetence and scandal given the catastrophic mishandling of the project by one of Britain's most hopeless and profligate quangos.
'One of the biggest problems was an embarrassing underestimate of the costs and overestimate of the benefits, despite warnings from industry experts and campaigners including this brave whistleblower.
'Even at this late stage Labour ministers should consider abolishing the project entirely.'
HS2 Ltd says investigations into Mr Cresswell's claims found no evidence of fraud or illegal activity.
In a statement it said: 'HS2 Ltd has accepted that Mr Cresswell raised concerns as a whistleblower and was not then given the appropriate level of protection when his contract came to an end.
'This is regrettable and HS2 Ltd is committed to ensuring that staff and others can raise concerns in confidence.
'This admission does not mean that HS2 Ltd accepts the specific allegations around cost estimating practices raised by Mr Cresswell.
'However, the company is under now under new leadership and a comprehensive review of its skills and structures is being carried out.'
Last month a DfT spokesperson said: 'We take all whistleblowing allegations seriously and it is important that individuals are given appropriate levels of protection, which clearly was not the case for Mr Cresswell.
'There is a lot of hard work still to do to get this project back on track, which is why we are overseeing a total reset of HS2, and reviewing the programme's costs, schedule and culture.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
28 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Faro Airport to let Brits use passport e-gates for first time
Faro Airport in Portugal will start this rollout ahead of the peak summer season in the Algarve. This announcement comes after a UK-EU deal where the government shared that British passport holders will be able to use e-gates at more European airports. Since Brexit, British travellers arriving at EU airports have generally been forced to queue for manned desks to have their passports stamped. 📍Faro airport. Horrendous This is instead of using automated gates with facial recognition technology, which has led to long waits in peak periods, The Daily Mail reports. British passports can currently be used at e-gates in the EU at only a limited number of airports in Spain and Portugal. Nick Thomas-Symonds, the minister for EU relations, told Parliament today (Thursday, June 5) that UK tourists arriving at Faro over the coming days will be able to use e-gates. He said: "The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests. "Good for bills, borders and jobs. It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. "Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week." The EU plans to introduce a new Entry/Exit system (EES) in October 2025, which will remove the need for people from non-member countries to have their passports stamped. The UK Government website says: "If you are travelling to a country in the Schengen area using a UK passport, you will be required to register your biometric details, such as fingerprints or a photo, when you arrive." It adds: "When EES is introduced, you will need to create a digital record on your first visit to the Schengen area at the port or airport on arrival. "You will be required to submit your fingerprints and have your photo taken at dedicated booths. You will not need to provide any information before travelling to a Schengen area country, and this data will be kept for three years. There are concerns this will cause queues at EU airports when first rolled out, as well as at the Port of Dover and Eurostar terminals. The countries that make up the Schengen area are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. According to the UK Government website, you do not need a visa for short trips to the EU or countries in the Schengen area if both of the following apply: Other reasons include: Recommended reading: Why are passports different colours and what does each colour mean? How to claim compensation for flight delays and cancellations Does buying from duty free at the airport save you money and how does it work? You can travel to more than one country in a 180-day period, but how long you can stay in individual countries depends on their rules. The website adds: "Your total stay in the Schengen area must be no more than 90 days in every 180 days. "It does not matter how many countries you visit. The 180-day period keeps 'rolling'."


BreakingNews.ie
41 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
ECB cuts interest rates as EU likely to counter US tariffs
The European Central Bank cut interest rates as expected on Thursday and kept all options on the table for its next meetings even as the case grows for a summer pause in its year-long easing cycle. The ECB has now lowered borrowing costs eight times, or by 2 percentage points since last June, seeking to prop up a euro zone economy that was struggling even before erratic US economic and trade policies dealt it further blows. Advertisement With inflation now safely in line with its 2 per cent target and the cut well-flagged, the focus has shifted to the ECB's message about the path ahead, especially since at 2 per cent, rates are now in the "neutral" range where they neither stimulate nor slow growth. The central bank for the 20 countries that share the euro offered few hints in its statement, however, sticking to its mantra that decisions would be taken meeting-by-meeting and based on incoming data. "The Governing Council is not pre-committing to a particular rate path," the ECB said. "Interest rate decisions will be based on its assessment of the inflation outlook in light of the incoming economic and financial data, the dynamics of underlying inflation and the strength of monetary policy transmission." ECB President Christine Lagarde's 1245 GMT news conference may offer more clues about the months ahead, with the bank's most aggressive easing cycle since the 2008/2009 Global Financial Crisis expected to start winding down. Advertisement Investors are already pricing in a pause in July, and some conservative policymakers have advocated a break to give the ECB a chance to reassess how exceptional uncertainty and policy upheaval both at home and abroad will shift the outlook. While ECB board member and chief hawk Isabel Schnabel has made explicit calls for a pause, others have been more cautious and Lagarde is likely to stick to language that leaves the ECB's options open, as the outlook is prone to sudden changes. The case for a pause rests on the premise that the short- and medium-term prospects for the currency bloc differ greatly and may require different policy responses. Inflation could dip in the short term - possibly even below the ECB's target - but increased government spending and higher trade barriers may add to price pressures later. Advertisement The added complication is that monetary policy impacts the economy with a 12-to-18 month lag, so support approved now could be giving help to a bloc that no longer needs it. Investors still see at least one more rate cut later this year, however, and a small chance of another move later on, especially if US. President Donald Trump's trade war intensifies Acknowledging near-term weakness, the ECB cut its inflation projection for next year. Trump's tariffs are already damaging activity and will have a lasting impact even if an amicable resolution is found, given the hit to confidence and investment. Advertisement "A further escalation of trade tensions over the coming months would result in growth and inflation being below the baseline projections," the ECB said. "By contrast, if trade tensions were resolved with a benign outcome, growth and, to a lesser extent, inflation would be higher than in the baseline projections." This sluggish growth, along with lower energy costs and a strong euro, will curb price pressures. Indeed, most economists think inflation could fall below the ECB's 2 per cent target next year, triggering memories of the pre-pandemic decade when price growth persistently undershot 2 per cent, even if projections show it back at target in 2027. Further ahead, the outlook changes significantly. The European Union is likely to retaliate against any permanent US tariffs, raising the cost of international trade. Firms could meanwhile relocate some activity to avoid trade barriers but changes to corporate value chains are also likely to raise costs. Higher European defence spending, particularly by Germany, and the cost of the green transition could add to inflation while a shrinking workforce due to an ageing population will keep wage pressures elevated.


Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Wise's US listing switch lacks financial wisdom
LONDON, June 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Wise (WISEa.L), opens new tab helps customers exchange money more cheaply, transparently and, well, wisely. But the $15 billion firm's plan, opens new tab to shift its primary listing to New York from London seems less clever. CEO, co-founder and largest shareholder Kristo Käärmann wants to tap deeper pools of liquidity and attract more American investors. Yet for a company already trading at a premium valuation, the move raises more questions than it answers. Käärmann's case rests on two key points. Wise's shares are thinly traded in London, meaning investors risk moving the market by offloading stock in large volumes. Second, a U.S. listing would boost the company's appeal to American investors and even customers. There's truth to both. The total daily value of Wise's trading volume has averaged about half of $4 billion American peer Remitly Global over the past two years according to a Breakingviews analysis of LSEG data, even though the London-listed group is much bigger. And some domestic-focused U.S. investors prefer to hold stocks listed in their home market. Yet Wise needn't cross the Atlantic Ocean to boost liquidity. One possible obstacle to winning more investors at home is the company's quirky governance, where Class B owners have nine votes per share. The effect is that Käärmann has a tight grip on the company despite owning less than 20% of the tradable Class A stock, according to LSEG data. The alternative to hopping across the pond would be to get rid of some of the CEO's special rights, which could in turn smooth Wise's entry into Britain's main stock benchmark, the FTSE 100 Index (.FTSE), opens new tab. That would boost liquidity to U.S. levels: LSEG research, opens new tab found that, relative to the volume of companies' tradable shares, FTSE 100 trading levels were slightly higher than in the S&P 500 Index (.SPX), opens new tab in 2022. Nor is the United States Wise's biggest geography, as it was for other listing switchers like CRH and Ferguson Enterprises. For Käärmann's company, the American market comes third after Europe and Asia, making up 20% of group revenue. As for brand awareness, switching trading venue seems like a strange way to gain publicity compared with a marketing campaign. Moving the listing also brings possible downside. Wise trades at 29 times consensus 2027 earnings – beating Remitly, Block, PayPal and others. Other metrics tell the same story: there's no evidence of a valuation penalty because of the company's UK trading venue. That means Käärmann has much to lose if the company ends up as one of the many 'orphaned' pond-hoppers, which switch listing but never quite catch fire in the U.S. market. Research by think tank New Financial earlier this year found that just 44% of the 16 European companies that had moved across the Atlantic subsequently beat the performance of their home continent. The one consolidation is that this doesn't seem to be about extra CEO pay: Käärmann, as a major shareholder, has taken a roughly 200,000-pound ($270,000) cash salary in recent years, which is tiny compared to most bosses. There are no plans to raise that, according to a person familiar with the matter. But for investors, Wise's shift looks like a poor financial trade-off. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.