logo
Hegseth clashes with Democrats over $134 million cost to deploy troops to LA protests

Hegseth clashes with Democrats over $134 million cost to deploy troops to LA protests

Yahooa day ago

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth clashed with House Democrats on Tuesday as he defended President Donald Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles despite California leaders' objections.
Appearing before the House appropriations subcommittee, Hegseth doubled down on Trump's narrative about the anti-immigration raid protests, saying it was necessary to deploy 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
'We want to ensure that those rioters, looters, and thugs on the other side assaulting our police officers know that we're not going anywhere,' Hegseth said.
Hegseth sparred with Democrats over the matter, who demanded to know where the Defense Department was getting $134 million from and why it was being used for the situation.
When Minnesota Rep. Betty McCollum asked Hegseth about the cost to deploy the personnel, Hegseth blamed Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for not protecting police during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.
'ICE ought be able to do it's job whether it's Minneapolis or Los Angeles,' Hegseth said.
McCollum accused Hegseth of refusing to answer her question.
Acting Pentagon Comptroller Bryn MacDonnell told representatives that the estimated cost was $134 million and largely covered travel, housing, and food for the military personnel.
Hegseth became more confrontational when California Rep. Pete Aguilar insinuated the military was not prepared to house or feed personnel who have been deployed, calling it a 'disingenuous attack.'
'I'm not going to take the fact that we don't care about the troops, nobody cares more about the troops at the top than this secretary,' Hegseth said.
Aguilar asked Hegseth which legal reason the president was relying on to justify ignoring California Governor Gavin Newsom's objection to the National Guard. He cited invasion by a foreign nation, rebellion against the government, or the president's inability to execute the law with regular forces.
'I don't know. You just read it yourself, and people can listen themselves, but it sounds like all three to me,' Hegseth replied.
Trump invoked a rarely-used power to activate 2,000 National Guard members on Saturday against the wishes of Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass after some of the protests led to instances of civil unrest.
Despite declining violence, the president ordered another 2,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles on Monday.
Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell rebuked the need for Marines and said he was 'confident' in the department and its partners' abilities to manage large-scale demonstrations. He warned that introducing federal military forces could create confusion and logistical issues.
While Trump deployed 700 Marines to the city, General Eric Smith, the Marine Corps Commandant, said the active-duty battalion in Los Angeles had not yet been called into action to protect federal property and personnel.
Newsom has asked a federal court to intervene in the matter and declare that Marines and other troops cannot perform law enforcement activities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal

Hamilton Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal

BANGKOK (AP) — Australia's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time,' saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.' He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture. 'I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said. The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy . The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built. In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing. Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.' 'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.' Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions. Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Protests against immigration raids continue to spread across the U.S. Here's a look at many of them.
Protests against immigration raids continue to spread across the U.S. Here's a look at many of them.

CBS News

time26 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Protests against immigration raids continue to spread across the U.S. Here's a look at many of them.

Protests over federal immigration enforcement raids and President Trump's mobilization of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles continue to spread nationwide. While many have been peaceful, with marchers chanting slogans and carrying signs against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, some protesters have clashed with police, leading to hundreds of arrests and the use of chemical irritants to disperse crowds. Activists say they will hold even larger demonstrations in the coming days with "No Kings" events across the country on Saturday to coincide with Mr. Trump's planned military parade through Washington, D.C. Here's a rundown of many of them: LOS ANGELES A group of demonstrators who'd gathered outside the federal buildings in the city's downtown marched out of the curfew zone just after it went into effect for a second night. A smaller crowd of people nearby was seen being taken into custody about 20 minutes after curfew, with the CBS News Los Angeles helicopter overhead. SEATTLE Police say the demonstration began with a peaceful march but officers intervened when some people set fire to a dumpster at an intersection late Wednesday night. As police waited for the Seattle Fire Department to arrive, some people "from the group confronted them, throwing bottles, rocks, and concrete chunks at them," police said. "A protestor threw a large firework at officers, but no one was injured. Police issued dispersal orders and moved the crowd out of the area making eight arrests for assault and obstruction." Protesters stand in front of a dumpster that was set on fire in front of the Henry M. Jackson Building in Seattle during a June 11, 2025 demonstration against federal immigration raids Ryan Sun / AP SPOKANE, WASH. More than 30 people were arrested in downtown Spokane Wednesday night as anti-ICE protesters clashed with police, CBS Spokane affiliate KREM-TV reports. The station says community members gathered at the Spokane ICE office Wednesday afternoon to protest the detainment of a 21-year-old Venezuelan man seeking asylum. Mayor Lisa Brown imposed a curfew in the city's downtown after the demonstration at the ICE office. Police Chief Kevin Hall said protesters were arrested and officers deployed "pepper balls" on the crowd. LAS VEGAS Hundreds of people gathered outside the Las Vegas Federal Courthouse in the downtown area, CBS Las Vegas affiliate KLAS-TV reported. The protest remained peaceful until around 9 p.m. when police issued a dispersal order and declared an unlawful assembly "due to protestors engaging in illegal activity." The crowd dispered 15 minutes later.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store