Japanese student has visa reinstated after it was revoked by potential AI mistake
A Japanese student in Utah had his student visa status reinstated suddenly after it was mysteriously cancelled earlier this month.
His attorney believes the sudden switch-up shows the student was mistakenly flagged for deportation by artificial intelligence.
Suguru Onda, a doctoral student at Brigham Young University, learned on Friday his status had been restored, minutes after he and a group of fellow university students filed a lawsuit arguing the government suddenly and arbitrarily cancelled their visas 'to coerce students' to leave the country even though they had done nothing wrong.
'He is reinstated as if it was never revoked,' attorney Adam Crayk told KSL-TV.
Onda, a father of five studying computer science, was notified earlier this month his status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System had been terminated because he was 'identified in criminal records check and/or has had their VISA revoked,' a procedural step that functionally ended his ability to remain in the United States for more than two weeks after the change.
The Japanese student had little apparent criminal history, besides a few speeding tickets and a fishing citation for organizing a church event where others caught too many fish, according to his lawyer.
'I feel helpless,' Onda told KSL NewsRadio at the time. 'Like nobody knows (the) answer, nobody knows what to do, what's going to happen.'
The Department of Homeland Security told NBC News it would not elaborate on Onda's case 'due to privacy concerns and visa confidentiality.'
The department has said it is using high-tech tools to search the social media activity and potential criminal histories of international students in the U.S.
That effort includes a State Department effort using artificial intelligence to screen foreign students for alleged support of terror groups, Axios reported in March.
Since taking office, more than 1,500 students from nearly 250 colleges have had their visas revoked, according to a tracker from Inside Higher Education.
The visa pullbacks have prompted lawsuits and widespread confusion.
They form the second major prong of the administration's deportation push on college campuses.
The White House has also targeted prominent leaders of the campus pro-Palestine movement, using a little-tested authority in federal immigration law to argue their activism threatens U.S. foreign policy interests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Iguana critically ill after being shot with pellet gun, shelter searching for owner
An iguana found in Hamilton County is critically ill after being shot with a pellet gun, and the Cincinnati Animal CARE is searching for its owner. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The iguana was found Friday on Northland Blvd in Forest Park is is being held at Cincinnati Animal CARE, according to a social media post. TRENDING STORIES: Heroic local pharmacist saves 2 lives in one shift Firefighters respond to reported apartment fire in Dayton 24-year-old man enrolled in an Ohio high school in U.S. Marshals custody Cincinnati Animal CARE took in the iguana after it appeared to be sick or injured, according to the post. An X-ray revealed that the iguana had been shot with a pellet gun and was potentially suffering from lead poisoning. An investigation into this case of suspected cruelty has been opened, according to the post. The Cincinnati Animal CARE medical team is working with reptile veterinary professionals to provide supportive care, but the post said that the iguana is critically ill. They are still looking for the owner of the iguana, but if they can not find them, they will seek rescue replacement due to limited, species-appropriate housing at the shelter. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
New Yorkers searched web for ‘Free Palestine' info more than any other state, study finds
New Yorkers scoured the web for information on Palestine-related phrases more than any other state in the US, a new study found. Since the start of the year, the Empire State averaged 8,260 searches per month for phrases including: 'Palestine protests,' 'Free Palestine movement' and 'free Palestine flag' — more than any other place in the country per capita. For every 100,000 people in the state, there were more than 41 searches for the 'free Palestine'-related phrases, the analysis of Google Trends data conducted by Ladah Law found. Advertisement Protesters descended on Times Square in April to call for the release of Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil. James Keivom The most popular phrase in New York, with 3,600 searches, was 'Free Palestine,' followed by 'Palestine protest,' with 1,600 searches. NYC's Columbia University was the epicenter of violent anti-Israel protests last year, with similar ones taking place throughout California and across the country. Advertisement Other Google entries part of the study included, 'free Palestine stickers,' 'free Palestine posters' and 'is Palestine free?' Vermont took second place with nearly 34 searches per 100,000 residents and California followed with just under 32, according to the Las Vegas-based firm. New Yorkers searched online information on Palestine more than any other state. Thaspol – For every 100,000 of California's nearly 40 million residents, there were approximately 12,570 searches for info on the movement, which spread across the nation following Hamas terrorists' deadly Oct. 7, 2023 attacks on Israel and subsequent anti-Israel protests. Advertisement Behind the Green Mountain and Golden states were Massachusetts, Oregon and Connecticut. Arkansas saw the fewest searches related to the conflict, according to the findings.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump travel ban includes 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others
Trump travel ban includes 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump bans travel from several countries around the world President Donald Trump signed a proclamation that bans travel from 12 countries and restricts seven others. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump has issued a full travel ban blocking the entry of foreign nationals from 12 countries into the United States, reviving a controversial policy from his first term that is likely to be challenged in court. Trump cited "national security risks" posed by citizens of the targeted nations, which include several Middle Eastern and African countries, in a June 4 proclamation he signed imposing the ban. He also partially restricted the entry of foreign nationals from seven other nations. The restrictions are scheduled to go into effect on June 9. The ban prohibits entry into the U.S. of foreign nationals from Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Trump issued partial travel suspensions for foreign nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Trump presidency: Marco Rubio says US will revoke visas from Chinese students, add new restrictions In videotaped remarks from the Oval Office, Trump pointed to last weekend's fiery assault on pro-Jewish demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, carried out by suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a native of Egypt who came to the U.S. on a tourist visa in late 2022 and stayed after the visa expired. "The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstayed their visas," Trump said. "We don't want them." Egypt is not among the countries facing new restrictions despite Trump invoking the attack, which the White House has blamed on the Biden administration's immigration policies. Trump's travel ban: A timeline look throughout his first presidency Who faces a travel ban? The move comes after the Trump administration has worked aggressively to deport immigrants who are in the United States unlawfully, halted the government's refugee resettlement program, and last week announced plans to "aggressively" revoke visas of Chinese students. The ban resembles similar actions Trump took during his first term to bar the entry of foreign nationals from several predominantly Muslim countries. The restrictions do not apply to visas that have already been granted, lawful permanent residents, certain athletes, immediate family members of current visa holders, and other classes of individuals for whom the administration granted exceptions. Travelers react to the latest travel ban from President Trump "Pros and cons." Travelers in Los Angeles responded to the news of President Donald Trump's travel ban impacting nearly 20 countries. "In the 21st century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign-visa overstayers from dangerous places. They should not be in our country," Trump said. "We will not let what happened in Europe happen to America." Council on American-Islamic Relations Executive Director Nihad Awad said the government already vets visa applicants extensively. The new order risks separating families, depriving students of educational opportunities and blocking patients from unique medical treatment, he said. "President Trump's new travel ban targeting mostly Muslim and African nations and raising the specter of more vague free speech restrictions is overbroad, unnecessary and ideologically motivated,' Awad said. "Automatically banning students, workers, tourists, and other citizens of these targeted nations from coming to the United States will not make our nation safer." Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said in a post on social media that the antisemitic attack in Boulder shouldn't be used to justify a ban on travel from primarily Muslim-majority countries. 'We'll keep saying it: the Jewish community's legitimate fears and concerns should not (be) exploited to undermine core democratic norms, or otherwise advance discriminatory & unconstitutional policies,' Spitalnick said. 'Doing so only makes Jews – and all communities – less safe.' Rep. Judy Chu, a California Democrat who introduced legislation in February that sought to prevent the Trump administration from banning travel to the U.S. by people of any religious group, lashed out at Trump on X. "Just now, Trump has re-issued his disgusting, bigoted, and Islamophobic travel ban. This goes against our core American values while doing nothing to make us safer. We can do better, we must do better," she said. What travelers need to know: Trump issues new travel ban affecting nearly 20 countries Trump revisits travel bans Trump's first-term travel bans were overturned repeatedly in the courts for apparent religious or racial motivations before being upheld by the Supreme Court. Within hours of the new ban, the International Refugee Assistance Project, a group that sued Trump in 2017, slammed the ban as arbitrary for making exceptions for athletes traveling to the United States for sporting events such as the Olympics and the FIFA World Cup, "while closing the door to ordinary people who've gone through extensive legal processes to enter the United States." "It is yet another shameful attempt by the Trump administration to sow division, fear, and chaos," Stephanie Gee, senior director of U.S. Legal Services, said in a statement. Trump's latest ban follows through on a day-one executive order directing his administration to identify countries throughout the world "for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a full or partial suspension on the entry or admission of nationals from those countries." Trump said he evaluated recommendations from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi based on foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism goals and largely accepted their recommendations. Factors included whether a county "has a significant terrorist presence within its territory" or a high rate of people overstaying their visas, Trump's order said. The president said the administration also considered a country's "cooperation with accepting back its removable nationals." At one point, the administration looked at slapping as many as 43 countries with restrictions. Egypt was not on either of the draft lists that circulated in March. The president said in the order that Rubio and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller provided him a list on April 9 of countries to consider. The White House did not immediately explain why it took Trump nearly two months after he received the report to take action. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment. "Very simply," Trump said, "we cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States." Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
