Union president raises safety concerns for its CFIA members tasked with B.C. ostrich cull
The union representing Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) workers tasked with carrying out a cull at a B.C. ostrich farm says there are fears over the workers' safety as emotions run high.
Over 400 birds at Universal Ostrich farm in Edgewood, B.C., face the prospect of a cull due to an avian flu detection in December.
The CFIA, which is handling Canada's response to an ongoing avian flu outbreak, won a court case earlier this month and says the cull will go ahead due to concerns over the spread and mutation of the virus.
But a vocal contingent of supporters — including U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — has spoken out against the cull, arguing the flightless birds, many decades old, pose little threat of spreading avian flu and the herd should be preserved for scientific study.Supporters have camped out at the Edgewood farm for weeks, saying they won't allow the cull to go ahead, even as farm spokesperson Katie Pasitney has repeatedly urged supporters to be peaceful, respectful and to follow the law.
Now, the union representing CFIA workers says it's fearful for their safety, over online death threats it says were made against CFIA members.
"Nobody likes to see their flocks culled, and we certainly don't take any pleasure in doing it, but ... it is our jobs, it's our mandate for the safety of Canadians to ensure that we carry out our job," said Milton Dyck, the president of the Agriculture Union, in an interview with CBC News.
Dyck said that a CFIA vehicle in the area of the farm was also pelted with a rock, but he does not know if that was directly related to the planned ostrich cull.
He said that the average worker was not responsible for the cull decision, which the CFIA says is due to wider concerns over virus mutation and the impact it could have on Canada's food supply.
"Some people will be passionate about what their motives are for keeping the ostriches — whether they love ostriches, whether it's something that they feel personally about disease," he said.
"But we have to look at it as we are doing a service to Canadians because we're protecting the health and safety of Canadians. We're protecting the value of the food chain going forward."In a statement, the union said it supported every individual's right to peaceful protest, so long as it does not obstruct the work of its members.
While the CFIA has said the cull would be proceeding, it has not provided an exact date when it would occur.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
9 hours ago
- CBS News
FDA to "review the latest data" on mifepristone. What could it mean for access to the abortion pill?
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has asked Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary "to review the latest data on mifepristone," raising questions about the drug commonly referred to as the abortion pill. A spokesperson for the FDA confirmed the plans in a statement to CBS News Tuesday, but did not respond to questions about when the review is scheduled to start and what exactly it will be reviewing about the medication. According to a letter published on social media Monday by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Makary's review aims to closely monitor the drug's safety. But experts say concerns about its safety are misguided, fueled in part by a report from the Ethics and Public Policy Center, an advocacy group that promotes religious traditions and is funded by multiple right-wing organizations. Mifepristone, which is taken with a second drug, misoprostol, to end an early pregnancy, was first approved by the FDA in 2000 after "a thorough and comprehensive review" determined it was safe and effective, the agency says. Periodic reviews since its approval have not found new safety concerns, according to the FDA. In the Ethics and Public Policy Center report, which was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, the authors, who don't have medical training, claim the pill harms women, causing 1 in 10 patients to experience what they call a "serious adverse event," including hemorrhage, ER visits, ectopic pregnancy and an undefined category of "abortion-specific complications." Dr. Céline Gounder, CBS News medical contributor and editor-at-large for public health at KFF Health News, said some of the instances described as "adverse events" are questionable. "When you have a medication abortion, you bleed. That is normal. That is not an adverse event unless the bleeding is so significant that a woman needs a transfusion," she explained. "It is to be expected that not all medication abortions will successfully eliminate the pregnancy. A surgical abortion after incomplete/failed medication abortion should not be considered an adverse event. ... An ectopic pregnancy is not caused by mifepristone and should not be considered a serious adverse event." Gounder added that the report lacks transparency and doesn't disclose the data source, meaning no one can reproduce and verify the findings, something Kennedy himself said he's a proponent of, noting in his confirmation hearings that he wants to replicate studies. It also lacks a comparison group, Gounder said, which is important for examining how experiences compare to pregnant women who did not take the drug. CBS News has reached out to the makers of the generic and brand name of mifepristone for comment. While it's unclear whether the latest review of the drug will impact access, this isn't the first time it has come under fire. In 2024, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge targeting the availability of the widely used pill, preserving access to the drug in its first major abortion-related ruling since the reversal of Roe v. Wade. If the challengers had prevailed, the ruling would have restricted access to mifepristone nationwide, even in states where abortion is legal. The justices unanimously ruled that the anti-abortion rights doctors and medical associations who brought the lawsuit against the FDA did not have the legal right to do so. They did not address whether the FDA acted lawfully when it took a series of steps in 2016 and 2021 that relaxed the rules for mifepristone's use. Makary had previously said that he had "no plans to take action on mifepristone," which has been a target of abortion opponents and conservatives who have called on the FDA to reconsider its approval. Since it was approved, mifepristone has been taken by more than 5 million patients, according to the FDA. Medication abortions made up more than half of all abortions in the United States health care system in 2023, a study from the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights research group, found. In 28 states, there are policies restricting access to mifepristone in some way, according to the Guttmacher Institute, four of which prohibit the mailing of abortion pills to patients. and contributed to this report.
Washington Post
10 hours ago
- Washington Post
Oilers' Hyman says his right wrist was dislocated late last round, knocking him out of the playoffs
EDMONTON, Alberta — Zach Hyman said Wednesday his right wrist got dislocated late last round, an injury that is sidelining one of the Edmonton Oilers' most valuable forwards for the Stanley Cup Final against the Florida Panthers. Hyman sported a brace on his right arm after undergoing surgery last week to repair the damage caused by a hit from Dallas' Mason Marchment in Game 4 of the Western Conference final.
Fox News
11 hours ago
- Fox News
Doctor reveals the 'hateful 8' seed oils that could harm your health
Americans are becoming more cognizant of the ingredients in their food amid the Make America Healthy Again movement. Seed oils — which are plant-based cooking oils that are often used in processed, packaged foods – have been touted by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as "unknowingly poison[ing]" Americans. Any oil that comes from seeds is classified as a seed oil, but that also includes some that are beneficial, such as sesame seed oil, peanut oil and flax oils, according to board-certified family physician Cate Shanahan, M.D., who is based in Florida. Shanahan, who specializes in using traditional food to promote health and reverse disease, shared with Fox News Digital which seed oils should be avoided. "I had to create a term that described the harmful oils in our food supply … the 'hateful eight seed oils' or the 'hatefully eight oils,'" she said. Those eight include corn, canola, cotton seed, soy, sunflower, safflower, rice bran and grape seed. There are several factors that make these eight specific oils unhealthy, according to Shanahan. The process to extract the oil is "not selectively bred to yield their oil easily," she noted — it requires high heat and pressure, leading to the presence of a neurotoxin called hexane. The oils contain polyunsaturated fatty acids, which can break down and turn into toxins during the heating process, according to Shanahan. "Even after processing, they can continue to degrade, especially when exposed to heat during cooking, leading to further toxin generation," she said. It's necessary to refine the oils to make them edible, but that process removes nutrients. "Some of these nutrients are very important, like choline and lecithin and other phospholipids," noted Shanahan. "They're important for our brain and our nervous system and our cellular division and fertility and key things in life like that." Seed oils are commonly found in processed "junk" food, as well as foods served in restaurants and in hospitals. "What makes a 'junk food' a 'junk food' is in the ingredients," Shanahan said. "When you pay attention to the ingredients, are they wholesome or not? These hateful eight seed oils are not wholesome." Seed oils overall have been linked to an increased risk of colon cancer, as Fox News Digital recently reported. Some health agencies, however, have spoken in defense of seed oils. In 2024, the American Heart Association (AHA) published a piece asserting that "there's no reason to avoid seed oils and plenty of reasons to eat them." The American Heart Association has stated that "there's no reason to avoid seed oils and plenty of reasons to eat them." The piece argued that it is "misleading" to state that the fatty acids in seed oils "break down into toxins when used for cooking, causing inflammation, weakening the immune system, and contributing to chronic illnesses." The AHA also pointed to other ingredients beyond seed oils that could lead to unhealthy outcomes. For more Health articles, visit "The real concern should be overeating ultraprocessed foods, which may contain harmful ingredients such as high-fructose corn syrup, added sugar and sodium," the post reads. "It's so odd that the internet has gone wild demonizing these things," said Dr. Christopher Gardner, a professor of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine in California and a nutrition scientist at the Stanford Prevention Research Center. "They are not to be feared."
