The American war too few talk about
The U.S. military is bombing extremist groups in the Horn of Africa, executing at least 32 strikes in Somalia this year alone.
That's more than double the previous year's tally, according to Africa Command, and is a sign of enduring extremism concerns back in Washington.
Why it matters: This is a war too few in the U.S. are discussing — or even realize is happening.
By the numbers: American forces, in cooperation with local government, targeted ISIS-Somalia 20 times and al-Shabab 12 times between Feb. 1 and June 4.
The strike cadence has surged in recent months, with roughly twice as many attacks in April and May (19 in total) as in the previous two months, AFRICOM announcements and posts on social media show.
The command reported three strikes this month, all on ISIS-Somalia.
The operations often target areas southeast of Bosaso, a coastal town on the Gulf of Aden, and areas northwest of Kismayo, a port near the Kenyan border.
The intrigue: Acting Chief of Naval Operations Adm. James Kilby at a Council on Foreign Relations event in May said the Harry S. Truman carrier strike group "launched the largest airstrike in the history of the world: 125,000 pounds from a single aircraft carrier into Somalia."
The Trump administration loosened rules for airstrikes and other raids earlier this year.
Washington has released few details on casualties, civilian or militant. An early February strike reportedly killed 14 ISIS-Somalia operatives, including a recruiter and financier.
The latest: AFRICOM boss Gen. Michael Langley, a Marine, on Tuesday told Congress that Africa "remains a nexus theater from which the United States cannot afford to shift its gaze."
"It is home to terrorists who take advantage of conditions in Africa to grow and export their ideology," he added.
"ISIS controls their global network from Somalia."
Context: Several U.S. administrations have become entangled in the region.
Perhaps the most infamous instance — the Battle of Mogadishu, associated with "Black Hawk Down" — occurred under President Clinton.
Zoom out: While this contemporary campaign is limited to Somalia, the threat from ISIS, al-Shabab and other extremist groups is not. It's particularly acute across the Sahel, where violence and worsening weather fuels political instability.
U.S. forces withdrew from Niger last year, following a coup. France also dramatically reduced its military presence in West Africa under pressure from local leaders.
Russia has entrenched its own influence in several states in West and Central Africa, via its Wagner mercenaries. On Monday, the Kremlin reiterated its desire to step up cooperation with African countries in "such sensitive areas as defense and security," Reuters reported.
The bottom line: The fight "in Africa is the least understood or covered," Alex Plitsas, a counterterrorism expert at the Atlantic Council, told Axios.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump hints he may raise auto tariffs ‘in the not too distant future'
President Trump said Thursday that he may increase tariffs on automobile imports 'in the not-too-distant future.' 'To further defend our autoworkers, I imposed this 25 percent tariff on all foreign automobiles, and investment in American manufacturing and auto manufacturing—all manufacturing—is surging,' Trump said. 'And I might go up with that tariff in the not-too-distant future,' Trump added. 'The higher you go, the more likely it is they build a plant here.' His comments came at a White House event to block a California state rule that would ban the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. Trump touted incoming investments from Ford and General Motors, crediting his tariffs for those announcements. However, foreign carmakers like Hyundai have warned they may have to raise prices because of tariffs. The president has aggressively imposed — and pulled back — tariffs on various sectors, such as automobiles and steel and aluminum, while threatening additional tariffs on pharmaceuticals and other specific imports. He has also imposed a 10 percent blanket tariff on all imports while announcing and later suspending higher tariff rates on dozens of other nations.
35 minutes ago
Standoff with troops in Los Angeles reignites old feud as Newsom resists Trump's immigration raids
WASHINGTON -- It was earlier this year that California Gov. Gavin Newsom was making nice with President Donald Trump as he sought help for his wildfire-battered state and moderating his approach ahead of a potential bid for the White House. But now the gloves are off after Trump took the extraordinary step of federalizing the National Guard in Los Angeles over Newsom's objections and the governor responded by suing the administration, alleging abuse of power that marked an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' The escalating clash pits the leader of the Republican Party against a Democrat with ambitions of leading his own party, with a striking backdrop of a domestic troop deployment meant to control a city in unrest and now to assist in arresting migrants — the centerpiece of the president's agenda. For Trump, it's another chance to battle with Newsom, a frequent foil who leads a heavily Democratic state the president has long criticized. And for Newsom, the feud has handed him a national platform as a beleaguered Democratic Party seeks a leader able to resist Trump. 'He has shown he's not going to be intimidated, and we're all for that,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said of Newsom on Wednesday. Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, a former California resident, said Newsom's motivations for taking on Trump are clear. 'This is all about Gavin Newsom running for president in 2028, and what he is hoping is that becoming the face of a resistance to Trump is going to jog him to victory in Democratic primaries,' he said in his podcast 'The Ben Shapiro Show.' Trump has long been a foe of California, which overwhelmingly rejected him in all three of his presidential campaigns. Over the years, Trump has threatened to intercede in the state's long-running homeless crisis, vowed to withhold federal wildfire aid as political leverage in a dispute over water rights, called on police to shoot people robbing stores and warned residents 'your children are in danger' because of illegal immigration. As a candidate in 2023, Trump said California was once a symbol of American prosperity but is 'becoming a symbol of our nation's decline.' 'This is not a great state anymore. This is a dumping ground,' Trump said at the time. 'The world is being dumped into California. Prisoners. Terrorists. Mental patients.' Newsom would learn to balance the dueling imperatives of a governor who needs to work with the federal government with being one of the Democratic Party's most prominent figures. As governor-elect, Newsom joined Trump in November 2018 as the then-president viewed wildfire damage in Paradise, California, and they pledged to put aside political differences to help the community recover. He was also overly complimentary of the Trump administration's assistance to California during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, praising Trump's 'focus on treatments' for the virus and thanking him for sending masks and gloves to his state. But Newsom was also a top surrogate for Democrats in the 2024 campaign and frequently warned of the consequences of Trump's return to the White House. There was a handshake and a warm pat on the back. Newsom was there on the tarmac in Los Angeles in January, welcoming Trump and first lady Melania Trump, who had traveled west to survey the damage from the deadly wildfires in Southern California. Then they spoke to reporters together, pledging cooperation to rebuild the area and appreciating each other's presence. 'You were there for us during COVID. I don't forget that,' Newsom said. 'And I have all the expectations that we'll be able to work together to get this speedy recovery.' Trump added: 'We will. We're going to get it done.' Newsom also traveled to Washington in February to press Trump and lawmakers for more federal wildfire relief. The governor called his meeting with Trump 'productive' and one that was marked with a 'spirit of collaboration and cooperation.' The cordial attitude was part of Newsom's unmistakable appeal to the center, painting himself as a pragmatist to reach out to those who had fled from a party that had just lost all battleground states in the 2024 presidential election. Newsom spoke to conservative allies of Trump on a new podcast the governor billed as a way for Democrats to learn from the political successes of Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement. He voiced opposition to transgender athletes participating in female sports while shifting focus away from efforts in Sacramento to 'Trump-proof' California — which Newsom embarked on after Trump's victory in November — as the wildfires raged. In an April interview with YouTube commentator Brian Tyler Cohen, Newsom acknowledged Trump's ability to appeal to the public. 'His success is his ability to win every damn news cycle and get us distracted and moving in 25 different directions,' he said. The Democratic governor and Trump have been feuding publicly about the response to protests, with Newsom claiming Trump didn't warn him he'd deploy troops in a Friday phone call and Trump claiming the conversation was about that. Newsom has taunted Trump administration officials with arresting him, and Trump first appeared receptive to the idea and then walked back earlier remarks. After Newsom filed an emergency request in federal court Tuesday to block the Trump administration from using the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles, he gave a public address accusing Trump of going beyond arresting criminals. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here,' he warned. 'Other states are next. Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our eyes.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Newsom's speech as performative. 'I know Gavin Newsom had a big address to the nation last night — I guess he thought that's what it was for maybe his future political ambitions,' Leavitt said Wednesday. 'But he spoke a lot of words. We haven't seen action.' The filing this week wasn't the first time this year that California had sued the Trump administration. In April, Newsom filed a lawsuit that challenged Trump's authority to impose sweeping tariffs that the governor asserted would inflate prices and inflict billions of dollars in damage to California, which has the nation's largest economy. And California — not just Newsom — continues to be a foil. Just this month, the Trump administration signaled that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns. He's threatened to pull federal funding in California if the state did not bar transgender students from participating in girls sports. The Justice Department warned districts they could face legal trouble if they don't bar trans athletes from competition.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth won't rule out military actions against Greenland, Panama
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of Greenland and Panama, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon may have plans for such a future strike. Appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, Hegseth asserted the department 'plans for any particular contingency' and said, 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' Pressed by Republican lawmakers to dismiss the possibility of such a U.S. military attack on Greenland or Panama, Hegseth reiterated that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Democrats on the panel scoffed at those answers. 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' said committee ranking member, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. 'The message this sends to the rest of the world is one that the U.S. is purely in it for itself, and does not care about alliances.' Space Force commander fired after email DOD says 'undermined' JD Vance The issue of possible U.S. military intervention to take over Greenland, Panama, Canada and other allied territories has been a point of concern for months among critics of President Donald Trump. On social media and in White House comments, Trump has stated multiple times that Denmark should surrender control of Greenland for the good of global security, and that Canada should become the 51st state in the American union. Administration officials have downplayed those comments. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the committee, avoided directly responding to the claims, but said the United States government has significant interest in protecting the areas from Chinese influence or manipulation. Earlier this week, Denmark's Parliament approved legislation to allow new U.S. military bases on Danish soil, broadening an existing previous military agreement between the countries. But Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen in recent months has vowed to oppose any U.S. efforts to take over the Danish territory. The Pentagon, meanwhile, is likely to shift Greenland from U.S. European Command to U.S. Northern Command, the military body responsible for defense of the American homeland, Mexico and Canada. The change itself only involves redrawing the maps of U.S. combatant commands and handing over responsibility for the military forces in Greenland, but it has caused angst among some in Denmark who think the administration is trying to draw the territory closer to America.
