
'Once a farm is gone, it's gone': Lawmakers, farmers push for agricultural disaster relief at the federal and state levels
On Aug. 26, 2024, William DellaCamera looked over the verdant fields of Cecarelli's Harrison Hill Farm in Northford, admiring the healthy vegetable plants as he mused about how beautiful and plentiful the upcoming harvest would be.
By the time he returned from lunch, DellaCamera was on the phone with his wife, telling her they had lost everything.
A freak hail storm wiped out DellaCamera's crops in a matter of 13 minutes.
When it was all over, the squall left DellaCamera with thousands of dollars in damage that federal insurance and other disaster programs failed to make whole.
DellaCamera was not alone. Between 2023 and 2024, Connecticut farms reported more than $72.3 million in losses from deep freezes, floods, storms and other extreme weather events that decimated crops, timber, livestock and agricultural infrastructure, according to data from the State Department of Agriculture.
Tired of hearing 'lip service' from government officials when farms were faced with financial ruin, DellaCamera hopped on his tractor and drove his John Deere 871 miles through Connecticut and down to Washington D.C.
By the end of DellaCamera's campaign, Congress had passed a $220 million Farm Recovery and Support Block Grant Program for small and medium-sized farms that were hit with extreme weather in New England, Hawaii and Alaska. The program passed in December, but farmers still have not seen a dime of the funding that could be make-or-break for their operations.
As farmers wait for their federal grants, state lawmakers heard testimony Monday on a bill that would create an emergency crop-loss fund when one-time weather events devastate production.
While Sen. Richard Blumenthal's office said the $220 million block grant is not tied up in the federal funding freeze, Blumenthal said the disbursement of the aid is sitting in a state of 'intolerable uncertainty.'
'Farmers really deserve it, and they are deeply anxious about whether they'll receive it,' Blumenthal said. 'Farmers need it without delay. As the growing season begins, farmers deserve to know whether they have a safety net when disaster strikes. And very specifically as to this aid, they need it now.'
Blumenthal said the Connecticut delegation is pushing the Trump administration to release the funds. He said the administration has not told him with 'any certainty or specificity' when that may happen.
DellaCamera said farmers need the money now, but they also need safety net programs to do their job.
During his 91-hour tractor journey, DellaCamera he said he heard the same story at every farm he stopped at.
'They say, 'Well, I don't participate in those programs because we can't afford them. I don't participate in those programs because I don't understand them. I don't participate in those programs because I did, and it didn't work for me. It didn't do what it was supposed to do.' I heard all the same. It doesn't matter where it was,' DellaCamera said. 'The programs that failed me and have failed every other specialty crop farmer clear across the United States. Those programs failed me, they failed my friends and my neighbors, and I am tired of it.'
'Our profession is the backbone of America,' DellaCamera said. 'It's not a Republican or a Democrat problem. This is a right and wrong problem.'
As weather events grow more extreme and localized, DellaCamera said, the question is not 'if' another weather disaster occurs, 'It's a when and where.'
Challenges for local farmers
Better known by his nickname Digga, Robert Schacht of Hunts Brook Farm in the Quaker Hill section of Waterford said he is 'one hailstorm away from getting a real job.'
'As long as I have farmed, I've joked about that,' Schacht said. 'Because, if what happened to Willie (DellaCamera) happened to me, I'm at the scale of farm where crop insurance doesn't really work.'
Schacht started Hunts Brook Farm in 2008, growing vegetables, fruits, flowers and greens. For him, he said, the job comes down to 'the security that food brings to myself and my community.'
'COVID was a huge example of that, watching how people reacted to the food shortages,' Schacht said. 'That sense of responsibility is strong.'
But in the last few years, Schacht explained how challenges in agriculture have left local farms more vulnerable to uncertainty.
'Every farmer I know has been struggling for the last couple of years, and I haven't heard a lot out in the world about it. I haven't heard about it in the press. I haven't heard about it from the ag partners that we have at the state level and in the different organizations,' Schact said.
'My vegetables did not pay for themselves last year for the first time,' Schacht added, explaining how grant programs kept him at break-even. 'My whole life is here. … There's really not a big separation between what I make for an income and what the farm makes for an income. … I'm able to just sort of live off the edges of the farm.'
With rapidly rising labor costs, increasing disease prevalence, new insects and shifting seasonality, Schacht explained that 'weather is just one of the many things that small farms are dealing with right now.'
'That's the unpredictable one,' Schacht said.
Schacht said an emergency crop-loss fund would help, as long as the level of documentation required to make a claim does not become a barrier to small farms that lack the manpower to weigh their harvests.
I can very easily tell you how many plants I have in the field, but I don't have time to weigh every harvest that I do coming out of the field," Schacht said. "If you end up having to put in eight days of labor to make a claim, that's where, for smaller farms like us, it just becomes too cumbersome."
Still, Schacht said, he is "glad to see that the legislators are taking this seriously.
'I have a lot of admiration for what Willie (DellaCamera) decided to do,' Schacht added. 'Not many people would've been in a position to have been able to make such a grand gesture of time and energy. Willie's a big guy with a big voice, and I think all of us small farms are very thankful that he used it.'
'Once a farm is gone, it's gone'
In the last decade, Connecticut has lost more than 15% of its farms, which fell from 5,977 in 2012 to 5,058 in 2022, according to the most recent census by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Through the process, nearly 65,000 acres — roughly 100 square miles — of farmland has disappeared from the state.
House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, a co-sponsor of the crop-loss bill, said the emergency fund would fill in gaps where federal insurance falls short. As he testified before the Environment Committee on Monday, he described the program as an important step toward preserving the state's agricultural resources.
'Once a farm is gone, it's gone,' Candelora said. 'The land gets developed, the expertise leaves — it's very hard to bring these farms back.'
In a letter submitted to the committee, Agriculture Commissioner Bryan Hurlburt said his department lacks the capacity to establish and run such a grant program.
'This was not included in the Governor's Biennial Budget,' Hurlburt wrote.
Hurlburt suggested that farmers would qualify for financial support under a different line item in Gov. Ned Lamont's budget proposal — a program providing 'grants-in-aid to support municipalities, homeowners and small businesses who have been impacted by a catastrophic event, not exceeding $15,000,000.'
During the public hearing, Sen. Christine Cohen, D-Guilford, who sits on the committee and co-sponsored the bill, said she was surprised by Hurlburt's lack of support.
'My concern with that is that $15 million is a very small amount to apply to statewide businesses, and this is not specific to agriculture,' Cohen said. 'I'm hoping we can put our heads together with the commissioner to come up with a solution that will be beneficial for our farmers moving forward.'
When farms faced crop loss in 2023 and 2024, Cohen described the sense of helplessness shared by farmers and lawmakers.
'There was really nothing we could do,' Cohen said. 'We didn't have any tools in the toolbox at the state level.'
Sen. Heather Somers, R-Groton, said the emergency fund 'is something that absolutely could be done by the department.'
'This is one small part that we could do to try to ensure that we have some kind of insurance stopgap for these farmers,' Somers, who is also a co-sponsor of the legislation, said. 'This is a lifeline for them to hang on.'
Somers said that Connecticut needs the crop-loss fund to keep farms in the state that are struggling to survive under mounting financial pressure.
'Sterling used to have 40 dairy farms. There's one left,' Somers said. 'That really kind of highlights where we are. … Once it's gone, you're going to have single-family houses or a development brought in there. You're not going to get the farm back.'
a.cross@theday.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
7 minutes ago
- Fox News
Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'
FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo., on Wednesday will introduce legislation that would ban congressional stock trading, serving as the House companion bill to Sen. Josh Hawley's, R-Mo., "PELOSI Act" in the Senate. Alford's proposed bill would ban lawmakers and their spouses from holding, purchasing or selling individual stocks while in office, but it allows investments in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds or U.S. Treasury bonds. If passed, current lawmakers would have 180 days to comply with the legislation. Likewise, newly elected lawmakers must achieve compliance within 180 days of entering office. "As public servants, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard and avoid the mere appearance of corruption," Alford said in a statement. "Unfortunately, too many members of Congress are engaging in suspicious stock trades based on non-public information to enrich themselves." "These gross violations of the public trust make clear: we must finally take action to ban members and their spouses from owning or selling individual stocks," he added. Under the proposed legislation, lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions would be required to hand over any profits they made to the U.S. Treasury Department. The House or Senate ethics committees could also impose a fine on such lawmakers amounting to 10% of each wrongful transaction. House Speaker Mike Johnson endorsed a stock trading ban on Wednesday, saying "a few bad actors" have ruined Americans' trust in lawmakers on the issue. "You want me to tell you my honest opinion on that? I'm in favor of that, because I don't think we should have any appearance of impropriety here," he told reporters during a press conference. President Donald Trump himself endorsed the same ban for members of Congress in an interview with Time magazine last month. "I watched Nancy Pelosi get rich through insider information, and I would be okay with it. If they send that to me, I would do it," he said of a trading ban. "You'll sign it?" the reporter pressed. "Absolutely," Trump responded. Democrats in the House of Representatives have also expressed support for a ban, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., throwing his weight behind the proposal last week.


USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt
Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt Eliminating the federal limit on government borrowing would remove one hurdle to congressional approval of the Trump's package of major policy priorities for tax cuts and border security. Show Caption Hide Caption Moody's pushes US out of top triple-A rating club, citing debt Moody's downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating on May 16 due to concerns about the nation's growing $36-trillion debt pile, in a move that could complicate President Donald Trump's efforts to cut taxes and send ripples through global markets. Trump agreed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., that the country should abolish the federal limit on borrowing. After credit-rating agencies downgraded the U.S. government, Trump said the debt limit should be scrapped to avoid economic catastrophe. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump announced he agrees with a longtime antagonist, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, on the need to abolish the cap on the country's borrowing. The announcement marked a thaw in years-long criticism that Trump and Warren of Massachusetts have hurled at each other over government finances and other issues. The rare consensus came as Congress faces the need to raise the country's debt limit again, a hurdle to approving an 1,100-page package of Trump's priorities for tax cuts and border security. The United States is nearly $37 trillion in debt and every time it approaches the limit on borrowing set by Congress, lawmakers must take a painful vote to raise it or risk being unable to pay bills. More: When is the debt ceiling deadline? What happens when the US reaches debt limit Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned the country will reach the cap in August. A provision to increase the limit was included in the House-passed package of Trump's priorities. The two-term Republican president lashed out this week at Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, who opposes the House bill and called for a separate vote on the debt limit. The debt limit is largely procedural because Congress has always voted to increase it. But the vote every few years becomes a cudgel against members of the governing party because approval contributes to the appearance of unbridled spending. Congress imposed a debt limit in 1939 to modernize federal financing, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. But political disputes about the accumulation of debt and difficulties raising the limit led credit-rating agencies to lower their grades for the federal government. The debate is another example of strange bedfellows in U.S. politics. Trump has derisively called Warren 'Pocahontas' for previously claiming Native American heritage. But Warren posted on social media May 30 that she agreed with Trump that 'the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe.' Trump endorsed the proposal in a social media post June 4 and said he was 'very pleased to announce' that he agreed with her. 'The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe,' Trump said. 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World.'


Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
Sen. Tim Scott expresses confidence about codifying DOGE cuts
All times eastern Making Money with Charles Payne The Evening Edit with Elizabeth Macdonald FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: House DOGE subcommittee holds hearing to expose NGOs' use of funds