logo
Cult London cinema threatened with closure amid battle with landlord

Cult London cinema threatened with closure amid battle with landlord

Yahoo28-01-2025

A cult London cinema has warned it is at risk of closure and faces the threat of redevelopment by its landlord.
The independent Prince Charles Cinema off Leicester Square, which has been praised by the likes of filmmaker Quentin Tarantino, said it believes its landlords are using 'significant financial resources to intimidate us'.
The cinema was founded in 1962 and attracts more than 250,000 customers a year.
It said on Tuesday that efforts to renew its lease, which is due to expire in September 2025, at a market rate, have been challenged by its landlord, Zedwell LSQ Ltd, and its ultimate parent company, Criterion Capital.
Criterion is owned by billionaire developer Asif Aziz and owns a number of hotels and other properties in the West End.
The cinema said the landlord has also demanded a new clause which, if triggered, would leave the cinema homeless with just six months' notice.
It added that Criterion has continually rejected requests for negotiation.
In a petition signed by more than 18,000 shortly after it launched, it said it believes the landlord is seeking planning permission to redevelop the cinema site.
A spokeswoman for the cinema said: 'We are one of the last remaining independent cinemas in central London, receiving no public funding and attracting over 250,000 customers a year at a time when the industry is struggling.
'We are disappointed that our landlords Zedwell LSQ Ltd and their parent company Criterion Capital have demanded the inclusion of a break clause that would require us to vacate the premises at six months notice, should they receive planning permission to redevelop the building, which we interpret as a clear intention to do so.
'Moreover, the landlord is also demanding a rent far above market rate and at a level which no cinema proprietor would consider reasonable, and is refusing to supply any information to back this up.
'We believe that these tactics amount to an attempt by the landlord and Criterion Capital to use their significant financial resources to intimidate us, regardless of our legal entitlement.'
The cinema said it is currently pursuing legal proceedings to contest the landlord's valuation of the lease.
A spokeswoman for Criterion said: 'We value Prince Charles Cinema and we work closely with our tenants to help best utilise the properties within our portfolio.
'We operate within the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and categorically deny any attempts to intimidate or disadvantage them.
'A break clause is standard commercial practice, reflecting long-term property planning, not unreasonable intent.
'Our rental expectations are based on a fair market assessment, and we remain open to constructive dialogue within legal frameworks to resolve disagreements.
'We are committed to curating a portfolio that balances community benefit with sustainable commercial arrangements, and mischaracterising our position through public campaigns hinders resolution.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘The Life of Chuck' May Change the Way You Look at Movies and Yourself
‘The Life of Chuck' May Change the Way You Look at Movies and Yourself

Gizmodo

time3 days ago

  • Gizmodo

‘The Life of Chuck' May Change the Way You Look at Movies and Yourself

This review of The Life of Chuck, the new film by Mike Flanagan based on a novella by Stephen King, starts in 1994. I was only 14 years old, still educating myself in the world of movies, when I found myself sitting down to see this new one everyone was talking about called Pulp Fiction. As it got toward the end, however, I found myself incredibly confused. Wasn't John Travolta's character dead? How was he back? I may have only been a kid, but I knew I'd watched him die, and now he was alive again. It wasn't until a little later when my formative teenage brain realized director Quentin Tarantino was telling his story out of order that I began to understand. That was something I had yet to encounter in burgeoning film fandom, and it helped turn Pulp Fiction into one of my favorite films ever. I mention this in a review of The Life of Chuck because the first time I saw it, I had a similar reaction. The Life of Chuck is very purposefully told backwards, and when characters from the third act (which you see first) appeared in illogical ways in the first act (which you see third), it didn't quite click. I was absolutely loving the movie, but one tiny piece was missing. Then, once that piece clicked for me, everything came together. It was a perfect puzzle that needed a touch more effort than most movies do. That's not to say The Life of Chuck will have the kind of infinite cultural impact Pulp Fiction did, but both films are beautiful in part because of their faith in the audience. Both are films bold enough to leave things to the imagination, to not connect every dot, and then let you figure it out for yourself. And, like Pulp Fiction, when you watch The Life of Chuck a second time—which I had the privilege of doing before writing this review—it's like watching a new movie. You can see every piece of foreshadowing in the story. Every clue that's subtly laced in there. And absent from any confusion, you can think about the film's bigger intentions and choices, which is where The Life of Chuck truly shines. The Life of Chuck stars Tom Hiddleston as the title character, Charles 'Chuck' Kranz, who in the first part of the film is described as 'Oz of the apocalypse.' Chiwetel Ejiofor and Karen Gillan lead a wholly intriguing, provocative, and terrifying story of the end of the world, where Chuck's image just so happens to keep popping up. Hiddleston takes over the role in the second act, which dramatizes a short but memorable moment in his life, and then the role is passed to three young actors—Cody Flanagan, Benjamin Pajak, and Jacob Tremblay—in the last third, as we see Chuck's childhood. As the story dives deeper into who Chuck really was, Flanagan lets both the character and the audience consider the universe and our place in it. The film is filled with mind-bending philosophical conversations about dancing, math, the universe, and more, most of which we learn as Chuck does. It's funny, it's sweet, and it continually keeps you on your toes. Along the way, the film asks us to never forget the first third of the movie where Chuck was the star of another story, and slowly start to work it all out. We're watching this beautiful rumination on the simple pleasures of life, all while this large mystery of 'What the hell was that?' looms over it like a cloud. Flanagan fills his story with fantastic actors giving career-best performances. There's Ejiofor and Gillan of course, but also Mia Sara (Ferris Bueller's Day Off), Carl Lumbly (Captain America: Brave New World), and even Mark Freaking Hamill. All of the actors playing Chuck are delightful too, with Pajak having the largest role and thereby making the most impact. Some of these characters appear in more than one segment, but most don't, a choice that makes a lot of sense once you understand what the film is actually doing. But, I have to admit, without piecing that puzzle together, The Life of Chuck does feel a little empty. It may, in fact, but a little too subtle with its intentions on a first pass. There's a fine line with making your narrative too obvious to be powerful and too subtle to be clear, and Flanagan walks that line throughout the whole movie. However, if you watch the movie a second time, you can see it's much less subtle than you thought on a first watch. It's just about paying attention and remaining engaged. The Life of Chuck is a powerful and beautiful movie. It's filled with humor and heart, as well as incredible conversations and revelations. It's also more than a little out there, and certainly not for everyone. When you see it for what it truly is, though, it may just change not just how you look at movies, but your own life as well. The Life of Chuck is now playing in limited release and opens wide June 13.

Wes Anderson Put a Great Deal of Time and Thought Into His Upcoming Criterion Career Box Set
Wes Anderson Put a Great Deal of Time and Thought Into His Upcoming Criterion Career Box Set

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Wes Anderson Put a Great Deal of Time and Thought Into His Upcoming Criterion Career Box Set

Last week, Criterion Collection announced it would be releasing 'The Wes Anderson Archive: Ten Films, Twenty-Five Years' box set featuring 4K versions of the director's first 10 feature films, starting with 'Bottle Rocket' (1996) through 'The French Dispatch of the Liberty, Kansas Evening Sun' (2021). While the celebrated director's films have previously been released on DVD and Blu-ray, including Criterion versions up through 'The Grand Budapest Hotel' (2014), when Anderson was on the Filmmaker Toolkit podcast to discuss his new film 'The Phoenician Scheme,' he made clear this wasn't simply a matter of doing UHD/HDR upgrades. More from IndieWire Luca Guadagnino Attached to Direct AI Business Comedy 'Artificial' for Amazon MGM Austrian Publication That Ran 'Phony' Clint Eastwood Interview Cuts Ties with HFPA Member Author 'We've been working on it for some time,' said Anderson of the upcoming box set. 'I like the idea of having this set. It's ten movies, it's an even number.' Anderson's relationship with Criterion dates back to 'Rushmore' (1998) and, based on his comments on the podcast, working with Criterion to bring his films together in a specially designed box set was something that was important to him. 'I always have thought of my films for whatever reason, as being a body of work, an ongoing thing, not just the films as one by one, but as a set of things,' said Anderson. 'I used to say, I feel like the characters from one of my films could walk into another of my films and fit into that world. Eventually, I started making period pictures, where that doesn't quite make as much sense anymore.' There are filmmakers who have gone back to restore their films for an updated home video release and have re-edited or utilized new digital tools to create new versions of their work. For example, Wong Kar Wai's recent career Criterion box set was notable for its different color grades of his beloved films. At the time, Wong Kar Wai wrote of the changes, 'As the saying goes: 'no man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.' Since the beginning of this process, these words have reminded me to treat this as an opportunity to present these restorations as a new work from a different vantage point in my career.' The suglassed Hong Kong auteur's comments mirror those of Terrence Malick, who once commented, 'No one asked Bob Dylan to play a song the same way every night. Why should I have to make one film?' But Anderson made clear he doesn't have the same philosophy about his own work, and had taken a different approach working on the upcoming Criterion box set. 'I'm not big on, 'let's make a new version,'' said Anderson. 'For me, it's like the movie has gone out and it sort of belongs to the audience at that point.' That said, Anderson did take advantage of the process to spend time fixing things he hadn't been 100 percent pleased with in the previous releases, while also overseeing how his films translated to the new video and audio formats, which isn't always a straight one-to-one. 'In the process of this Criterion box set, for instance, there were things that we could refine,' said Anderson. 'There were things that didn't translate quite right in the original home video versions that we corrected.' Focus Features' 'The Phoenician Scheme' is in select theaters now and will be released nationwide Friday, June 6. Criterion will release 'The Wes Anderson Archive: Ten Films, Twenty-Five Years' on Tuesday, September 30. You can pre-order here. To hear Wes Anderson's full interview, subscribe to the Filmmaker Toolkit podcast on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite podcast platform. Best of IndieWire The Best Thrillers Streaming on Netflix in June, from 'Vertigo' and 'Rear Window' to 'Emily the Criminal' All 12 Wes Anderson Movies, Ranked, from 'Bottle Rocket' to 'The Phoenician Scheme' Nightmare Film Shoots: The 38 Most Grueling Films Ever Made, from 'Deliverance' to 'The Wages of Fear'

David Fincher's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD Netflix Sequel Adds Elizabeth Debicki and Scott Caan — GeekTyrant
David Fincher's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD Netflix Sequel Adds Elizabeth Debicki and Scott Caan — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time6 days ago

  • Geek Tyrant

David Fincher's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD Netflix Sequel Adds Elizabeth Debicki and Scott Caan — GeekTyrant

Elizabeth Debicki ( Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 , The Crown ) and Scott Caan ( Ocean's 11 ) have joined the cast of David Fincher's Once Upon a Time in Hollywood follow-up at Netflix. The pair will star alongside Brad Pitt, who is reprising his Oscar-winning role as the zen stuntman Cliff Booth for the feature, which comes from a script written by the original film's writer-director Quentin Tarantino. The sequel still seems somewhat unreal to many fans of Tarantino and Fincher, but with the addition of more cast members, the project seems to be gaining steam as it heads towards a potential summer production start in California. The synopsis of the film remains shrouded in mystery, but the film, which is currently being called The Continuing Adventures of Cliff Booth , is currently in pre-production. It was previously revealed that this next chapter is shaping up to be a unique continuation and it was explained: "This probably should not be thought of as a sequel. This should be thought of more of a follow-up that's connected to but not the same as — the example that was cited to me was, think about how A Big Sleep , the Raymond Chandler adaptation starring Humphrey Bogart, is in the same world as Farewell, My Lovely , the 1975 Robert Mitchum movie, but it's [a] different actor, different directors, different time in the storyline. They are different, they are not really sequels, they are the further adventures of [Cliff]." It was also said: 'The movie takes place in 1977, which is roughly eight years after Once Upon a Time in Hollywood , so a different time in Cliff's life." Stay tuned for updates as it moves forward.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store