Iran's top diplomat heads to Moscow for talks with Putin after US strikes
MOSCOW, June 23 — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was due to hold 'important' talks with key ally Vladimir Putin on Monday, 48 hours after a major US attack on Iran's key nuclear facilities.
Moscow is a crucial backer of Tehran, but has not swung forcefully behind its partner since Israel launched a wave of attacks on June 13, strikes that triggered Iran to respond with missiles and drones.
While Russia condemned the Israeli and US strikes, it has not offered military help and has downplayed its obligations under a sweeping strategic partnership agreement signed with Tehran just months ago.
'In this new dangerous situation ... our consultations with Russia can certainly be of great importance,' Russian state media reported Araghchi as saying after landing in Moscow.
The official IRNA news agency reported Sunday that Araghchi would 'hold consultations with the president and other senior officials of Russia regarding regional and international developments following the military aggression by the United States and the Zionist regime against Iran.'
Putin initially pitched himself as a possible mediator between Iran and Israel, but on Friday said he was only 'suggesting ideas', after US President Donald Trump pushed back against a role for the Kremlin leader.
'We are by no means seeking to act as a mediator, we are simply suggesting ideas,' Putin said at an economic forum in Saint Petersburg.
'If they turn out to be attractive to both sides, we will only be happy,' he added.
Russia's foreign ministry on Saturday condemned the US strikes as 'irresponsible,' after having previously warned against military intervention. — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
‘Extremely dangerous' if Iran closes Strait of Hormuz: EU
BRUSSELS: The EU's top diplomat warned Monday it would be 'extremely dangerous' should Iran shut down the crucial Strait of Hormuz trading route over US strikes on its nuclear sites. 'Concerns of retaliation and this war escalating are huge,' Kaja Kallas told reporters as EU foreign ministers met in Brussels for talks, with the Iran-Israel conflict high on the agenda. 'Especially the closing of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran is something that would be extremely dangerous and not good for anybody,' she warned. Analysts have said Iran may opt to retaliate to Washington's early Sunday attack by shutting the Strait, a waterway through which one-fifth of global oil output passes. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged China to help deter Iran from shutting down the trading route. The European Union has been urging de-escalation since the United States joined Israel's war with Iran by striking the country's nuclear sites. 'Ministers are very much focused on the diplomatic solution,' Kallas said Monday, having called on all sides at the weekend to 'step back' and return to negotiations. The EU foreign policy chief, who joined top diplomats from France, Germany and Britain for talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Geneva Friday, said the European outreach would continue. 'There has to be a diplomatic solution,' Kallas said. 'When Iran is willing to talk to us. I think we have to use this opportunity.' France, Germany and Britain called jointly on Tehran on Sunday 'not to take any further action that could destabilise the region'. Speaking in Brussels, France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot insisted Europe could bring to bear its long experience negotiating with Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons. 'There is no lasting military solution to this problem,' Barrot said. 'Only negotiations can enable us to place long-term limits on Iran's nuclear programme.' 'Europe can bring its experience, its competence, its fine knowledge of these questions to open a space for negotiations,' he said. 'We reject any attempt to bring about regime change by force,' Barrot added, warning it would be 'illusory and dangerous' to think such a shift can be achieved with 'bombs'.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Putin slams attack on Iran, but offers no support to key ally
MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday slammed attacks on Iran as "unprovoked" and "unjustified" in a meeting with Tehran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, but did not announce any concrete support to his key ally in the Middle East. Moscow is a crucial backer of Iran, but has not swung forcefully behind its partner even as the United States launched strikes on its nuclear facilities over the weekend. "This absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran is unjustified," Putin said in televised remarks to Araghchi at the start of their meeting. Putin did not single out the US attacks, talking instead broadly of "strikes" against Iran, though the Kremlin had earlier Monday said it condemned and regretted the US strikes. "There has been a new escalation of tensions in the region, and, of course, we condemn this and express our deep regret in this regard," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, shortly before Putin met Araghchi in the Kremlin. Putin has pitched himself as a mediator between Iran and Israel, an idea rejected by US President Donald Trump last week. Since Israel launched its wave of strikes on June 13, triggering Iran to respond with missiles and drones, Russia has not publicly offered military help to Tehran. Putin and other officials have also downplayed Moscow's obligations under a sweeping strategic partnership agreement signed with Tehran just months ago, highlighting that it is not a mutual defence pact. Russia was "making efforts to help Iranian people," Putin said in the meeting, without elaborating. Asked what specific support Russia might offer, Peskov told reporters: "It all depends on what Iran needs. We have offered our mediation services." Putin said last week that Iran had not requested any support. Landing in Moscow on Sunday evening ahead of the meeting, Araghchi said the talks with Putin would be of "great importance," Russian state media reported. — AFP
Focus Malaysia
an hour ago
- Focus Malaysia
Global markets on edge as conflict risks push oil prices higher
THE US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend has marked its direct involvement in the Israel-Iran war, which we fear could escalate an already volatile situation in the Middle East. If this conflict is prolonged, it could further destabilise the fragile market sentiment, which has been weighed down by weak economic conditions. In the short-term, the uncertainty could prop up oil prices, exacerbating inflationary pressure and sending bond yield higher, especially in the developed countries – US, Europe, Japan. Iran's parliament has now voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, where c.30% of global seaborne oil trade flows through the chokepoint. 'We believe the market will remain in a cycle of risk aversion with investors shying away from risky assets, until peace and stability prevail,' said Public Investment Bank (PIB). Although global market has regained losses since the announcement of a 90-day tariff pause in April, this trend could reset. We maintain our bearish outlook, favouring defensive stocks that predominantly focusing on the domestic market i.e. Maybank, Telekom, TNB, CCK and IGB Comm REIT. While we have a neutral call on the oil and gas sector, we believe there is upside risk in the immediate term, we have Outperform rating on Hibiscus and Bumi Armada. Since the start of the Israel-Iran conflict on 13 June, the US has largely refrained direct engagement in the war with its Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressing Israel has acted unilaterally while President Donald Trump announcing, just last week, that he will decide whether or not the US gets involved within the next two weeks. However, within days, the US has changed the course of the conflict, launching strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on 21 June. Promising to be a 'peacemaker' in his run up to return to the White House, Trump has taken a dramatic step by bringing US directly into the conflict. Should this escalate into a protracted conflict, it could strain the US' fiscal deficit even further, which is projected at about 6.2% of GDP in 2025. This should also increase its swelling debt, which stood at about 123% of GDP. Note that US artillery stockpiles are depleting quickly due to increased demand while the urgency to replenish may be constrained by limited rare earth supplies from China. The US military industrial base is already facing challenges in ramping up production to meet increasing demand from Ukraine and Gaza. Although Trump claimed the Iranian nuclear facilities had been destroyed by the US bunker-blaster, the extent of damage to the underground enrichment plants remains unclear, especially Fordow which is believed to be buried at a depth of 80-90m with mountain above ground. Iran could retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz or launching attacks on the US military base. The US operates a broad network of military sites, both permanent and temporary, across approximately 19 locations in the Middle East. The uncertainty in the Middle East is likely to cause a spike in oil prices as the region contributes to 30% of the world's total output, with Iran being the third-largest OPEC producer. If there is no material disruption to global supply of oil with the Strait of Hormuz remains accessible (the final decision now lies with Iran's national security council after the parliament voted to close the critical oil trade route), this may well be short-lived, as there is still ample supply of oil in the market while global demand could weaken due to slowdown in international trade following the increase in tariffs. Nonetheless, given the uncertainty and risk of escalation, oil prices are likely to surge in the immediate term while investors would rush to safe-haven assets (likely to be gold or JPY instead of USD or Treasuries) and avoid risky investments such as equities. US CPI remains under control partly due to low energy prices but a protracted conflict in the Middle East could potentially lead to a sustainable rise in energy prices, increasing the likelihood of the US economy slipping into a stagflation in 2H 2025. —June 23, 2025 Main image: Maukerja
