University of Sheffield staff to strike over 'drastic' cuts
Staff at the University of Sheffield have voted to go on strike over "drastic" restructuring plans which aim to save £23m over two years.The University and College Union (UCU) said up to 1,000 jobs would be put at risk by the plans, which have seen the number of academic departments cut by more than half.The university said it would not be making that many staff redundant, with a "significantly lower" number of jobs affected.Three quarters of voters backed strike action after the university did not agree to make zero compulsory redundancies during the restructure.
It said this would have been "irresponsible … given the challenges the higher education sector is facing".
'Cuts are too deep, too fast'
In November, after the university found itself facing a £50m shortfall, Vice Chancellor Koen Lamberts announced plans to cut staffing costs by £9m in 2025 and £14m in 2026.Three hundred members of staff at the university had already taken voluntary redundancy by the end of 2024.UCU General Secretary Jo Grady said: "These cuts are too deep, too fast, and put vital student support and academic provision at risk."Staff at Sheffield have sent a clear message that they are willing to take industrial action to protect their jobs and the future of their university."A spokesperson for the university noted similar industrial action was taking place across higher education in the UK.They cited "difficult decisions institutions are making to address sector-wide challenges".The university would aim to minimise the impact of the strike, although the "vast majority" of students and staff would likely be unaffected by the action, they added.Strike dates have not yet been confirmed.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Edinburgh academics strike over £140m funding cuts
Academics will take to picket lines surrounding the university this morning, and a rally will be held in the city's George Square at 11AM. The strikes are intended to disrupt the university's annual Open Day, where prospective students and their families will visit the Old College campus. Additional pickets are set to be carried out between 8-12 September as students return from the summer holidays. Bosses at the university aim to reduce spending by £140m. (Image: Newsquest) Sophia Woodman, president of the Edinburgh University UCU branch, said: 'Taking strike action is the very last thing UCU members at Edinburgh want to do but the decision of the principal to press ahead with huge cuts and the refusal to rule out compulsory redundancies has simply left us no choice. 'University staff are worried about the future and whether they'll have a job this time next year. We are striking on Open Day to sound the alarm about the future of research and teaching at the university, because we care deeply about the quality of education we provide to our students. Woodman added: 'Staff are stunned to see university senior management pressing ahead with plans to spend vast sums on public relations consultants and increase spending on buildings while cutting the staff who teach students and carry out world leading research. Even at this late stage it's not too late for the university to rule out the use of compulsory redundancies and end this dispute.' Read more: 'It was clunky at best': Edinburgh University pulls 'don't be snobs' guidance Edinburgh University could cut 1750 staff jobs, claims union Edinburgh University at risk of lawsuit over policy to make all toilets mixed-sex University principal Peter Mathieson, who recently told MSPs he was not sure how much money he made, has also come under fire. Asked by Education Committee convenor Douglas Ross to confirm his salary, Mathieson was unable to do so, quipping: 'I don't carry that figure round in my head. I recognise that I'm very well paid. 'You could pay the senior team of the University of Edinburgh nothing and that would make largely no difference to the size of the expenditure challenge we face.' UCU General Secretary Jo Grady UCU General Secretary Jo Grady has also hit out at the chief executive, who makes around £418,000 a year. She said: 'Peter Mathieson has been warned often enough about the impact his cuts will have on staff, students and the university's reputation but the refusal not to rule out compulsory redundancies means that the fault for this strike going ahead lies firmly at his door.' A University of Edinburgh spokesperson said: 'Open Day is a hugely important event in our calendar, and we are delighted to be welcoming thousands of potential students to our campus. Visitors will get a taste of what classes might be like, see accommodation options as well as experiencing the city itself. "While we respect colleagues' right to take part in industrial action, we are doing our utmost to keep any disruption to a minimum and have endeavoured to keep those planning to attend well informed.'
South Wales Argus
3 days ago
- South Wales Argus
Cardiff University UCU claims evidence was 'misleading'
The University and College Union (UCU) branch claimed Pat Younge made 'numerous (no doubt inadvertently) misleading claims' about them while giving evidence to the Children, Young Persons, and Education Committee. The union reassured members in an email, stating it aimed to 'set the record straight.' The UCU also submitted a critique of the university's "Academic Futures" cuts proposals to the council, ahead of the university council's consideration of the plans on June 17. The union said it would present more detailed criticisms of "Academic Futures" to the council in person. The University Senate, which met on June 11, unanimously rejected the "Academic Futures" proposals, citing foundational risks to academic sustainability and the financial future of the university. The meeting also noted that senior management did not vote in favour of the plans. The union, along with Unite and Unison, is urging the council to pause the proposals' implementation and consider more measured reform. The UCU reported the university to the Health and Safety Executive over concerns related to the "Academic Futures" process, following a survey highlighting potential serious health and safety consequences.
The Herald Scotland
5 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
UCU academics oppose Glasgow Uni trans rights consultation
The review of the institution's gender policies is being carried out in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of a woman in late April. In the wake of the judicial decision, which ruled that the term 'woman' derives its legal definition from biological sex, not gender identity; transgender women have been banned from a range of female-only toilets and sports teams, including at the Scottish Parliament. The UCU is a prominent supporter of trans rights. (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA)The email, sent last Thursday, reads: 'Communication with our membership is already evidencing that this consultation is causing distress and fear for trans, nonbinary and other gender diverse staff and students, by exposing them to scrutiny and debate about their rights, and requiring them to feel obliged to respond in defence of those rights – rights that the University is already on record as stating it supports as 'an inclusive community'. 'We recommend that UCU members do not respond to this consultation until we can issue further guidance. We are also preparing to ask UofG EDU to cancel this consultation and to discuss with us better ways of supporting staff and students around the Supreme Court decision. Read more: The communique goes on to state that the UCU 'unequivocally' promotes the rights of trans and nonbinary staff and students, adding: 'We believe that this type of consultation on the rights of marginalised groups increases their marginalisation, severely impacts their wellbeing and safety, and does not provide a sound basis for determining policy or practice. 'Human rights are not up for debate. It also increases the atmosphere of fear and uncertainty that has already been engendered by the Supreme Court ruling.' For Women Scotland took the Scottish Government to court in April. (Image: PA) A spokesperson for campaign group For Women Scotland has hit out at the union, telling The Herald: 'UCU appears to inhabit an alternate reality where universities can pick and choose which laws they obey. It benefits none of their members if the union or the university stick their fingers in their ears like a petulant toddler. It also reflects poorly on their capacity to understand pretty basic concepts. 'This is not a consultation on rights, it is about the application of the law. Women who understand the reality of sex-based violence and discrimination and work at the university also have human rights, and it may astonish the UCU to learn that they also have a responsibility to represent those members as well as the select elite they prefer to pander to.' Meanwhile, Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at human rights charity Sex Matters, said the 'era of no debate' was over. She told The Herald: 'Gender ideologues' attempts to thought-police and silence gender-critical academics in recent years have been shameful. It's hard to understand how this can continue even after the Supreme Court judgment. 'This letter raises an obvious question: what is UCU Glasgow afraid of? Could it be that it cannot counter gender-critical arguments on their merits, and must resort to shunning and ostracism instead?' Protestors blocked a screening of Adult Human Female in Edinburgh in the spring of 2023. (Image: Levi Pay) The academic union is no stranger to facing criticism over its position on trans rights. Two university lecturers behind the gender-critical film Adult Human Female recently sued the UCU over claims they had been discriminated against because of their views. Dr Deirdre O'Neill of Hertfordshire University, and Michael Wayne of Brunel University, told the Employment Tribunal that the union's public opposition to the film amounted to unlawful discrimination. Members of the UCU Edinburgh branch objected to the film being shown on campus in 2022 and 2023 over 'misinformation' relating to trans and nonbinary people. However, in a ruling handed down this week, a judge dismissed the claim, ruling that the pair had not been treated detrimentally under the Equality Act 2010. Read more: Mary Senior, Scotland official UCU, said: "This is a sensible and common sense decision, and we thank Judge Laidler and the tribunal for their careful deliberations. 'It cannot be right that a trade union is not able to protest peacefully within the law and to employers when material is presented on campus which it believes attacks the human rights of others.' Asked for comment on the UCU declining to participate in the consultation, a University of Glasgow spokesperson refused to be drawn. Instead, they repeated a statement previously issued to The Herald, noting: 'The University is committed to being an inclusive community and ensuring that everyone on our campuses is treated with care and respect. We are actively considering the Supreme Court ruling and are consulting with colleagues and students.' UCU Glasgow has been contacted for comment.
