logo
Where and how to watch and follow live Australian election coverage tonight

Where and how to watch and follow live Australian election coverage tonight

The Guardian02-05-2025

You've cast your vote, eaten your democracy sausage and now you want to watch the outcome unfold on Saturday night.
After you've loaded the Guardian Australia's election live blog on your phone or laptop, you might want to see what's happening on the TV.
Where can you see all the action and what time does it start? Which politician will be on which channel? Who will call the result first? Will there be another election night gimmick like the Worm, the Shredder or the Boot? Our guide to election night viewing gives you all the answers.
Sign up to get Guardian Australia's weekly media diary as a free newsletter
The public broadcaster's election night coverage kicks off with national political lead David Speers and 7.30 host Sarah Ferguson at 5.30pm.
On the panel at the ABC's election centre in Ultimo, Sydney will be Annabel Crabb, Laura Tingle and Bridget Brennan, who will interview candidates from across the country. The grand master of Australian elections, Antony Green will be crunching the numbers for the final time on Saturday after more than three decades. The broadcaster will have live crosses to reporters in key seats across the country.
Politicians
Federal treasurer Jim Chalmers and Coalition senator James McGrath.
Gimmick
Jeremy Fernandez will present results in real time on the 'Big Board'.
Number cruncher
The ABC has two: Green and Casey Briggs. Green's prediction on timing: 'I always say that by 7.30 you will know the result or you'll know you have to wait'.
Wild card
Emotions may get carried away as Green calls the election for the last time.
You can also follow all the action on ABC NewsRadio and ABC Local Radio from 6pm.
Michael Usher and Natalie Barr are co-hosting Seven's Australia Decides program, alongside veteran political editor, Mark Riley, who has covered 11 federal elections over three decades in Canberra.
Politicians
Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, Labor ministers Tanya Plibersek and Clare O'Neil and Coalition senators Jane Hume and Michaelia Cash.
Number crunchers
Seven's national news desk director, Hugh Whitfeld, will present the results alongside political scientists Simon Jackman and Luke Mansillo.
Gimmick
Seven News is promising to 'call the election first using its 'cutting-edge technology' including the 7NEWS Power Board and the 7News Election Needle.
The Election Needle resembles a car's speedometer and claims to predict whether Anthony Albanese or Peter Dutton is winning the election.
Wild card
Guests Warren Mundine and Clive Palmer.
Hosted by Ally Langdon and Peter Overton, Election 2025: Australia Decides starts at 5pm with insights from 9News's political editor, Charles Croucher, national affairs editor, Andrew Probyn, and politics reporter Liz Daniels. Sarah Abo will be at Labor headquarters and Karl Stefanovic will be at Liberal headquarters.
Politicians
Labor ministers Katy Gallagher and Chris Bowen, and Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie.
Gimmick
Nine is keeping this gem under wraps. 'And of course, in true Nine tradition, we'll be giving departing politicians the send-off they deserve – the only question is: what will it be this time?'
Wild card
Former Liberal minister Christopher Pyne.
Sign up to Weekly Beast
Amanda Meade's weekly diary on the latest in Australian media, free every Friday
after newsletter promotion
Kicking off at 6pm, Australia Decides: 10 News First Special Coverage with the Betoota Advocate will be anchored by Sandra Sully with Ten's national affairs editor, Hugh Riminton, and network political editor, Ashleigh Raper.
Politicians
Labor senator Jenny McAllister, independent MP Kylea Tink and Liberal senator Dave Sharma will be in the studio.
Gimmick
The Betoota Advocate's Errol Parker and Clancy Overell will join the broadcast live from Betoota HQ, ensuring 'no moment goes un-mocked, or unmissed'.
Wild card
Independent senator Jacqui Lambie.
Australia Decides: Election Night, anchored by Kieran Gilbert, will feature journalists Andrew Clennell and Chris Uhlmann and Sky After Dark host Peta Credlin, a former chief of staff to Tony Abbott. Sky News hosts Sharri Markson and Paul Murray will be live from Liberal headquarters and Chris Kenny and Laura Jayes live from Labor headquarters.
Politicians
Labor minister Murray Watt, Liberal senator Sarah Henderson, former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce and former Labor MP Joel Fitzgibbon.
Number cruncher
Sky News's chief election analyst, Tom Connell, will have emerging trends, projections, and results across all 151 seats.
Gimmick
Sky News is always first off the starting blocks so is a good destination for political junkies. It's a 6am start with First Edition: Australia Decides with Peter Stefanovic and from 9am, AM Agenda: Australia Decides, with Laura Jayes tracking turnout and early trends.
Wild card
Commentator Andrew Bolt and former Labor cabinet minister Graham Richardson.
As well as the election live blog, helmed by Krishani Dhanji we'll have news, commentary and analysis, seat-by-seat results and a special election edition of the Full Story podcast. On Sunday there will be a post-election episode of Back to Back Barries .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

£80m for carbon capture shelved after Greens threatened SNP pact
£80m for carbon capture shelved after Greens threatened SNP pact

Sunday Post

time4 hours ago

  • Sunday Post

£80m for carbon capture shelved after Greens threatened SNP pact

Get a weekly round-up of stories from The Sunday Post: Thank you for signing up to our Sunday Post newsletter. Something went wrong - please try again later. Sign Up Vital funding to accelerate a carbon capture and storage project that could create thousands of jobs in Scotland was shelved after the Scottish Greens threatened to put their power-sharing agreement with the SNP at risk, we can exclusively reveal. It is one of a series of stark revelations uncovered by a Sunday Post investigation into why £80 million promised by the Scottish Government for the landmark Acorn project has yet to materialise. The Acorn project would see harmful greenhouse gas emissions piped under the North Sea and then stored, creating almost 5,000 long-term jobs and billions of investment for the Scottish economy. But we found squabbling between political factions and attempts to shift blame have caused the money to be held up at a time when the north east is haemorrhaging jobs. The SNP offered up the cash to encourage the UK Government to rethink after the Scottish Cluster, a group of decarbonisation projects focused on Peterhead Power station, missed out on funding in 2021. But earlier this year, SNP energy secretary Gillian Martin admitted there were no plans to pay out and claimed that investors do not currently need the cash. Previously unseen private communications, memos and briefing notes show: The Scottish Greens threatened to publicly disagree with the government's energy strategy if it handed out the £80m for carbon capture – a move that could have put the Bute House agreement in jeopardy. Emails sent between senior SNP figures and notes issued by special advisors indicate the funding was not originally conditional on UK Government support – as SNP ministers now claim. There was nearly three months of delay in discussing the funding at ministerial level while jobs were placed at risk. Net Zero secretary Michael Matheson was rebuked by UK energy minister Greg Hands for releasing details of their 'confidential' meeting so he could make an announcement ahead of an Environmental Information Request going public. Last night the GMB union described the revelations as 'shocking confirmation of ministers' inertia as a jobs catastrophe looms in the North Sea'. Meanwhile, nearly £22 billion has been promised over the next 25 years for Merseyside and Teesside, supporting thousands of roles. What does the Bute House memo say? A Bute House memo dated December 2022 – nearly a year after the £80m was announced – illustrates the power the Greens held over government energy policy at the time. It states the group had already been handed assurances of changes made in 'several areas'. The author, Green MSP Mark Ruskell, notes this is particularly the case in the Just Transition chapter of the government's plans. © KATIE NOBLE The note says the Greens would 'likely need to publicly disagree' with elements of the Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan if it was published in its current form. It states the party would like to see any financial support for carbon capture and blue hydrogen come out of UK Government money, 'reallocating Scottish Government funding for other pressing priorities'. It adds that this includes reallocating the £80m projected spend from the Emerging Energy Technologies Fund on the Scottish Cluster. The Scottish Government had previously warned withdrawing the funding would give the impression that it no longer supports Acorn and would be contrary to the Bute House Agreement – an argument refuted by the Greens in the memo. Jobs 'still at risk' Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Douglas Lumsden said: 'This internal memo, hidden until now, shows the extremist Greens have had a veto on SNP energy policy for years. 'Although the Emerging Energy Technologies Fund promised £80m to develop the Scottish Cluster, the Greens said no. Then it was canned. 'Tens of thousands of Scottish jobs remain at risk because Patrick Harvie's paw prints are still all over Scottish Government policy.' © DC Thomson Environmental groups are sceptical of carbon capture and argue it props up the fossil fuel industry by hiding emissions, rather than cutting them. But the energy firms behind Acorn estimate the project will add £17.7 billion to UK GDP by 2050, create over 10,800 jobs during construction and sustain 4,700 long-term operational roles. It has been listed since 2023 as one of two new carbon capture projects awaiting formal backing by the UK Government following approval of the two clusters in England. Greens stand by carbon capture stance Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said his party has always been sceptical about both the Scottish and UK governments putting too much reliance on 'untested' carbon capture technology, adding that it is firmly opposed to using it as an excuse for more fossil fuel extraction or burning. He said: 'At best – if it ever works – it could reduce emissions from the residual use of fossil fuel while we do everything we can to shift to renewables. 'But it's too often being used as an excuse for business as usual, which is why it's no surprise to see the anti-environment Conservatives backing it.' © Jane Barlow/PA Wire The Scottish Government claims the delay in handing over the money is linked to the UK Government taking so long to approve the project. However, internal memos and correspondence reveal no such conditions were in place when the money was first allocated. In a letter to Shona Robison in December 2021 – six weeks before the Acorn funding announcement – Michael Matheson said the Scottish Cluster would be supported without caveat by the same £80 million from the same fund. This is parroted in a number of other pieces of correspondence sent by Matheson that have subsequently been obtained by The Sunday Post. Around six weeks later, advisers began to gameplan the 'conditionality of funding point', adding that the 'key point to make would be that the £80m is not enough, and UKG support is still required in terms of access to business models etc.' SNP minister rebuked We can reveal officials were then left scrambling to put out an announcement because a letter from Matheson to UK energy minister Greg Hands referencing the cash was set to be released to the public through an Environmental Information Request. But Matheson was given a dressing down by Hands on January 19 2022 for making the announcement following what was supposed to be a confidential meeting. Hands wrote: 'You had been seeking a meeting with me for some days, which I agreed to, but at no point during what I understood to be a confidential meeting between two ministers, was it said that a media notification would follow the meeting. 'Instead, we had I thought, agreed at the meeting that the two governments would work together, which is what I believe the Acorn project would want, and the people of Scotland would expect.' © PA Hands says he told Matheson during the meeting that the £80m funding 'needs careful consideration but does not address some of the key challenges'. These include the likely burden of ongoing revenue support payments and practical constraints of supporting multiple carbon capture projects in three different areas of the UK to launch at the same time. Further correspondence reveals the Scottish Government was not notified the Scottish Cluster would not be included in a list of fast-tracked projects before the announcement was put out publicly. © Thomas Krych/ZUMA Press Wire/Shu Three meetings between Matheson and Hands were arranged and then cancelled around this time and there was no direct response to the funding offer in Matheson's letter to the Chancellor in October 2021 or a subsequent letter from the first minister to the prime minister the following month. This meant there was a nearly three month delay in discussing the funding proposal at a ministerial level. 'Inertia and inaction' GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour said needless delays in driving through investment for Acorn exposes the abject failure of UK and Scottish governments to protect the sector or deliver new jobs in green energy. She said: 'Offshore production and onshore supply chains are in crisis with thousands of skilled jobs on the line but, behind the scenes, our ministers are apparently spending their time on spin and squabbles. 'There is clearly no joined-up thinking between our governments and no concerted plan of action. Instead, there are politicians playing games. © Andrew Cawley 'There is only inertia and inaction while thousands of well-paid jobs are in peril along with the families and communities that rely on them.' The Scottish Government said its Programme for Government 'made clear' that it is committed to the £80 million of support. However no actual funding was allocated and the project was not even mentioned in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget. The government added that the funding is 'contingent upon the UK Government confirming a full-funding package and timeline for the Acorn project at the Spending Review'.

Erin Patterson's mushroom murder case is Australia's Trial of the Century
Erin Patterson's mushroom murder case is Australia's Trial of the Century

Spectator

time7 hours ago

  • Spectator

Erin Patterson's mushroom murder case is Australia's Trial of the Century

Since its general election a month ago, Australia's politics have endured their biggest upheaval in fifty years. Its Labor government was re-elected by a massive majority, when just months ago it was in danger of being tossed out, and the conservative opposition parties are in existential turmoil and even briefly severed their coalition. Yet Australia's epicentre of interest this past month hasn't been the nation's capital, Canberra. Instead, it's been Morwell, a dying industrial town in the Gippsland region of the state of Victoria. There, Australia's Trial of the Century is playing out a sordid tale of love, hate, lust and intrigue. And mushrooms. Erin Patterson is a a frumpy, middle-aged woman, with a mien unfortunately drawn by nature as a mask of permanent misery. She has been estranged from her husband and his family for several years.

Scottish Greens probe bullying complaint against MSP Maggie Chapman
Scottish Greens probe bullying complaint against MSP Maggie Chapman

The National

time8 hours ago

  • The National

Scottish Greens probe bullying complaint against MSP Maggie Chapman

Documents shared with this paper allege that the MSP contacted the place of work of Green activist Guy Ingerson in October 2024 to suggest that he 'was untrustworthy and should be 'watched''. Ingerson is named as the complainer in the documents, which the Sunday National understands were brought before the Greens' Conducts and Complaints Committee last week. The complaint reads: 'On October 15, 2024, I was informed by my line manager that Ms Chapman had raised concerns to my place of employment, [redacted]. This involved speaking with a board member of the organisation and insinuating that I was untrustworthy and should be 'watched'. Green activist Guy Ingerson is named as the complainer in documents obtained by the Sunday National (Image: Archive) 'The full details of this incident can be provided to the CCC upon request. A contact has been provided. I am currently in my probation period with my new employer, and this could have resulted in my termination. 'This act shows an escalation of the malicious behaviour described previously and is a serious breach of the Code of Conduct.' The document makes reference to a separate complaint put in by Chapman against Ingerson, which the Sunday National understands was ultimately dismissed. It states: 'There was also an instruction to take pictures etc of Ms Chapman at any event in which we are both in attendance, regardless of the capacity I may be there in. 'As well as being a highly inappropriate attempt to force me to work for the party outside of party-related events, this unreasonable expectation formed part of the complaint Ms Chapman had made against me.' Other allegations in the complaint relate to disagreements around social media output or internal party processes about motions to be heard at conference. Green co-leader and MSP Patrick Harvie and MSP Mark Ruskell are both named as witnesses in the documents. READ MORE: Campaign against Flamingo Land reaches milestone with 50,000 letters sent to minister Ingerson was second on the Greens' North East Scotland regional list in the 2021 Holyrood elections, and is believed to be bidding to take the top spot from Chapman for the 2026 vote. One source who has worked with both dismissed the idea that the latest bullying complaint was simply part of a selection battle between the two, saying: 'I have seen tit-for-tat selection battles and this isn't one.' They said that while they have seen 'malicious complaints about [Chapman] in the past', they believed this was 'legitimate'. Both Ingerson and Chapman declined to comment in detail on the complaint. Chapman said: 'I cannot comment on anything that has been raised with the Conduct and Complaints Committee to review as this is an internal party process that is dealt with in private, and that must be respected.' And Ingerson said: 'I won't comment on internal party processes, but I will make the general point that bullying is unacceptable in any political party and in any workplace.' A party spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said: 'The Scottish Greens have a robust complaints procedure and a Code of Conduct for all members. 'Any complaints raised are reviewed by our Conduct and Complaints Committee privately. We do not comment on any complaints.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store