Judge finds police acted reasonably in shooting New Mexico man while at wrong address
A federal judge has dismissed part of a lawsuit that accused police of violating constitutional protections when they fatally shot a man after showing up at the wrong address in response to a domestic violence call.
The shooting of Robert Dotson, 52, in the northwestern New Mexico city of Farmington prompted a civil lawsuit by his family members, though public prosecutors found there was no basis to pursue criminal charges against officers after a review of events. The suit alleged that the family was deprived of its civil rights and officers acted unreasonably.
Hearing a knock at the door late on April 5, 2023, Dotson put on a robe, went downstairs and grabbed a handgun before answering. Police outside shined a flashlight as Dotson appeared and raised the firearm before three police officers opened fire, killing him. Dotson did not shoot.
'Ultimately, given the significant threat Dotson posed when he pointed his firearm at officers ... the immediacy of that threat, the proximity between Dotson and the defendant officers, and considering that the events unfolded in only a few seconds, the court finds that the defendant officers reasonably applied deadly force,' U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Garcia said in a written court opinion.
The judge also said the officers were entitled under the circumstances to qualified immunity — special legal protections that prevent people from suing over claims that police or government workers violated their constitutional rights.
The opinion was published May 15 — the same day the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in a separate case that courts should weigh the totality of circumstances and not just a 'moment of threat' when judging challenges to police shootings under the Fourth Amendment.
Tom Clark, one of the Dotson family's attorneys, said the lawsuit against Farmington police will move forward on other claims under tort law and provisions of the New Mexico Civil Rights Act, which limits immunity for police and other government agencies.
Defense attorneys said in court filings that the officers acted reasonably under 'the totality of circumstances,' noting that they repeatedly knocked and announced that police had arrived and saying Dotson 'posed an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to police.'
Philip Stinson, a professor of criminal justice at Bowling Green State University in Ohio, said Tuesday that court evaluations of police immunity in shootings 'sometimes lead to results that end up leaving you scratching your head.'
'Here the court is saying the police made a mistake — but in that moment they were confronted with a decision to use deadly force,' he said. 'I don't think this is the last word in this case.'
Lawyers for Dotson's family emphasized that police were at the wrong address and that he was likely blinded by the flashlight with little inkling that police were there. They said officers did not give him sufficient time to comply with commands as an officer shouted, 'Hey, hands up.'
According to the lawsuit, Dotson's wife, wearing only a robe, came downstairs after hearing the shots and found her husband lying in the doorway. She fired outside, not knowing who was out there. Police fired 19 rounds but missed her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Travis Decker: Search continues for man who allegedly killed his 3 daughters
Police are still looking for a Washington man they believed murdered his three young daughters one week Decker, 32, is wanted on kidnapping and first-degree murder charges for killing his daughters aged nine, eight and five, according to the Wenatchee Police Department in Washington state. Officials believe Mr Decker, who they say is an outdoorsman and may have gone to mountain survival school as part of his military training, is hiding in a remote part of the mountainous and wooded state, making the search for him difficult. He has been said to "pose a significant risk, if approached". Police have not provided a possible motive. The girls, Paityn, Evelyn and Olivia, died from apparent suffocation in a remote campground, earlier this week, according to police. Their mother reported them missing on 30 May after Mr Decker failed to return his daughters to her following a visit. He also did not take her phone calls. A few days later, on 2 June, police found the girls' bodies near a campground. Police also found Mr Decker's cell phone at the campground but he was no longer there. His truck, which he was believed to have been living in, was also found nearby."I don't think any motive would be acceptable. And clearly it's not the decision of a sound mind," Chelan County Sheriff Mike Morrison said at a press conference on Wednesday, where he made a public plea to Mr Decker to turn himself Decker's outdoor survival skills may be helping him evade the authorities searching for him, which includes the FBI, Sheriff Morrison said. "It sounds like at times he would go out and would be off-grid for sometimes up to two and a half months," Sheriff Morrison said after speaking with Mr Decker's Decker may have scoped out the area and hidden supplies there before allegedly killing his children, and he has "the knowledge to survive for a long period of time," the sheriff added."We want a peaceful resolution to this, but we're not going to relinquish our efforts," Sheriff Morrison said in asking Mr Decker to come forward. "Let's wrap this up and do what's right for your kids."The US Marshals Service on Wednesday announced a $20,000 (£14,780) reward for information leading to Mr Decker's capture.
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Houston Trial Attorney Will Moye Secures $37.9 Million Verdict in Zero-Offer Case Against 3M, Just One Day After Helping Defeat Texas Tort Reform Bill
HOUSTON, TX, June 6, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- In a victory for Texas plaintiffs and community safety, Will Moye, opens new tab, founding attorney of Moye Law Firm, opens new tab secured a $37.9 million jury verdict Tuesday in a case where 3M offered nothing to settle. The win came just one day after Moye helped defeat Senate Bill 30, opens new tab (SB 30), a controversial tort reform measure, opens new tab aimed at capping civil jury awards and limiting Texans' access to full compensation. 'This was a week where truth prevailed at the Capitol and in the courtroom. We warned the legislature that SB 30 would silence victims and their families. And on Monday, that bill died. On Tuesday, a Harris County jury sent a $37.9 million message that justice still matters in Texas,' Moye said. Moye tried the case alongside Robert Kwok and Ryan Loya of Kwok Daniel, LLP. The jury found 3M and its subsidiary Teledyne Detcon responsible for selling and servicing a gas detection system that catastrophically failed during the January 2020 explosion at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing. The blast killed three people, injured many more, and destroyed hundreds of homes in Houston's Spring Branch neighborhood. Trial evidence showed that a 3M technician had falsely certified the system as operational, despite critical alarms and sensors never being properly connected. Before trial, 3M refused to offer even a nominal settlement. Instead, the company insisted it bore no responsibility and urged the jury to assign all blame to Watson Grinding, which filed for bankruptcy shortly after the explosion. At one point during trial, a 3M attorney asked one of the plaintiffs, a 50-year-old Latina housekeeper whose home and health were destroyed, why she had not 'just driven for Uber' to recover financially. 'That kind of corporate arrogance is exactly why we go to trial. They didn't take the case seriously. Thankfully, the jury did,' Moye said. With five years of pre-judgment interest, the total judgment is expected to exceed $40 million. Frequently Asked Questions Who is Will Moye? Will Moye, opens new tab is a veteran Houston trial attorney with more than two decades of courtroom experience. He previously defended some of the world's largest corporations before founding his own plaintiffs-only law firm in 2024. What is the Watson Grinding explosion case? The January 24, 2020 explosion at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing in Spring Branch killed three people and destroyed a residential neighborhood. Moye helped prove that 3M and Teledyne Detcon failed to properly install or test a gas detection system that could have prevented the blast. What was the verdict? A Harris County jury awarded $37.9 million to five plaintiffs. With pre-judgment interest, the award will exceed $40 million. Why is this verdict significant? The verdict coincided with the death of SB 30, Texas legislation aimed at reducing large jury awards. Will Moye played a direct role in defeating the bill and securing justice for his clients—all in the same week. About Will Moye and Moye Law Firm Will Moye, opens new tab is a courtroom-tested trial attorney with over 25 years of experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants. Before founding Moye Law Firm, opens new tab, he spent his career defending some of the nation's largest energy companies, manufacturers, and insurers, giving him a rare, strategic understanding of how powerful corporations assess and fight legal claims. Today, Moye uses that insider knowledge, opens new tab to fight for individuals and families, opens new tab catastrophically harmed by explosions, workplace safety failures, defective products, and corporate negligence. He has tried high-stakes cases across Texas, from major metropolitan areas like Harris and Travis Counties to smaller rural venues, earning a reputation for tough, strategic, and compassionate advocacy. Moye is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), one of the most prestigious organizations in the legal profession, reserved for experienced trial lawyers who exhibit high personal character, integrity, and proficiency in trial advocacy. He founded Moye Law Firm in 2024. Headquartered in Houston, it is a plaintiffs-only trial firm dedicated exclusively to catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death litigation. The firm's mission is simple: to deliver fearless, strategic, and personalized representation to those whose lives have been shattered by preventable disasters. The firm's attorneys bring over 80 years of combined courtroom experience, including significant backgrounds as former defense counsel for major corporations. Their unique perspectives enables the firm to anticipate defense strategies and build powerful, winning cases on behalf of injured clients. Their primary practice areas include: For more information, visit opens new tab. Media Contact Amanda Orramanda@ ### SOURCE: Moye Law Firm Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
BreakingNews.ie
28 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Jury dismisses allegations against Garda into alleged 'sorting out' of insurance offences
A serving Garda was found not guilty by a jury of charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice after allegations he 'sorted out' motoring offences for drivers. Garda Tom Flavin was acquitted of a total of 22 counts of allegedly attempting to pervert the course of justice by a jury at Limerick Circuit Criminal Court following an eight-day trial. Advertisement On Friday, the jury returned unanimous not guilty verdicts on 17 of the charges. Earlier the jury was directed by the trial judge, Colin Daly, to return not guilty verdicts in respect of five counts against Garda Flavin. The long serving and respected Co Limerick Garda, who had consistently denied all of the charges, was supported in court throughout the trial by a large gathering of family friends and colleagues. On Thursday, Garda Flavin's barrister, senior counsel Mark Nicholas, instructed by solicitor Dan O'Gorman, urged the jury to acquit the garda of all of the charges, and said there was no evidence of wrongdoing by the accused. Advertisement Garda Flavin was arrested and charged following an investigation by the Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigation (GNBCI) and ultimately accused of knowingly entering false motor insurance details on the Garda Pulse computer records system, in an attempt to frustrate potential prosecutions against persons for driving without insurance. His trial heard that the drivers involved were stopped at routine Garda checkpoints around the country and asked by the garda present to produce their insurance and licence details at a nominated Garda station within ten days of the traffic stop. All of the drivers involved nominated Rathkeale garda station, and, later, when the investigating garda in each of the traffic stops carried out follow up checks of Pulse they were satisfied the details entered indicated that the driver in each case was insured. However, the court heard some of the drivers were actually not insured and had actually been prosecuted in court after pleading guilty to driving without insurance. Advertisement Mr Nicholas told the jury Mr Flavin was an exemplary garda who had served with dedication in Croom and Rathkeale, Co Limerick, for many years. The defence barrister had urged the jury to acquit and not fall into the trap of speculation, remarking to the jury that there was radically insufficient evidence to support a conviction against Garda Flavin. 'He (Mr Flavin) served his community without blemish and without any disciplinary blots - you know that from the evidence. "When other gardaí came to give evidence, his superiors, they spoke of him very fondly and well - It wasn't far off gushing and they spoke with knowledge,' Mr Nicholas told the jury in his closing speech, Thursday. Advertisement Mr Nicholas spoke of the 'unique challenges' gardaí face in Rathkeale as opposed to other jurisdictions: 'People who live down here know it has an enormous population, transient, in and out at various times of the year. "One policeman said (the population) quadruples and with that comes its own set of problems and own sets of vehicles - UK car registrations, UK insurance, some not insured, some not being entirely truthful.' 'We know that a certain number of times that people who were pulled up and stopped and asked for their documentation, produced bogus insurance certificates.' Mr Nicholas said the charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice, is an extraordinarily, serious allegation to make against a serving garda and that the State had 'nothing close' to proving its case. Advertisement The court heard evidence that persons had provided certain documents at Rathkeale garda station, where Garda Flavin was based at the time, however it was unclear who produced the documents nor was it clear what documents they produced. Fiona Murphy SC, prosecuting, had alleged that the evidence would show that Gda Flavin had 'sorted out' the uninsured drivers by inputting data into Pulse to try to frustrate prosecutions against them. However, Ms Murphy had told the jury that the prosecution case was 'a circumstantial case' with 'no direct evidence'. 'Instead, the prosecution relies on indirect evidence,' Ms Murphy said. Ireland Coroner returns verdict of accidental death after... Read More Ms Murphy had explained to the jury that a statute of limitation of 'six months' generally applied in respect of prosecuting offences of driving without insurance. She had argued that all of the relevant data entries into Pulse 'were entered under the ID of Thomas Flavin' and she had alleged that 'Tom Flavin knew they (the drivers) were not covered (by insurance) and that he entered the details onto PULSE to ensure they (appeared) covered'. 'Mr Flavin knew what he was doing, and he did so to ensure those persons were insured (on PULSE) when they were not, in order to ensure there was no prosecution,' Ms Murphy had alleged in court. However, after deliberating for three hours and 21 minutes, the jury disagreed and unanimously dismissed all of the allegations that had been made against Gda Flavin, following an expensive and top-level GNBCI (Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigation) probe.
