
Deaf Association Sues Trump for Lack of ASL Interpreters at Press Briefings
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The National Association of the Deaf (NAD) sued President Donald Trump and several co-defendants for failing to provide qualified ASL interpreters at public press briefings and similar events.
The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday, alleges that the White House stopped using ASL interpreters in January, "denying hundreds of thousands of deaf Americans meaningful access to the White House's real-time communications on various issues of national and international import."
The Executive Office of the President, The White House Office, Office of the Vice President, White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt were also named as defendants in the suit.
Newsweek reached out to attorneys for the plaintiffs and the White House for comment.
Why It Matters
ASL is the primary and preferred language of many deaf individuals. The language has a unique vocabulary, grammar and syntax.
"Many deaf individuals cannot read or understand written English. Consequently, English closed captions are not an adequate substitute for ASL interpretation," attorneys for the plaintiffs said in the complaint.
The Trump administration faced a similar legal challenge during the first term of his presidency. The NAD filed a lawsuit against Trump and several others in 2020 for failure to provide in-frame ASL interpretation during COVID-19 briefings.
President Donald Trump speaking during a swearing in ceremony for interim U.S. Attorney General for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in the Oval Office of the Washington.
President Donald Trump speaking during a swearing in ceremony for interim U.S. Attorney General for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in the Oval Office of the Washington.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci
Under a judge's injunction, the administration was required to provide in-frame interpretation or a simultaneous stream with an interpreter from a remote location in a picture-in-picture format.
The case was dismissed in 2021 after then-President Joe Biden took office. The Biden administration laid out its commitment to providing ASL interpretation in a memo entitled "Communication Services for People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing at Presidential Briefings." The policy stated that a qualified interpreter would be provided at briefings held by the President, Vice President, First Lady, Second Gentleman or White House Press Secretary, in addition to COVID-19 briefings and any other briefings approved by designated White House officials.
The policy remained in effect throughout Biden's presidency.
What To Know
The NAD and two of its members, 36-year-old Indiana resident Derrick Ford and 48-year-old Maryland resident Matthew Bonn, allege that the failure to provide ASL interpreters is a violation of federal law prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities and requiring access to the federal government's programs and services.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs said both Ford and Bonn were unable to understand much of what was being said at White House press briefings, depriving them of information on executive orders, DEI, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the economy and other issues impacting Americans.
"It is apparent that the White House is not complying with the Policy announced and followed by the prior administration," attorneys for the plaintiffs wrote in the complaint.
The NAD sent a letter to Wiles urging the White House to reinstate ASL interpreters in January, but the association has not received a response, according to the suit.
The plaintiffs are asking the court to provide injunctive relief requiring the defendants to provide qualified ASL interpreters at press briefings, press conferences and related events held by the president, vice president, first lady, second lady or White House press secretary. The plaintiffs are also asking that the interpreters be visible in frame, both in television broadcasts and videos streamed or uploaded to the White House's website or social media pages.
What People Are Saying
Attorneys for the plaintiffs, in a complaint filed Wednesday: "Such fluent and accurate interpretations are critical for deaf Americans, especially in times of great and frequent change."
Dr. Bobbie Beth Scoggins, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the NAD, in a statement: "Deaf and hard of hearing Americans have the right to the same access to White House information as everyone else. Denying them ASL interpreters is a direct violation of that right, and the NAD will continue to fight for their full inclusion in the democratic process."
What Happens Next
Summons were issued for the defendants, who will have 60 days to respond after being successfully served.
Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Budget Drops Protections For State Medical Cannabis Programs
The White House budget request for 2026 omits language that has protected state-regulated medical ... More cannabis operators from federal prosecution for more than decade. The Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year drops provisions that have protected state medical cannabis programs for more than a decade, online cannabis news outlet Marijuana Moment reported on Monday. The budget provision has blocked federal law enforcement agencies from spending resources to investigate or prosecute businesses operating in compliance with state-authorized medical cannabis programs, despite the continued prohibition of marijuana under federal law. 'This provision, which has been in place since 2014, protects patients, caregivers, and medical cannabis providers in the 39 states that have legalized medical access from federal interference or criminal prosecution,' the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) wrote in a statement. 'Prior to the passage of this protection, federal prosecutors routinely took actions against patients and dispensaries in legal states.' The budget restriction was first adopted by Congress in 2014 and has been included in the federal budget every year since. But the Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year released last week does not include the language. Similarly, the budget requests for each of the four years of President Donald Trump's first term omitted the protections for state-regulated medical cannabis operators. The administration of President Barack Obama also left the language prohibiting federal interference with regulated medical marijuana businesses out its budget requests following the initial adoption of the provisions. By contrast, the administration budget requests for all fours years of Joseph Biden's presidency included the protections for state-legal medical marijuana businesses. While the budget request illustrates the Trump administration's spending policies and priorities, Congress has the constitutional responsibility and authority for appropriations legislation. The congressional budget has included the language every year since 2014, despite attempts by both Democratic and Republican administrations to drop the provision. 'Today, more than half the country, including 36 states and Washington, D.C., have embraced medical marijuana, and for the past 10 years, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment has prevented the Department of Justice from using federal funds to stop states from implementing their medical marijuana programs,' Laura A. Bianchi, co-founding partner of the cannabis and psychedelics law firm Bianchi and Brandt, writes in an email. 'Rolling back these protections would mark a significant setback for marijuana reform. Ultimately, Congress will have the final say, and the industry remains hopeful that they will uphold these vital safeguards.' When Trump signed previous appropriations bill including the protections for medical cannabis operators after requesting they be removed, his administration issued a statement that it 'will treat this provision consistent with the President's constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.' The statement, which was issued on three separate occasions, was widely interpreted to suggest that the Trump administration might ignore the budget restriction. The omission of the protections for state-legal medical cannabis programs in the Trump administration's 2026 budget request is likely to disappoint supporters of cannabis policy reform who were encouraged by the president's apparent support for decriminalizing marijuana during the 2024 election campaign. In September, Trump suggested he supported reclassifying marijuana under federal drug laws and that he would back state efforts to legalize recreational cannabis. 'As President, we will continue to focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug, and work with Congress to pass common sense laws, including safe banking for state authorized companies, and supporting states rights to pass marijuana laws, like in Florida, that work so well for their citizens,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, according to a report from Marijuana Moment.


Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China In Wait and See Mode: Cameron Johnson
US-China trade talks do not appear to be progressing as President Trump said via social media, China's leader Xi Jinping is "extremely hard to a deal with." Tidalwave Solutions Senior Partner Cameron Johnson has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US
A Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico last month is back in the United States, his legal team told CNN, in what appears to mark the first time the Trump administration has brought back a migrant after a judge ordered the administration to facilitate their return. OCG, a pseudonym the migrant is using in the case, landed in the United States on Wednesday and made contact with a member of the litigation team challenging the Trump administration's moves to send migrants to countries where they have no ties, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. The team expects he will be taken into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, though it's unclear where he'll be detained, Realmuto told CNN. This is a developing story and will be updated.