Federal judge says attempted deportation of anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil may be unconstitutional
A federal judge in New Jersey ruled that President Donald Trump's effort to deport anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil is most likely unconstitutional on Wednesday.
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz handed down the ruling, though he did not go so far as to order Khalil's release. Farbiarz argued that the Trump administration's deportation order was likely to be dismissed as "unconstitutionally vague."
"The district court held what we already knew: Secretary Rubio's weaponization of immigration law to punish Mahmoud and others like him is likely unconstitutional," lawyers for Khalil said after the ruling.
Khalil, who was approved for deportation by a U.S. immigration judge, has argued that his free speech rights were being "eroded" by the Trump administration.
Khalil is accused of being a ringleader for anti-Israel protests at Columbia University.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys have argued that Khalil's free speech claims were a "red herring," saying that the 30-year-old green card holder lied on his visa applications.
Khalil, they said, willfully failed to disclose his employment with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut when he applied for permanent U.S. residency.
Khalil has Algerian citizenship through his mother, but was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria.
Khalil is married to Noor Abdalla, a U.S. citizen. They met in 2016 while volunteering in Lebanon. They married in 2023, and she was eight months pregnant at the time of his arrest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘A fear campaign.' Students around the world are shocked, scared and saddened by US visa pause
When Adefemola Akintade learned that the Trump administration had suspended the processing of foreign student visas, she immediately went blank. 'I don't know what to do; this is something I've always wanted for the longest of times,' she told CNN, still with an air of disbelief. The Nigerian journalist has been accepted into Columbia Journalism School for a master's degree and was on the cusp of applying for her US visa. 'I don't have any backup plan,' the 31-year-old said. 'I put all my eggs in one basket – in Columbia… which is quite a risk.' She is due to start her degree in New York in August having already paid a hefty enrolment fee. Akintade is among thousands of people across the globe who were thrown into limbo on Tuesday when the US State Department instructed its embassies and consulates to pause the scheduling of new student visa interviews as it plans to expand social media vetting for applicants. It's the latest in a series of moves by the Trump White House targeting higher education, starting with an ongoing fight with Harvard University and then dramatically expanding in scope. CNN spoke with several affected overseas students, who expressed a mix of sadness, confusion and fear over the latest developments and the sudden upending of their lives. Many of them asked to remain anonymous, citing concerns about possible retribution or problems in the future. 'It feels like a really scary and unsettling time for international students studying in the US,' said one Canadian student who has also been accepted by Columbia. 'A lot of us chose to study in the US for its freedoms but now knowing that innocent social media posts could cost an education feels like censorship.' Some prospective students have even started self-censoring. Another Canadian, accepted into Harvard Law School, told CNN how a friend working on Capitol Hill advised her to go through her social media posts shortly after the visa suspension news broke. 'We were looking at a post from us at Pride, and my caption was simply a rainbow flag and then a trans flag. And I was on the phone with her 'and I was like, do I have to take this down?' Eventually we decided no, I could leave it up, but I changed the caption, I removed the trans flag. I don't know how to feel about that,' the student said. 'I do think it's real proof that it is a fear campaign that is incredibly successful,' she said, adding that she has deferred her place for this year after getting a job offer. 'I changed the caption with the anticipation that it could get worse. Today it is one (issue) and tomorrow it will be another one.' The State Department has required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on immigrant and nonimmigrant visa application forms since 2019, a spokesperson said. In addition, it had already called for extra social media vetting of some applicants, largely related to alleged antisemitism. But it's unclear what kind of post might pose a problem for an application from now on, or how these posts will be scrutinized. British student Conrad Kunadu said he'd been grappling with an 'internal conflict' over his offer to pursue a PhD in Environmental Health at Johns Hopkins University after monitoring the crackdown on US colleges 'religiously' for the past few months. The case of a French scientist who was recently denied entry into the US for allegedly posting messages criticizing President Donald Trump was a 'big turning point' for Kunadu. 'I was like, oh, wow. Ok, no, this is potentially really bad. I just don't know if this is an environment that I actually want to be in,' he told CNN. After wondering whether he could manage his anxiety that 'something (he) wrote in 2016' could get him deported, Kunadu decided to stay in Britain and study at Oxford University instead. Despite being grateful to have another option, he described his situation as a 'lose-lose.' 'I wanted to study in the US not just because, for my interests in health security, it's where all the talent and resources are, but because it's the best way to make an impact on these issues at a global scale,' Kunadu said. Like many others, he can't help but mourn the possible academic research and advances that now may never come to fruition. Kunadu and another student who requested anonymity both mentioned being anxious about exploring topics in their studies that could be interpreted as dissent and ruffle official feathers. 'It's incredibly distressing as an American to hear that,' Michael Kagan, who directs the Immigration Clinic at the University of Nevada, told CNN. 'It's not something someone should have to worry about to study in the United States… But I think, right now, it's totally rational. And if I were advising someone, I would tell them that, from a legal point of view, that seems like a reasonable thing to be concerned about.' Kagan described the visa halt as 'one of many attacks on higher education and immigrants… two of the Trump administration's favorite targets,' which in this case overlap. And while the directive is consistent with what the White House was already doing, he sees this as 'an unprecedented attack in a non-emergency time.' When asked whether those who had accepted college offers and were waiting for a visa appointment had any legal avenues available to them, Kagan was not encouraging. 'If someone is trying to enter and not yet getting a visa, (that person) usually has nearly no recourse,' he said. In the 2023-34 academic year, more than 1.1 million international students studied at US higher education institutions, according to a report from the the Institute of International Education. The students CNN spoke with were all now trying to come to terms with their new reality and figure out their next steps. 'I'm still kind of hoping that there's a Supreme Court case that suddenly sees things in my favor,' Kunadu said. Oliver Cropley, a 27-year-old British student from a low-income background, told CNN that he was due to attend Kansas University for one year on a scholarship, but without a visa appointment he is no longer sure. 'It just feels like a kick when you are already down,' he said. 'Our strategy is a waiting game, we want to see if Trump is going to backtrack.' The Canadian accepted into Harvard Law School said she was glad the institution is taking a stand against the Trump administration. 'If Harvard caves, everybody caves and it's the collapse of civil society, right? If the wealthiest institution with the highest brand recognition folds, everyone folds,' she told CNN. For Nigerian journalist Akintade, who has always dreamed of studying at an Ivy League school, the feeling of rejection by the US is weighing heavily. 'This is the message I'm getting: we don't want you,' she said, with a deep sigh. Lisa Klaassen, Nimi Princewill and Quinta Thomson contributed to this report
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOGE is entering a new phase. It's going to be way harder than the first.
With Elon Musk leaving the Trump administration, DOGE is entering a new phase. Now, it's going to be up to Congress to pass bills to codify spending cuts into law. It's not going to be easy. For the first several months of President Donald Trump's second term, DOGE seemed like an unstoppable force. Now, political gravity is about to kick in. Though he says he'll still be in Washington here and there, Elon Musk is ending his time as an official White House employee. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is preparing to formally ask Congress to begin codifying some of the cuts DOGE has already made — a process that's far from certain to succeed. It all amounts to a new phase for DOGE, one where the swift and disruptive action of Trump's first few months will give way to the delays, gridlock, and possibility of failure that come with trying to pass bills through Congress. "The DOGE team has done incredible work," Musk said during a recent appearance at the Qatar Economic Forum. "But the magnitude of the savings is proportionate to the support we get from Congress and from the executive branch of the government in general." The first task for Republicans is passing $9.4 billion in cuts that the White House plans to send to Congress on Tuesday. That so-called "rescission" package, which rescinds funding previously approved by the legislative branch, includes $8.3 billion in cuts to foreign aid and $1.1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the government-backed entity that funds NPR and PBS. Symbolically, it's a big deal. Republicans have been clamoring to cut federal funding to NPR and PBS for months, and the House DOGE subcommittee held a hearing on the issue in March. There's also been growing frustration on the right that DOGE cuts haven't come sooner, with some lawmakers arguing that they should be regularly voting to codify spending cuts. "We should have been voting on DOGE cuts every single week," Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia wrote on X on Monday. Numerically, however, the $9.4 billion package is minuscule. It's less than half of one percent of the $2 trillion that Musk once envisioned cutting, and it's only about 6% of the $160 billion that Musk says DOGE has cut already. And despite GOP control of both the House and the Senate, it's not guaranteed to pass. All it would take is a handful of Republicans to derail the effort, and when Trump tried to pass a $15 billion recession package in his first term, it failed in the Senate. There's already at least one GOP senator who's likely to vote against it: Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who recently wrote an op-ed opposing cuts to public broadcasting funding. A White House official told BI that the $9.4 billion in cuts — only the second time a president has sent a rescission package to Congress since 2000 — is an indication of the administration's commitment to following through on DOGE's work. The official also expressed optimism that the package would pass and that more rescissions would come in the future. While there may be more rescissions down the line, much of the DOGE cuts are likely to be made in the coming government funding process, which Congress will have to wrap up before funding runs out at the end of September. House Speaker Mike Johnson said as much in a post on X on Wednesday, adding that the House is "eager and ready to act on DOGE's findings so we can deliver even more cuts to big government." That will be even harder than passing stand-alone DOGE cuts. While rescission packages only require a simple majority in both chambers to pass, government funding is generally a bipartisan process — one that Democrats have the power to block entirely in the Senate via the 60-vote filibuster rule. Democrats let a government funding bill pass the Senate in March despite their misgivings about DOGE at the time. That led to intense backlash from the Democratic base, which has helped fuel primary challenges and calls for generational change. It's unclear that enough Democrats will be willing to do the same thing again in September. Meanwhile, Republicans are making their own job harder with their "Big Beautiful Bill," a sprawling piece of legislation that, in its current form, would increase the deficit by trillions of dollars over the next decade. Musk made his dissatisfaction with that bill clear in a recent interview, saying it "undermines" the work that DOGE has been doing by increasing the deficit and debt. "I think a bill can be big, or it could be beautiful," Musk said. 'I don't know if it could be both." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Guardian: UK's strategic review will point to "immediate and pressing" threat from Russia
The UK is facing a "new era of threat" when drones, artificial intelligence and other technologies are changing the nature of war more fundamentally than ever before in history. Source: the UK government's strategic defence review, which is expected to be presented on Monday, as European Pravda reports with reference to the Guardian The 130-page document, written by three advisers to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, will warn of the "immediate and pressing" danger from Russia and is expected to draw heavily on lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. It will also focus on China, which will be described not as an enemy but as a "sophisticated and persistent challenge" that is sometimes willing to cooperate with Moscow, and two smaller "regional disruptors" in the form of Iran and North Korea. The review depicts the gravest military and security threat since the end of the Cold War, although it stops short of suggesting that Moscow's heightened cyber and sabotage activities mean the UK is already sliding towards war with Russia. The analysis, prepared by a group of experts led by former NATO Secretary General George Robertson, is not expected to contain any new commitments to defence spending. Instead, it will reiterate Starmer's February pledge to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 and to 3% during the next parliament. However, the review is likely to serve as justification for a substantial increase in medium-term defence spending, expected to be agreed upon at the NATO summit in June and potentially exceeding £50 billion (around US$6.65 billion) in real terms. The review is also expected to address the size of the British army as the Ministry of Defence and the Treasury are reportedly at loggerheads over whether to commit to increasing the planned number of 73,000 personnel. Figures released this week show that the army's size has fallen to its lowest level since Napoleon and even before: as of 1 April, the number of soldiers in full-time military training stood at 70,860, down 2.3% on the previous year. Assuming recruitment is successful, any commitment to increase army numbers by 5,000 would cost around £2.5 billion (approx. US$3.08 billion) a year in additional salaries, housing, kit and other resources. But if it does succeed, it would help the armed forces meet commitments that are likely to grow in the coming years. Background: The British military will spend over £1 billion (US$1.35 billion) on artificial intelligence and a hacking team. NATO has proposed that cybersecurity and border and coastal security costs be included in the Alliance's new target of 1.5% of GDP for "pre-military" spending. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
