logo
Does the Obsbot Tail 2 mean the world's first talent show without any camera operators can happen? At any angle?

Does the Obsbot Tail 2 mean the world's first talent show without any camera operators can happen? At any angle?

Yahoo22-03-2025

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Obsbot's new studio-ready PTZ camera the Tail 2 is stacked brings the company's popular AI tracking tech into a 4K broadcast-capable environment, and goes further than before. It could mean that camera operators become entirely optional – even for the main camera. Atop all that it has another trick up its sleeve – rotation!
The New Tail 2 is stacked with the features you'd expect from any serious PTZ camera – NDI, RTMP, HDMI etc, – but Obsbot can call it a "World's First PTZR" (The R is for rotation, because Obsbot's gimbal is capable of working vertically).
Like Obsbot's impressive webcam-sized gimbal cameras with tracking, like the Tiny 2 which nearly knocked my socks off in review, this device boasts straightforward AI subject tracking, but on every level the specs are bumped up.
The new AI Tracking 2.0 system can still follow simple hand gestures from subjects, or remote control on app or a remote device like the Obsbot Talent. The AI can recognise over 30 animals and over 200 objects, and track zonally, frame specific things like faces and keep a group in frame at once like the dancers illustrated. If the person speaking turns to look at another the camera will frame them both automatically.
The camera boasts all-pixel phase detection AF on its 1/1.5-inch image sensor, which Obsbot say makes it fast enough to keep up with fast-moving sports like tennis. The chip also boasts dual native ISO, meaning low light should prove less of a challenge than with other camera systems.
The 12-element lens means that, up to 5x zoom, all zoom falls onto 2 nano-meter pixels, though there is the option of hybrid up to 12x zoom too, and this appears smooth and continuous from Obsbot's demos.
As well as high-end broadcast compatibility with integrated NDI HX3, the camera is equipped with the FreeD protocol which means it's able to fit seamlessly into 3D production environments and mo-cap, and Obsbot promise the built-in image stabilization system will benefit creators from virtual studios to games designers.
Connectivity is at a professional level too. The 4K 60fps capable camera boasts a HDMI 2.0 port, Ethernet, 3G-SDI, Ethernet/PoE, USB 3, Mic, Line, RS-232 in and out and a Micro SD Slot for storage. Power, too, is via a USB-C-shaped socket for convenience on the road.
The camera can operate from a 5000mAh battery to provide up to 5 hours of shooting and live-streaming using Wi-Fi 6 at up to 1200Mbps (the more common Wi-Fi 5 is 867 Mbps).
I look forward to confirming whether the camera lives up to the expectations these specs set when my review model arrives soon. The Obsbot Tail 2 comes in at $1,199 / £999 / AU$1,985 (a cheaper alternative that still has NDI capability exists in the earlier Tail Air which is more targeted at streaming).
Introductory offer For some reason B&H have the camera with an NDI HX3 License Key for less than they have it without for the launch!View Deal
Read our guide to the best PTZ cameras (and, if this lives up to expectations expect to find this device in that guide soon).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal ‘too blunt'
Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal ‘too blunt'

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal ‘too blunt'

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei criticized the latest Republican proposal to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) as 'far too blunt an instrument' to mitigate the risks of the rapidly evolving technology. In an op-ed published by The New York Times on Thursday, Amodei said the provision barring states from regulating AI for 10 years — which the Senate is now considering under President Trump's massive policy and spending package — would 'tie the hands of state legislators' without laying out a cohesive strategy on the national level. 'The motivations behind the moratorium are understandable,' the top executive of the artificial intelligence startup wrote. 'It aims to prevent a patchwork of inconsistent state laws, which many fear could be burdensome or could compromise America's ability to compete with China.' 'But a 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument,' he continued. 'A.I. is advancing too head-spinningly fast. I believe that these systems could change the world, fundamentally, within two years; in 10 years, all bets are off.' Amodei added, 'Without a clear plan for a federal response, a moratorium would give us the worst of both worlds — no ability for states to act, and no national policy as a backstop.' The tech executive outlined some of the risks that his company, as well as others, have discovered during experimental stress tests of AI systems. He described a scenario in which a person tells a bot that it will soon be replaced with a newer model. The bot, which previously was granted access to the person's emails, threatens to expose details of his marital affair by forwarding his emails to his wife — if the user does not reverse plans to shut it down. 'This scenario isn't fiction,' Amodei wrote. 'Anthropic's latest A.I. model demonstrated just a few weeks ago that it was capable of this kind of behavior.' The AI mogul added that transparency is the best way to mitigate risks without overregulating and stifling progress. He said his company publishes results of studies voluntarily but called on the federal government to make these steps mandatory. 'At the federal level, instead of a moratorium, the White House and Congress should work together on a transparency standard for A.I. companies, so that emerging risks are made clear to the American people,' Amodei wrote. He also noted the standard should require AI developers to adopt policies for testing models and publicly disclose them, as well as require that they outline steps they plan to take to mitigate risk. The companies, the executive continued, would 'have to be upfront' about steps taken after test results to make sure models were safe. 'Having this national transparency standard would help not only the public but also Congress understand how the technology is developing, so that lawmakers can decide whether further government action is needed,' he added. Amodei also suggested state laws should follow a similar model that is 'narrowly focused on transparency and not overly prescriptive or burdensome.' Those laws could then be superseded if a national transparency standard is adopted, Amodei said. He noted the issue is not a partisan one, praising steps Trump has taken to support domestic development of AI systems. 'This is not about partisan politics. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have long raised concerns about A.I. and about the risks of abdicating our responsibility to steward it well,' the executive wrote. 'I support what the Trump administration has done to clamp down on the export of A.I. chips to China and to make it easier to build A.I. infrastructure here in the United States.' 'This is about responding in a wise and balanced way to extraordinary times,' he continued. 'Faced with a revolutionary technology of uncertain benefits and risks, our government should be able to ensure we make rapid progress, beat China and build A.I. that is safe and trustworthy. Transparency will serve these shared aspirations, not hinder them.'

Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years as AI expands, UN agency says
Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years as AI expands, UN agency says

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years as AI expands, UN agency says

By Olivia Le Poidevin GENEVA (Reuters) -Indirect carbon emissions from the operations of four of the leading AI-focused tech companies, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta, rose on average by 150% from 2020-2023, as they had to use more power for energy-demanding data centres, a United Nations report said on Thursday. The use of artificial intelligence is driving up global indirect emissions because of the vast amounts of energy required to power data centres, the report by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the U.N. agency for digital technologies, said. Indirect emissions include those generated by purchased electricity, steam, heating and cooling consumed by a company. Amazon's operational carbon emissions grew the most at 182% in 2023 compared to three years before, followed by Microsoft at 155%, Meta at 145% and Alphabet at 138%, according to the report. The ITU tracked the greenhouse gas emissions of 200 leading digital companies between 2020 and 2023. Meta, which owns Facebook and WhatsApp, pointed Reuters to its sustainability report that said it is working to reduce emissions, energy and water used to power its data centres. The other companies did not respond immediately to requests for comment. As investment in AI increases, carbon emissions from the top-emitting AI systems are predicted to reach up to 102.6 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2) per year, the report stated. The data centres that are needed for AI development could also put pressure on existing energy infrastructure. "The rapid growth of artificial intelligence is driving a sharp rise in global electricity demand, with electricity use by data centres increasing four times faster than the overall rise in electricity consumption," the report found. It also highlighted that although a growing number of digital companies had set emissions targets, those ambitions had not yet fully translated into actual reductions of emissions.

Trump Administration To Rebrand Biden-Era Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute, Commerce Secretary Says At AI Honors: 'We're Not Going To Regulate It'
Trump Administration To Rebrand Biden-Era Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute, Commerce Secretary Says At AI Honors: 'We're Not Going To Regulate It'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Administration To Rebrand Biden-Era Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute, Commerce Secretary Says At AI Honors: 'We're Not Going To Regulate It'

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told a D.C. crowd this week that the Biden-era AI Safety Institute would be rebranded as the Center for AI Standards and Innovation, as a 'place where people voluntarily go to drive analysis and standards.' 'As we move from large language models to large quantitative models, and we add all these different things, you want a place to go,' Lutnick said. 'We say, has someone checked out this model? Is this a safe model? Is this a model that we understand? How do I do this? And we're not going to regulate it. We are going to enhance the voluntary models of what great American innovation is all about.' More from Deadline Trump Launches Punitive Biden Probe, New Travel Bans, But Still Silent On Elon Musk's 'Kill Bill' Attack On Agenda Trump Celebrity Supporters: Famous Folks In Favor Of The 47th President Former Biden White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre To Publish Book Explaining Her Affiliation Switch From Democrat To An Independent Lutnick's remarks came at the inaugural AI Honors this week, held by the Washington AI Network at the Waldorf Astoria. The rebrand reflects a more hands-off approach that the Trump administration has taken to AI, after President Joe Biden often addressed AI by spotlighting the need for guardrails around the technology, and lined up major AI companies to agree to a set of voluntary commitments for 'responsible innovation.' Biden signed an executive order in 2023 that directed the Department of Commerce to develop standards for authentication and watermarking, among other things, in the creation of a Safety Institute. Days after taking office, Trump rescinded Biden's executive order, placing an emphasis on deregulation. In his speech, Lutnick said that AI safety 'is sort of an opinion-based model. And the Commerce Department and NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, we do standards and we do most successfully cyber, the gold standard of cyber.' The Biden administration acknowledged that in many cases it would be left to Congress to pass laws to regulate AI technology. In entertainment, one of the more significant proposals is the No Fakes Act, which would give individuals a right to control their digital likeness, meaning that content creators would need permission to recreate celebrities and anyone else using AI. The Center for AI Standards and Innovation also will seek voluntary agreements 'with private sector AI developers and evaluators, and lead unclassified evaluations of AI capabilities that may pose risks to national security,' per a Commerce Department announcement. The ceremony on Tuesday honored Sen. Todd Young (R-IN); Rep. Jay Olbernolte (R-CA) and Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA); Vice Admiral Frank Whitworth, director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency; SandboxAQ CEO Jack Hidary; Patricia Falcone, deputy director for science and technology at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Ylli Bajraktari, president & CEO of SCSP and founder of AI + EXPO; and Booz Allen's Chief Technologist Joanna Guy, Space Llama Engineer Zane Price; and VP of AI Don Polaski. Alos honored was Father Paolo Benanti, Vatican adviser on AI ethics. The Washington AI Network was founded by Tammy Haddad. CNN anchor Sara Sidner emceed the event. In his speech, Lutnick also emphasized the need for the U.S. to remain the leader in AI, as he outlined parts of the administration's strategy to boost advanced manufacturing. 'The fact is that our adversaries are substantially behind us and we expect to keep them substantially behind us, but we want to bring our allies onto our side,' he said. Among other things, he talked of doubling the U.S. power capacity to meet the need for giant data centers. 'The power necessary to drive these data centers is awesome. It's awesome the amount of power they draw,' he said. 'And it can't be that the United States of America is balancing its citizens operating their refrigerator or a data center. That is just not a practical solution. So the practical solution would be to allow data center operators to build their own power generation sites adjacent to their data center.' Best of Deadline 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series 'Nine Perfect Strangers' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store