Trump thinks Zelenskyy ready to give up Crimea to Russia
USA - US President Donald Trump said he believed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was ready to concede Crimea to Russia as part of any ceasefire deal, as talks on a truce entered what Washington called a critical week on Monday.
Trump also stepped up pressure on Vladimir Putin, saying the Russian president should "stop shooting" and sign an agreement to end the grinding war that started with Moscow's February 2022 invasion.
Trump's comments came a day after he met Zelenskyy during the funeral of Pope Francis, breaking the ice after a major row between the US and Ukrainian leaders at the White House in February.
"Oh, I think so," Trump told reporters in Bedminster, New Jersey, when asked whether he thought Zelensky was ready to "give up" Crimea - despite the Ukrainian president repeatedly saying he never would.
Trump added that during their talks in the Vatican they had "briefly" discussed the fate of the Black Sea peninsula, which Moscow annexed in 2014.
AFP | Tetiana DZHAFAROVA
The 78-year-old US president, who boasted before his inauguration that he could halt Russia's invasion of Ukraine within one day, launched a diplomatic offensive to stop the fighting after taking office in January.
Kyiv and western allies have feared that Trump was pivoting towards Moscow's position.
But the US leader has appeared increasingly impatient with Putin in recent days.
Russia launched drone and missile attacks the night after the Vatican talks, killing four people in regions across eastern Ukraine and wounding more than a dozen.
- 'Stop shooting' -
"I want him to stop shooting, sit down, and sign a deal," Trump said Sunday when asked what he wanted from Putin. "We have the confines of a deal, I believe, and I want him to sign it."
The White House has said that without rapid progress, it could walk away from its role as a broker. Trump indicated that he would give the process "two weeks."
UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP | Handout
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier Sunday stressed the importance of the week ahead.
"We're close, but we're not close enough" to a deal to halt the fighting, Rubio told broadcaster NBC. "I think this is going to be a very critical week."
But there is still US frustration with both sides, as the war, which has devastated swaths of eastern Ukraine and killed tens of thousands of people, drags on.
Ukraine launched a "massive" drone attack on Russia's Bryansk region on Sunday, killing one civilian and injuring another, the regional governor said.
Washington has not revealed details of its peace plan, but has suggested freezing the front line and accepting Russian control of Crimea in exchange for an end to hostilities.
Russia claims to have annexed four eastern and southern territories of war-battered Ukraine since its full-scale invasion three years ago, despite not having full military control over them.
Russia holds about 20 percent of Ukraine's territory, including Crimea.
AFP | STRINGER
But Germany's Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Sunday that Ukraine should not agree to all the steps reportedly set out in the deal proposed by Trump.
Kyiv knew a ceasefire "may involve territorial concessions," Pistorius told broadcaster ARD. "But these will certainly not go... as far as they do in the latest proposal from the US president."
Europe has pushed for a bigger role in the Ukraine talks, with French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer joining Trump and Zelenskyy briefly for the meeting in Saint Peter's Basilica.
Rubio meanwhile had a phone call Sunday with Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, the foreign ministry in Moscow said.
The pair said there were "emerging prerequisites" for starting negotiations towards a long term peace, a statement said.
Russia insists on keeping the territory it has taken and demands the demilitarisation of Kyiv, plus an end to western support.
In a sign of the war's global dimensions, North Korea on Monday confirmed for the first time that it had deployed troops to Russia's Kursk region and said its soldiers had helped Moscow reclaim territory there.
Moscow over the weekend claimed the "liberation" of Kursk, where Kyiv launched a shock cross-border offensive in August 2024, hoping to use land there as a bargaining chip in any peace talks.
But Zelensky said Sunday that Ukraine's army was "maintaining our presence on Russian territory."
By Danny Kemp With Stanislav Doshchitsyn In Kyiv
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Justice in Kashmir is the only path to peace for Indian and Pakistan
Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated following a deadly attack in Kashmir. This article delves into the historical context of the Kashmir conflict and argues that true peace can only be achieved through justice for the Kashmiri people. Image: AFP Imraan Buccus Tensions between India and Pakistan soared following an attack On 22 April 2025, after militants opened fire on a group of mostly Hindu tourists in the Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians. The Indian government swiftly alleged Pakistani involvement—a claim for which no evidence has been provided. The Indian media followed suit, stoking nationalist fervour. In the days that followed, both sides engaged in military posturing and cross-border exchanges of fire. Now that the immediate crisis has passed, it is time to take a deeper look at the unresolved tragedy of Kashmir—one of the longest-running and most dangerous conflicts in modern history. What makes the current moment especially dangerous is the ideological nature of the regime in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP first came to power in 2014. Modi built his national standing with the far right following the anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat, where he was chief minister, in 2002. Under Modi's rule India has taken an openly authoritarian turn, built on a toxic cocktail of neoliberal economic policies and Hindu nationalism. The annexation of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019—stripping the region of its autonomy, dissolving its legislature, and imposing a sweeping military clampdown—was a key moment in the BJP's consolidation of power. It sent a clear message: for this government, Kashmiris are not equal participants in a democratic polity but a population to be subdued and ruled. The parallels with the occupation of Palestine are impossible to ignore. Like Israel, India seeks to dominate a territory whose people overwhelmingly reject its rule. It floods the area with soldiers and surveillance. It shuts down internet access. It detains thousands without trial. It promotes demographic change through settler policies, hoping to shift the region's character. And it silences dissent by branding it terrorism. This is not a project of democracy. It is a project of colonialism. One of the most searing literary accounts of Kashmir's anguish comes from Indian novelist and essayist Arundhati Roy, whose 2017 novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, is partly set in the valley. Through the voice of a Kashmiri militant, she captures both the trauma of military repression and the clarity of defiance. Reflecting on the use of pellet guns—non-lethal weapons deployed by Indian forces that have blinded hundreds of young Kashmiris—Roy writes: 'One day Kashmir will make India self‑destruct in the same way. You may have blinded all of us, every one of us, with your pellet guns by then. But you will still have eyes to see what you have done to us… You're not destroying us. You are constructing us. It's yourselves that you are destroying.' This haunting passage speaks not only to the physical brutality visited upon the Kashmiri people, but also to the long-term moral corrosion inflicted on the Indian state. The attempt to crush dissent with overwhelming force is, as Roy suggests, a form of slow national suicide—one that eats away at democracy from within. South African journalist Azad Essa, whose excellent book Hostile Homelands: The New Alliance Between India and Israel was published in 2023, maps the deepening strategic ties between the two states—from arms deals to surveillance systems and demographic policies. In an October 2024 interview, Essa observed: 'For example, in 2019, India essentially annexes Kashmir... Later, the Indian ambassador to the US makes a statement saying that they're going to build settlements in the territory, just as Israel has built settlements in Palestine.' Essa's book explores how converging ethno-nationalist logics—Hindutva in India and Zionism in Israel—are driving policies in both regions, from annexation and surveillance to demographic engineering. In both cases, the occupying power claims that it is the victim. And in both cases, any call for justice—any demand that the people of the land be given their basic political and human rights—is dismissed as extremism. When a Kashmiri teenager throws a stone, or a Palestinian farmer defends his land, it is cast as an existential threat to a nuclear state. This absurd logic holds because it is backed by power: military, economic, and increasingly, diplomatic. India's international image has shifted dramatically in the last two decades. Once a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement, it now seeks to be a junior partner to Western powers in the emerging strategic contest with China. As such, it benefits from the same impunity that shields Israeli aggression. While Pakistan grapples with significant internal challenges across the economic, political, security and terrorism sectors, the oppression of Kashmir by India remains a paramount concern. India's refusal to recognise the political aspirations of the Kashmiri people is rooted in a narrow, majoritarian nationalism that sees Indian Muslims in general—and Kashmiris in particular—as suspect, as not fully Indian, as a fifth column. The rise of Hindutva, or Hindu nationalist ideology, has made it almost impossible for even liberal voices inside India to advocate for justice in Kashmir without being labelled as traitors. Hindu nationalism is not merely a cultural or religious identity. It is a form of fascism that seeks to define the Indian state in terms of an exclusionary ethno-religious ideal. It treats secularism and pluralism as threats. It rewrites history to suit its mythologies. It demonises minorities, especially Muslims, and it weaponises the media, the courts, and the police. In this context, Kashmir becomes both a real place and a symbol—a place to be crushed to prove the supremacy of what is now understood as a Hindu nation. In South Africa, we have learned that peace cannot be built on injustice. The apartheid regime tried for decades to impose peace without justice. It failed. Our transition, for all its compromises, was grounded in the recognition that a lasting future required recognition, inclusion, and dignity for the oppressed. In Kashmir, as in Palestine, peace will only come when justice is done. This means supporting the demand for self-determination. It means ending military occupation. It means releasing political prisoners, restoring civil liberties, and ending the project of demographic change. South Africa has an important role to play here. Our history gives us a particular moral voice in the international arena. We have used it in relation to Palestine—and rightly so. We should do the same for Kashmir, the Congo and other countries suffering oppression. ** Dr Buccus is a research fellow at ASRI and at the University of the Free State *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of IOL or Independent Media IOL Opinion Dr Imraan Buccus Image: IOL
Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Attacking Iran, Israel brazenly defies 'man of peace' Trump
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Thursday implored Israel not to attack Iran and declared once again his goal was to be a peacemaker. Hours later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one of Trump's closest international allies, brazenly defied his advice by unleashing a major military campaign described as a "pre-emptive" strike against Iran's nuclear program. The attack marks only the latest setback for Trump's lofty goal set out at the start of his second term of being a "man of peace." Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has also boasted a warm relationship, has rebuffed his overtures on a ceasefire with Ukraine. And Israel resumed another massive offensive in Gaza after talks bogged down on extending a ceasefire with Hamas reached with Trump's support at the end of his predecessor Joe Biden's term. Trump's friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff - who has negotiated in all three crises - had been set to meet Iranian officials again Sunday in Oman. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement made clear the United States was not involved in attacking Iran and warned Tehran not to retaliate against US troops in the region. Rubio said that Israel advised that it attacked out of "self-defence," but conspicuously did not say if the United States agreed. Trump, hours before the strikes, doubled down with a social media post saying he remained "committed to a diplomatic resolution" on Iran. Netanyahu has described Iran's cleric-run government, which backs Hamas, as an existential threat and already last year ordered strikes that knocked out its air defences. "We've clearly seen a fork in the road in the American and Israeli approaches to this problem set," said Dana Stroul, a former senior Pentagon official who is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "These strikes are going to disrupt and delay and degrade Iran's nuclear program. The question, I think, is whether or not the United States and Israel in the future are going to work together on what to do to maximize the time that's put back on the clock," she said. INCREASINGLY AT ODDS Stroul noted that rifts had been building between Israel and Trump, who last month agreed to remove sanctions on Syria after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa swept into power. Trump embraced the new Syrian leader after appeals on a tour of Gulf Arab monarchies - which have also backed diplomacy on Iran. In Qatar last month, Trump said after meeting the emir that he believed a deal was in sight with Iran and that there would be no "nuclear dust" over the region. Despite growing disagreements, Israel enjoys robust support in Trump's right-wing base. The Trump administration in recent days has again taken lonely positions to back Israel, with the United States casting one of the only votes at the UN General Assembly against a Gaza ceasefire resolution and criticising top allies, including Britain, for imposing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers. Justin Logan, director of defence and foreign policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Israeli attack will "destroy US diplomatic efforts" on Iran and called for Trump to reject any US military role in protecting Israel from retaliation. "Israel has the right to choose its own foreign policy. At the same time, it has the responsibility to bear the costs of that policy," he said. But lawmakers in Trump's Republican Party quickly rallied behind Israel. Senator Tom Cotton said that the United States should "back Israel to the hilt, all the way," and topple Iran's Islamic Republic if it targets US troops. Trump's Democratic rivals, who mostly backed his diplomacy on Iran, were aghast at Israel's action on the eve of new US-Iran talks. "Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," said Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Forces Committee.
Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Judge blocks Trump's use of National Guard in protest-hit Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES - President Donald Trump will be "relieved of his command" of the California National Guard after a judge ruled his deployment of them to protest-hit Los Angeles was "illegal," Governor Gavin Newsom said Thursday as he notched a victory in his state's growing stand-off with the White House. Sporadic but spectacular violence that has rocked Los Angeles over days of demonstrations against immigration raids fell "far short" of the "rebellion" the president described to justify his extraordinary decision to send in the reserve force, US District Judge Charles Breyer ruled. Trump's actions "were illegal ... He must therefore return control" of the guardsmen to Newsom, Breyer said in the 36-page opinion. He stayed his order until 12:00 pm local time (1900 GMT) Friday, and the White House swiftly launched an appeal that could go all the way to the Supreme Court. But Newsom was quick to celebrate the victory - a much-needed win in just one of several fronts that the wealthy, Democratic state is currently fighting against the White House. "Donald Trump will be relieved of his command at noon tomorrow," Newsom said in televised comments after the ruling was issued. "He is not a monarch, he is not a king, and he should stop acting like one," the 57-year-old Democrat said. Protests over the immigration crackdown ordered by the Trump administration first began in Los Angeles on Friday and were largely confined to just a few blocks of the sprawling city. Damages include vandalism, looting, clashes with law enforcement and several torched driverless taxis. Trump, who has repeatedly exaggerated the scale of the unrest, deployed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to Los Angeles despite the objections of local officials, claiming that the city was "burning" and local officials had lost control. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard over the wishes of a state's governor. Critics have accused Trump of a power grab. But he has been unrepentant, taking credit Thursday for making Los Angeles "safe" and declaring that Newsom - a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 - had "totally lost control." Anger at Trump's crackdown and the use of masked, armed immigration agents, backed by uniformed soldiers, is rousing protests in other cities. 'REEKS OF TOTALITARIANISM' The ruling came after California's stand-off with the administration ratcheted up earlier Thursday, when a sitting US senator was handcuffed and forcibly removed from a press conference on the immigration raids. The shocking incident was slammed by furious Democrats who said it "reeks of totalitarianism." Video footage shows California Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat, being pushed from the room at a federal building in Los Angeles as he tried to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about the raids. "I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary," he said as two men grappled with him in front of journalists, including from AFP. Footage filmed by Padilla's staff outside the room shows the senator being pushed to the ground and handcuffed. "If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question... you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day labourers out in the Los Angeles community," Padilla said later. The incident "reeks of totalitarianism," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said, calling for an investigation. The White House hit back, claiming it was a "theatre-kid stunt" and claiming without evidence that Padilla "lunged toward Secretary Noem." California also sued Trump's administration Thursday over his move to scrap the state's tailpipe emission rules and its drive to phase out gas-powered cars. Trump was elected last year after promising to launch historic mass deportations. But with his mounting crackdown rippling through industries heavily reliant on immigrant labour, Trump said he had heard employers' complaints and hinted at a forthcoming policy shift. "We're going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think. We can't do that to our farmers, and leisure, too, hotels," he said. Breyer's ruling on the National Guard came two days ahead of the nationwide "No Kings" protests expected on Saturday, the same day Trump attends a highly unusual military parade in the US capital. The parade, featuring warplanes and tanks, has been organised to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the US Army, but also happens to be on the day of Trump's 79th birthday.
