‘The cavalry is here': Florida AG offers to help State Attorney Monique Worrell clear backlog
ORLANDO, Fla. — Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier offered Monday to provide additional prosecutors to Central Florida to help clear a backlog of cases, the latest development in an ongoing feud between the Gov. Ron DeSantis ally and Orange-Osceola State Attorney Monique Worrell.
'The cavalry is here,' he said at a news conference in Orlando as he stood alongside Orange County Sheriff John Mina. 'We've got a tiger team of prosecutors that we're going to be sending to help out.'
Uthmeier said he'll dispatch four prosecutors and a 'handful more,' though not the 13 Worrell said she needed to clear a backlog of 13,000 'nonarrest' cases, most of which she added may not be suitable for prosecution.
The attorney general's actions come after he criticized Worrell, a Democrat, for enacting a policy limiting the review of cases in which an alleged suspect has not been arrested — her approach to trimming the backlog.
The cases that will be reviewed under any circumstance, according to her office's three-page memo detailing the policy, are homicides, child abuse cases, economic crimes and trafficking offenses, among others. The rest, including misdemeanor cases and violent felonies, require at least an arrest warrant before they are to be taken on by prosecutors.
Worrell said last week she would be willing to rescind the policy if Uthmeier gave her the resources to handle the cases. Her office did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment but will hold a press conference at 2:30 p.m.
'I have a feeling our team is going to pack a heavy punch, and if there's truly an additional need for resources, if that's truly an accurate statement, then we'll look at helping her out further,' Uthmeier said.
The backlog of nonarrest cases dates back to former State Attorney Aramis Ayala's administration and has grown since then, Uthmeier said. Worrell, when announcing her policy to reporters, said a case backlog has been a problem for even longer — pointing to a 2013 news report from when Jeff Ashton was top prosecutor outlining his concerns.
Records show her policy was influenced by one put in place by neighboring Fifth Circuit State Attorney William Gladson, whose district covers five counties including Lake. That policy, implemented in 2021 to address a swelling backlog amid the COVID-19 pandemic, specifies several offenses prosecutors will review without an arrest, but requires an arrest for other offenses. Both policies encourage law enforcement to reach out to prosecutors with concerns about individual cases.
Uthmeier disputed that Gladson, a Republican, has a similar nonarrest policy. He said Gladson's policy doesn't list offenses that are not going to be prosecuted and with a smaller backlog of about 500 cases, his office has not turned any away nor has it requested assistance.
But Statewide Prosecutor Nick Cox called the backlog of 13,000 cases in Orange and Osceola counties a 'remarkable' number that needs to be dealt with.
'If we don't get this done, it's dangerous,' he said. 'It's a public safety issue and so we're glad to do anything we can to help.'
Mina, the only local law enforcement leader to publicly speak against Worrell's policy, thanked the state attorney for reaching out to Uthmeier's office for help.
'I know that's not an easy thing to do, but this is the right thing for Orange County, Osceola County and the Ninth Circuit here,' he said. 'We need to start working together to accept these cases, some very serious, and this is all about protecting the victims.'
Concerned with how these cases are being handled, he pointed to an example of a nonarrest case from March 21, involving a lurker in east Orlando. In that incident, according to a report shared with the Orlando Sentinel, a man who had been asked to leave a martial arts studio earlier that day returned and was observing children's classes. That man was then escorted out of the business and deputies were called, and an employee said he wished to press charges.
Despite the report saying there was probable cause to arrest the man for trespassing — a misdemeanor — he was not. The case was then forwarded to Worrell's office but was later rejected, Mina said. While the office's nonarrest policy says misdemeanors 'where no felony is alleged' are not eligible for review without an arrest, it further notes issuing a notice to appear in court for such crimes would then qualify it as an arrest case.
But even if deputies had sought a warrant, judges won't sign one for certain misdemeanors if officers didn't witness the offense, Mina added. Chief Judge Lisa Munyon told the Sentinel Florida law establishes the conditions to sign warrants in crimes where only a misdemeanor is alleged — and unless an arrest is made or the state attorney decides to the pursue the case, a warrant can only be signed when a summons is issued and returned unserved.
In other words, she said: 'It's not that we won't sign misdemeanor arrest warrants, it's that we can't.'
'Law enforcement is stuck in the middle,' Mina told reporters. If Worrell is 'not going to accept the cases and the judges won't review certain cases, then our victims are the ones suffering,' he added.
Worrell's policy sparked a back-and-forth between her and Uthmeier, renewing concerns from her allies that DeSantis is looking to again remove the state attorney from office. In 2023, she was suspended and replaced with Andrew Bain after she was accused of incompetence and neglect of duty, a move upheld by the Florida Supreme Court.
But then, Worrell handily beat Bain in last November's election. Weeks before taking office, she appeared to be the subject of a grand jury investigation but no charges have been brought and no update has been announced. When asked about that investigation on Monday, Uthmeier said he is not allowed to talk about it while DeSantis, who had a press event that same day, said he has no involvement with the proceedings.
But Uthmeier, who has called Worrell a 'Soros prosecutor,' denied his office is playing politics by going after her. DeSantis, meanwhile, said Worrell does not 'have the ability to pick and choose which laws you're going to enforce.'
'We're not running around the state looking for people to remove from office,' Uthmeier said. 'We're looking for people that aren't doing their job, and as a prosecutor, your job is simple: Put bad people away and keep Floridians safe. It's that simple. If you're willing to do that, I got no beef with you.'
-------------
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Keep it real and show the receipts': California Congresswoman on how to fight Trump's agenda
Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, who represents parts of Los Angeles and sits on the House Judiciary Committee, says Trump has 'created and manufactured violence in Los Angeles to distract from the Republican budget.' She joins the Weeknight to break down Trump's escalating use of force on protesters – and what the tactics are really about.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022
The federal courthouse in Tampa on June 11, 2025. (Photo by Mitch Perry/Florida Phoenix) Day Three of the federal lawsuit alleging that a Tampa Bay area state Senate district was racially gerrymandered focused in part on how that district was created in 2022. The suit, filed by the ACLU of Florida and the Civil Rights & Racial Justice Clinic at New York University on behalf of three residents of Tampa and St. Petersburg, alleges the Legislature packed Black voters into District 16 to reduce their influence in nearby District 18, in violation of their equal-protection rights. Democrat Darryl Rouson serves in SD 16, while Republican Nick DiCeglie is the incumbent in SD 18. The defendants are Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, and their attorneys began their defense on Wednesday, bringing Jay Ferrin back to the witness stand in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa. Ferrin is now a senior adviser to the Florida Senate, but he served as staff director of the Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment in the fall of 2021, when the districts lines were created. He discussed how he and his staff went about drawing up the Senate districts that year and the guidelines they followed. The reapportionment process beginning that fall was taking place under the guidance of Ray Rodrigues, who chaired the Senate Reapportionment Committee. Defense attorneys aired several Florida Channel video excerpts on Wednesday showing Rodrigues explaining how 'hard lessons were learned' following the Florida Supreme Court's decision in 2015 to throw out the GOP-controlled Legislature's maps after deeming them unlawful under the Fair Districts constitutional amendments adopted by voters in 2010. Rodrigues was insistent that he wanted the 2022 Legislature to conduct itself in such a fashion that the courts would not reject the maps lawmakers would produce. 'This map will withstand a court challenge,' Rodrigues declared on the floor of the Senate. That's what the trial taking place this week will ultimately determine. Ferrin testified that, after his staff created other Senate districts in the Tampa Bay area, there remained about 100,000 residents in Pinellas County who would have to be inserted into another Senate district. (With the population of Florida in 2021 at 21.5 million people, Ferrin said, his staff were tasked to draw approximately 538,438 voters into each of the 40 Senate districts). The resultant SD 16, which encompasses parts of St. Petersburg and Hillsborough County, is similar to the 'benchmark' map created in 2015 that was then known as Senate District 19. Ferrin denied that he was instructed to maintain that same configuration. He also said that under the rules promulgated by Rodrigues, he and his fellow staffers could speak about any new maps only with either the Senate's general counsel or other Senate members — and not the general public. He was not supposed to review public submissions. Florida senators were allowed to propose amendments during the reapportionment process, to add their own maps. Rodrigues and Democratic Sen. Audrey Gibson had filed such amendments, Ferrin said, but no senator had asked him to directly to create any Senate maps. ACLU attorney Nicholas Warren said at the beginning of the morning that he had sought to depose Rodrigues and fellow Republican and committee member Danny Burgess before the trial, but both had asserted legislative privilege, which shields them having to testify in certain lawsuits. In the afternoon, the defense called two expert witnesses who criticized the expert witness testimony and voting analysis that came from the plaintiffs on Tuesday. Steven Voss is a political science professor at the University of Kentucky. When asked to break down the political partisanship of the Tampa Bay area, he included four counties that make up the Tampa Bay metropolitan statistical area — Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk and Hernando. Based on population, he said, five Senate districts could be folded into the area, and that three historically were reliably Republican while two would favor Democrats. Currently, that breakdown is four Republican districts and one Democratic — with Senate District 14, which Voss said historically favored Democrats, going to the GOP in 2022. Voss took aim at the alternative voting maps produced for the ACLU by Penn State University professor of statistics Cory McCartan. Those maps showed that a district could have been fairly drawn up exclusively in Hillsborough County while still protecting Tier-1 standards there and in Pinellas County. (That involves the Florida Constitution's Fair District Amendment, which says that districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice). Voss said that the result of McCartan's work was that he was 'cracking and packing' voters in his maps to ultimately help Democrats at the voting booth. Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, also testified for the defense. He praised the composition of the Senate maps passed by the Legislature in 2022, saying it was 'pretty incompetent racial gerrymandering, if that's what's going on.' The trial is expected to conclude on Thursday. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
David Hogg exits DNC
David Hogg ended his 130-day tenure at the Democratic National Committee on Wednesday, opting not to run again for vice chair after DNC members voted to hold a re-vote for the job. 'I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters,' Hogg wrote in a letter announcing his decision. The news that Hogg would not seek the role again was first reported by Semafor. Hogg's decision ended a months-long saga that began with a botched Feb. 1 election, continued with a challenge by one of the Democrats who lost to him, and turned into a widely-covered argument about the future of the party. The 25-year-old Democrat, who frustrated some in the party when he told The New York Times that his political PAC would intervene in Democratic primaries, clashed with DNC Chair Ken Martin over a plan to bar that sort of politicking by committee members. 'I commend David for his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation,' Martin said in a statement. 'While I continue to believe he is a powerful voice for this party, I respect his decision to step back from his post as vice chair. I have no doubt that he will remain an important advocate for Democrats across the map. I appreciate his service as an officer, his hard work, and his dedication to the party.'Last month, the DNC's rules and bylaws committee recommended that the full party vote to hold new elections, siding with Democratic activist Kalyn Free, who'd lost the Feb. 1 election for vice chair. On Wednesday afternoon, the DNC announced that the party had voted to approve Free's challenge by a 294-99 margin, and would hold new elections on the grounds that the Feb. 1 vote had violated its rules. In the new election, under the party's gender parity rules, one vice chair slot would be reserved for a male candidate, and one slot could go to a candidate of any gender. Malcolm Kenyatta, who was elected to the male vice chair slot on Feb. 1, had won more votes than Hogg that day; Hogg won the second slot over Free and two other female candidates. The re-vote loomed as much more difficult for Hogg. On Thursday, California DNC members held a call about their plans for this week's votes. Most did not favor holding a new election. But if one was held, several members who had supported Hogg before intended to support someone else, with several favoring Washington state Democratic chair Shasti Conrad, the runner-up to Hogg in February. 'I appreciate that DNC members wanted to rectify the issues with balloting in the previous election,' Conrad told Semafor. 'I'm looking forward to putting this all behind us, and getting back to the work of electing Democrats.' On Sunday, Politico published audio of a May 15 meeting between DNC officers, including Hogg, where Martin said that the vice chair had 'essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to' at a crucial time for the party. Hogg denied being the source of the leak, but that weakened his position with party members further, with several saying on the record, and on social media, that Hogg could not be trusted. That led to Wednesday's lopsided online vote for a new election. Candidates who had competed for the roles in February were allowed to run again, and to submit one-minute videos making their cases. According to several DNC members, Hogg was the only potential candidate who did not submit a video. The online election for the male vice chair role will be held as scheduled, ending on Saturday. Kenyatta will be the only candidate on the ballot, and the election for the other vice chair role will be held between Sunday and all that? Hogg's win on Feb. 1 came at the end of a long day when DNC members agreed to rush their final vote and get it over with. No one in the room expected this to happen next. Hogg had been clear that he co-led The Future We Deserve, a PAC that spent money to elect Democratic candidates. Free had filed her challenge to the vote weeks later. But not until April 15, when Shane Goldmacher of The New York Times reported that the PAC could spend money on primary challengers, did this explode into a controversy. Martin, who himself had once endorsed candidates as the chair of Minnesota's Democratic Farmer-Labor Party, was dead set on a rule banning party members from doing that in the future. This was, in part, a legacy of the 2016 presidential primary, where Hillary Clinton's early support from party members infuriated supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who called the primary rigged — even though Clinton would end up with more votes and more delegates elected in the primaries and caucuses. Ahead of the 2020 primary, Democrats changed their rules to prevent 'superdelegates' (DNC members not elected in primaries) from voting on the first ballot at a national nominating convention. And before the 2024 primary, the DNC voted to endorse Joe Biden as its nominee — a decision that complicated things for any potential Biden challenger, and the three who did run. A few states opted not to hold primaries altogether, pledging their delegates to Biden — who, of course, ended up bowing out before the convention, after the most damaging debate in the history of presidential elections. When will Democrats get past the party's internal struggles, all of them distractions from the work of opposing the Trump administration and beating Republicans? Today, they hope. The Hogg drama really didn't have any effect on Democrats' ability to win elections this year, like Wisconsin's state supreme court race and an Iowa state Senate election that flipped back a GOP-held seat. As Martin said on the call, obtained by Politico's Holly Otterbein, the story made Democrats look bad, distracted from their work, and made life easier for Republicans. But Hogg made his point, one that a lot of Democrats do agree with: There are a great many elderly incumbents who aren't doing much for the party, and they create problems for the people they want to serve when they die in office instead of letting new talent rise the Times, Goldmacher has more on Hogg's decision. 'It is clear that there is a fundamental disagreement about the role of a Vice Chair — and it's OK to have disagreements. What isn't OK is allowing this to remain our focus when there is so much more we need to be focused on.' In Fast Company, before the vote, Devin Gordon talked to Hogg about what might happen with his challenge to the party.
