logo
Lukashenko extends three-decade rule in election denounced by West

Lukashenko extends three-decade rule in election denounced by West

Yahoo26-01-2025

Belarus autocrat Alexander Lukashenko, in power since 1994, won a seventh consecutive term in office Sunday in an election denounced by the European Union and the exiled opposition.
With his opponents in prison or exiled, the 70-year-old ruler appeared to have won 87.6 percent of the vote according to an official exit poll.
Lukashenko has orchestrated a ruthless crackdown on opponents since huge protests against him in 2020. This time around, the candidates picked to run against him actually campaigned in his favour.
Exiled opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya called the election a "farce", while the EU described it as a "sham".
Lukashenko, however, said he did not care whether or not the bloc recognised the results.
And he had "no regrets" over letting his "older brother" Russian President Vladimir Putin's troops enter Ukraine through Belarus in 2022 -- despite hundreds of thousands of deaths in the three-year conflict.
The vote took place five years into unprecedented repression in Belarus, during which time rights groups say the country has jailed more than 1,200 political prisoners.
In Sunday's election victory he won more of the vote than in 2020, when he won 81.04 percent.
- The 'illusion of choice' -
Belarus's 2020 election ended in nationwide protests with demonstrators accusing Lukashenko of rigging the vote.
Tens of thousands of Belarusians fled their country in the aftermath of the 2020 protests as the KGB embarked on a repression spree, mainly to neighbouring Poland and Lithuania.
Lukashenko said Sunday his opponents were behind bars or abroad out of choice.
"Some chose prison, some exile," he said.
"If it is prison then it's those who opened their mouths too widely," he added.
Repenting and asking for pardon were preconditions for any prisoner releases, he said during a news conference that lasted four hours and 25 minutes.
In Warsaw, home to many exiled Belarusians, opposition leader Tikhanovskaya described Lukashenko as a "criminal who has seized power".
Many people wore masks and some refused to speak to AFP, explaining they had relatives in Belarus and criticism could make trouble for them.
"It's just a country with the illusion of choice," 22-year-old student Aliaxandra said, adding that some of her countrymen had been living in fear "for decades".
Tikhanovskaya told AFP in an interview this month she wanted dissidents to be ready for an opportunity for change in Belarus. But she admitted that it was "not the moment".
- 'Peace in this country' -
Her allies in Belarus are held in harsh prisons -- often incommunicado and in isolation.
Lukashenko accused imprisoned protest leader Maria Kolesnikova -- who tore up her passport during a forced deportation by the KGB in 2020 -- of "breaking" prison rules.
He said he personally gave the order for Kolesnikova to be "shown to the people" last November -- when photos of her were released in a first sign of life for over a year.
Fears for the health of Kolesnikova -- who was hospitalised while in prison -- have risen for months, but Lukashenko said: "She is fine."
Most people in the landlocked country have only distant memories of life before Lukashenko, who was 39 when he won the first national election after Belarus gained independence from the Soviet Union.
Criticism of the strongman is banned. Most people AFP spoke to in Minsk and other towns voiced support for him.
In Minsk, 74-year-old pensioner Nadezhda Guzhalovskaya said she voted for Lukashenko due to a lack of other options.
"Maybe everything here is not perfect, we don't have democracy," admitted Guzhalovskaya.
But Irina Lebedeva said that "thanks to our president there is peace in this country," repeating the government's position that the 2020 street protest leaders had created chaos.
- Reliant on Russia -
The United Nations estimates that some 300,000 Belarusians have left the country since 2020 out of a population of nine million.
They will not be able to cast ballots, with Belarus having scrapped voting abroad.
In the run-up to the election, the Lukashenko administration pardoned around 200 political prisoners.
But former inmates told AFP those released were under the close watch of security services and unable to lead a normal life.
Known as "Europe's last dictator" -- a nickname he embraces -- Lukashenko's Belarus has retained much of the Soviet Union's traditions and infrastructure.
If he completes his term, which would finish in 2030, he will have been in power for 36 years.
bur-rbj-oc/jj

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia warns US not to help Israel militarily against Iran
Russia warns US not to help Israel militarily against Iran

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Russia warns US not to help Israel militarily against Iran

MOSCOW (Reuters) -Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov warned on Wednesday that direct U.S. military assistance to Israel could radically destabilise the situation in the Middle East, where an air war between Iran and Israel has raged for six days. In separate comments, the head of Russia's SVR foreign intelligence service, Sergei Naryshkin, was quoted as saying that the situation between Iran and Israel was now critical. Ryabkov warned the U.S. against direct military assistance to Israel or even considering such "speculative options," according to Russia's Interfax news agency. "This would be a step that would radically destabilise the entire situation," it cited him as saying. Earlier, a source familiar with U.S. internal discussions said President Donald Trump and his team were considering a number of options, including joining Israel in strikes against Iranian nuclear sites. On Tuesday, Trump openly mused on social media about killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but said "We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." Israel launched air strikes last Friday against Iran's nuclear sites, scientists and top military leaders in a surprise attack that Russia condemned as unprovoked and illegal. Iran has responded with missile and drone attacks on Israeli cities. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who in January signed a strategic partnership treaty with Iran, has called for a cessation of hostilities between the two sides.

Belgian officials go after a 92-year-old diplomat for his role in the murder of Patrice Lumumba
Belgian officials go after a 92-year-old diplomat for his role in the murder of Patrice Lumumba

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Belgian officials go after a 92-year-old diplomat for his role in the murder of Patrice Lumumba

Belgian prosecutors are looking to take Etienne Davignon (92), a former diplomat who was allegedly involved in the murder of the Congolese revolutionary, Patrice Lumumba. Belgian prosecutors are investigating Etienne Davignon's involvement in Patrice Lumumba's murder. Accusations center on unlawful detention and degrading treatment of Lumumba prior to his execution. Davignon was a trainee diplomat at the time and is the sole survivor among the suspects. According to the prosecutor's office, the accused was involved in the "unlawful detention and transfer" of the former Congolese head of state, who was wrongly imprisoned and subjected to "humiliating and degrading treatment". AFP news agency disclosed that Davignon is the only survivor of ten Belgians who are suspected of being engaged in Lumumba's assassination. He held the position of vice-chairman of the European Commission throughout the 1980s and was a trainee diplomat at the time of the killing. As reported by the BBC, in 2011, Lumumba's children filed a complaint in Belgium to seek justice for their father's murder at the age of 35. A hearing is scheduled for January 2026 to determine if he should go to trial. The news was welcomed by Juliana, Lumumba's daughter, who told Belgian network RTBF: "We're moving in the right direction. What we're seeking is, first and foremost, the truth." Life of Patrice Lumumba Patrice Lumumba, born in 1925 in the Belgian Congo, was a fierce anti-colonial leader and the first Prime Minister of an independent Congo. A powerful orator and visionary, he led the Congolese National Movement and played a central role in securing the country's independence from Belgium on June 30, 1960. His passionate Independence Day speech, in which he denounced the cruelty of Belgian colonialism, shocked Western leaders and marked him as a threat to foreign interests. Within months of independence, Congo descended into crisis. The mineral-rich Katanga province, backed by Belgian interests, declared secession. As Lumumba sought Soviet assistance to defend Congo's unity, Western powers, including the U.S. and Belgium, grew increasingly hostile. He was soon overthrown in a coup led by Colonel Joseph Mobutu, who had Western backing. Lumumba was arrested, humiliated, and eventually handed over to Katangan secessionists. On January 17, 1961, he was executed by firing squad alongside two allies. His body was dismembered and dissolved in acid to prevent a grave from becoming a rallying point. Foreign complicity in his death is widely acknowledged today. Patrice Lumumba remains a martyr of African liberation, his life and brutal killing symbolize the deep struggles Africa faced in shaking off the chains of colonialism.

Five reasons Trump should renew US engagement in NATO
Five reasons Trump should renew US engagement in NATO

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Five reasons Trump should renew US engagement in NATO

At next week's NATO Annual Summit in the Netherlands, leaders of the 32 alliance members will come together to discuss priorities and the way ahead for NATO at a time when Russia and China pose pressing security threats. President Trump should pivot towards strengthening the transatlantic organization — here are the five reasons why. First, Russian President Vladimir Putin is playing the United States. He does not want peace in Ukraine. Russia is the antagonist in this conflict, and conditions for Ukraine are slowly worsening with each passing day. To end this trajectory, options are to punish Russia financially or to strengthen Ukraine militarily. Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) recently met with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and wholeheartedly believe Putin is preparing for a new offensive, despite the high costs. More to the point, a June 2 meeting between Ukrainian and Russian officials in Istanbul, ostensibly to end the war, ended abruptly after less than 90 minutes with no real discussion about peace. If Trump draws back from the negotiations without demonstrating strength towards Russia, Putin will get exactly what he wants — in the end, control over Ukraine and a reformatting of Europe's security structure. Second, NATO has stood by the U.S., and Trump should be proud to return the favor with respect to transatlantic security. The only time NATO invoked Article V (treating an attack on one member as an attack on all) was right after the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. If the U.S. fails to remain engaged in NATO, the world could see an escalation to the war more broadly on the European continent. Europe will take more responsibility for its own security, but it needs time to build credible conventional forces and will still depend on the U.S. nuclear umbrella. Trade between the U.S. and the European Union is one of the most expansive in terms of absolute dollars on the global stage coming in at $975 billion in 2024. Market disruptions would be cataclysmic if war expanded to include countries on NATO's eastern flank. Russia will seek to test the resolve of the alliance if it perceives that the U.S. is doubting its commitments. Accordingly, the U.S. must maintain at least a credible forward presence of its military alongside our allies to deter Russia's ambitions from moving westward and strongly uphold Article V. The alternative hurt both the U.S. and European Union economically. Third, a robust relationship with NATO will leave Trump with a freer hand to deal with China. Continuous Chinese military capability and capacities are an increasing threat. On one side, China wants to be a large economic partner to both Europe and the U.S. On the other hand, its security policy actions are detrimental to a constructive relationship with the West. The strategic partnership between China and Russia should be monitored closely — not least the Chinese support enabling Russia's war in Ukraine. U.S. engagement with NATO will improve coordination to deal with this dual threat. Fourth, NATO engagement will provide the U.S. with improved collective intelligence sharing. Joint and combined Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance is an important capability to forewarn NATO (including the U.S.) of impending threats. Moreover, NATO members each have unique intelligence gathering capabilities and, as was the case in the leadup to the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, NATO countries should be transparent with the processed intelligence they prepare. Unlike China and Russia, the U.S. benefits from a wide intelligence network, and this collective intelligence sharing could be quite useful regarding antagonistic states, terrorism and President Trump's Golden Dome initiative. U.S. engagement at the summit should press NATO countries to continue to be transparent with intelligence sharing, especially on threats to Alliance member countries. Fifth, NATO engagement will help enhance cyber capabilities — another asymmetric capability that all adversaries of the United States use, as highlighted in the most recent Annual Threat Assessment. Moving beyond cyber defense, discussion at The Hague Summit should press for computer network operations, and more specifically computer network attack and computer network exploitation capabilities. Adversaries such as Russia and questionable actors such as China are using these tools against NATO members and allies alike. Not only does NATO benefit, but all member countries, especially the United States, would realize advantages as well. The fact that the NATO alliance has survived more than 75 years is quite significant. That said, the alliance cannot rest on its laurels. The U.S. plays a pivotal part in moving forward with serious discussion regarding these five issues. The security of both the U.S. and Europe is at stake. Tom Røseth, Ph.D. is an associate professor at the Norwegian Defence University College and founder of its Ukraine Program. He is coauthor of 'The 'Five Eyes' Intelligence Sharing Relationship: A Contemporary Perspective.' John Weaver, DPA, is a professor of Intelligence Analysis at York College and author of 'NATO in Contemporary Times: Purpose, Relevance, Future.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store