logo
Applicant claims employer requested full-body photo for recruitment, calling the requirement 'relevant' , Singapore News

Applicant claims employer requested full-body photo for recruitment, calling the requirement 'relevant' , Singapore News

AsiaOne3 days ago

While applying for a job in a cafe recently, a second-year university student was asked to send a full-body photo as "part of the application process".
The 19-year-old, who only wanted to be known as Cheryl, had previously applied for jobs in the food and beverage industry here, but she claimed that this was the first time an employer had made such a request — something she found disturbing.
Currently on her semester break, Cheryl, who is from Indonesia, told AsiaOne that she had applied to several recruitment agencies before finally receiving a response from recruitment platform, FastJobs.
Excited about the upcoming job opportunity, she contacted the manager of a cafe located at Dhoby Ghaut to ask for more information.
Upon reaching out, the manager requested a full-body photo of her along with her height, explaining that it was part of the recruitment process.
'Too ugly cannot, too pretty also cannot'
'This is a job interview (and) we need photos. Too fat cannot, too skinny cannot. Too ugly cannot too pretty also cannot. So we will have to see,' the manager replied through an audio message.
'If you go for job interview, every interviewer will want to see your photo. Photos for (a) job interview is 100 per cent relevant.'
Speaking to AsiaOne, Cheryl, who did not want to reveal the cafe's name, said she felt deeply uncomfortable with the response and immediately blocked the individual.
She added that while she felt disappointed about losing the opportunity, she believed she made the right decision to step away from the situation, as she did not want to risk being taken advantage of.
The audio recordings from the manager which were posted on Cheryl's TikTok account and have since garnered over 256K views and 12.4K shares as at May 26.
Since the post, FastJobs has reached out to Cheryl to address the matter, before issuing a public statement on the incident.
In a Facebook post uploaded by FastJobs on Friday (May 23), a spokesperson addressed the video that has been circulating online, which has since raised concerns about unfair hiring practices.
"We do not support or condone any form of discrimination or mistreatment during the hiring process," the platform said.
"If you ever come across job listings or employers on our platform who don't reflect the values of fairness and respect, please let us know. We take all feedback seriously and will take appropriate action to ensure our platform remains safe and inclusive."
FastJobs added that it will continue to work closely with relevant stakeholders to uphold standards and ensure the platform remains a trusted and secure space for all users. Does appearance really matter?
Cheryl's story highlights a common concern among job seekers — whether appearance still plays a role in one's career.
Responding to queries from AsiaOne, several human resource agencies shared their views on whether such practices are common and if they are considered acceptable within the industry.
Joerin Yao, HR practice leader at Enable Consulting, emphasised that requesting photos are appropriate only at the point of offer and must be accompanied by an explanation of their purpose.
"Based on fair employment practices outlined by the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (Tafep), such recruitments should only be done for clear and legitimate reasons," said Yao.
"Otherwise, asking for photos during the selection or evaluation stages may be perceived as discriminatory."
Wong KJ, a human resource specialist at a local firm, also weighed in on the topic, noting that fair employment practices state that recruitment should be based on merit, skills experience or the ability to perform the job.
"However, we understand that some roles require specific physical attributes. For example, air stewards need to meet certain height requirements to assist customers with placing luggage in overhead compartments," said Wong.
Charmaine Choo, Director of HR and Partnerships at Execup HR Consulting, highlighted that while the primary focus of recruitment is on qualifications, skills, and experience, some roles do take other factors into account.
"While our primary focus in recruitment remains on skills, experience, and qualifications, in certain roles particularly those involving customer interaction or brand representation—appearance may be considered as part of the overall impression," said Choo.
Despite that, Choo concluded that factors such as nationality, gender identity, or other personal attributes should not affect job eligibility.
"It's worth noting that while appearance may be a consideration in some hiring decisions, continued employment ultimately depends on an individual's ability to carry out the role effectively."
[[nid:709554]]
xingying.koh@asiaone.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US to ban foreign officials over ‘flagrant censorship' on social media
US to ban foreign officials over ‘flagrant censorship' on social media

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

US to ban foreign officials over ‘flagrant censorship' on social media

[WASHINGTON] The US will impose visa bans on foreign nationals it deems to be censoring Americans, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Wednesday, and he suggested the new policy could target officials regulating US tech companies. Rubio did not name any specific instances of censorship. But US tech companies and the Trump administration have challenged US allies in Europe, alleging censorship of social media platforms. Restricting officials from visiting the US appeared to be an escalation by Washington. Rubio said in a statement that a new visa restriction policy would apply to foreign nationals responsible for censorship of protected expression in the US. He said it was unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants for social media posts made on US soil. 'It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States,' Rubio said. Some foreign officials have taken 'flagrant censorship actions against US tech companies and US citizens and residents when they have no authority to do so,' Rubio said. US social media companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have said an EU content moderation law, the Digital Services Act, amounts to censorship of their platforms. The Trump-appointed chairman of the US Federal Communications Commission in March warned the EU Digital Services Act excessively restricts freedom of expression. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In January, Meta said it would end its US fact-checking programme in favour of community notes on controversial posts, but the company continues fact checking elsewhere, including in Europe and Latin America. EU regulators have issued preliminary findings that X, the platform owned by Trump-ally Elon Musk that also relies on community notes, saying it breached the bloc's content moderation rules. EU officials have defended the Digital Services Act, which is meant to make the online environment safer and fairer by compelling tech giants to do more to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material. A European Commission spokesperson said commissioners were aware of Rubio's announcement, which 'seems to be of a general nature.' The spokesperson declined to comment further. The EU has been seeking a trade deal with Washington to avoid President Donald Trump's threatened 50 per cent tariffs on European imports. Rubio's announcement came just before he met with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul in Washington. Europe 'a hotbed of digital censorship' Trump officials have repeatedly weighed in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing politicians, including in Romania, Germany and France, accusing European authorities of censoring views like criticism of immigration in the name of countering disinformation. In April, Rubio shut down a State Department office that had sought to counter foreign disinformation, accusing it of censorship and wasting US taxpayer money. In a social media post on Wednesday, Rubio added, 'Whether in Latin America, Europe, or elsewhere, the days of passive treatment for those who work to undermine the rights of Americans are over.' Rubio did not name specific countries or individuals that would be targeted. Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has clashed with X over compliance with orders to take down accounts accused of spreading misinformation. Trump's media company, along with video sharing platform Rumble, has also sued the judge over an order to remove the accounts of Allan dos Santos, a US-based supporter of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Chris Pavlovski, CEO of Rumble, welcomed the visa ban policy on Wednesday. 'As Rumble has experienced, these enemies of free speech from around the world try to reach into America and supersede the First Amendment,' he said in a statement. The Brazilian government is waiting to fully understand who could be targeted by the ban and what its scope would be, a government source told Reuters on condition of anonymity. The Trump administration has repeatedly called out European nations for supposed censorship of online content. Vice-President JD Vance denounced content moderation while in Paris in February, calling it 'authoritarian censorship.' Rubio has said threats to free speech are an attack on shared values that are important to US-European relationship and said the issue was being raised in diplomacy with both the EU and Britain. Officials from the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor are separately visiting EU members France and Ireland this week to press those governments on freedom of expression, a State Department official told Reuters, requesting anonymity. An op-ed by Samuel Samson, senior advisor for that bureau, accused Britain and Germany of censoring online speech and said the EU Digital Services Act was 'used to silence dissident voices through Orwellian content moderation.' He also cited Britain's jailing of two anti-abortion activists. 'Far from strengthening democratic principles, Europe has devolved into a hotbed of digital censorship, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom, and numerous other assaults on democratic self-governance,' Samson wrote. REUTERS

Audrey Fang case: Spanish judge blocks suspect's deportation to S'pore over death penalty concerns
Audrey Fang case: Spanish judge blocks suspect's deportation to S'pore over death penalty concerns

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Audrey Fang case: Spanish judge blocks suspect's deportation to S'pore over death penalty concerns

Singaporean Mitchell Ong (left) was arrested in Spain in April 2024 after Ms Audrey Fang's body was found with multiple stab wounds. PHOTOS: STRONGESTASIAN/INSTAGRAM, FANG DIROU/FACEBOOK SINGAPORE - An attempt by Spanish immigration authorities to deport Mitchell Ong, the suspect in the fatal stabbing of fellow Singaporean Audrey Fang in Spain, was blocked by a local court over death penalty concerns. As such, it is unlikely for the 44-year-old to face the death penalty if charged with murder, as a murder charge in Spain carries a jail sentence ranging from 15 years to 25 years. News of the deportation request being blocked was first reported by Spanish daily La Opinion de Murcia on May 28. The deportation request was made by Spain's General Commissariat for Aliens and Borders, a national police agency that manages immigration and border control matters, and was supported by the lawyer representing Ms Fang's family. However, a judge ruled that Ong did not meet the criteria outlined in Spain's laws pertaining to the expulsion of foreigners, one of which states that immediate deportation can take place if an individual has been charged for a crime with a jail sentence fewer than six years, or given an alternate sentencing, such as a fine. Ong's lawyer, Ms Maria Jesus Ruiz de Castaneda, had told The Straits Times earlier in May that she is opposing the request. If the deportation had gone through, the Spanish immigration authority had also requested that Ong be banned from returning to Spain for 10 years. Ms Ruiz de Castaneda had also earlier told Spanish media that an expulsion would be a violation of the rule of law and international treaties Spain has signed and ratified. 'He is involved in ongoing criminal proceedings in Spain, where he must be tried with due process,' she said. 'Expulsion would be contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights, the principle of non-refoulement and Spain's commitments against the death penalty.' She had previously called for the case to be dismissed, saying all necessary evidence had to be examined and that Ong 'firmly and consistently' insisted he did not kill Ms Fang. The 39-year-old architect was found dead near a parking lot for lorries in the town of Abanilla on April 10, 2024. She left Singapore on April 4 to travel alone to Xabia in the Valencia region of Spain, and was supposed to return eight days later, but became uncontactable on April 10. Her body was found with knife wounds and head trauma, and Ong was arrested six days later. Testimonies from two of Ms Fang's friends on June 26, 2024, said that Ms Fang and Ong had met on a social dating network, with her family's lawyer saying that she had told her friends she was meeting the former insurance agent during her holiday in Spain. In March, La Opinion reported that DNA from two men was found on her clothes, raising the possibility that more than one person was involved in her death. Ong meanwhile was also found to have been nominated as the sole beneficiary of Ms Fang's Central Provident Fund savings, with the accounts reportedly containing about $498,000. ST has contacted the Ministry of Home Affairs for comment. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Indonesia antitrust agency finds risk of monopoly from TikTok's Tokopedia takeover
Indonesia antitrust agency finds risk of monopoly from TikTok's Tokopedia takeover

Business Times

time14 hours ago

  • Business Times

Indonesia antitrust agency finds risk of monopoly from TikTok's Tokopedia takeover

[JAKARTA] Indonesia's antitrust agency on Wednesday (May 28) said last year's takeover of the country's biggest e-commerce platform Tokopedia by TikTok carried a risk of monopoly. TikTok, owned by China's ByteDance, in January 2024 completed a deal to buy 75.01 per cent of Tokopedia for US$840 million from GoTo. The antitrust agency said it had found during its investigation process a significant increase in market concentration and the possibility of post-acquisition price increases due to market dominance. TikTok declined to comment while Tokopedia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The antitrust agency has power to investigate and determine violations of competition law and impose fines or issue administrative sanctions, based on their findings. The agency listed several requirements for TikTok and Tokopedia, including ensuring open methods for payment and logistics and prohibition of self-preferencing and predatory pricing practices. It also asked the companies to provide monthly reports every three months for two years, as well as lists and agreement documents of logistics and payment partner companies both before and after the acquisition. The next hearing is on Jun 10. TikTok was forced to close its relatively new e-commerce service, TikTok Shop, in Indonesia after the country banned online shopping on social media platforms in September last year, citing the need to protect smaller merchants and users' data. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store