
In Trump's telling, a resolution in Ukraine is always two weeks away
It's been a long two weeks.
Since at least the end of April, President Donald Trump has been telling reporters he will decide what to do in Ukraine in two weeks, using the timeframe over and over to suggest he is close to a final assessment on how to proceed.
It is not a new tactic. Trump has been setting two-week deadlines since at least the start of his first term in 2017 — for policy plans, long-awaited decisions or unspecified major announcements. Many never arrived.
Now, as Trump faces a decision on whether to apply new sanctions on Moscow or to walk away altogether from efforts to broker peace, he again says it will take a fortnight to determine whether his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin is serious about ending the war in Ukraine.
'We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not. And if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently,' Trump said Wednesday when questioned in the Oval Office about Putin's intentions. 'But it'll take about a week and a half, two weeks.'
Trump did not say what, exactly, he was waiting to learn in the next two weeks that would cause him to finalize his assessment of the Russian leader. Nor did he say exactly what he was prepared to do when the deadline was up.
How to end the seemingly intractable war in Ukraine has become one of the major conundrum's of Trump's presidency. To his deep frustration, the conflict has proved more difficult to resolve than he expected.
As far back as April 24, Trump suggested a reporter follow up – in two weeks – with their question about continued military assistance in Ukraine.
'Let's see what happens,' he said. 'You can ask that question in two weeks, and we'll see.'
Three days later, it was as if no time had passed.
'We'll let you know in about two weeks,' he told a reporter that day who asked whether he trusted the Russian president.
As it turned out, Wednesday was exactly two weeks from another of Trump's assertions, on May 14, that he would soon provide an update on whether Putin was 'tapping him along.'
'I'll let you know in a week,' he told reporters on Air Force One. 'I'll let you know in a few days.'
About a week after that, on May 19, he said it would take another two weeks to determine whether Ukraine was doing enough to end the conflict.
'I'd rather tell you in about two weeks from now because I can't say yes or no,' he said.
Trump and his team have been exasperated over the last week waiting for Moscow to produce a memorandum laying out its position on potential peace talks. The Kremlin said Wednesday the document was finished, and that it would present it to Ukraine during a round of talks in Istanbul next week.
But there was little to indicate any new breakthroughs were imminent in ending the conflict.
The plodding pace of talks has led Trump to worry Putin could be dragging things out. Yet the US president has, so far, stopped short of imposing sanctions or taking other action. He acknowledged this week there was more he could do.
'What Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'He's playing with fire!'
Even as Trump continues to mull new sanctions on Moscow, potentially targeting the banking or energy sectors, he voiced concern new measures could push Putin away from talks.
'If I think I'm close to getting a deal, I don't want to screw it up by doing that,' he said Wednesday, suggesting he remains undecided on whether to move ahead with the various options his team has drawn up.
He has also weighed walking away altogether from his attempts to mediate the war if it appears the two sides' differences cannot be bridged. His top lieutenants have said at various points over the last month that time is growing short for any American role in ending the war.
'I think this is going to be a very critical week. This week is going to be really important week in which we have to make a determination about whether this is an endeavor that we want to continue to be involved in,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio told an NBC interviewer on April 27.
If a determination was made the following week, it wasn't made public.
Instead, Trump has tried to keep his options open while still attempting to distance himself from the war. After speaking with Putin by telephone last week, he said it would be up to Ukraine and Russia to resolve their differences.
He told European leaders the same day he would not join them in applying new sanctions – at least for now. And he said in his view, Putin believed he was winning the war.
Yet by the following Sunday, he'd grown frustrated again with the Russian leader, who had launched the biggest aerial assault of the 3-year war on multiple Ukrainian cities, including the capital Kyiv.
'I don't know what the hell happened to Putin,' Trump bemoaned, claiming his counterpart had changed over time.
In fact, a changed Putin is precisely what many European leaders have been warning Trump of for months, even before he returned to office. In December, as Trump visited Paris for the reopening of Notre-Dame Cathedral, French President Emmanuel Macron tried telling him the Russian leader he got to know during his first term in office was not the same man.
He hadn't appeared to internalize the warnings until this week, when he deemed Putin had gone 'absolutely CRAZY.' On Wednesday, he insisted his forceful new tone was itself a strong rebuke of Moscow, even absent new sanctions.
'The words speak pretty loud,' he insisted. 'We're not happy about that situation.'
But when asked whether he still believed Putin wanted the war to end, he said he would need more time.
'I can't tell you that,' he said, 'but I'll let you know in about two weeks.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Balfour Beatty plc's (LON:BBY) Latest Stock Performance A Reflection Of Its Financial Health?
Most readers would already be aware that Balfour Beatty's (LON:BBY) stock increased significantly by 9.2% over the past month. Since the market usually pay for a company's long-term fundamentals, we decided to study the company's key performance indicators to see if they could be influencing the market. Specifically, we decided to study Balfour Beatty's ROE in this article. ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. The formula for ROE is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Balfour Beatty is: 16% = UK£178m ÷ UK£1.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. So, this means that for every £1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of £0.16. See our latest analysis for Balfour Beatty Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features. At first glance, Balfour Beatty seems to have a decent ROE. Further, the company's ROE is similar to the industry average of 15%. This certainly adds some context to Balfour Beatty's exceptional 22% net income growth seen over the past five years. We reckon that there could also be other factors at play here. For example, it is possible that the company's management has made some good strategic decisions, or that the company has a low payout ratio. Next, on comparing Balfour Beatty's net income growth with the industry, we found that the company's reported growth is similar to the industry average growth rate of 22% over the last few years. Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Has the market priced in the future outlook for BBY? You can find out in our latest intrinsic value infographic research report. Balfour Beatty has a three-year median payout ratio of 30% (where it is retaining 70% of its income) which is not too low or not too high. By the looks of it, the dividend is well covered and Balfour Beatty is reinvesting its profits efficiently as evidenced by its exceptional growth which we discussed above. Moreover, Balfour Beatty is determined to keep sharing its profits with shareholders which we infer from its long history of nine years of paying a dividend. Upon studying the latest analysts' consensus data, we found that the company is expected to keep paying out approximately 31% of its profits over the next three years. As a result, Balfour Beatty's ROE is not expected to change by much either, which we inferred from the analyst estimate of 15% for future ROE. Overall, we are quite pleased with Balfour Beatty's performance. Specifically, we like that the company is reinvesting a huge chunk of its profits at a high rate of return. This of course has caused the company to see substantial growth in its earnings. That being so, a study of the latest analyst forecasts show that the company is expected to see a slowdown in its future earnings growth. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
England's Euro 2025 squad: Who's on the plane and who's got work to do?
England head into Euro 2025 as reigning champions as the Lionesses seek to win a second consecutive European crown. Sarina Wiegman's side will have to be sharp from their first match in Switzerland, after being drawn alongside France, the Netherlands and Wales in Group D of the July tournament. England won the Euros on home soil three years ago and then reached the World Cup final the following year, so come into the competition with plenty of major tournament experience. A number of star players from England's historic triumph will return but there are plenty of new faces competing for their places, too, as well as a couple of major injury concerns. Advertisement As it stands, England are preparing to name a 23-player squad for the Euros, although Uefa increased the maximum squad size to 26 ahead of the men's Euros last summer and may opt to mirror it for the women's tournament. There is less than one week to go until England have to name their squad for the Euros, so here's a look at how Wiegman's plans are shaping up ahead of their opening match against France in Zurich on Saturday 5 July. On the plane Lucy Bronze Key to setting a winning mentality among the squad, Bronze is set to represent her country at a seventh major tournament. The 33-year-old's competitive edge is as sharp as ever and she remains England's first-choice right back. Advertisement Leah Williamson The captain of the Lionesses when they won the Euros, Williamson was forced to sit out of the World Cup after suffering an ACL injury. Now back as skipper, the Arsenal centre-back is a leader off and on the pitch. Showed she remains one of the best in the world with a remarkable display in Arsenal's Champions League victory over Barcelona. Millie Bright Bright recovered from her own knee injury to stand as England's defensive rock at the last World Cup. An invaluable presence as England's vice-captain, who remains key to Chelsea's dominance domestically. Has withdrawn from the Nations League squad for games against Portugal and Spain to take an extended break and allow a period of recovery. Advertisement Keira Walsh Back in England having signed for Chelsea after a successful two-and-a-half-year spell at Barcelona. Walsh's ability to set the tempo in midfield helped Barca to back-to-back Champions Leagues titles. On her day, she is one of the best in the world in her position. Alessia Russo England's super-sub in the Euros, who shone as a starter at the World Cup. The Arsenal striker's record at major tournaments is impressive, with seven goals across her appearances at the Euros and World Cup, and she will lead the line again as No 9 after a brilliant season for the Gunners that saw her win the WSL Golden Boot award. Advertisement Ella Toone A player for the big occasion, with goals in the Euros final and World Cup semi-final. Toone opened up about the difficulty of losing her father last September and her form since on the pitch has been superb. Beth Mead England's golden boot winner in 2022, who then missed the World Cup with an ACL injury. The Arsenal forward has yet to rediscover the heights of that 21/22 campaign since returning from injury but is still an important player for the Lionesses and Wiegman trusts her. Chloe Kelly The scorer of the goal that won the Euros has been in sensational form since joining Arsenal on loan and has starred in their run to the Champions League final. Her place looked to be in doubt after being dropped earlier this year, but she has responded in the perfect way. Advertisement Grace Clinton Started against Portugal and Spain in February, and held her own against the world champions at Wembley. A strong, powerful box-to-box midfielder, Clinton is beginning to assert herself in the England side. Jess Park One of the breakthrough talents to emerge over the last couple of years, Park is set to appear at her first major tournament. At 23, she has stepped up on a regular basis for Manchester City and has caught the eye on a couple of starts for England with her skill and guile on the ball. She has emerged as a surprise option on the right wing. Hannah Hampton Will be England's No 1 in Switzerland after the shock retirement of Euros winner Mary Earps. Hampton had won the battle for the shirt having started three of the last four games, but there are no doubts now. Impressive under Emma Hayes and now Sonia Bompastor for Chelsea, she has come a long way since being dropped by Wiegman in 2022. Advertisement Jess Carter Often an unsung hero in defence, Carter played an important role at the last World Cup due to her versatility and can play in both at the left side of a back three and back four. Wiegman has used Carter as a full back and centre back since the World Cup. Niamh Charles The Chelsea full-back started both games against Portugal and Spain and was quietly impressive. Her connection with club team-mate James on the left is a bonus for Wiegman and Charles showed her strengths as a willing runner around the outside and as a recovering defender. Almost there Lauren James Arguably the biggest talent in the squad, James did not play for England for almost 10 months due to injury but showed what they had missed with her performances against Portugal and Spain in February. Wiegman says James had also shown a 'massive improvement' in her work off the ball. Suddenly the biggest injury concern in the squad after hurting her hamstring. Advertisement Lauren Hemp A guaranteed starter when she's fit, offering pace and constant danger as an all-action forward, Hemp returned to the pitch over the final weeks of the season after undergoing surgery on a knee meniscus injury in November, in what is a big boost for the Lionesses. Georgia Stanway The Bayern Munich midfielder was named in an England squad for the first time this year ahead of the games against Portugal and Spain. Yet to play a match since December and may not feature in the Nations League, although she is back in training, but her return is important for Wiegman ahead of the Euros. Alex Greenwood Arguably England's best player at the last World Cup and most important defender on her day, even if Bright and Williamson are often selected ahead of her. Greenwood is also back in the squad after returning from injury. Advertisement Fran Kirby The Euros winner and former PFA Player of the Year has not had much luck with injuries after being ruled out of the last World Cup, but is usually selected when she it fit. The emergence of Clinton and Park, along with James and Toone, means Wiegman has options at No 10. Aggie Beever-Jones The impressive 21-year-old winger has already racked up 50 appearances for an all-conquering Chelsea side, where she is in constant competition with some of the best in the world. Pacy and direct with an eye for a goal, she is starting to get minutes for England and scored her first for her country against Belgium. (Getty) Maya Le Tissier The 22-year-old has enjoyed an impressive season after being named as captain of Manchester United. Le Tissier was close to making the World Cup squad and she has grown as a player since being named on the standby list. Interestingly, Wiegman views Le Tissier as a full-back even though she is a centre-back for her club. Advertisement Esme Morgan Morgan appears to fit Wiegman's requirements as an adaptable defensive player who can play in multiple positions in the defence, having played at both centre-back and full-back under the England manager. Khiara Keating The 20-year-old Manchester City goalkeeper had a breakthrough campaign last season and has featured in England squads without making her senior international debut. This season has been more difficult after high-profile errors in games against Manchester United and Arsenal. Anna Moorhouse The Orlando Pride goalkeeper received her first call-up at the age of 29 but is yet to make her first appearance, though. Looks likely to go to the Euros along with Keating after the retirement of Mary Earps. On the fringes Michelle Agyemang Scored on her debut against Belgium after being drafted into the squad as an injury replacement for Alessia Russo. Could go to Switzerland as a back-up striker, with England short of options behind Russo at No 9, and she was selected again for the games against Portugal and Spain. Advertisement Lotte Wubben-Moy A firm favourite at Arsenal, but has been in and out of England squads despite making the final cut for the Euros and the World Cup. Although Wubben-Moy has yet to feature prominently at a major tournament, the centre-back is clearly a personality that Wiegman wants to have around her squad. Missed the end of the season due to injury but has replaced Bright. Nikita Parris The Euros winner made a shock return to the England squad after a two-year absence for the games against Portugal and Spain. The 30-year-old, who is now at Brighton, was given an opportunity while Kelly was out of the picture and Hemp was injured, but her place at the Euros is uncertain now they are both back. Advertisement Jessica Naz The Tottenham winger was given some chances when there were injuries among the forwards but did not take them as finds herself out of the squad ahead of the summer. Millie Turner The Manchester United centre-back is not as versatile as some of the other defenders in England's squad, such as Carter, Morgan and club team-mate Le Tissier, and likely faces a battle with Wubben-Moy to be the fourth-choice centre-back. Ella Morris The Tottenham defender was called up to the England camp for the first time ahead of the Nations League finale against Spain and Portugal, having impressed as part of the Under-23s. Advertisement Missy Bo Kearns Another who has spent some time around the first time after catching the eye while playing for the Under-23s, the Aston Villa midfielder is ahead of some other prospects for now but the Euros are still unlikely. Ruby Mace Made her England debut in December and kept her place in February, but has returned to the England Under-23s for now. Had caught the eye playing in defensive midfield for Leicester. Laura Blindkilde Brown Followed a similar journey to Mace, coming through from the Under-17s to the senior side, but has also dropped out of contention ahead of the Euros. Lucy Parker The Aston Villa defender has spent time around the squad as an injury replacement but won't go to the Euros if Wiegman's senior options are fit. Advertisement Gabby George Could have been an option at left-back and has shown good form for Manchester United after making a comeback from an ACL injury. Returned to the England squad last November after a two-year absence but is out of the picture now. Ellie Roebuck The former England goalkeeper – who had been challenging for a starting spot with Earps before the last Euros – is looking to rebuild her playing career after recovering from a stroke. Retired Mary Earps The Euros winner and two-time goalkeeper of the year has announced her retirement from international football and will not go to the Euros. 'I've spent a long time making this decision and it's not one I've made lightly,' Earps said. 'For me, ultimately this is the right time for me to step aside and give the younger generation an opportunity to thrive.' England squad to face Portugal and Spain Goalkeepers: Hannah Hampton, Anna Moorhouse, Khiara Keating, (Mary Earps retired) Advertisement Defenders: Lucy Bronze, Jess Carter, Niamh Charles, Alex Greenwood, Maya Le Tissier, Esme Morgan, Ella Morris, Leah Williamson, Lotte Wubben Moy (Millie Bright withdrawn) Midfielders: Grace Clinton, Missy Bo Kearns, Fran Kirby, Jess Park, Georgia Stanway, Ella Toone, Keira Walsh Forwards: Michelle Agyemang, Aggie Beever-Jones, Lauren Hemp, Chloe Kelly, Beth Mead, Nikita Parris, Alessia Russo
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'No doubt' UK will spend 3% of GDP on defence in next parliament, defence secretary says
There is "no doubt" the UK "will spend 3% of our GDP on defence" in the next parliament, the defence secretary has said. John Healey's comments come ahead of the publication of the government's Strategic Defence Review (SDR) on Monday. This is an assessment of the state of the armed forces, the threats facing the UK, and the military transformation required to meet them. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously set out a "clear ambition" to raise defence spending to 3% in the next parliament "subject to economic and fiscal conditions". Mr Healey has now told The Times newspaper there is a "certain decade of rising defence spending" to come, adding that this commitment "allows us to plan for the long term. It allows us to deal with the pressures." A government source insisted the defence secretary was "expressing an opinion, which is that he has full confidence that the government will be able to deliver on its ambition", rather than making a new commitment. The UK currently spends 2.3% of GDP on defence, with Sir Keir announcing plans to increase that to 2.5% by 2027 in February. This followed mounting pressure from the White House for European nations to do more to take on responsibility for their own security and the defence of Ukraine. The 2.3% to 2.5% increase is being paid for by controversial cuts to the international aid budget, but there are big questions over where the funding for a 3% rise would be found, given the tight state of government finances. While a commitment will help underpin the planning assumptions made in the SDR, there is of course no guarantee a Labour government would still be in power during the next parliament to have to fulfil that pledge. A statement from the Ministry of Defence makes it clear that the official government position has not changed in line with the defence secretary's comments. The statement reads: "This government has announced the largest sustained increase to defence spending since the end of the Cold War - 2.5% by 2027 and 3% in the next parliament when fiscal and economic conditions allow, including an extra £5bn this financial year. "The SDR will rightly set the vision for how that uplift will be spent, including new capabilities to put us at the leading edge of innovation in NATO, investment in our people and making defence an engine for growth across the UK - making Britain more secure at home and strong abroad." Sir Keir commissioned the review shortly after taking office in July 2024. It is being led by Lord Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary and NATO secretary general. The Ministry of Defence has already trailed a number of announcements as part of the review, including plans for a new Cyber and Electromagnetic Command and a £1bn battlefield system known as the Digital Targeting Web, which we're told will "better connect armed forces weapons systems and allow battlefield decisions for targeting enemy threats to be made and executed faster". Read more: On Saturday, the defence secretary announced a £1.5bn investment to tackle damp, mould and make other improvements to poor quality military housing in a bid to improve recruitment and retention. Mr Healey pledged to "turn round what has been a national scandal for decades", with 8,000 military family homes currently unfit for habitation. He said: "The Strategic Defence Review, in the broad, will recognise that the fact that the world is changing, threats are increasing. "In this new era of threat, we need a new era for defence and so the Strategic Defence Review will be the vision and direction for the way that we've got to strengthen our armed forces to make us more secure at home, stronger abroad, but also learn the lessons from Ukraine as well. "So an armed forces that can be more capable of innovation more quickly, stronger to deter the threats that we face and always with people at the heart of our forces… which is why the housing commitments that we make through this strategic defence review are so important for the future."