logo
LEGISLATIVE ROUNDUP: Sen. Baker's electronic payroll modernization bill advances out of committee

LEGISLATIVE ROUNDUP: Sen. Baker's electronic payroll modernization bill advances out of committee

Yahoo2 days ago

Jun. 10—WILKES-BARRE — The State Senate Labor and Industry Committee unanimously approved Sen. Lisa Baker's electronic payroll modernization legislation, co-introduced by Sen. Nick Miller, D-14th District.
Senate Bill 581 provides employers the option to utilize either payroll cards or direct deposit for the electronic payment of their employees.
"This is not a new issue," said Baker, R-Lehman Township. "The time has come for modernizing payroll delivery in Pennsylvania, benefiting both employees and employers alike while offering important protections from fraud. Last session, the Senate overwhelmingly passed the legislation, and we're hopeful the bill will advance to the governor's desk this year."
Baker said the legislation would provide employers with the option to pay employees electronically with a modern and secured method. She said payroll cards provide strong consumer protections, offering employees the access to utilize banks, ATMs and online purchases with cash-back at a point of sale.
In addition, the payroll cards will not overdraw or expire and include fraud protections that consumers are familiar with.
"As technology continues to evolve, we need to improve existing payment options that make it easier for individuals to access their wages promptly and efficiently," said Miller. "With living costs rising across the Commonwealth, we are working to improve affordability on multiple fronts. Ensuring timely and reliable wage distribution is one way we can ensure employees can access their hard-earned money in a timely fashion, especially during unexpected disruptions."
Pashinski hosts senior fair
State Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski, D-Wilkes-Barre, recently hosted a very well-attended senior fair at the Wyoming Valley Mall, providing Luzerne County seniors and their families with a comprehensive array of resources and services designed to enhance their quality of life.
The free event, held from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., featured 40 vendors offering a wide range of services, including free health screenings, legal advice, caregiver resources, and transportation information. Attendees had the opportunity to engage directly with representatives from state and local agencies, healthcare providers, insurance companies, and senior living communities.
"Lots of folks don't even know some of the resources that are available to them," Pashinski said. "That's why this one-stop-shop kind of concept gives them a very good idea of what's out there. We had so many great conversations during this event and everyone was happy — very happy to be able to have a face-to-face conversation to answer their questions and to receive so many handouts related to their concerns."
The senior fair also provided information on health care services and insurance options, senior discount programs, resources for care-giving, housing, and transportation, as well as educational materials on state and federal assistance programs.
For those who were unable to attend, Pashinski encourages residents to contact his office at 570-825-5934 in Wilkes-Barre and 570-301-6158 in Plains Township for assistance in connecting with available services.
"My staff and I are looking forward to the next senior fair in 2026," Pashinski said.
Walsh to host grant seminars
Rep. Jamie Walsh, R-Ross Township, will host two seminars for municipalities and community organizations to learn about applying for grant funding.
Walsh will be joined by Paul Macknosky, Regional Director, Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; and Tyler Day, community and economic development manager, Northeastern Pennsylvania Alliance.
The evens will be on Thursday, June 12, from 10 a.m. to noon and from 2-4 p.m. a two sites — Back Mountain Regional E.M.A. Building, 3593 State Route 118, Dallas; and Sugarloaf Township Municipal Building, 858 Main St., Sugarloaf.
Bresnahan announces U.S. Service Academy nomination application process
U.S. Rep. Rob Bresnahan, Jr.. R-Dallas Township, has announced the opening of the application process for nominations to the United States Service Academies for the Class of 2030.
Young men and women from Pennsylvania's Eighth Congressional District are encouraged to apply to serve our nation and receive a world-class education at one of the nation's leading service academies.
"Service academies offer unparalleled opportunities for education, leadership, and service to our country. I am honored to help open the doors for the next generation of leaders who will serve both in the military and as public servants," said Bresnahan. "These institutions are training tomorrow's leaders, and I look forward to working with local students to help them achieve their dreams."
Applications are now being accepted for the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, the U.S. Naval Academy, the U.S. Air Force Academy, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, and the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. Nominations are required for each of these institutions — (the U.S. Coast Guard Academy does not require a congressional nomination) — and Bresnahan is committed to ensuring that talented students from our community have access to these incredible opportunities.
For information on eligibility requirements, the application process, and an upcoming information session, visit Bresnahan's website. Additional details and instructions are available to help guide students through the nomination process.
Rep. Haddock measure celebrates U.S. Army's 250th birthday
The state House of Representatives unanimously approved a resolution sponsored by state Rep. Jim Haddock, D-Pittston Township, recognizing the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army on June 14.
"Today, between active duty, reserve, National Guard and civilian personnel, more than 1.2 million individuals ensure that our Army is prepared to protect our country," said Rep. Haddock, a member of the House Veterans Affairs and Emergency Preparedness Committee. "I introduced this resolution to recognize their selfless service and sacrifice, as well as that of those who have served before them."
Rep. Haddock said he asked 10 House colleagues who served in the Army to be co-prime sponsors of this measure, "because those who serve in our Armed Forces don't recognize party affiliation and that is the way it should be. I think if George Washington was alive today, he would be proud of us for coming together in a bipartisan way to approve this resolution."
On June 14, 1775, the U.S. Continental Army was established to represent the original 13 colonies in the war for independence. At their core, this force was largely composed of riflemen hailing from Pennsylvania. Following the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the Continental Army was renamed the Army of the United States. Since then, the U.S. Army has served in every major conflict of the United States.
With nearly 700,000 veterans living in Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth is home to the fifth-largest population of veterans in the country.
Featured Local Savings
Featured Local Savings
Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs measure to overturn California's EV mandate
Trump signs measure to overturn California's EV mandate

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump signs measure to overturn California's EV mandate

President Trump moved to overturn California's electric vehicle (EV) mandate on Thursday, setting off another legal fight with the Golden State. Trump signed a congressional resolution that overturns a California state rule that would have phased out the sale of gas powered cars by 2035. The California rule, and the decision to revoke it, are a massive deal for the auto market. The state makes up about 12 percent of the U.S. population. Its rule has also been adopted by 11 other states and Washington D.C. California says its rule would benefit both public health and the environment, reducing both emissions that contribute to global warming and the amount of pollution its residents are exposed to. The state estimates that its rule would prevent nearly 1,300 cardiopulmonary deaths between 2026 and 2040. California has already said that it would sue the Trump administration over the move, which Congress sent to the president after flouting its own internal arbiters. The Biden administration approved California's rule late last year, and that Biden-era approval is what is actually being revoked. A law known as the Congressional Review Act (CRA) gives Congress, with presidential approval, the right to rescind recently passed regulations. But the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, and the Senate parliamentarian both determined that the Biden-era approval was a waiver rather than a rule, and therefore the CRA does not apply. The House voted to rescind the waiver regardless, and the Senate took procedural steps to sidestep those determinations by first voting on a 'point of order' as to whether waivers could be overturned by the CRA. The decision comes with tensions at an all time high between California and the Trump administration after the president sent in the military over Los Angeles protests against his immigration policies.

Republicans lay groundwork for ‘total tax cliff' at end of Trump's term
Republicans lay groundwork for ‘total tax cliff' at end of Trump's term

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans lay groundwork for ‘total tax cliff' at end of Trump's term

Congressional Republicans are laying the groundwork for a tax cliff at the end of President Trump's term in office. While the conference is pushing to make the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent, additional measures geared toward working-class Americans are being slated for expiration at the end of 2028. 'It means that's going to be an issue in the next presidential race,' House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.) said Tuesday. The major expiring tax breaks in the House-passed version of Republicans' domestic agenda bill are boosts in the standard deduction, the deduction for seniors, and the child tax credit, along with the cancellation of taxes on tips, overtime pay, and car loan interest. Budget hawks are saying this sets up a 'tax cliff' in the legislation similar to the one Republicans are now trying to surmount, since most of the 2017 Trump tax cuts expire at the end of this year. 'There's a total tax cliff in there. There's about $1.5 trillion worth of taxes that expire in four years, five years, which means what? In five years, they'll just keep them going. This is why we end up with the same problem,' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said last week. 'It is 100 percent a gimmick to have tax cuts that you're putting in place for four or five years,' he added. The legislation is likely to undergo substantial changes in the Senate, including a change in the accounting baseline that will allow trillions of dollars worth of deficit additions coming from the extension of previous tax cuts to be ignored. But senators are sounding open to maintaining the split between making the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) permanent and allowing the additional cuts for workers, families, retirees and consumers to expire. 'The general feeling of Senate Finance is the TCJA — we need to make that permanent. We need to make the business provisions — the expensing, the R&D provisions — we need to make those permanent. The other things, I think we should discuss it,' Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said last week. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) stressed the objective of overall permanence while saying the additional cuts could be subject to change. 'Our intent is to make the tax cuts permanent. Now, something like the child tax credit, with a huge transfer payment aspect to it, I'd have to say that's something I'd have to check on. Other tax cuts and reductions, depending on score and how the votes come down, that could change,' he said last week. The expiring cuts are mostly ones President Trump proposed while he was on the campaign trail. They appealed to various constituencies and came fast and furious in the run-up to the election. Seven different targeted tax proposals were floated in September and October, according to a tally by news agency Reuters. Trump proposed making auto loan interest fully deductible at a speech in October in Detroit, the capital of the U.S. auto industry. He pitched getting rid of taxes on tips in June in Las Vegas, Nev., a battleground state with an enormous hospitality sector. He proposed a tax credit for family caregivers at a rally at Madison Square Garden in New York, a state where more than 4 million people take care of loved ones. Many in the policy establishment — both left-leaning and right-leaning — view Trump's additional cuts as ancillary, if not altogether undesirable. 'I would prefer those things would be completely off the list,' Daniel Bunn, president of the Tax Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington, told The Hill in November. 'It's not good policy. It does not move in the same direction that the 2017 reforms work.' William Gale, co-director of the more liberal Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, wrote in a commentary last year that canceling taxes on tips was a bad idea. 'The obvious problem is that the proposals are inconsistent with sound tax policy. The less obvious problem is that exempting tips would not even help the vast majority of low-income workers,' he wrote. While senators sound open to keeping the division between permanent and temporary tax cuts, they're also wary about creating another tax cliff that is likely to factor into political debates in the future. 'They're doing that for only four years, and all of a sudden that stops? I'm not real high on tax policy that expires,' Johnson said of the no-tax-on-tips provision. 'If it's good enough to include, let's make it permanent. Let's have that discussion.' The Senate has a lot more room to work with than the House, since its budget baseline for the bill could allow about $5.5 trillion in expiring tax cuts to be left out of the accounting. However, conservatives in both chambers have expressed concerns about the potential deficit impact of the GOP bill, which has rattled financial markets and spurred a sell-off in the bond market. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated last week that the House's version of the plan would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over roughly the next decade. In a follow-up analysis requested by Democrats, Congress's official budget scorer estimated additional interest costs resulting from the plan would amount to $551 billion over a decade — a change that would 'increase the cumulative effect on the deficit to $3.0 trillion.' While top Republicans have sought to discredit the CBO's scoring of the measure, there has been distress in both chambers, as well as the White House, over the overall cost and the fact that it is projected to grow the economy by just 0.03 percent. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated the bill would grow the economy from 1.83 percent to 1.86 percent over the long run, representing little change from the Federal Reserve's latest prediction of 1.8 percent made prior to the passage of the legislation in the House. 'The Democrat inspired and 'controlled' Congressional Budget Office (CBO) purposefully gave us an extremely low level of growth, 1.8 percent over 10 years — how ridiculous and unpatriotic is that!' Trump wrote on social media earlier this month. One of the JCT's models shows the legislation reducing U.S. capital stock by 0.9 percent over the budget window, leading to an overall decrease in economic output. 'The first and second half effects result in a decrease of 0.1 percent on average over the entire budget window,' the JCT found. Democrats have seized upon the expiring cuts that Trump proposed as evidence that the bill is skewed toward the wealthy — though lower income tax rates for lower earners will be made permanent as part of the bill. 'Why is this bill designed to take away some of the benefits that you claim people are going to have?' Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during a hearing Wednesday. 'The senior tax credit expires. … No taxes on tips expires.' Despite locking in lower tax rates for lower earners, forecasts project the House-passed tax bill will benefit higher earners more and will redistribute wealth from the bottom to the top of the income spectrum. Half of the bill's passthrough deduction alone, which was worth more than $200 billion in 2022, went to the top 1 percent of taxpayers by adjusted gross income, according to the JCT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Bessent Sees Deficit Falling Over 10 Years After Tax-Cut Bill
Bessent Sees Deficit Falling Over 10 Years After Tax-Cut Bill

Bloomberg

time40 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bessent Sees Deficit Falling Over 10 Years After Tax-Cut Bill

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that there are a number of different assessments of the deficit impact of Republicans' signature tax-cut bill, and that his own expectation is it will shrink borrowing over a decade. There's 'varying scoring' of the tax bill, Bessent said in answering questions at a Senate Finance Committee hearing Thursday. 'It is my view that over the 10-year window, it will decrease.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store